Amantadine and rimantadine prophylaxis of influenza A in nursing homes. A tolerability perspective

Amantadine-associated delirium in patients with maintenance dialysis: Insomnia-associated recovery and uneven seasonal distribution

Amantadine hydrochloride is a risky drug for triggering delirium in dialysis patients; however, it is often administered casually. Furthermore, little is known regarding the recovery and prognosis of dialysis patients with amantadine-associated delirium. Data of this retrospective cohort study were collected from a local hospital database for hospitalizations between January 2011 and December 2020. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: early recovery (recovery within 14 days) and delayed recovery (recovery more than 14 days). The cases were analyzed together with the intermonth temperature using descriptive statistics. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve and binary logistic regression were applied for the analyses of prognoses and factors. A total of 57 patients were included in this study. The most common symptoms were hallucinations (45.61%) and muscle tremors (43.86%). Early recovery was observed in 63.16% of the patients. Only 3.51% of the cases occurred in local summer (June, July, and August). Better prognoses for survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.066, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 0.021-0.212) and hospitalization costs (7968.42 ± 3438.43 CNY vs 12852.38 ± 9361.13 CNY, P = .031) were observed in patients with early recovery than in those with delayed recovery. In the multivariate logistic regression adjusted by 1:1 propensity score matching, delayed recovery was independently caused by insomnia (P = .022, = 10.119, 95% CI = 1.403-72.990) and avoided in patients with urine volume over 300 mL (P = .029, = 0.018, 95% CI = 0.006-0.621). The increment (per 100 mg) of cumulative dose (P = .190, = 1.588, 95% CI = 0.395-3.172) tended to be a risk of delayed recovery. The area under curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.867, with a sensitivity of 90.5% and a specificity of 82.4% at the cutoff point (cutoff = 0.432). For amantadine-associated delirium in dialysis patients with uneven seasonal distribution, early recovery with better prognosis should be the aim of treatment by giving priority to the remedy of insomnia.

Recommendations for the prevention and treatment of influenza using antiviral drugs based on cost-effectiveness

Influenza is an acute respiratory disease that causes epidemics and pandemics in the human population of temperate regions. Influenza epidemics occur every year during the winter months, affecting approximately 10% of the population. The primary strategy for reducing the effect of influenza in the community is to vaccinate persons who are at risk or caring for high-risk individuals each year before seasonal increases in influenza virus circulation occur. Antiviral drugs can be used for the treatment of influenza and the prevention of seasonal and post-exposure influenza. Four antiviral drugs are available for the prevention and treatment of influenza infections: oseltamivir, zanamivir, rimantadine and amantadine. Antiviral drugs can be used for the treatment of influenza and for post-exposure and seasonal influenza prevention. The cost-effectiveness of antiviral therapies ranged from cost savings to more than US$130,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) for influenza treatment, from GB pound9000 to more than pound1 million per QALY for seasonal prevention and from cost savings to pound100,000 per QALY for post-exposure prevention. Based on the cost-effectiveness threshold of pound30,000 or $40,000 per QALY, antiviral therapies can be recommended for influenza treatment and post-exposure prevention in healthy and high-risk individuals and for seasonal prevention in high-risk individuals. Zanamivir, oseltamivir and amantadine have favorable cost-effectiveness ratios for these interventions, but amantadine should only be used in countries with a low prevalence of resistant virus. The stockpile of antiviral drugs should be maintained in developed countries because they are cost effective for the prevention and treatment of a possible influenza pandemic.

Avian influenza--a review for doctors in travel medicine

First identified in humans in Hong Kong, influenza A/H5N1, known commonly as avian influenza, has caused human disease in 15 countries around the world. Although the current number of confirmed patients is tiny compared to seasonal and the recently emerged H1N1 'swine' influenza, H5N1 remains a candidate for the next highly pathogenic influenza pandemic. Currently, H5N1 has very limited ability to spread from person-to-person but this may change because of mutation or reassortment with other influenza viruses leading to an influenza pandemic with high mortality. If this occurs travellers are likely to be affected and travel medicine doctors will need to consider avian influenza in returning febrile travellers. The early clinical features may be dismissed easily as 'the flu' resulting in delayed treatment. Treatment options are limited. Oral oseltamivir alone has been the most commonly used drug but mortality remains substantial, up to 80% in Indonesia. Intravenous peramivir has been filed for registration and IV zanamivir is being developed. This review will focus on the epidemiological and clinical features of influenza A/H5N1 avian influenza and will highlight aspects relevant to travel medicine doctors.

Inhaled zanamivir versus rimantadine for the control of influenza in a highly vaccinated long-term care population

BACKGROUND

Despite vaccination, influenza commonly causes morbidity and mortality in institutional settings. Influenza control with rimantadine and amantadine is limited by emergence and transmission of drug-resistant influenza A variants, ineffectiveness against influenza B, and toxicity. This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of zanamivir versus rimantadine for influenza outbreak control in long-term care facilities.

