Addition of lomustine for bevacizumab-refractory recurrent glioblastoma

Sonodynamic therapy-derived multimodal synergistic cancer therapy

Sonodynamic therapy (SDT) represents a promising modality that provides the possibility of non-invasively eliminating solid tumors in a site-directed manner. In light of the complexity and heterogeneity of tumors, more and more studies are attempting to combine SDT with other therapeutic methods so as to achieve better tumor treatment effect, which sheds new light on the potential of SDT-based synergistic therapeutics. Herein, the representative studies of SDT-instructed multimodal synergistic cancer therapy are comprehensively presented, such as sono-chemotherapy, sono-radiotherapy, sono-immunotherapy, and sono-chemodynamic therapy, etc., and their incorporate mechanisms are discussed in detail. The current challenges and future prospects to promote the advanced development of SDT-based nanomedicines in this burgeoning research field are highlighted. It is believed that such an emerging synergistic therapeutic modality based on SDT will play a more significant role in the field of tumor precision treatment medicine.

Retrospective study of nivolumab for patients with recurrent high grade gliomas

INTRODUCTION

Patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas (HGG) have limited treatment options. HGG utilize the PD-1 pathway to evade immune responses. Checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated safety and clinical activity in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. We explored the efficacy of nivolumab in recurrent HGG with a primary objective of progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed HGG patients treated with nivolumab in our institution. We included patients with advanced HGG who received nivolumab at their oncologist's decision. Patients received nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until confirmed progression, intolerable toxicity, death, or physician decision. Radiographic assessments were performed every 8 weeks.

RESULTS

Between April 2015 and October 2017, 50 HGG patients received nivolumab. 43 patients received nivolumab with bevacizumab. 44 patients were bevacizumab refractory and 7 patients received nivolumab monotherapy. All had received prior radiation and chemotherapy. 39 adverse events (AEs) were noted [most commonly fatigue (16%) and constipation (10%)]. 4 (8%) patients experienced grade 3-4 AEs. 36 (72%) patients experienced stable disease (SD) at the 2-month assessment. Median duration of SD was 4.3 months (5.1 months in the bevacizumab naïve, 3.8 months in the bevacizumab refractory). Median PFS was 4.3 months (95% CI 3.5-5.3); median OS was 6.5 months (95% CI 6.0-8.8).

CONCLUSION

Treatment with nivolumab therapy was associated with a manageable safety profile. In a subset of patients, there was disease stabilization in heavily pre-treated recurrent HGG.

EMP-induced BBB-disruption enhances drug delivery to glioma and increases treatment efficacy in rats

Chemotherapy on gliomas is not satisfactorily efficient because the presence of blood-brain barriers (BBB) leads to inadequate exposure of tumor cells to administered drugs. In order to facilitate chemotherapeutics to penetrate BBB and increase the treatment efficacy of gliomas, electromagnetic pulse (EMP) was applied and the 1-(2-Chlorethyl)-cyclohexyl-nitrosourea (CCNU) lomustine concentration in tumor tissue, tumor size, tumor apoptosis, and side effects were measured in glioma-bearing rat model. The results showed that EMP exposure could enhance the delivery of CCNU to tumor tissue, facilitate tumor apoptosis, and inhibit tumor growth without obvious side effects. The data indicated that EMP-induced BBB disruption could enhance delivery of CCNU to glioblastoma multiforme and increase treatment efficacy in glioma-bearing rats. Bioelectromagnetics. 39:60-67, 2018. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

A randomized phase II trial of standard dose bevacizumab versus low dose bevacizumab plus lomustine (CCNU) in adults with recurrent glioblastoma

Antiangiogenic therapy can rapidly reduce vascular permeability and cerebral edema but high doses of bevacizumab may induce selective pressure to promote resistance. This trial evaluated the efficacy of low dose bevacizumab in combination with lomustine (CCNU) compared to standard dose bevacizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Patients (N = 71) with recurrent glioblastoma who previously received radiation and temozolomide were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive bevacizumab monotherapy (10 mg/kg) or low dose bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) in combination with lomustine (90 mg/m(2)). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) based on a blinded, independent radiographic assessment of post-contrast T1-weighted and non-contrast T2/FLAIR weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using RANO criteria. For 69 evaluable patients, median PFS was not significantly longer in the low dose bevacizumab + lomustine arm (4.34 months, CI 2.96-8.34) compared to the bevacizumab alone arm (4.11 months, CI 2.69-5.55, p = 0.19). In patients with first recurrence, there was a trend towards longer median PFS time in the low dose bevacizumab + lomustine arm (4.96 months, CI 4.17-13.44) compared to the bevacizumab alone arm (3.22 months CI 2.5-6.01, p = 0.08). The combination of low dose bevacizumab plus lomustine was not superior to standard dose bevacizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Although the study was not designed to exclusively evaluate patients at first recurrence, a strong trend towards improved PFS was seen in that subgroup for the combination of low dose bevacizumab plus lomustine. Further studies are needed to better identify such subgroups that may most benefit from the combination treatment.