1
|
Abedalweli R, Nguyen M, Deodhar A. Combination biologics or targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in the treatment of spondyloarthritis: a systematic literature review. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2024:1-9. [PMID: 38512065 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2024.2327589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The advent of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) have transformed the management of immune-mediated rheumatic diseases, including spondylarthritis (SpA). However, the data about combining b/ts DMARDs in the treatment of SpA are scarce. The study objectives were to assess the efficacy and safety of combination b/tsDMARD in SpA. METHODS We conducted systematic literature review (PubMed and Medline) with two independent reviewers, one adjudicator, exploring the efficacy and safety of combination b/tsDMARDs in the treatment of SpA. Inclusion criteria were studies published in last 20 years, English language, interventions included use of two b/tsDMARDs, and minimal three-month follow-up. RESULTS Out of 1936 initial hits, 28 manuscripts fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Two were randomized controlled trials, and the remaining were retrospective cohort studies or case series. Combination of apremilast with bDMARD, or TNF inhibitor plus IL12/23 inhibitor were the commonest and reported good efficacy with no increased safety signal. CONCLUSIONS There is not enough data to fully evaluate efficacy and safety of combination b/tsDMARDs in SpA treatment. Limited information shows apremilast plus bDMARD, or TNF inhibitor plus IL12/23 inhibitor combination to be efficacious and safe. Randomized controlled trials and larger cohort with a longer follow-up are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rand Abedalweli
- Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University/Hillsboro Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Michelle Nguyen
- Department of Medicine, Providence St. Vincent Hospital, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Atul Deodhar
- Division of Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Valero-Martínez C, Urgelles JF, Sallés M, Joven-Ibáñez BE, de Juanes A, Ramírez J, Juanola X, Almodóvar R, Laiz A, Moreno M, Pujol M, Beltrán E, Pinto-Tasende JA, Crespí L, Sala-Icardo L, Castañeda S, García-Vicuña R. Dual targeted therapy in patients with psoriatic arthritis and spondyloarthritis: a real-world multicenter experience from Spain. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1283251. [PMID: 37936691 PMCID: PMC10627177 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1283251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Dual targeted therapy (DTT) has emerged as a promising approach in patients with refractory spondyloarthritis (SpA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and extra-musculoskeletal manifestations of both diseases, but its effectiveness/safety ratio still remains unclear. This is a retrospective, real-world multicenter study in refractory SpA and PsA patients with simultaneous use of two biological or synthetic targeted agents. Effectiveness was assessed using Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score with C-reactive protein (ASDAS-CRP) and Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) Score. We identified 39 different DTT combinations in 36 patients (22 SpA; 14 PsA), 25 of them with concomitant inflammatory bowel disease. The most commonly used combinations were TNF inhibitor plus antagonist of the IL12/23 pathway, followed by TNF inhibitor plus IL-17 antagonist. During a median exposure of 14.86 months (IQR 8-20.2), DTT retention rate was 69.4% (n=25/36; 19 SpA, 6 PsA). Major clinical improvement (change in ASDAS-CRP > 2 or improvement > 85% in DAPSA) was achieved in 69.4% of patients (n=25/36 therapeutical combinations; 17/21 SpA, 8/15 PsA), with a 58.3% (n=21/36 combinations; 15/20 SpA, 6/13 PsA) low-activity/remission rate. Of the patients who were receiving glucocorticoids, 55% managed to withdraw them during follow-up. Interestingly, only four serious adverse events in three patients were observed, leading to DTT discontinuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Meritxell Sallés
- Rheumatology Unit, Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària, Manresa, Spain
| | | | | | - Julio Ramírez
- Rheumatology Unit, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Juanola
- Rheumatology Unit, Hospital U. Bellvitge, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Raquel Almodóvar
- Rheumatology Unit, Hospital U. Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Laiz
- Rheumatology Unit, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mireia Moreno
- Rheumatology Unit, Hospital U. Parc Taulí, I3PT (UAB), Sabadell, Spain
| | - Manel Pujol
- Rheumatology Unit, Hospital U, Mútua Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Emma Beltrán
- Rheumatology Unit, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Laura Crespí
- Rheumatology Unit, Hospital de Manacor, Manacor, Spain
| | | | - Santos Castañeda
- Rheumatology Unit, Hospital U. de La Princesa, IIS-Princesa, Madrid, Spain
- Cátedra Universidad Autónoma de Madrid UAM-Roche, enfermedad pulmonar intersticial difusa (EPID)-Future, Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain
| | - Rosario García-Vicuña
- Rheumatology Unit, Hospital U. de La Princesa, IIS-Princesa, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mutlu MY, Tascilar K, Schett G. Rationale, current state and opportunities in combining biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis. Joint Bone Spine 2023; 90:105578. [PMID: 37076093 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2023.105578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2022] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
