Differences in head impulse test results due to analysis techniques

A Clinical Framework for Video Head Impulse Testing and Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Assessments in Primary School-Aged Children

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to offer normative data and age trends of an age-appropriate vestibular test protocol in a large group (n = 140) of school-aged children (6 to 13 years old) as well as to provide a practical and clinical framework for accurate performance and interpretation of vestibular test results in this specific age group.

DESIGN

The typically developing participants (mean age of 9.51 ± 2.04 years) were recruited to provide a representative group of 20 children for each of the seven age groups that were composed of children aged from 6 to 13 years in 1-year intervals. Each age group consisted of 10 boys and 10 girls. The protocol comprises the video head impulse test, and cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential assessments to provide a child-friendly, noninvasive, short, and portable test battery, which is equally applicable in the hospital and office-practice, and which provides information on the integrity of all five parts of the peripheral vestibular system.

RESULTS

The study demonstrates that all included tests and methods, with an overall test duration of 25 min 12 sec ± 5 min 10 sec, were feasible to perform in primary school-aged children, taking into account some practical adaptations. Concerning the video head impulse test, no clinically relevant sex and age effects were noted. However, t tests revealed significant differences for the mean gain of the horizontal (right > left; t[139] = 14.563; p < 0.001) and posterior semicircular canals (left > right; t[139] = -4.823; p < 0.001) between both sides. For the cVEMP assessment, no laterality differences were observed for any of the parameters, but a significantly shorter N1 latencies in the youngest age categories (<8 years), compared with the oldest groups were observed [F(6,118) = 8.336; p < 0.001; partial ƞ² = 0.298]. For all oVEMP parameters, no laterality, sex, or age differences were seen. On the basis of the presented normative data, cutoff criteria were proposed with accompanying clinical recommendations to perform vestibular function testing in this target population.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study in a large group of school-aged children offering normative data and age trends of an age-appropriate vestibular test protocol that evaluates the integrity of all parts of the peripheral vestibular organ. The reported normative values and clinical cutoff values will enable appropriate and age-specific interpretation of clinical and scientific results. Moreover, in combination with extensive history taking, and additional vestibular testing (e.g., rotatory chair test, caloric testing) when needed, the results of this study may support clinicians in the diagnosis of side-specific and location-specific vestibular deficits, which is required for accurate counseling and referral for further follow-up and/or intervention.

The vertical computerized rotational head impulse test

The computerized rotational head impulse test (crHIT) uses a computer-controlled rotational chair to deliver whole-body rotational impulses to assess the semicircular canals. The crHIT has only been described for horizontal head plane rotations. The purpose of this study was to describe the crHIT for vertical head plane rotations. In this preliminary study, we assessed four patients with surgically confirmed unilateral peripheral vestibular abnormalities and two control subjects. Results indicated that the crHIT was well-tolerated for both horizontal head plane and vertical head plane stimuli. The crHIT successfully assessed each of the six semicircular canals. This study suggests that the crHIT has the potential to become a new laboratory-based vestibular test for both the horizontal and vertical semicircular canals.

The value of saccade metrics and VOR gain in detecting a vestibular stroke

OBJECTIVE

A normal video Head Impulse Test is the gold standard in the emergency department to rule-in patients with an acute vestibular syndrome and a stroke. We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of vHIT metrics regarding the vestibulo-ocular reflex gain and the corrective saccades in detecting vestibular strokes.

METHODS

Prospective cross-sectional study (convenience sample) of patients presenting with acute vestibular syndrome in the emergency department of a tertiary referral centre between February 2015 and May 2020. We screened 1677 patients and enrolled 76 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria of acute vestibular syndrome. All patients underwent video head impulse test with automated and manual data analysis. A delayed MRI served as a gold standard for vestibular stroke confirmation.

RESULTS

Out of 76 patients, 52 were diagnosed with acute unilateral vestibulopathy and 24 with vestibular strokes. The overall accuracy of detecting stroke with an automated vestibulo-ocular reflex gain was 86.8%, compared to 77.6% for cumulative saccade amplitude and automatic saccade mean peak velocity measured by an expert and 71% for cumulative saccade amplitude and saccade mean peak velocity measured automatically. Gain misclassified 13.1% of the patients as false positive or false negative, manual cumulative saccade amplitude and saccade mean peak velocity 22.3%, and automated cumulative saccade amplitude and saccade mean peak velocity 28.9% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a better accuracy of video head impulse test for the diagnosis of vestibular strokes when using the vestibulo-ocular reflex gain than using saccade metrics. Nevertheless, saccades provide an additional and important information for video head impulse test evaluation. The automated saccade detection algorithm is not yet perfect compared to expert analysis, but it may become a valuable tool for future non-expert video head impulse test evaluations.

Binocular video head impulse test: Normative data study

Introduction

The video head impulse test (vHIT) evaluates the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR). It's usually recorded from only one eye. Newer vHIT devices allow a binocular quantification of the VOR.

Purpose Aim

To investigate the advantages of simultaneously recorded binocular vHIT (bvHIT) to detect the differences between the VOR gains of the adducting and the abducting eye, to define the most precise VOR measure, and to assess gaze dys/conjugacy. We aimed to establish normative values for bvHIT adducting/abducting eye VOR gains and to introduce the VOR dysconjugacy ratio (vorDR) between adducting and abducting eyes for bvHIT.

Methods

We enrolled 44 healthy adult participants in a cross-sectional, prospective study using a repeated-measures design to assess test-retest reliability. A binocular EyeSeeCam Sci 2 device was used to simultaneously record bvHIT from both eyes during impulsive head stimulation in the horizontal plane.

Results

Pooled bvHIT retest gains of the adducting eye significantly exceeded those of the abducting eye (mean (SD): 1.08 (SD = 0.06), 0.95 (SD = 0.06), respectively). Both adduction and abduction gains showed similar variability, suggesting comparable precision and therefore equal suitability for VOR asymmetry assessment. The pooled vorDR here introduced to bvHIT was 1.13 (SD = 0.05). The test-retest repeatability coefficient was 0.06.

