The Therapeutic Challenge of Disseminated Bone Marrow Metastasis From HR-Positive HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Metronomic cyclophosphamide for bone marrow carcinomatosis in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

PURPOSE

In some patients with prostate cancer, bone marrow carcinomatosis develops later in the course of the disease, which has a poor prognosis. These are often heavily pretreated patients in the castration-resistant situation for whom there are no other therapeutic options, because either all available systemic therapies have already been used or the use of one is not possible due to the cytopenias associated with bone marrow carcinomatosis. In our literature search, there are no data on this treatment in the setting available, especially no clinical trial or even randomized data. This case series is to determine the clinical efficacy of metronomic cyclophosphamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone marrow carcinomatosis, particularly with regard to stabilization of the blood count (thrombocytopenias) and thus the possibility of further (more toxic) lines of therapy.

METHODS

Retrospective unicenter analysis was performed on eleven patients between 54 and 84 years of age on metronomic cyclophosphamide for bone marrow carcinomatosis in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated at a Swiss cancer center between 2014 and 2023.

RESULTS

Eleven patients received metronomic cyclophosphamide for varying periods of time; the majority had severe cytopenias (especially thrombocytopenias). Partially hematologic stabilization was achieved with administration of further systemic therapies.

CONCLUSION

Our case series demonstrates that the use of metronomic cyclophosphamide allows hematologic stabilization for months, benefiting patients who had already received all available therapies for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Alternatively, it may act as bridging therapy to allow consecutive administration of more toxic therapies with proven survival benefit.

Acquired hyperfibrinolysis as the presenting sign of metastatic breast cancer: A case report

Fibrinolysis is a bleeding disorder characterized by hypofibrinogenemia caused by abnormal activation of fibrinolytic system function. Patients with cancer are prone to hypercoagulable and should be vigilant for the risk of venous thrombosis. However, patients with tumors in which bleeding is the first manifestation are relatively rare. The present study reports the case of a 52-year-old woman with metastatic breast cancer with acquired hyperfibrinolysis as the first manifestation. Hyperfibrinolysis is an important sign and manifestation of disease progression. In this case, fibrinogen was used as a sensitive biomarker of tumor burden to specifically predict the efficacy of the antitumor therapy. Effective antitumor therapy can improve the hyperfibrinolysis of patients, and so the fibrinogen levels gradually increased. In conclusion, the present case showed acquired hyperfibrinolysis with bleeding symptoms, which is an uncommon paraneoplastic phenomenon in breast cancer, especially when combined with bone marrow metastasis, as in the present case. Timely diagnosis and treatment of the primary disease is the fundamental way to improve hyperfibrinolysis. As an effective biomarker, fibrinogen level predicts the changes in a patient's illness and guides the clinical diagnosis and treatment process.

Severe thrombocytopenia and anemia as an initial presentation of breast cancer: A case report

Breast cancer patients with bone marrow metastasis (BMM) having profound thrombocytopenia and anemia are rare and there is no definitive treatment guideline. We present a case of successful initial treatment with anti-disseminated intravascular coagulation therapy and endocrine therapy, followed by chemotherapy to avoid deterioration of severe thrombocytopenia and anemia.

Symptomatic bone marrow metastases in breast cancer: A retrospective cohort study

Objective

Breast cancer symptomatic bone marrow metastasis (BMM) is rare and has a poor prognosis. Chemotherapy is usually the primary treatment, but it has limited efficacy, resulting in dose reduction and a decrease in quality of life due to the adverse effects of the agent. Other than chemotherapy, there are no other treatment studies for BMM. This study aimed to explore the clinicopathological characteristics of BMM patients with breast cancer, the prognosis using different treatment modalities, and the risk factors that affect the prognosis.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with breast cancer BMM from January 2018 to January 2022 in the Cancer Center of the First Hospital of Jilin University. The analysis focused on the characteristics of the patients, the treatment regimen, and the prognosis.

Results

Of 733 patients with advanced breast cancer, 33 patients were identified with BMM. All patients showed a hemoglobin decrease, and 25 (75.75%) presented with a fever of unknown origin. As for the metastasis breast cancer subtype, 25 (75.75%) were hormone receptor (HR) positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative, three (9.09%) had HER2 overexpression, and five (15.15%) were triple negative. The BMM patients had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 7 months (1-21 months) and a median overall survival (OS) of 18 months (2-108 months). Among 25 HR⁺/HER2^- BMM patients treated with different modalities, the median OS of the endocrine therapy (ET) group was 23 months, compared with 5 months in the chemotherapy group. Cox proportional hazards models suggested that higher Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores and old age were associated with shorter survival.

Conclusion

When breast cancer patients present with anemia and fever of unknown origin, BMM should be considered. For HR⁺/HER2^- patients with good physical status and can receive active treatment, CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with ET can be used to control disease progression, improve quality of life, and prolong survival.

Fulvestrant May Falsely Increase 17β-Estradiol Levels in Immunoassays: A Case Report of a 57-Year-Old Postmenopausal Patient With Recurrent Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer

The prognosis for female patients with locoregionally recurrent breast cancer has improved with the concurrent local and systemic treatment under multiple disciplinary teams. Radiotherapy is a valuable local treatment measure for unresectable locoregional recurrent breast cancer; however, reirradiation in previously irradiated areas is still a matter of debate. Antihormonal therapy achieves an overall survival benefit for most of these patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer in both adjuvant and metastatic settings. Fulvestrant is an ER antagonist and selective ER downregulator widely used in antihormonal therapy, especially in recurrent postmenopausal ER+ breast cancers. However, fulvestrant closely resembles 17β-estradiol in its molecular structure which may result in false increases in serum 17β-estradiol levels in commercially available immunoassays leading to incorrect medical decisions. Herein, we report a case of a 57-year-old postmenopausal patient with recurrent ER+ breast cancer treated with concurrent fulvestrant and reirradiation. There was a good clinical response, and the combination treatment was well tolerable. During the quarterly follow-up, we monitored a gradual increase of the serum 17β-estradiol level in immunoassays, unexpectedly, because the patient underwent natural menopause 8 years ago. To rule out the suspected fulvestrant cross-reactivity with 17β-estradiol in immunoassay, the patient’s serum 17β-estradiol levels were subsequently tested with the more sensitive and specific liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) method, which confirmed 17β-estradiol levels at the postmenopausal level. Concomitant fulvestrant with reirradiation seems to be a safe and effective therapy for locoregionally recurrent ER+ breast cancer. However, a falsely increased 17β-estradiol may result from cross-reactivity between 17β-estradiol and its molecular analog compounds, for example, fulvestrant. Therefore, it is important for the clinicians with the knowledge of this interaction to prevent unnecessary erroneous interpretation of results and avoid wrong medical decisions.