The advent of biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) has considerably improved patient outcomes in inflammatory arthritis. However, not all patients reach the state of remission, as disease can be resistant even to single cytokine inhibition by bDMARDs. Simultaneous or sequential inhibition of multiple cytokines may be considered in situations where disease control is not adequate under singular inhibition of cytokines. Although there have been some disappointing experiences in the past with combination of bDMARDs, the ongoing improvement of our understanding about inflammatory pathways and the overall better safety understanding of bDMARDs seem to make new biologic treatment combinations possible. This review covers the rationale and current evidence for bDMARDs combination in inflammatory arthritis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melek Yalcin Mutlu
- Department of Internal Medicine 3 - Rheumatology and Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Koray Tascilar
- Department of Internal Medicine 3 - Rheumatology and Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Georg Schett
- Department of Internal Medicine 3 - Rheumatology and Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Diotallevi F, Paolinelli M, Radi G, Offidani A. Latest combination therapies in psoriasis: Narrative review of the literature. Dermatol Ther 2022; 35:e15759. [PMID: 35959523 PMCID: PMC9786636 DOI: 10.1111/dth.15759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Biological therapies revolutionized the treatment of many chronic inflammatory skin diseases, first of all psoriasis, thanks to their high efficacy and the reduced number of side effects. However, the use of a single biologic drug does not always provide complete control of the disease or associated comorbidities over time. The first biological drugs used for the treatment of psoriasis, tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors, have long been used in combination with traditional topical and systemic therapies to induce a complete remission of the disease that could not be achieved with innovative drug alone. Even with the advent of new biological therapies with more precise molecular targets, the challenge of using combination therapies remained. Psoriatic patients often have major comorbidities, such as arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, uveitis or have other concomitant conditions such as chronic spontaneous urticaria and atopic dermatitis, which may require different biologic treatments than those indicated in psoriasis. The objective of this article is, through a comprehensive revision of the literature, to analyze in which cases the use of the combination of the latest therapies for psoriasis may be useful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Diotallevi
- Dermatological Clinic, Department of Clinical and Molecular SciencesPolytechnic University of the Marche RegionAnconaItaly
| | - Matteo Paolinelli
- Dermatological Clinic, Department of Clinical and Molecular SciencesPolytechnic University of the Marche RegionAnconaItaly
| | - Giulia Radi
- Dermatological Clinic, Department of Clinical and Molecular SciencesPolytechnic University of the Marche RegionAnconaItaly
| | - Annamaria Offidani
- Dermatological Clinic, Department of Clinical and Molecular SciencesPolytechnic University of the Marche RegionAnconaItaly
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gyldenløve M, Alinaghi F, Zachariae C, Skov L, Egeberg A. Combination Therapy with Apremilast and Biologics for Psoriasis: A Systematic Review. Am J Clin Dermatol 2022. [PMID: 35737251 DOI: 10.1007/s40257-022-00703-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The evidence for adding small-molecule drugs to an ongoing biologic treatment is sparse, but combination therapies appear to be advantageous in appropriately selected patients with psoriasis. To our knowledge, efficacy and safety of combination therapy with apremilast and biologics has not previously been reviewed. MATERIALS AND METHODS A literature search was performed on Medline (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of psoriasis, age ≥ 18 years, concomitant treatment with apremilast and a specified biologic agent, and available safety and/or efficacy results. All papers written in English and published from database inception to August 2021 were included. No limit was set regarding study size. RESULTS The literature search yielded 447 citations. Of these, 19 studies published from 2015 to 2020 were included in the review. All papers referred to retrospective studies, comprising case reports (n = 9), case series (n = 8), or cohort studies (n = 2). A total of 172 patients with psoriasis were identified. Clinical subtypes included plaque psoriasis (n = 164), palmoplantar pustulosis (n = 7), and acute pustular psoriasis (n = 1). The observation period ranged from 3 weeks to 24 months. Geographical origin of studies was North America (n = 11), Europe (n = 4), and Asia (n = 4). In general, apremilast-biologic combination therapy was reported to be safe; across papers, one serious adverse event was registered (hospitalization due to weight loss). Adverse events (AEs) were otherwise mostly mild and gastrointestinal. No differences in AEs were observed in studies comparing apremilast mono- and combination therapy. In several papers, sufficient information about AEs was not reported or could not be extracted. Clinical response to combination treatment was evaluated at various time points, and only few studies used validated scores. In the remaining papers, efficacy data were descriptive and/or in photographic form, or not available. In total, two patients discontinued therapy due to lack of efficacy. CONCLUSION Evidence for combined treatment with apremilast and biologics is limited and restricted to retrospective studies of various quality. Based on available data, apremilast may constitute an efficacious and safe add-on treatment to biologic therapy, but properly conducted clinical investigations are needed.