Conclusion

Our study provides normative values reflecting the conjugacy of eye movement responses to horizontal bvHIT in healthy participants. The results were similar to a previous study using the gold-standard scleral search coil, which also reported greater VOR gains in the adducting than in the abducting eye. In analogy to the analysis of saccade conjugacy, we propose the use of a novel bvHIT dysconjugacy ratio to assess dys/conjugacy of VOR-induced eye movements. In addition, to accurately assess VOR asymmetry, and to avoid directional gain preponderance between adduction and abduction VOR-induced eye movements leading to monocular vHIT bias, we recommend using a binocular ductional VOR asymmetry index that compares the VOR gains of only the abduction or only the adduction movements of both eyes.

Head and vestibular kinematics during vertical semicircular canal impulses

BACKGROUND

The video head impulse test (vHIT) is a common assessment of semicircular canal function during high-speed impulses. Reliability of the vHIT for assessing vertical semicircular canals is uncertain. Vertical head impulses require a complex head movement, making it difficult to isolate a single semicircular canal and interpret resulting eye rotations.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to provide descriptive head kinematics and vestibular stimuli during vertical plane impulses to ultimately improve impulse delivery and interpretation of vHIT results for vertical semicircular canals.

METHODS

Six participants received right anterior (RA) and left posterior (LP) semicircular canal impulses. Linear displacements, rotational displacements, and rotational velocities of the head were measured. Peak velocities in semicircular canal planes and peak-to-peak gravitoinertial accelerations at the otolith organs were derived from head kinematics.

RESULTS

The largest rotational velocities occurred in the target semicircular canal plane, with non-negligible velocities occurring in non-target planes. Larger vertical displacements and accelerations occurred on the right side of the head compared to the left for RA and LP impulses.

CONCLUSIONS

These results provide a foundation for designing protocols to optimize stimulation applied to a singular vertical semicircular canal and for interpreting results from the vHIT for vertical semicircular canals.

Vestibulo-ocular reflex gain improvements at peak head acceleration and velocity following onset of unilateral vestibular neuritis: Insights into neural compensation mechanisms

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

An acute unilateral peripheral vestibular deficit (aUPVD) due to vestibular neuritis causes deficient yaw axis vestibular ocular reflex (VOR) gains. Using video head impulse tests (vHITs), we examined phasic and tonic velocity gains of the VOR over time to determine if these differed at onset and during subsequent improvement.

METHODS

The VOR responses of 61 patients were examined within 5 days of aUPVD onset, and 3 and 7 weeks later using vHIT with mean peak yaw angular velocities of 177°/s (sd 45°/s) and mean peak accelerations of 3660°/s2 (sd 1300°/s2). The phasic velocity or acceleration gain (aG) was computed as the ratio of eye to head velocity around peak head acceleration, and the tonic velocity gain (vG) was calculated as the same ratio around peak head velocity.

RESULTS

aG increased ipsi-deficit from 0.45 at onset to 0.67 at 3 weeks and 7 weeks later, and vG increased ipsi-deficit from 0.29 to 0.51 and 0.53, respectively, yielding a significant time effect (p < 0.001). Deficit side aG was significantly greater (p < 0.001) than vG at all time points. Deficit side gain improvements in aG and vG were similar. Contra-deficit aG increased from 0.86 to 0.95 and 0.94 at 3 weeks and 7 weeks, and vG contra-deficit increased from 0.84, to 0.89 and 0.87, respectively, also yielding a significant time effect (p = 0.004). Contra-deficit aG and vG were normal at 3 weeks. Mean canal paresis values improved from 91% to 67% over the 7 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Acceleration and velocity VOR gains on the deficit side are reduced by aUPVD and improve most in the first 3 weeks after aUPVD onset. Deficit side aG is consistently higher than deficit side vG following an aUPVD, suggesting that acceleration rather than velocity sensitive compensatory neural mechanisms are predominant during the compensation process for aUPVD.

Acute unilateral vestibular neuritis contributes to alterations in vestibular function modulating circumvention around obstacles: A pilot study suggesting a role for vestibular signals in the spatial perception of orientation during circumvention

Background

Walking among crowds avoiding colliding with people is described by patients with vestibular disorders as vertigo-inducing. Accurate body motion while circumventing an impeding obstacle in the gait pathway is dependent on an integration of multimodal sensory cues. However, a direct role of vestibular signals in spatial perception of distance or orientation during obstacle circumvention has not been investigated to date.

Materials and methods

We examined trunk yaw motion during circumvention in patients with acute unilateral vestibular loss (aUVL) and compared their results with age-matched healthy controls (HCs). Subjects performed five gait tasks with eyes open two times: walk 6 m in total, but after 3 m, circumvent to the left or right, as closely as possible, a cylindrical obstacle representing a person, and then veer back to the original path; walk 6 m, but after left and right circumvention at 3 m, veer, respectively, to the right, and left 45 deg; and walk 6 m without circumvention. Trunk yaw angular velocities (YAVs) were measured using a gyroscope system.

Results

Yaw angular velocity peak amplitudes approaching to, and departing from, the circumvented object were always greater for patients with aUVL compared to HCs, regardless of whether passing was to the aUVLs’ deficit or normal side. The departing peak YAV was always greater, circa 52 and 87%, than the approaching YAV for HCs when going straight and veering 45 deg (p ≤ 0.0006), respectively. For patients with aUVL, departing velocities were marginally greater (12%) than approaching YAVs when going straight (p < 0.05) and were only 40% greater when veering 45 deg (p = 0.05). The differences in departing YAVs resulted in significantly lower trajectory-end yaw angles for veering trials to the deficit side in patients with aUVL (34 vs. 43 degs in HCs).

