The role of neurosurgeons in global public health: the case of folic acid fortification of staple foods to prevent spina bifida

Neurosurgery and the World Health Organization Intersectoral Global Action Plan for Epilepsy and Other Neurological Disorders 2022-2031

The World Health Organization's Intersectoral Global Action Plan (IGAP) on Epilepsy and Other Neurological Diseases 2022-2031 is a holistic, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral plan with a strong focus on equity and human rights. The IGAP was unanimously approved by all World Health Organization Member States at the 75th World Health Assembly in May 2022 and provides a framework for researchers and clinicians to study and address national and global inadequacies in the evaluation and management of people suffering from neurological disorders and their prevention. While IGAP has applied epilepsy as an entry point for other neurological disorders, advocacy by neurologists and neurosurgeons has broadened it to include diseases with a large and growing global health footprint such as stroke, hydrocephalus, traumatic brain injury, and brain and spine cancers. The IGAP is important to neurosurgeons globally because it provides the first ever roadmap for comprehensively addressing unmet neurological and neurosurgical care in low- and middle-income countries. Furthermore, it creates an opportunity for neurologists and neurosurgeons to scale up services for neurological diseases in tandem. As such, it provides a structure for the neurosurgery community to become involved in global health initiatives at all levels.

Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of mandatory folate fortification as an evidence-based policy to prevent neural tube defects

BACKGROUND

Neural tube defects continue to be one of the main congenital malformations affecting the development of the nervous system and a significant cause of disability and disease burden to individuals living with these conditions. Mandatory food fortification with folic acid is, by far, one of the most efficacious, safe, and cost-effective interventions to prevent neural tube defects. However, most countries fail to effectively fortify staple foods with folic acid, impacting public health and healthcare systems and generating dismal disparities.

AIM

This article discusses the main barriers and facilitators for implementing mandatory food fortification as an evidence-based policy to prevent neural tube defects worldwide.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the scientific literature allowed the identification of the determinant factors acting as barriers or facilitators for the reach, adoption, implementation, and scaling up of mandatory food fortification with folic acid as an evidence-based policy.

RESULTS

We identified eight barriers and seven facilitators as determinant factors for food fortification policies. The identified factors were classified as individual, contextual, and external, inspired by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation of Research (CFIR). We discuss mechanisms to overcome obstacles and seize the opportunities to approach this public health intervention safely and effectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Several determinant factors acting as barriers or facilitators influence the implementation of mandatory food fortification as an evidence-based policy worldwide. Notoriously, policymakers in many countries may lack knowledge of the benefits of scaling up their policies to prevent folic acid-sensitive neural tube defects, improve the health status of their communities, and promote the protection of many children from these disabling but preventable conditions. Not addressing this problem negatively affects four levels: public health, society, family, and individuals. Science-driven advocacy and partnerships with essential stakeholders can help overcome the barriers and leverage the facilitators for safe and effective food fortification.

Postnatal Surgical Correction of Myelomeningoceles: Preoperative and Intraoperative Risk Factors Associated with Postoperative Neurologic Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Open spina bifida or myelomeningocele (MMC) is a congenital defect that results from failure of caudal neurulation. We present a case series of patients who were treated with postnatal surgical correction for MMC, evaluating the possible preoperative and intraoperative risk factors associated with neurologic outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent postnatal surgical correction for MMCs over 11 years at our institution was performed. MMCs were classified based on their morphologic configuration into 3 types. Type I includes defects without a sac and there is cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. Type II includes where there is a sac ≤4 cm, with or without CSF leak. Type III includes defects with a sac that are greater than 4 cm.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were included. The median age of gestation at surgery was 37.4 weeks. There were 30 females (60%). All mothers received adequate folate supplementation. All patients underwent surgical correction in the first 48 hours. Lower extremity motor function at the last clinical follow-up was normal in 34 patients (68%). CSF leak, infection, and mortality were 8%, 2%, and 0%, respectively. Twenty-one patients (42%) underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt for hydrocephalus.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite there being no statistically significant associations with a timely closure, all cases were treated within the first 48 hours and this could influence the low complication rate. Individuals of Hispanic background who received appropriate folate supplementation still had high rates of MMC and we posit that this may be caused in part by a genetic/molecular predisposition.