Survival of Japanese patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension after the introduction of endothelin receptor antagonists and/or phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors

Prevalence, incidence, and survival of pulmonary arterial hypertension: A systematic review for the global burden of disease 2020 study

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is characterized by increased resistance in the pulmonary arterioles as a result of remodeled blood vessels. We sought all available epidemiologic data on population‐based prevalence, incidence, and 1‐year survival of PAH as part of the Global Burden of Disease Study. We performed a systematic review searching Global Index Medicus (GIM) for keywords related to PAH between 1980 and 2021 and identified population‐representative sources of prevalence, incidence, and mortality for clinically diagnosed PAH. Of 6772 articles identified we found 65 with population‐level data: 17 for prevalence, 17 for incidence, and 58 reporting case fatality. Reported prevalence ranged from 0.37 cases/100,000 persons in a referral center of French children to 15 cases/100,000 persons in an Australian study. Reported incidence ranged from 0.008 cases/100,000 person‐years in Finland, to 1.4 cases/100,000 person‐years in a retrospective chart review at a clinic in Utah, United States. Reported 1‐year survival ranged from 67% to 99%. All studies with sex‐specific estimates of prevalence or incidence reported higher levels in females than males. Studies varied in their size, study design, diagnostic criteria, and sampling procedures. Reported PAH prevalence, incidence, and mortality varied by location and study. Prevalence ranged from 0.4 to 1.4 per 100,000 persons. Harmonization of methods for PAH registries would improve efforts at disease surveillance. Results of this search contribute to ongoing efforts to quantify the global burden of PAH.

Effect of Combination Therapy of Endothelin Receptor Antagonist and Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitor on Clinical Outcome and Pulmonary Haemodynamics in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The combination of an endothelin receptor antagonist and a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor having different biological targets has become an integral part of the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension; however, several clinical studies have reported conflicting results.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of an endothelin receptor antagonist and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor combination in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

METHODS

After performing a comprehensive literature search in MEDLINE, Cochrane and the International Clinical Trial Registry Platform, reviewers assessed eligibility and extracted data from seven relevant articles (publications till December 2018). PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed in the selection, analysis and reporting of findings. The odds ratio and mean difference were calculated to estimate the difference in clinical worsening, 6-minute walking distance, pulmonary vascular resistance and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide between the groups. Quality assessment was performed using the risk of bias assessment tool and a meta-regression for probable variables affecting effect size.

RESULTS

The random-effect model analysis revealed an odds ratio of 0.56 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-0.76; p = 0.0002] for clinical worsening, mean difference of 15.64 (95% CI 2.67-28.61; p = 0.02) for 6-minute walking distance, - 1.66 (95% CI - 3.82 to 0.50; p = 0.13) for pulmonary vascular resistance and - 21.04 (95% CI - 26.87 to - 15.22; p < 0.00001) for N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide. The meta-regression showed no statistically significant association between the dose and duration of treatment and outcomes (odds ratio of clinical worsening and mean difference of 6-minute walking distance).

CONCLUSIONS

In pulmonary arterial hypertension, endothelin receptor antagonist and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor combination therapy significantly improved 6-minute walking distance, clinical worsening and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide compared with the monotherapy but did not offer any advantage in improving pulmonary vascular resistance.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NO

CRD42018091133.

Clinical characteristics and survival of Korean idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension patients based on vasoreactivity

We aimed to identify a vasoreactive subset of patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) in Korea and to show their clinical characteristics and prognosis. Data on patients who were diagnosed with IPAH at Asan Medical Center between January 1994 and March 2013 were retrospectively collected. Acute vasodilator testing was performed with inhaled nitric oxide during diagnostic right heart catheterization. A positive acute response was defined as a reduction in mean pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) ≥10 mmHg to an absolute level of mean PAP <40 mmHg without a decrease in cardiac output. Among a total of 60 IPAH patients included for analysis, 9 (15%) showed a positive acute response to acute vasodilator testing. Acute responders showed significantly lower peak velocity of a tricuspid regurgitation jet on echocardiography (4.1±0.3 m/s vs. 4.6±0.6 m/s; P=0.01) and significantly lower mean PAP hemodynamically (47±10 mmHg vs. 63±17 mmHg; P=0.003) than non-responders at baseline. The survival rate of acute responders was 88% at 1, 3, 5, and 10 yr, respectively, which was significantly higher than that of non-responders (85%, 71%, 55%, and 40%, respectively; P=0.029). In conclusion, Korean IPAH patients with vasoreactivity showed better baseline hemodynamic features and survival than those without vasoreactivity.

Improved survival of Korean patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension after the introduction of targeted therapies

OBJECTIVES

We compared the survival of patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH), receiving conventional and targeted therapies.

BACKGROUND

IPAH is an incurable disease with high mortality. To manage IPAH, several targeted therapies have been used in Korea.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 71 patients diagnosed with IPAH in a tertiary hospital between January 1994 and February 2013. Patients were classified into "conventional therapy group" (treated with conventional therapies and/or beraprost) and "targeted therapy group" (treated with targeted therapies other than beraprost).

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 33 years and 50 patients were female. The survival rate at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years was 80.1% 62.0%, 51.5%, and 26.8%, respectively. The survival rate in the targeted therapy group was greater than in the conventional therapy group (p-value = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

We believe targeted therapies would improve survival benefits in IPAH patients.

Long-term survival of Japanese patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension treated with beraprost sodium, an oral prostacyclin analogue

OBJECTIVE

Beraprost was developed as the first oral prostacyclin analog to treat patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Although this drug demonstrates improvements in the patient's exercise capacity and symptoms, it carries a weak recommendation in the PAH evidence-based treatment algorithm due to a lack of durability of effects. However, this therapy remains a major treatment method in Japan due to its availability and inexpensive cost. The purpose of this study was to elucidate whether this drug exhibits durable effects on sustained overall survival.

METHODS

A comparison of survival benefits was completed among patients undergoing treatment with beraprost (n=35) or conventional therapy (n=44). In addition, the estimated survival calculated using the equation developed by the National Institutes of Health Registry was used for the analysis.

RESULTS

Although no significant differences were observed between the two groups using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve, a statistical difference was observed between the patients receiving high-dose beraprost therapy (>120 μg) and those receiving conventional therapy (5- and 10-year survival: 71.1% and 49.4% vs. 37.7% and 21.2%, respectively; p=0.0466). Moreover, the cumulative survival rates in the patients receiving beraprost were slightly better than the estimated survival rates. In the PAH patients with connective tissue diseases, a tendency towards better survival outcomes was observed in the group treated with beraprost.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests the survival benefits of high-dose beraprost therapy for patients with PAH. The retrospective nature of this study, however, makes it difficult to conclude definitively that beraprost exerts significant beneficial effects on survival.