1
|
Patel S, Schupper AJ, Ezzat B, Asfaw Z, Yuk FJ, Stein A, Choudhri TF. The Top 100 Cited Articles on Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Bibliometric Analysis. Clin Spine Surg 2024:01933606-990000000-00312. [PMID: 38679817 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Bibliometric analysis. OBJECTIVE Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has emerged as an effective surgical intervention for degenerative cervical disc disease with potential advantages over traditional cervical fusion. This bibliometric analysis aimed to assess the current state of research on CDA by analyzing the relevant literature using bibliometric indicators. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Web of Science Core Collection. METHODS A comprehensive search was conducted using the Web of Science database, for articles related to CDA published in the last 19 years. The top 100 articles were reviewed using bibliometric analysis. Publication trends, citation patterns, authorship, and collaboration networks were analyzed using VOSviewer and the Bibliometrix package in RStudio. RESULTS The results revealed a significant increase in the number of publications related to CDA over the past 2 decades, with most of the articles being published in orthopedic and spine surgery journals. The most frequently cited articles were related to clinical outcomes, complications, and biomechanical studies of CDA. Co-authorship analysis identified influential authors and collaborative networks, highlighting the multidisciplinary nature of CDA research involving neurosurgeons, orthopedic surgeons, and engineers. Overall, this bibliometric analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of research on CDA, highlighting the key research themes, influential authors, and collaborative networks in the field. CONCLUSION These findings can serve as a guide for researchers, clinicians, and policymakers to identify knowledge gaps, research trends, and future directions in the field of CDA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shrey Patel
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Alexander J Schupper
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Bahie Ezzat
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Zerubabbel Asfaw
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Frank J Yuk
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Alan Stein
- Department of Neurosurgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY
| | - Tanvir F Choudhri
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Reidy J, Mobbs R. Australian Spine Surgeon's Perspectives on Endoscopic Spine Surgery: An In-depth Analysis. Neurospine 2023; 20:1321-1327. [PMID: 38171300 PMCID: PMC10762410 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2346912.456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) is a minimally invasive approach with reduced tissue trauma, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery times. It employs advanced endoscopic instruments and imaging technologies to address a wide range of spinal pathologies with minimal disruption to surrounding tissues. As ESS continues to evolve, this article aims to gather insights into the opinions and perspectives of the key stakeholders involved, and highlight strategies to improve implementation. METHODS A cross-sectional survey was distributed to collect data on Australian spine surgeons' perspectives of ESS. The survey questionnaire was distributed electronically to a diverse group of spine surgeons who are members of the Spine Society of Australia. RESULTS Of responders, 46.8% were already integrating ESS into practice, or had the sufficient training to commence ESS. A further 29.8% were contemplating introduction of ESS techniques, while just under one quarter of respondents (23.4%) were not interested in implementing minimally invasive techniques. Primary motivators for implementation included skill development and improved patient outcomes. Primary barriers included lack of training opportunities, length of time to develop competency and lack of current supporting evidence. CONCLUSION The study contributes to the existing body of knowledge on ESS by providing a comprehensive analysis of surgeon opinions and experiences. The results highlight the growing interest in endoscopic techniques, while recognizing the challenges that need to be addressed to make this more widely utilised and available. The findings can guide future research, training programs, clinical practice and ultimately improve health and financial outcomes to patients and the wider health system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Reidy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | - Ralph Mobbs
- Department of Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia
- Neurospine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Randwick, NSW, Australia
- NeuroSpineClinic, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jitpakdee K, Liu Y, Heo DH, Kotheeranurak V, Suvithayasiri S, Kim JS. Minimally invasive endoscopy in spine surgery: where are we now? Eur Spine J 2023; 32:2755-2768. [PMID: 36856868 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07622-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) is a minimally invasive surgical technique that offers comparable efficacy and safety with less collateral damage compared to conventional surgery. To achieve clinical success, it is imperative to stay abreast of technological advancements, modern surgical instruments and technique, and updated evidence. PURPOSES To provide a comprehensive review and updates of ESS including the nomenclature, technical evolution, bibliometric analysis of evidence, recent changes in the spine communities, the prevailing of biportal endoscopy, and the future of endoscopic spine surgery. METHODS We conducted a comprehensive review of the literature on ESS for the mentioned topics from January 1989 to November 2022. Three major electronic databases were searched, including MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase. Covidence Systematic Review was used to organize the eligible records. Two independent reviewers screened the articles for relevance. RESULTS In total, 312 articles were finally included for review. We found various use of nomenclatures in the field of ESS publication. To address this issue, we proposed the use of distinct terms to describe the biportal and uniportal techniques, as well as their specific approaches. In the realm of technical advancement, ESS has rapidly evolved from