Conclusion

The results demonstrate the effects of vestibular loss on yaw velocity control during the three phases of circumvention. First, approaching an obstacle, a greater YAV is found in patients with aUVL. Second, the departing YAV is found to be less than in HCs with respect to the approaching velocity, resulting in larger deficit side passing yaw angles. Third, patients with UVLs show yaw errors returning to the desired trajectory. These results could provide a basis for rehabilitation protocols helping to avoid collisions while walking in crowded spaces.

Suppression Head Impulse Test (SHIMP) versus Head Impulse Test (HIMP) When Diagnosing Bilateral Vestibulopathy

The Suppression Head Impulse (SHIMP) test was introduced as an alternative to the Head Impulse Paradigm (HIMP) to overcome challenges in VOR gain calculation due to the interference of covert saccades. The objectives of this study were (1) to determine if SHIMP, compared to HIMP, reduces covert saccades in BV patients and (2) to define the agreement on diagnosing BV between SHIMP and HIMP. First, the number of covert saccades was compared between SHIMP and HIMP. Secondly, VOR gain was compared between SHIMP and HIMP. Lastly, the agreement between SHIMP and HIMP on identifying BV (horizontal VOR gain <0.6) was evaluated. A total of 98 BV patients were included. To our knowledge, this is the largest study population on SHIMP testing in BV patients. Covert saccades were significantly reduced, and a lower VOR gain was found during SHIMP compared to HIMP (p < 0.001). However, the clinical relevance of these statistically significant differences is small. In 93% of the patients, an agreement was found between the two paradigms regarding the diagnosis of BV, and both paradigms detect BV in the vast majority of patients.

Objective measurement of HINTS (Head Impulse, Nystagmus, Test of Skew) in peripheral vestibulopathy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate how often the positive sign of HINTS (Head-Impulse, Gaze Evoked Nystagmus, Test of Skew) appears in patients with acute peripheral vestibular lesion, HINTS findings were quantitatively measured and analyzed in patients with peripheral vestibulopathy accompanying spontaneous nystagmus.

METHODS

HINTS was evaluated in 14 vertigo patients with spontaneous nystagmus. Horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain was measured using the video head impulse test (vHIT). To evaluate gaze-evoked nystagmus (GEN), slow-phase velocities at different points of lateral gaze were measured and plotted, then the slope and its inverse value, the neural integrator time constant, were calculated. Skew deviation was tested using anaglyph filters to simulate the alternate cover test, and the degree and latency of vertical eyeball deviation were measured. The ABCD2 score was calculated to evaluate the risk of stroke.

RESULTS

Among 13 patients of peripheral vestibulopathy, 7 showed positive signs in HINTS (normal vHIT: 5, direction-changing GEN: 0, skew deviation: 3). One patient with a cerebellopontine angle tumor presented with both a peripheral and central pattern and showed positive HINTS findings (presence of direction-changing GEN). The mean VOR gain of patients with abnormal vHIT was 0.58±0.29 and 1.10±0.11 in the affected and contralateral side, respectively, while those in patients with normal vHIT were 1.04±0.21 and 1.13±0.12, respectively. The neural integrator time constant calculated from the mean slope of horizontal slow-phase velocity according to horizontal eye position was 42.9 s. The mean vertical eyeball deviation of patients with positive skew was 2.14±1.18° while uncovering the eye on the affected side, and -1.97±1.59° while uncovering the eye on the unaffected side. The median ABCD2 score of 14 patients was 2 (range, 1-3).

CONCLUSIONS

HINTS findings were objectively measured in vertigo patients with spontaneous nystagmus. Although positive findings of HINTS have been recognized as a central sign, 54% (7/13) of cases with peripheral vestibulopathy showed positive HINTS signs. HINTS results should be interpreted carefully considering that a substantial proportion of peripheral vestibulopathy shows a positive HINTS sign.

Imbalance and dizziness caused by unilateral vestibular schwannomas correlate with vestibulo-ocular reflex precision and bias

Imbalance and dizziness are disabling symptoms for many patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS) but symptom severity typically does not correlate with the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) amplitude-based metrics used to assess peripheral vestibular damage. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that imbalance and dizziness in patients with VS relate to VOR metrics that are not based on response amplitude. Twenty-four patients with unilateral, sporadic VS tumors were studied, and objective (balance) and subjective (dizziness) vestibular dysfunction was quantified. The VOR was tested using two yaw-axis motion stimuli, low-frequency en-bloc sinusoidal, and high-frequency head-on-body impulsive rotations. Imbalance correlated with VOR precision (the inverse of the trial-to-trial variability) and with low-frequency VOR dynamics (quantified with the time constant), and these two metrics were also strongly correlated. Dizziness correlated with the VOR bias caused by an imbalance in static central vestibular tone, but not with dynamic VOR metrics. VOR accuracy (mean response amplitude relative to the ideal response) was not correlated with the severity of imbalance or dizziness or with measures of VOR precision or time constant. Imbalance in patients with VS, therefore, scales with VOR precision and time constant, both of which appear to reflect the central vestibular signal-to-noise ratio, but not with VOR slow-phase accuracy, which is based on the magnitude of the central vestibular signals. Dizziness was related to the presence of a static central tone imbalance but not to any VOR metrics, suggesting that abnormal perception in VS may be affected by factors that are not captured by yaw-axis VOR measurements.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The severity of symptoms associated with unilateral vestibular schwannomas (VS) is poorly correlated with standard yaw-axis vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) metrics that are based on response amplitude. In this study, we show that the balance and perceptual dysfunction experienced by patients with VS scales with VOR metrics that capture information about the central signal-to-noise ratio (balance) and central static tone (dizziness), but are not correlated with the VOR gain, which reflects central signal amplitude.