METHODS

This double-blind, randomized, controlled study prospectively enrolled nursing home residents for 3 influenza seasons (1997 to 2000). Vaccine was offered to all subjects. Following influenza outbreak declaration, subjects were randomized to inhaled zanamivir 10 mg or standard of care (rimantadine 100 mg for influenza A or placebo for influenza B) once daily for 14 days. The proportion of randomized subjects developing symptomatic, laboratory-confirmed influenza during prophylaxis was the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

Of 482 randomizations (238 zanamivir, 231 rimantadine, 13 placebo), 96% of subjects were elderly or had high-risk conditions; over 90% were vaccinated. Symptomatic, laboratory-confirmed influenza occurred in 3% of zanamivir subjects and 8% of rimantadine subjects during chemoprophylaxis (P = .038; additional protective efficacy for zanamivir over rimantadine = 61%). Since only 25 subjects were randomized during 2 influenza B outbreaks and none developed influenza, the influenza B data were excluded from further analysis. Zanamivir was well tolerated and unassociated with emergence of resistant virus; rimantadine-resistant variants were common.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first prospective, controlled study demonstrating effectiveness of chemoprophylaxis for influenza outbreak control. Zanamivir prevents symptomatic, laboratory-confirmed influenza more effectively than rimantadine, is unassociated with resistant virus, and has a favorable safety profile. Zanamivir is an appropriate alternative for influenza outbreak control among institutionalized vaccinated elderly.

Prevention and control of influenza in persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Despite recommendations for annual vaccination against influenza, more than half of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in developed countries do not receive this vaccine. Influenza is characterized by its potentially of causing epidemics and by excess morbidity and mortality in patients with COPD and other chronic medical conditions. Good evidence of the efficacy, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of influenza vaccination underlines the recommendation of use in patients with COPD. Influenza vaccination could reduce influenza-related complications and exacerbations in patients with COPD, therefore reducing hospitalizations and deaths. Each year, all persons with COPD should be vaccinated with the inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine containing the most frequent two influenza A viral strains and one influenza B viral strain detected in the influenza season of the previous year. To achieve a 100% vaccination rate in patients with COPD, all patients with COPD registered in health insurance companies and attended in health centers and specialized clinics should be vaccinated during the immunization period (October-December). Antiviral therapies could be used as an adjunct to vaccination and to reduce influenza transmission in outbreaks. Antiviral therapies could reduce the duration and complications of influenza when administered within two days of the onset of illness. Research is necessary for new antiviral therapies that could prevent influenza with cost-effectiveness similar to the influenza vaccine.

Unique aspects of antimicrobial use in older adults

Elderly persons consume a significant proportion of health care resources. Antimicrobials are just one class among many pharmaceuticals that are prescribed more frequently to elderly patients than to younger patients. There are unique aspects of antimicrobial use in elderly persons that make prescribing complicated and monitoring unpredictable. Physiologic changes associated with aging result in altered pharmacokinetics, and accurate estimates of renal function cannot be made with standard methods. Together, these qualities make antimicrobial dosing difficult. Because of a higher prevalence of other chronic diseases, there is a greater propensity for polypharmacy and a resulting risk of an adverse event or a significant drug interaction. Lastly, irrespective of altered pharmacokinetics, adverse effects of many antimicrobials are more common in elderly persons, which introduces an added dimension to ensuring safety with antimicrobial therapy.

Adverse effects of amantadine and oseltamivir used during respiratory outbreaks in a center for developmentally disabled adults

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Antiviral prophylaxis is recommended for the control of institutional influenza A outbreaks. In long-term-care institutions other than nursing homes, neither the seriousness of influenza nor the risks and benefits of antiviral prophylaxis is clearly understood. We studied the severity of illness due to influenza among adults residing in a center for the developmentally disabled and assessed adverse reactions to amantadine and oseltamivir prophylaxis.

METHODS

Data were collected from the charts of consenting residents. Complications of upper respiratory tract illness were recorded. Potential adverse events were documented during amantadine and oseltamivir therapy, and during a baseline period with neither medication.

RESULTS

The median age of the 287 participants was 46.4 years. Only 15 (5%) were older than 65 years, and 69 (24%) had chronic underlying medical illness placing them at high risk for influenza. Of the 122 residents with an upper respiratory tract infection, 16 (13%) developed pneumonia, 12 (9.8%) were hospitalized, and 5 (4%) died. Twenty-eight (25%) of 112 residents had an adverse neurologic event while receiving amantadine prophylaxis, compared with 3 (2.7%) receiving no antiviral medication and 5 (4.5%) receiving oseltamivir (P < .001). Sixteen percent of the residents discontinued amantadine due to adverse events; in contrast, adverse events were identified in 2.9% of the residents prescribed oseltamivir, and none discontinued therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Viral respiratory tract infections are associated with a high risk of complications in this population. The rate of adverse neurologic events associated with amantadine was significantly higher than that associated with oseltamivir.