Collapse
|
6
|
Shurey M, Yip A, Ziouzina O, Chan J, Dutz JP. Combination Therapy With Tofacitinib and IL-12/23, IL-23, or IL-17A Inhibition for the Treatment of Refractory Psoriatic Arthritis: A Case Series. J Clin Rheumatol 2022; 28:e626-e628. [PMID: 34176886 DOI: 10.1097/rhu.0000000000001767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Shurey
- From the Department of Internal Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Ashley Yip
- From the Department of Internal Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Olga Ziouzina
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zimmer S, Goldust M, Bhargava S, Wegner J, Grabbe S, Staubach-Renz P. Combination therapy of recalcitrant severe psoriasis with psoriatic arthritis, diabetes nephropathy, and liver cirrhosis. J Cosmet Dermatol 2021; 21:2226-2228. [PMID: 34416082 DOI: 10.1111/jocd.14367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Treatment of recalcitrant moderate-to-severe psoriasis can be challenging. Combination therapy of biologics and immunosuppressive agents can be a new strategy for treating therapy-resistant cases with comorbidities, where many systemic medications are contraindicated. CASE PRESENTATION We report a case of a 62-year-old diabetic man with a 30-year history of severe plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis with cirrhosis and diabetic nephropathy that was treated successfully in combination with apremilast and etanercept after multiple previous unsuccessful treatment attempts. CONCLUSION There are no data supporting the combination of apremilast and etanercept in the management of recalcitrant cases of moderate-to-severe psoriasis and multiple comorbidities including psoriatic arthritis, diabetic nephropathy, and cirrhosis. In patients who do not respond to multiple approaches for the treatment of psoriasis, combination therapy with biologic agents and new systemic medications may lead to dramatic disease control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Zimmer
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Mohamad Goldust
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Shashank Bhargava
- Department of Dermatology, R.D. Gardi Medical College, Ujjain, India
| | - Joanna Wegner
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Stephan Grabbe
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Arora S, Das P, Arora G. Systematic Review and Recommendations to Combine Newer Therapies With Conventional Therapy in Psoriatic Disease. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:696597. [PMID: 34490293 PMCID: PMC8416676 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.696597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Psoriasis continues to have unmet needs in its management despite introduction of newer molecules. Monotherapy with these newer agents may not achieve therapeutic goals in all cases, hence necessitating their combinations with other molecules. Improved understanding of newer as well as conventional treatment modalities and experiences in their combinations hence necessitates therapeutic guidelines for their use in psoriasis. Objective: To review the combinations of treatments reported in literature and recommendations for their use based on best current evidence in literature. Methods: A literature review of MEDLINE database for studies evaluating combinations of newer therapies with conventional therapies in psoriasis was done. Newer therapies were identified as biologic disease modifying anti rheumatic drugs and other molecules such as apremilast while conventional therapies included methotrexate, cyclosporine, or retinoids, phototherapy and others. The therapeutic guidelines are proposed with the aim to provide evidenced based approach to combine newer and conventional agents in day-to-day psoriasis management. Findings: Combination of acitretin and narrow band ultraviolet B (NB-UVB)/Psoralen with ultraviolet A (PUVA) achieves faster clearance and allows reduction of dose of the latter. A variable outcome is reported of methotrexate with TNF-α inhibitors vs. TNF-α inhibitors alone, although addition of methotrexate appears to reduce