The prevalence of isolated otolith dysfunction in a local tertiary hospital

OBJECTIVE

Patients with dizziness may present with symptoms of tilting, swaying, rocking, floating or with disequilibrium. This may be suggestive of an isolated otolithic dysfunction yet, there is little emphasis on this emerging clinical entity. To characterize and describe the prevalence of isolated otolith dysfunction in a local tertiary hospital and correlate them with clinical diagnosis.

METHODOLOGY

Retrospective medical chart review of patients who presented with dizziness to the specialist outpatient Otolaryngology clinic, who required vestibular laboratory investigation.

RESULTS

Of the 206 patients, more than half of them (52.4%) fulfilled the criteria for either probable or definite isolated otolith dysfunction. When there are clinical symptoms of otolith dysfunction reported, there is a 1.62 odds of a remarkable laboratory otolith finding. The most common clinical finding was "no clear diagnosis" (65.5%) followed by Vestibular Migraine (13.6%).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of isolated otolith dysfunction is quite high. Laboratory tests of otolith function should be performed more routinely. This can be done in a sequential way to optimize cost effectiveness in countries with no insurance reimbursement. Prospective cohort studies on isolated otolith dysfunction, will lay the groundwork for achieving diagnostic consensus and formulating rehabilitation plans to aid this group of patients.

Video Head Impulse Test in Darkness, Without Visual Fixation: A Study on Healthy Subjects

OBJECTIVE

The head impulse test (HIT) is triggered by the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR), complemented by the optokinetic and pursuit systems. This study aimed to evaluate the possibility of individualizing the VOR contribution to the HIT.

DESIGN

Thirty-six healthy individuals (19 males, 17 females; age 21-64 years, mean 39 years) underwent horizontal video HIT (vHIT). This was first conducted in darkness, without visual fixation, and then visually tracked.

RESULTS

Seventy percent of the impulses delivered ocular responses opposite to the direction of the head, matching its velocity to a point where quick anticompensatory eye movements (SQEM) stopped the response (SQEM mean latency 58.21 ms, interquartile range 50-67 ms). Of these, 75% recaptured the head velocity after culmination. Thirty percent of the responses completed a bell-shaped curve. The completed bell-shaped curve gains and instantaneous gains (at 40, 60, and 80 ms) before SQEM were equivalent for both paradigms. Females completed more bell-shaped traces (42%) than males (15%); p = 0.01. The SQEM latency was longer (62.81 versus 55.71 ms, p < 0.01), and the time to recapture the bell-shaped curve was shorter (77.51 versus 92.52 ms, p < 0.01) in females than in males. The gains were comparable between sexes in both paradigms.

CONCLUSIONS

The VOR effect can be localized in the first 70 ms of the vHIT response. In addition, other influences may take place in estimating the vHIT responses. The study of these influences might provide useful information that can be applied to patient management.

The Effect of Different Head Movement Paradigms on Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Gain and Saccadic Eye Responses in the Suppression Head Impulse Test in Healthy Adult Volunteers

Objective: This study aimed to identify differences in vestibulo-ocular reflex gain (VOR gain) and saccadic response in the suppression head impulse paradigm (SHIMP) between predictable and less predictable head movements, in a group of healthy subjects. It was hypothesized that higher prediction could lead to a lower VOR gain, a shorter saccadic latency, and higher grouping of saccades. Methods: Sixty-two healthy subjects were tested using the video head impulse test and SHIMPs in four conditions: active and passive head movements for both inward and outward directions. VOR gain, latency of the first saccade, and the level of saccade grouping (PR-score) were compared among conditions. Inward and active head movements were considered to be more predictable than outward and passive head movements. Results: After validation, results of 57 tested subjects were analyzed. Mean VOR gain was significantly lower for inward passive compared with outward passive head impulses (p < 0.001), and it was higher for active compared with passive head impulses (both inward and outward) (p ≤ 0.024). Mean latency of the first saccade was significantly shorter for inward active compared with inward passive (p ≤ 0.001) and for inward passive compared with outward passive head impulses (p = 0.012). Mean PR-score was only significantly higher in active outward than in active inward head impulses (p = 0.004). Conclusion: For SHIMP, a higher predictability in head movements lowered gain only in passive impulses and shortened latencies of compensatory saccades overall. For active impulses, gain calculation was affected by short-latency compensatory saccades, hindering reliable comparison with gains of passive impulses. Predictability did not substantially influence grouping of compensatory saccades.

vHIT Testing of Vertical Semicircular Canals With Goggles Yield Different Results Depending on Which Canal Plane Being Tested

Objective: The use of goggles to assess vertical semicircular canal function has become a standard method in vestibular testing, both in clinic and in research, but there are different methods and apparatus in use. The aim of this study was to determine what the cause of the systematic differences is between gain values in testing of the vertical semicircular canals with two different video head impulse test (vHIT) equipment in subjects with normal vestibular function. Study Design: Retrospective analysis of gain values on patients with clinically deemed normal vestibular function (absence of a corrective eye saccade), tested with either Interacoustics or Otometrics system. Prospective testing of subjects with normal vestibular function with the camera records the eye movements of both eyes. Finally, 3D sensors were placed on different positions on the goggles measuring the actual vertical movement in the different semicircular planes. Results: In the clinical cohorts, the gain depended on which side and semicircular canal was tested (p < 0.001). In the prospective design, the combination between the stimulated side, semicircular canal, and position of the recording device (right/left eye) highly influenced the derived gain (p < 0.001). The different parts of the goggles also moved differently in a vertical direction during vertical semicircular canal testing. Conclusion: The gain values when testing the function of the vertical semicircular canals seem to depend upon which eye is recorded and which semicircular plane is tested and suggests caution when interpreting and comparing results when different systems are used both clinically as well as in research. The results also imply that further research and development are needed to obtain accurate vertical semicircular canal testing, in regard to both methodology and equipment design.