Cognitive toxicity of drugs used in the elderly

The aged are an extremely heterogeneous population that is growing worldwide, included are healthy and agile individuals in their early sixties, as well as an increasing number of people over the age of 35. Pharmacotherapy is expected to continue its prominent role in the medical management of a wide range of conditions that affect older people. Adverse consequences of all kinds complicate the use of medications, and such events seem to increase in incidence with polypharmacy. Cognitive impairment can occur during the course of treatment with a wide range of medications and can have a variety of presentations, Both the number of concurrent medications that older individuals routinely use and physiologic changes in these patients render them more susceptible to developing cognitive toxicity. Most of the frequently implicated medications carry documentation of their ability to cause cognitive disturbances in their package labeling, suggesting that the level of vigilance for adverse effects during the course of their use should always be high. Such caution can be used to guide appropriate drug treatment of the aged so that clinicians do not need to opt for undertreatment to avoid toxicity.

Influenza outbreak detection and control measures in nursing homes in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of influenza vaccine, rapid influenza testing, and influenza antiviral medication in nursing homes in the US to prevent and control outbreaks.

METHODS

Survey questionnaires were sent to 1017 randomly selected nursing homes in nine states. Information was collected on influenza prevention, detection and control practices, and on outbreaks during three influenza seasons (1995-1998).

RESULTS

The survey response rate was 78%. Influenza vaccine was offered to residents and staff by 99% and 86%, respectively, of nursing homes. Among nursing homes offering the influenza vaccine, the average vaccination rate was 83% for residents and 46% for staff. Sixty-seven percent of the nursing homes reported having access to laboratories with rapid antigen testing capabilities, and 19% reported having a written policy for the use of influenza antiviral medications for outbreak control. Nursing homes from New York, where organized education programs on influenza detection and control have been conducted for many years, were more likely to have reported a suspected or laboratory-confirmed influenza outbreak (51% vs 10%, P = .01), to have access to rapid antigen testing for influenza (92% vs 63%, P = .01), and to use antivirals for prophylaxis and treatment of influenza A for their nursing home residents (94% vs 55%, P = .01) compared with nursing homes from the other eight states.

CONCLUSIONS

Influenza outbreaks among nursing home residents can lead to substantial morbidity and mortality when prevention measures are not rapidly instituted. However, many nursing homes in this survey were neither prepared to detect nor to control influenza A outbreaks. Targeted, sustained educational efforts can improve the detection and control of outbreaks in nursing homes.

Amantadine is beneficial in restless legs syndrome

Twenty-one patients (mean age 70 yrs) with restless legs syndrome (RLS) were treated with amantadine in an open-label trial. Amantadine was started at 100 mg per day and was increased every 3-5 days by 100 mg (up to a maximum of 300 mg per day) until significant relief of symptoms or intolerable side effects were experienced. Patients were rated pre- and posttreatment using an RLS rating scale (0-10). Each patient also rated the degree of response in a continuous scale from 0% (no improvement) to 100% (complete improvement). Eleven of 21 (52%) had subjective benefit to amantadine, with degree of response ranging from 25%-100% (mean 69%) among responders. Six had 95%-100% improvement. The RLS score for all 21 patients dropped from a mean (+/- standard deviation) of 9.8 +/- 0.6 (range, 8-10) pretreatment to 6.6 +/- 3.8 (range, 0-10) posttreatment (p = 0.001). The duration of response was 0-13 months (mean, 3.6 +/- 4.5), with nine responders still remaining on the drug as of last follow up. The mean effective dose was 227 mg per day. The most common side effects were drowsiness (3), fatigue (2), and insomnia (2); only two stopped amantadine because of side effects. We conclude that amantadine is an effective and well-tolerated drug for RLS.

Influenza

The currently available antiviral drugs rimantadine and amantadine are effective only for influenza A viruses. Another class of influenza antiviral drugs is the neuraminidase inhibitors, which selectively inhibit both influenza A and B viruses. Recent studies have found the neuraminidase inhibitors zanamivir and oseltamivir to be 67-82% effective in preventing laboratory-confirmed infection when administered as prophylaxis during the influenza season. As treatment, they reduce the duration of illness by 1-1.5 days when started within 36-48 h of illness onset. The reported adverse effects of these drugs are minimal, and unlike amantadine and rimantadine, the drugs do not appear to affect the central nervous system. Poor oral bioavailability and rapid renal clearance limit the use of zanamivir to inhalation and concern has been raised about its use in asthmatics. The sialic acid analogue, GS4071, has been shown to be a potent inhibitor of neuraminidase activity and is shown to be effective in controlling influenza, and its prodrug form--GS4104 (oseltamivir) can be given orally. Direct comparison of zanamivir and oseltamivir, their use for prophylaxis and treatment in high-risk groups, and evaluation of their cost effectiveness are all required before they enter routine clinical practice.

Nursing home-acquired pneumonia

Nursing Home-Acquired Pneumonia is a significant infection that is often seen in the long-term care setting. It is associated with substantial morbidity, healthcare expenditure, and mortality rates as high as 44%. Uniform diagnosis and therapeutic strategies have not been specifically established for pneumonia in the nursing home setting. This paper will update the long-term care provider with the unique features and challenges of pneumonia in this setting and review the approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of this important illness. The discussion will conclude with details regarding overall prevention of nursing home-acquired pneumonia and the critical role played by the nursing home medical director in this process.