immunogenicity of TNF-α inhibitors thereby preventing formation of anti-drug antibodies especially in case of infliximab. While combination of acitretin and PUVA is beneficial, combining TNF-α inhibitors and phototherapy too produces better and faster results but long term risks of Non Melanoma Skin Cancers (NMSCs) may preclude their use together. Combination of cyclosporine and phototherapy is not recommended due to greater chances of NMSCs. Adding phototherapy to Fumaric Acid Esters (FAEs) improves efficacy. Apremilast can be safely combined with available biologic agents in patients with plaque psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis not responding adequately to biologics alone. Hydroxyurea and acitretin may be used together increasing their efficacy and reducing doses of both and hence their adverse effects. Conclusion: Selected clinical scenarios shall benefit from combinations therapies, improving efficacy of both conventional and newer agents and at the same time helping reduce toxicity of higher dosages when used individually.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandeep Arora
- Department of Dermatology, Army College of Medical Sciences & Base Hospital Delhi Cantt, New Delhi, India
| | - Pankaj Das
- Department of Dermatology, Army College of Medical Sciences & Base Hospital Delhi Cantt, New Delhi, India
| | - Gulhima Arora
- Consultant Dermatologist, Mehektagul Dermaclinic, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Picchianti-Diamanti A, Spinelli FR, Rosado MM, Conti F, Laganà B. Inhibition of Phosphodiesterase-4 in Psoriatic Arthritis and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22052638. [PMID: 33807944 PMCID: PMC7961737 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22052638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Phosphodiesterases (PDEs) are a heterogeneous superfamily of enzymes which catalyze the degradation of the intracellular second messengers cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP). Among PDEs, PDE4 is the most widely studied and characterized isoenzyme. PDE4 blocking can lead to increased levels of intracellular cAMP, which results in down-regulation of inflammatory responses by reducing the expression of tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin (IL)-23, IL-17, interferon-γ, while increasing regulatory cytokines, such as IL-10. Therefore, PDE4 has been explored as a therapeutic target for the treatment of different chronic inflammatory conditions such as psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). PsA shares clinical, genetic, and pathogenic features with IBD such as ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD), and enteropathic spondyloarthritis (eSpA) represent a frequent clinical evidence of the overlap between gut and joint diseases. Current therapeutic options in PsA patients and underlying UC are limited to synthetic immunosuppressants and anti-TNF. Apremilast is an oral PDE4 inhibitor approved for the treatment of active PsA patients with inadequate response to synthetic immunosuppressants. The efficacy and a good safety profile observed in randomized clinical trials with apremilast in PsA patients have been confirmed by few studies in a real-life scenario. In addition, apremilast led to significant improvement in clinical and endoscopic features in UC patients in a phase II RCT. By now there are no available data regarding its role in eSpA patients. In view of the above, the use of apremilast in eSpA patients is a route that deserves to be deepened.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Picchianti-Diamanti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, S. Andrea University Hospital, “Sapienza” University, 00189 Rome, Italy;
- Correspondence:
| | - Francesca Romana Spinelli
- Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche Internistiche, Anestesiologiche e Cardiovascolari, “Sapienza” Università di Roma, 00161 Rome, Italy; (F.R.S.); (F.C.)
| | | | - Fabrizio Conti
- Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche Internistiche, Anestesiologiche e Cardiovascolari, “Sapienza” Università di Roma, 00161 Rome, Italy; (F.R.S.); (F.C.)