Is regression gain or instantaneous gain the most reliable and reproducible gain value when performing video head impulse testing of the lateral semicircular canals?

BACKGROUND

Several different video Head Impulse Test (vHIT) systems exist. The function of each individual semicircular canal (SCC) may be determined by performing this test. All vHIT systems provide information about the function of the vestibular ocular reflex by means of two modalities: SACCADES and GAIN. However, different gain calculation methods exist.

OBJECTIVE

Primary endpoint:•Is instantaneous gain or regression gain the most reproducible and reliable gain value when performing vHIT with testing of the lateral SCCs?Secondary endpoints:•Comparison of each of the instantaneous gain values at 40, 60, and 80ms with the regression gain.•Examination of any intra- and inter examiner variability.•Mean instantaneous gain values, and at different velocities, compared with regression gain values of the lateral SCCs.

METHODS

60 subjects between 18-65 years were included. All patients filled out the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) questionnaire and underwent four separate vHIT tests, two by an experienced neurotologist and two by an inexperienced examiner.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

240 datasets were obtained, displaying both regression and instantaneous gain values. Regression gain was more reproducible than instantaneous gain. The experienced examiner provided the most reproducible results.When comparing instantaneous gain, we found the gain at 40 ms to be the least reproducible. There was no significant difference between 60 ms and 80 ms.For both examiners no significant intra examiner variability was found.

Diagnosing vestibular hypofunction: an update

Unilateral or bilateral vestibular hypofunction presents most commonly with symptoms of dizziness or postural imbalance and affects a large population. However, it is often missed because no quantitative testing of vestibular function is performed, or misdiagnosed due to a lack of standardization of vestibular testing. Therefore, this article reviews the current status of the most frequently used vestibular tests for canal and otolith function. This information can also be used to reach a consensus about the systematic diagnosis of vestibular hypofunction.

Assessment of the effects of menopause on semicircular canal using the video head impulse test

This cross-sectional study included early menopausal and late menopausal women aged between 40 and 60 years to evaluate the effects of menopause on semicircular canal function. A video head impulse test (vHIT) was performed for all subjects. Vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) mean gains of each semicircular canal and gain asymmetry were compared between groups. Of the 87 subjects, 37(42.5%) were reproductive age 28(32.5%) were early menopausal and 22(25.3%) were late menopausal patients. VOR gain of semicircular canals or gain asymmetry values did not differ between groups. In postmenopausal women, presence of vasomotor symptoms was associated with higher gain asymmetry of the left anterior-right posterior (LARP) plane (p = .01), and presence of balance problems was associated with lower right anterior (RA) VOR gain (p = .01). In conclusion semicircular canal function in postmenopausal women was similar to that in women of reproductive age.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? During menopause, women face potential risks such as dizziness, balance problems, falls and fractures. Postmenopausal patients were tested with dynamic posturography to measure balance before and after oestrogen treatment, and it was shown that balance problems significantly improved with oestrogen treatment. Healthy vestibular system is one of the components for sustaining normal balance.What do the results of this study add? In postmenopausal women the function of the semicircular canals is normal and the balance deficit in postmenopausal women may not be caused by the vestibular system. In this study changes within normal limits were observed in vestibular system of postmenopausal women.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Reported balance deficits might have been due to central origin. Further research to differentiate origin of balance deficits are needed. Specific research on symptomatic postmenopausal patients would reveal more information.

VOR gain calculation methods in video head impulse recordings

BACKGROUND: International consensus on best practices for calculating and reporting vestibular function is lacking. Quantitative vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain using a video head impulse test (HIT) device can be calculated by various methods. OBJECTIVE: To compare different gain calculation methods and to analyze interactions between artifacts and calculation methods. METHODS: We analyzed 1300 horizontal HIT traces from 26 patients with acute vestibular syndrome and calculated the ratio between eye and head velocity at specific time points (40 ms, 60 ms) after HIT onset (‘velocity gain’), ratio of velocity slopes (‘regression gain’), and ratio of area under the curves after de-saccading (‘position gain’). RESULTS: There was no mean difference between gain at 60 ms and position gain, both showing a significant correlation (r2 = 0.77, p < 0.001) for artifact-free recordings. All artifacts reduced high, normal-range gains modestly (range –0.06 to –0.11). The impact on abnormal, low gains was variable (depending on the artifact type) compared to artifact-free recordings. CONCLUSIONS: There is no clear superiority of a single gain calculation method for video HIT testing. Artifacts cause small but significant reductions of measured VOR gains in HITs with higher, normal-range gains, regardless of calculation method. Artifacts in abnormal HITs with low gain increased measurement noise. A larger number of HITs should be performed to confirm abnormal results, regardless of calculation method.

Impulse Classification Network for Video Head Impulse Test

The vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) is a dynamic system of the human brain that helps to maintain balance and to stabilize vision during head movement. The video head impulse test (vHIT) is a clinical test that uses lightweight, high-speed video goggles to examine the VOR function by calculating the ratio of eye-movement to head-movement velocities. The main problem with a patient's vHIT is that data coming from the goggles may have artifacts and other noise. This paper proposes an impulse classification network (ICN) using a one-dimensional convolutional neural network that can detect noisy data and classify human VOR impulses. Our ICN found actual classes of a patient's impulses with 95% accuracy.Clinical Relevance-ICN is a high-performance classification method that works on a patient's vHIT impulse data by identifying abnormalities and artifacts. This method is an advanced clinical decision support system that can help doctors quickly make decisions.

Comparison of three video head impulse test systems for the diagnosis of bilateral vestibulopathy

INTRODUCTION

A horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex gain (VOR gain) of < 0.6, measured by the video head impulse test (VHIT), is one of the diagnostic criteria for bilateral vestibulopathy (BV) according to the Báràny Society. Several VHIT systems are commercially available, each with different techniques of tracking head and eye movements and different methods of gain calculation. This study compared three different VHIT systems in patients diagnosed with BV.

