Multimodal Treatment of Breast Cancer Liver Metastases Based on Hepatic Resection and Microwave Coagulo-Necrotic Therapy (MCN)

Hepatic resection versus operative microwave ablation for single hepatocellular carcinoma ≤5 cm: A propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Little evidence exists regarding the perioperative and oncologic benefits of microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of hepatic resection and operative microwave ablation (microwave coagulo-necrotic therapy) for single hepatocellular carcinoma ≤5 cm.

METHODS

Between 1994 and 2015, a total of 551 patients with a single hepatocellular carcinoma ≤5 cm were treated in our institution (hepatic resection: n = 128; microwave coagulo-necrotic therapy: n = 423). We compared overall survival and recurrence-free survival between hepatic resection and microwave coagulo-necrotic therapy. Propensity score matching analysis identified 94 matched pairs of patients to compare outcomes.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, baseline variables, including liver function and tumor size, were well-balanced between the 2 groups. The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 76% and 47% for hepatic resection and 77% and 48% for microwave coagulo-necrotic therapy, respectively (P = .865). The 5- and 10-year recurrence-free survival rates were 55% and 41% for hepatic resection and 47% and 32% for microwave coagulo-necrotic therapy, respectively (P = .377). In the subgroup analysis, the hepatic resection group had better recurrence-free survival than the microwave coagulo-necrotic therapy group in patients with tumor size >3 cm, with 5-year recurrence-free survival rates of 56.5% and 32.4% in the hepatic resection and microwave coagulo-necrotic therapy group, respectively (P = .029).

CONCLUSION

Our propensity score matching study confirmed no statistically significant differences in both overall survival and recurrence-free survival between hepatic resection and microwave coagulo-necrotic therapy for single hepatocellular carcinoma ≤5 cm; however, hepatic resection is recommended for hepatocellular carcinoma with tumor size >3 cm when patients have good liver function.

Oncological outcomes after hepatic resection and/or surgical microwave ablation for liver metastasis from gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Indications and efficacy of surgical treatment for liver metastases from gastric cancer (LMGCs) remain controversial. This retrospective study was designed to clarify the benefits of surgical treatment and identify prognostic factors.

METHODS

Between December 1997 and December 2015, 34 consecutive patients underwent hepatic resection and surgical microwave ablation for synchronous or metachronous LMGCs at our institution. We analyzed their cumulative overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates and clinical parameters to identify predictors of prognosis.

RESULTS

Of the 34 patients, 14 underwent hepatic resection, 13 underwent surgical microwave ablation, and 7 underwent hepatic resection combined with surgical microwave ablation. Their OS rates were 1-year: 84.4%, 3-year: 38.6%, and 5-year: 34.7%; and their RFS rates were 1-year: 38.5%, 3-year: 28.0%, and 5-year: 28.0%. OS did not significantly vary among the surgical procedures. In multivariable analysis, positive of both CEA and CA19-9 were independent predictors of poor survival (hazard ratio [HR] 4.51; P = 0.049) and early recurrence (HR 5.70; P = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

Both hepatic resection and surgical microwave ablation for LMGCs are effective and can improve survival in selected patients.