addressing disc herniation and spinal stenosis to encompassing endoscopic fusion, along with technological innovations such as navigation, robotics, and augmented reality. According to bibliometric analysis, China, South Korea, and the USA have accounted for almost three-quarters of total publications. The studies of the biportal endoscopy are becoming increasingly popular in South Korea where the top ten most-cited articles have been published. The biportal endoscopy technique is relatively simple to adopt, as it relies on a more familiar approach, requires less expensive instruments, has a shorter learning curve, and is also well-suited for interbody fusion. The uniportal approach provided the smallest area of soft tissue dissection. While robotics and augmented reality in ESS are not widely embraced, the use of navigation in ESS is expected to become more streamlined, particularly with the emergence of recent electromagnetic-based navigation technologies. CONCLUSIONS In this paper, we provide a comprehensive overview of the evolution of ESS, as well as an updated summary of current trends in the field, including the biportal and uniportal approaches. Additionally, we summarize the nomenclature used in ESS, present a bibliometric analysis of the field, and discuss future directions for the advancement of the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khanathip Jitpakdee
- Spine Unit, Department of Orthopaedics, Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Chonburi, Thailand
- Spine Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yanting Liu
- Spine Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Dong Hwa Heo
- Endoscopic Spine Surgery Center, Neurosurgery, Champodonamu Spine Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Vit Kotheeranurak
- Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Center of Excellence in Biomechanics and Innovative Spine Surgery, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Siravich Suvithayasiri
- Spine Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
- Orthopaedic and Musculoskeletal Centre, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Jin-Sung Kim
- Spine Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu Y, Jitpakdee K, Van Isseldyk F, Kim JH, Kim YJ, Chen KT, Choi KC, Choi G, Bae J, Quillo-Olvera J, Correa C, Silva MS, Kotheeranurak V, Kim JS. Bibliometric analysis and description of research trends on transforaminal full-endoscopic approach on the spine for the last two-decades. Eur Spine J 2023:10.1007/s00586-023-07661-0. [PMID: 36973463 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07661-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The study aims to assess the current development status of transforaminal full-endoscopic spine surgery (TFES) by exploring and analyzing the published literature to obtain an overview of this field and discover the evolution and emerging topics that are underrepresented. METHODS Using Bibliometrix, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer, we analyzed the bibliometric data selected from the Web of Science Core Collection between January 2002 and November 2022. The descriptive and evaluative analyses of authors, institutes, countries, journals, keywords, and references are compiled. The quantity of research productivity was measured by the number of publications that were published. A quality indicator was thought to be the number of citations. In the bibliometric analysis of authors, areas, institutes, and references, we calculated and ranked the research impact by various metrics, such as the h-index and m-index. RESULTS A total of 628 articles were identified in the field of TFES by the 18.73% annual growth rate of research on the subject from 2002 to 2022, constituting the documents are by 1961 authors affiliated with 661 institutions in 42 countries or regions and published in 117 journals. The USA (n = 0.20) has the highest international collaboration rate, South Korea has the highest H-index value (h = 33), and China is ranked as the most productive country (n = 348). Brown univ., Tongji univ., and Wooridul Spine represented the most productive institutes ranked by the number of publications. Wooridul Spine Hospital demonstrated the highest quality of paper publication. The Pain Physician had the highest h-index (n = 18), and the most cited journal with the earliest publication year in the area of FEDS is Spine (t = 1855). CONCLUSION The bibliometric study showed a growing trend of research on transforaminal full-endoscopic spine surgery over the past 20 years. It has shown a significant increase in the number of authors, institutions, and international collaborating countries. South Korea, the United States, and China dominate the related areas. A growing body of evidence has revealed that TFES has leapfrogged from its infancy stage and gradually entered a mature development stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanting Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, 06591, South Korea
| | - Khanathip Jitpakdee
- Department of Orthopedics, Thai Red Cross Society, Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Sriracha, Thailand
| | - Facundo Van Isseldyk
- 2-Latinamerican Endoscopic Spine Surgery Society (LESSS), Hospital Privado de Rosario, Rosario, Argentina
| | - Jung Hoon Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, 06591, South Korea
| | - Young Jin Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, 06591, South Korea
| | - Kuo-Tai Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Kyung-Chul Choi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul Top Spine Hospital, Goyangsi, South Korea
| | - Gun Choi
- Department of Spine Surgery, Pohang Woori Hospital, Pohang, Republic of Korea
| | - Junseok Bae
- Department of Neurosurgery, Wooridul Spine Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Javier Quillo-Olvera
- The Brain and Spine Care, Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Group, Hospital H+, Queretaro City, Mexico
| | - Cristian Correa
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital Hernán Henríquez Aravena, University of La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
| | - Marlon Sudario Silva
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cirurgia Minimamente Invasiva E Endoscopia da Coluna, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Vit Kotheeranurak
- Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
| | - Jin-Sung Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, 06591, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|