| | - Bruno Laganà
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, S. Andrea University Hospital, “Sapienza” University, 00189 Rome, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Juvenile spondyloarthritis is a subset of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) with onset in late childhood and adolescence and a strong association with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) B-27 positivity and familial aggregation that has the potential for axial involvement, potentially leading to ankylosing spondylitis. Current therapy for severe disease relies heavily on tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). Treatment paradigms in children largely consist of extrapolation from studies on adults with spondyloarthritis. Additional therapies studied in adults include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), blockade of the interleukin-17 (IL-17) and IL-23 axes, blockade of T-cell stimulation, phosphodiesterase (PDE)-4 inhibition, and Janus-activated kinase (JAK) pathway alteration. IL-17 blockade and IL-23 blockade are guideline approved after TNFi failure (and even as an alternative to TNFi) in adults, depending on concomitant inflammatory bowel and skin disease, with JAK and PDE-4 inhibition options following biologic failure. Neither pediatric nor adult guidelines address IL-6 blockade, T-cell co-stimulation blockade, or combination biologic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M Bridges
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| | - Matthew L Stoll
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a seronegative inflammatory arthritis often observed in patients with skin psoriasis. Treatment of PsA, especially peripheral PsA, has typically relied on disease-modifying anti-rheumatic agents (DMARDs); however, these agents have limited efficacy and considerable associated toxicity. More recently, monoclonal antibodies (biologic agents) have revolutionized management of immune-mediated diseases; however, these therapies carry a high cost and require parenteral administration. Apremilast, a novel oral DMARD, was approved by the European Union for psoriatic arthritis in 2015. Apremilast inhibits the function of phosphodiesterase-4, a regulator of cyclic adenosine monophosphate, leading to a broad inhibition of proinflammatory mediators and subsequent reduction in tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) response. The PALACE and ACTIVE trials, phase III randomized controlled trials for apremilast, showed that apremilast is effective at improving various clinical and patient-reported outcome measures for psoriatic arthritis in both DMARD-naïve and DMARD-experienced PsA patients. Efficacy was limited in patients with previous biologic DMARD failure and the overall efficacy of apremilast appears to be less than biologics agents, though no head-to-head trials exist comparing apremilast to biologic DMARDs. Apremilast is generally well tolerated, with short-lived gastrointestinal side effects being the most commonly reported adverse events. Guidelines suggest a trial of apremilast in patients who have failed traditional oral DMARDs and for whom, biologics are contraindicated. More studies directly comparing apremilast to conventional DMARDs and biologic DMARDs are needed and will be crucial in informing clinical and economic decisions about apremilast role in management of PsA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vijay K Sandhu
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lihi Eder
- Division of Rheumatology, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jensen Yeung
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada - .,Division of Dermatology, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Dermatology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Probity Medical Research Inc., Waterloo, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Introduction: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that waxes and wanes, and long-term remission can be difficult to achieve regardless of disease severity. Currently, numerous treatment options are available for psoriasis including steroid and non-steroid topical agents, phototherapy, oral systemic agents, and biologics, with many more therapeutic agents under development.Areas covered: This article will review various combination therapy strategies such as rotational therapy and sequential therapy and describe a variety of safe and effective combination therapies for the treatment of psoriasis. Two or more agents with different mechanisms of action and safety profiles can be used to achieve and/or maintain adequate disease control while minimizing the toxicity of treatments. Combination therapy can also be used when a single agent is not enough for treating recalcitrant disease. Choosing a combination regimen that maximizes safety and efficacy while considering patient usability and compliance can be a challenge.Expert opinion: Given the various treatment options currently available for psoriasis and more agents under development, combination therapy will continue to be a valuable treatment strategy for any patient with psoriasis. It is crucial for clinicians to carefully consider the fine balance between safety and efficacy when combining various therapeutic agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mio Nakamura
- Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - John Koo
- Department of Dermatology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Olisova OY, Svistunova DA, Chernyavskaya LM, Anpilogova EM. Phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor in the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Vestnik dermatologii i venerologii 2019. [DOI: 10.25208/0042-4609-2019-95-2-74-80] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, especially moderate and severe, represents difficulties. Recently, various methods of molecular medicine have been actively developed, however, targeted therapy deserves special attention, which consists of chemical agents that have specific target as a specific protein or enzyme. Targeted therapy is a promising direction in many branches of medicine, especially in dermatology.Despite the wide range of biological products, their use may be accompanied by an increased risk of infectious processes and malignant neoplasms, which makes the search for a new pharmacological solution in targeted therapy even more relevant.This review presents the possibilities and prospects for the therapeutic use of the phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor from the group of small molecules — apremilast, primarily in the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O. Yu. Olisova
- I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
| | - D. A. Svistunova
- I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
| | - L. M. Chernyavskaya
- I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
| | - E. M. Anpilogova
- I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
| |
Collapse
|