METHODS

This study comprised 46 BV patients (diagnosed according to the Báràny criteria), tested with three commercial VHIT systems (Interacoustics, Otometrics and Synapsys) in random order. Main outcome parameter was VOR gain as calculated by the system, and the agreement on BV diagnosis (VOR gain < 0.6) between the VHIT systems. Peak head velocities, the order effect and covert saccades were analysed separately, to determine whether these parameters could have influenced differences in outcome between VHIT systems.

RESULTS

VOR gain in the Synapsys system differed significantly from VOR gain in the other two systems [F(1.256, 33.916) = 35.681, p < 0.000]. The VHIT systems agreed in 83% of the patients on the BV diagnosis. Peak head velocities, the order effect and covert saccades were not likely to have influenced the above mentioned results.

CONCLUSION

To conclude, using different VHIT systems in the same BV patient can lead to clinically significant differences in VOR gain, when using a cut-off value of 0.6. This might hinder proper diagnosis of BV patients. It would, therefore, be preferred that VHIT systems are standardised regarding eye and head tracking methods, and VOR gain calculation algorithms. Until then, it is advised to not only take the VOR gain in consideration when assessing a VHIT trial, but also look at the raw traces and the compensatory saccades.

Comparison of test results from two separate video head impulse test systems in a cohort of patients diagnosed with a unilateral vestibular schwannoma

PURPOSE

Video head impulse testing (vHIT) is a relatively new technology enabling evaluation of vestibular function. The aim of this study was to compare the test results from two separate vHIT systems in a group of patients diagnosed with a unilateral vestibular schwannoma (VS) with regards to sensitivity, specificity and inter-examiner differences.

METHODS

Forty-two patients were examined with two separate vHIT systems: EyeSeeCam^® (system A) and ICS Impulse^® (system B), by one of two examiners. All six semicircular canals (SCCs) were tested under standardized conditions, and strict criteria were set up for post-test interpretation.

RESULTS

With the majority of test parameters, the two test systems were in agreement. Vestibular deficits were found in 40.5% (system A) to 45% (system B) of patients with a VS on the tested side; corresponding to a positive predictive value (PPV) of 86.4% (system B) to 94.4% (system A). The specificity was 97.6% for system A and 92.9% for system B. An overall agreement between the two vHIT systems measured as kappa was computed to be 0.61. There were no significant inter-examiner differences. When testing the vertical SCCs, a tendency of too high mean gain values was seen with system A but not with system B.

CONCLUSION

In patients with unilateral VS, vHIT is a test with moderate sensitivity and high specificity in regard to identification of a vestibular deficit. There were no significant differences in test results between the two vHIT systems.

Estimating loss of canal function in the video head impulse test (vHIT)

BACKGROUND:

The vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain is the primary parameter for quantifying and interpreting the video head impulse test (vHIT). Yet, the relationship between the VOR gain and the extent of canal function is not clear.

OBJECTIVE:

The goal of this paper was to determine if the loss of canal function in vHIT can be estimated from the VOR gain.

METHODS:

A model of the VOR was developed that included linear components for the cupula and the velocity storage mechanism as well as nonlinear components for the vestibular nerve and the vestibular nuclei. Multiple simulations were carried out as the level of function for the right and left VOR pathways was varied systematically over their entire range.

RESULTS:

Simulation results were similar to the typical findings in normal individuals as well as in patients with unilateral and bilateral loss of canal function. Based on these simulations, a relationship between the canal function and the VOR gains was established. This relationship was surprisingly independent of most model parameters.

CONCLUSIONS:

The sum of right and left VOR gains (or 2 times the mean of VOR gains) at a given head velocity is an estimate of the total function of the involved canals. This simple formula can estimate the loss of canal function in purely unilateral lesions. For bilateral lesions, the same formula can estimate the total loss of bilateral function but contributions from individual canals cannot be determined without additional information.

Residual vestibular function after vestibular schwannoma surgery

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess vestibular function in 39 patients who underwent neurectomy for vestibular schwannoma.

METHOD

Semicircular canal reactivity was measured by video head-impulse test using high-frequency passive head acceleration. Response gain was calculated as a ratio between the areas under the eye-velocity curve and the head-velocity curve.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Student t-test was used for to compare quantitative variables. ANOVA was used to test inter-group differences in categoric variables.

RESULTS

In all cases, surgery-side gain on head impulse test was low, with increased gain asymmetry. A subgroup of 7 patients (18%) showed relatively high gain in vestibulo-ocular reflex on the surgery side. Caloric reaction was absent in all cases. These findings indicate that residual vestibular function can be conserved following vestibular schwannoma extirpation.

CONCLUSION

Cases with moderate vestibulo-ocular reflex gain were a subgroup with partial conservation of vestibular nerve fibers. Whether this is a predictor of better functional prognosis remains to be elucidated. Higher gain correlated with less extensive surgery and sparing of the inferior vestibular nerve. Low gain correlated with complete vestibular neurectomy. This information may guide rehabilitation strategy following surgery.

Video-head impulse test results in patients with Menière's disease related to duration and stage of disease

BACKGROUND:

The video-head impulse test employs the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) to assess vestibular function. To this day, no consensus has been reached among scientists in terms of whether or not vHIT results change in MD patients as the disease progresses.

OBJECTIVE:

To assess whether the vHIT is more often abnormal in later stages of MD compared to earlier stages.

METHODS:

We retrospectively analyzed patients with ‘definite’ MD who had undergone a vHIT and caloric test between 2012 and 2015. Patients were evaluated based on duration of disease in years (≤1, >1≤5, >5≤10, >10) and stage of disease (stage I and II versus III and IV). For the vHIT, an abnormal vestibulo-ocular reflex was defined as a gain cut-off value of≤0.8 and presence of correction saccades including subanalyses using a cut-off value of≤0.9.

