Economic simulation of canagliflozin and sitagliptin treatment outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequate glycemic control

Patient preferences for diabetes-related complications in Taiwan

Background: As the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) continues to increase rapidly, there has been a rising need not only to assess the clinical outcomes but also the impact of DM on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of affected individuals. Most previous studies have found that having complications is strongly associated with decreased HRQoL in DM patients. As such, it is crucial to measure individuals' preferences for DM-related complications in order to assess the magnitude of complications' effect on overall HRQoL. In addition, preference scores are an essential component of cost-utility analyses (CUAs), which studies can incorporate healthcare costs, HRQoL and clinical outcomes of DM into one analysis.Objective: The aims of this study were to assess the preference scores of DM-related complications using both the standard gamble (SG), a choice-based method, and visual analogue scale (VAS), a scaling method. We also aimed to assess several possible factors that might be associated with the preference scores of the complications.Methods: This is a cross-sectional interview-administered survey, and 213 patients with type 2 DM were interviewed. The respondents' preference scores of eleven DM-related complications were obtained using VAS and SG techniques. Demographic information, clinical characteristics and risk attitudes were also collected to explore factors that may affect patients' preference scores.Results: Nearly one quarter of participants in Taiwan ranked at least one of the complications worse than death. The mean VAS scores ranged from 0.004 (amputation) to 0.47 (nocturnal hypoglycemia) while the mean adjusted SG scores ranged from 0.30 (blindness) to 0.66 (nocturnal hypoglycemia). There were significant differences in all of the complications' preference scores depending on risk attitudes.Conclusion: Both the VAS and SG methods were used to elicit the preference scores of DM-related complications, and the preference scores derived could be useful for future cost utility analyses.

Real-world evaluation of Hba1c, blood pressure, and weight loss among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with canagliflozin: an analysis of electronic medical records from a network of hospitals in Florida

OBJECTIVE

Clinical trials and real-world studies reported that canagliflozin (CANA) improved HbA1c, blood pressure (BP), and weight in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study examines if previous results hold regionally and within specific patient sub-groups.

METHODS

Adults with T2DM and ≥12 months of clinical activity before the first CANA prescription (index) were identified in electronic medical records (January 1, 2012-February 15, 2017) from a network of hospitals in Florida. Quality measures were described at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-index. Selected thresholds were HbA1c < 7%, BP < 140/90 mmHg, and weight loss ≥5%. Sub-groups included patients ≥65 years old, with African American race, with CANA dose increase, initiating CANA in an endocrinology setting, and initiating CANA in a primary care setting.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,259 patients (mean age = 56.7 years; 51.2% female, 70.4% White) were identified. Among patients with a baseline HbA1c ≥ 7%, 16.1% had an HbA1c < 7% 3 months following CANA initiation, and the mean HbA1c decreased from 8.8% to 8.1%. Among patients with a baseline systolic BP ≥140 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg, 59.3% attained a systolic BP < 140 mmHg and 77.3% a diastolic BP < 90 mmHg after 3 months. HbA1c and BP responses were sustained through 12 months. The proportion of patients with a weight loss from baseline ≥5% increased from 17.0% at 3 months to 31.1% at 12 months. Consistent trends were observed for all sub-groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In CANA-treated patients and patient sub-groups from a network of Florida hospitals, improvements in quality measures and response durability were similar to clinical trials and other real-world studies.

Quality measure and weight loss assessment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with canagliflozin or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Achieving control of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), blood pressure (BP), and body weight (BW) remains a challenge for most patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In clinical trials, canagliflozin (CANA), an inhibitor of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2, has shown significant improvement compared to some dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors in the achievement of such quality measures. This study used recent electronic medical records (EMR) data to assess quality measure achievement of HbA1C, BP, and BW loss in patients treated with CANA versus DPP-4 inhibitors.

METHODS

Adult patients with ≥1 T2DM diagnosis and ≥12 months of clinical activity (baseline) before first CANA or DPP-4 prescription (index) were identified in the QuintilesIMS Health Real-World Data EMRs-US database (03/29/2012-10/30/2015). Patients were observed from the index to last encounter. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for observed baseline confounders between groups. Kaplan-Meier (KM) rates and Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare achievement of HbA1c < 7% (among patients <65 years old), HbA1c < 8%, systolic BP < 140 mmHg, diastolic BP < 90 mmHg, and BW loss ≥ 5% among patients not meeting these respective targets at baseline.

RESULTS

A total of 10,702 CANA and 17,679 DPP-4 patients were selected. IPTW resulted in balanced baseline demographic, comorbidity, and disease characteristics (CANA: N = 13,793, mean age: 59.0 years; DPP-4: N = 14,588, mean age: 58.9 years). Up until 24 months post-index, CANA patients were more likely to reach an HbA1c < 7% (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.10, P = 0.007, KM rates: 42.8% vs. 40.3%), an HbA1c < 8% (HR = 1.16, P < 0.001, KM rates: 63.7% vs. 60.0%), and a BW loss ≥ 5% (HR = 1.46, P < 0.001, KM rates: 55.2% vs. 46.2%), compared to DPP-4 patients. Up until 12 months post-index, CANA patients were more likely to reach a systolic BP < 140 mmHg (HR = 1.07, P = 0.04, KM rates: 87.8% vs. 83.9%). but not a diastolic BP < 90 mmHg (HR = 0.95, P = 0.361), compared to DPP-4 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study of EMR data covering up to 30 months after CANA approval (March 2013) suggests that patients initiated on CANA were more likely to reach HbA1c, systolic BP, and weight loss objectives specified by general diabetes care guidelines than patients initiated on DPP-4 inhibitors.