The algorithms of adjuvant therapy in gliomas and their effect on survival

Targeting glioma cells by antineoplastic activity of reversine

Gliomas are the most common type of primary central nervous system tumors and despite great advances in understanding the molecular basis of the disease very few new therapies have been developed. Reversine, a synthetic purine analog, is a multikinase inhibitor that targets aurora kinase A (AURKA) and aurora kinase B (AURKB). In gliomas, a high expression of AURKA or AURKB is associated with a malignant phenotype and a poor prognosis. The present study investigated reversine-related cellular and molecular antiglioma effects in HOG, T98G and U251MG cell lines. Gene and protein expression were assessed by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR and western blotting, respectively. For functional assays, human glioma cell lines (HOG, T98G and U251MG) were exposed to increasing concentrations of reversine (0.4–50 µM) and subjected to various cellular and molecular assays. Reversine reduced the viability and clonogenicity in a dose- and/or time-dependent manner in all glioma cells, with HOG (high AURKB-expression) and T98G (high AURKA-expression) cells being more sensitive compared with U251MG cells (low AURKA- and AURKB-expression). Notably, HOG cells presented higher levels of polyploidy, while T98G presented multiple mitotic spindles, which is consistent with the main regulatory functions of AURKB and AURKA, respectively. In molecular assays, reversine reduced AURKA and/or AURKB expression/activity and increased DNA damage and apoptosis markers, but autophagy-related proteins were not modulated. In conclusion, reversine potently induced mitotic catastrophe and apoptosis in glioma cells and higher basal levels of aurora kinases and genes responsive to DNA damage and may predict improved antiglioma responses to the drug. Reversine may be a potential novel drug in the antineoplastic arsenal against gliomas.

Digital biomarkers: Importance of patient stratification for re-irradiation of glioma patients - Review of latest developments regarding scoring assessment

PURPOSE

To review scoring assessments in re-irradiation of high-grade glioma (HGG) patients and how to use scoring for patient stratification. The next aim was to investigate the different approaches employed by the scoring systems and the way they can be applied to build homogeneous patient groups for a reliable prognosis.

METHODS

We searched the Medline/Pubmed and Web of science databases for relevant articles regarding scores for re-irradiation of recurrent HGG. All references were divided into the following groups: novel score establishment (n = 5), score validation (n = 6), not relevant to this evaluation (n = 26).

RESULTS

We identified five scoring systems. Two are modifications of an already existing score. Calculations differ immensely from easy point addition to a more complex formula with including three up to 10 individual parameters. Six validation articles were found for three of the scores; one was validated four times. Two scores were never validated.

CONCLUSION

For recurrent HGG, the clinical situation remains demanding. Due to the heterogeneity of data at re-irradiation, patient stratification is important. Several scoring systems have been developed to predict prognosis. As a digital biomarker, scores are of high value regarding quick patient assessment and therapy decision making. For the next generation of digital biomarkers, easy calculation, and inclusion of easily available parameters are crucial.

The Molecular Effects of Ionizing Radiations on Brain Cells: Radiation Necrosis vs. Tumor Recurrence

The central nervous system (CNS) is generally resistant to the effects of radiation, but higher doses, such as those related to radiation therapy, can cause both acute and long-term brain damage. The most important results is a decline in cognitive function that follows, in most cases, cerebral radionecrosis. The essence of radio-induced brain damage is multifactorial, being linked to total administered dose, dose per fraction, tumor volume, duration of irradiation and dependent on complex interactions between multiple brain cell types. Cognitive impairment has been described following brain radiotherapy, but the mechanisms leading to this adverse event remain mostly unknown. In the event of a brain tumor, on follow-up radiological imaging often cannot clearly distinguish between recurrence and necrosis, while, especially in patients that underwent radiation therapy (RT) post-surgery, positron emission tomography (PET) functional imaging, is able to differentiate tumors from reactive phenomena. More recently, efforts have been done to combine both morphological and functional data in a single exam and acquisition thanks to the co-registration of PET/MRI. The future of PET imaging to differentiate between radionecrosis and tumor recurrence could be represented by a third-generation PET tracer already used to reveal the spatial extent of brain inflammation. The aim of the following review is to analyze the effect of ionizing radiations on CNS with specific regard to effect of radiotherapy, focusing the attention on the mechanism underling the radionecrosis and the brain damage, and show the role of nuclear medicine techniques to distinguish necrosis from recurrence and to early detect of cognitive decline after treatment.

A Second Course of Radiotherapy in Patients with Recurrent Malignant Gliomas: Clinical Data on Re-irradiation, Prognostic Factors, and Usefulness of Digital Biomarkers

OPINION STATEMENT

The treatment of malignant gliomas has undergone a significant intensification during the past decade, and the interdisciplinary treatment team has learned that all treatment opportunities, including surgery and radiotherapy (RT), also have a central role in recurrent gliomas. Throughout the decades, re-irradiation (re-RT) has achieved a prominent place in the treatment of recurrent gliomas. A solid body of evidence supports the safety and efficacy of re-RT, especially when modern techniques are used, and justifies the early use of this regimen, especially in the case when macroscopic disease is present. Additionally, a second adjuvant re-RT to the resection cavity is currently being investigated by several investigators and seems to offer promising results. Although advanced RT technologies, such as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) have become available in many centers, re-RT should continue to be kept in experienced hands so that they can select the optimal regimen, the ideal treatment volume, and the appropriate techniques from their tool-boxes. Concomitant or adjuvant use of systemic treatment options should also strongly be taken into consideration, especially because temozolomide (TMZ), cyclohexyl-nitroso-urea (CCNU), and bevacizumab have shown a good safety profile; they should be considered, if available. Nonetheless, the selection of patients for re-RT remains crucial. Single factors, such as patient age or the progression-free interval (PFI), fall too short. Therefore, powerful prognostic scores have been generated and validated, and these scores should be used for patient selection and counseling.