RESULTS:

In 89 definite MD patients (42 (47%) male, mean age 55±5 (SD)), data on both the caloric test and the vHIT were available. The risk of an abnormal vHIT was 25% in patients with a duration of disease over 10 years compared to 22% in the patients with a disease duration of 10 years or less (risk difference 3%, 95% CI:– 28% to 35%), p = 0.82). The risk for an abnormal vHIT in the Stage I and Stage II was 17% compared to 26% in Stage III and IV (risk difference 9%, 95% CI:– 30% to 11%). When using a cut-off value of 0.9 we also did not demonstrate a relationship between the duration of disease and the proportion of abnormal vHIT test results.

CONCLUSIONS:

There is no relationship between the proportion of abnormal vHIT test results in patients with MD in either duration or stage of disease.

Comparison of Video Head Impulse Test (vHIT) Gains Between Two Commercially Available Devices and by Different Gain Analytical Methods

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether video head impulse test (vHIT) gains are dependent on the measuring device and method of analysis.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study.

METHODS

vHIT was performed in 25 healthy subjects using two devices simultaneously. vHIT gains were compared between these instruments and using five different methods of comparing position and velocity gains during head movement intervals.

RESULTS

The two devices produced different vHIT gain results with the same method of analysis. There were also significant differences in the vHIT gains measured using different analytical methods. The gain analytic method that compares the areas under the velocity curve (AUC) of the head and eye movements during head movements showed lower vHIT gains than a method that compared the peak velocities of the head and eye movements. The former method produced the vHIT gain with the smallest standard deviation among the five procedures tested in this study.

CONCLUSION

vHIT gains differ in normal subjects depending on the device and method of analysis used, suggesting that it is advisable for each device to have its own normal values. Gain calculations that compare the AUC of the head and eye movements during the head movements show the smallest variance.

Functional Testing of Vestibulo-Spinal Contributions to Balance Control: Insights From Tracking Improvement Following Acute Bilateral Peripheral Vestibular Loss

Background: A battery of stance and gait tasks can be used to quantify functional deficits and track improvement in balance control following peripheral vestibular loss. An improvement could be due to at least 3 processes: partial peripheral recovery of sensory responses eliciting canal or otolith driven vestibular reflexes; central compensation of vestibular reflex gains, including substitution of intact otolith responses for pathological canal responses; or sensory substitution of visual and proprioceptive inputs for vestibular contributions to balance control. Results: We describe the presumed action of all 3 processes observed for a case of sudden incapacitating acute bilateral peripheral loss probably due to vestibular neuritis. Otolith responses were largely unaffected. However, pathological decreases in all canal-driven vestibular ocular reflex (VOR) gains were observed. After 3 months of vestibular rehabilitation, balance control was normal but VOR gains remained low. Conclusions: This case illustrates the difficulty in predicting balance control improvements from tests of the 10 vestibular end organs and emphasizes the need to test balance control function directly in order to determine if balance control has improved and is normal again despite remaining vestibular sensory deficits. This case also illustrates that the presence of residual otolithic function may be crucial for balance control improvement in cases of bilateral vestibular hypofunction.

Proposal on the Diagnostic Criteria of Definite Isolated Otolith Dysfunction

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Dizzy patients with abnormal otolith function tests, despite a normal caloric response, are defined as having specific (isolated) otolith organ dysfunction. This study was performed to compare the differences in clinical presentation between isolated otolith dysfunction (iOD) patients with lab- and Sx-based iOD group and lab-based iOD symptoms.

SUBJECT AND METHODS

The medical records of 23 iOD patients with normal caloric response but abnormal cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP), ocular VEMP, or subjective visual vertical were reviewed. Non-spinning vertigo was considered as otolith-related symptoms. The patients' age, onset of dizziness, Numeric Rating Scale on the severity of dizziness, and concomitant vestibular disorders were analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients in the lab-based iOD group were significantly older than those in the lab- and Sx-based iOD group. Known vestibular disorders were significantly more common in the lab-based iOD group (83.3%) compared to the lab- and Sx-based iOD group (18.2%). Despite the normal caloric response, catch-up saccade was found in the video head impulse test in more than half (54.5%) of the lab-based iOD group patients. There was no catch-up saccade in the lab- and Sx-based iOD group. There were no significant differences in gender ratio, frequency of dizziness attacks, and duration of illness.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose new definitions of definite iOD (lab- and Sx-based iOD) and probable iOD (lab- or Sx-based iOD). These new definitions may help researchers to identify patients who are more likely to have true iOD, and facilitate comparisons of results between different studies.

Suppression head impulse paradigm in healthy adolescents - A novel variant of the head impulse test

BACKGROUND

Suppression Head Impulse Paradigm (SHIMP), a novel variant of the Head Impulse Test has been introduced. At the same time, the Head Impulse Test was renamed to the Head Impulse Paradigm (HIMP). Contrary to HIMP saccades, SHIMP saccades are a sign of vestibular function.

OBJECTIVE

1) To compare SHIMP and HIMP feasibility, vestibular-ocular reflex (VOR) gain value and the saccadic pattern in healthy adolescents. 2) To compare SHIMP and HIMP feasibility in the hands of an experienced and an inexperienced HIMP examiner.

METHOD

A total of 29 adolescents from Skåde Municipal School, Denmark were tested with HIMP and then with SHIMP.

RESULTS

Neither covert nor overt saccades were observed in the HIMP, whereas SHIMP saccades were observed in all SHIMP reports. SHIMP gain values were statistically lower than HIMP gain values. A statistically significant difference was observed between the two examiners' right SHIMP gain values, but not for the left SHIMP gain values or the HIMP gain values.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that HIMP and SHIMP tests are feasible in healthy adolescents for experienced as well as inexperienced examiners. However, one must be aware of potential pitfalls in the execution and interpretation of both tests. This is a well-known fact for the HIMP test, but additional considerations are needed to obtain reliable results from the SHIMP test.

The Effect of Peripheral Vestibular Recovery on Improvements in Vestibulo-ocular Reflexes and Balance Control After Acute Unilateral Peripheral Vestibular Loss

BACKGROUND

Patients with an acute unilateral peripheral vestibular deficit (aUPVD), presumed to be caused by vestibular neuritis, show asymmetrical vestibular ocular reflexes (VORs) that improve over time. Questions arise regarding how much of the VOR improvement is due to peripheral recovery or central compensation, and whether differences in peripheral recovery influence balance control outcomes.

METHODS

Thirty patients were examined at aUPVD onset and 3, 6, and 13 weeks later with four different VOR tests: caloric tests; rotating (ROT) chair tests performed in yaw with angular accelerations of 5 and 20 degrees/s; and video head impulse tests (vHIT) in the yaw plane. ROT and vHIT responses and balance control of 11 patients who had a caloric canal paresis (CP) more than 90% at aUPVD onset and no CP recovery (no-CPR) at 13 weeks in caloric tests were compared with those of 19 patients with CP recovery (CPR) to less than 30%, on average. Balance control was measured with a gyroscope system (SwayStar) recording trunk sway during stance and gait tasks.

RESULTS

ROT and vHIT asymmetries of no-CPR and CPR patients reduced over time. The reduction was less at 13 weeks (36.2% vs. 83.5% on average) for the no-CPR patients. The no-CPR group asymmetries at 13 weeks were greater than those of CPR patients who had normal asymmetries. The greater asymmetries were caused by weaker deficit side responses which remained deficient in no-CPR patients at 13 weeks. Contra-deficit side vHIT and ROT responses remained normal. For all balance tests, sway was slightly greater for no-CPR compared with CPR patients at aUPVD onset and 3 weeks later. At 13 weeks, only sway during walking eyes closed was greater for the no-CPR group. A combination of 5 degrees/s ROT and balance tests could predict at onset (90% accuracy) which patients would have no-CPR at 13 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that for ROT and vHIT tests, central compensation is observed in CPR and no-CPR patients. It acts primarily by increasing deficit side responses. Central compensation provides approximately 60% of the VOR improvement for CPR patients. The rest of the improvement is due to peripheral recovery which appears necessary to reduce VOR asymmetry to normal at 13 weeks on average. Balance control improvement is more rapid than that of the VOR and marginally affected by the lack of peripheral recovery. Both VOR and balance control measures at onset provide indicators of future peripheral recovery. For these reasons VOR and balance control needs to be tested at aUPVD onset and at 13 weeks.

The Video Head Impulse Test and the Influence of Daily Use of Spectacles to Correct a Refractive Error

Objective

To determine the influence of daily use of spectacles to correct a refractive error, on the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain measured with the video head impulse test (vHIT).

Study design

This prospective study enrolled subjects between 18 and 80 years old with and without a refractive error. Subjects were classified into three groups: (1) contact lenses, (2) spectacles, and (3) control group without visual impairment. Exclusion criteria comprised ophthalmic pathology, history of vestibular disorders, and alternated use of spectacles and contact lenses in daily life. Corrective spectacles were removed seconds before testing. One examiner performed all vHIT’s under standardized circumstances using the EyeSeeCam system. This system calculated the horizontal VOR gain for rightward and leftward head rotations separately.

Results

No statistically significant difference was found in VOR gain between the control group (n = 16), spectacles group (n = 48), and contact lenses group (n = 15) (p = 0.111). Both the spectacles group and contact lenses group showed no statistically significant correlation between VOR gain and amount of refractive error, for rightwards (p = 0.071) and leftwards (p = 0.716) head rotations. There was no statistical significant difference in VOR gain between testing monocularly or binocularly (p = 0.132) and between testing with or without wearing contact lenses (p = 0.800).

Conclusion

In this study, VOR gain was not influenced by wearing corrective spectacles or contact lenses on a daily basis. Based on this study, no corrective measures are necessary when performing the vHIT on subjects with a refractive error, regardless of the way of correction.

The Video Head Impulse Test

In 1988, we introduced impulsive testing of semicircular canal (SCC) function measured with scleral search coils and showed that it could accurately and reliably detect impaired function even of a single lateral canal. Later we showed that it was also possible to test individual vertical canal function in peripheral and also in central vestibular disorders and proposed a physiological mechanism for why this might be so. For the next 20 years, between 1988 and 2008, impulsive testing of individual SCC function could only be accurately done by a few aficionados with the time and money to support scleral search-coil systems—an expensive, complicated and cumbersome, semi-invasive technique that never made the transition from the research lab to the dizzy clinic. Then, in 2009 and 2013, we introduced a video method of testing function of each of the six canals individually. Since 2009, the method has been taken up by most dizzy clinics around the world, with now close to 100 refereed articles in PubMed. In many dizzy clinics around the world, video Head Impulse Testing has supplanted caloric testing as the initial and in some cases the final test of choice in patients with suspected vestibular disorders. Here, we consider seven current, interesting, and controversial aspects of video Head Impulse Testing: (1) introduction to the test; (2) the progress from the head impulse protocol (HIMPs) to the new variant—suppression head impulse protocol (SHIMPs); (3) the physiological basis for head impulse testing; (4) practical aspects and potential pitfalls of video head impulse testing; (5) problems of vestibulo-ocular reflex gain calculations; (6) head impulse testing in central vestibular disorders; and (7) to stay right up-to-date—new clinical disease patterns emerging from video head impulse testing. With thanks and appreciation we dedicate this article to our friend, colleague, and mentor, Dr Bernard Cohen of Mount Sinai Medical School, New York, who since his first article 55 years ago on compensatory eye movements induced by vertical SCC stimulation has become one of the giants of the vestibular world.