RECIL versus Lugano for Treatment Response Assessment in FDG-Avid Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas: A Head-to-Head Comparison in 54 Patients

Comparison of Lugano Criteria Versus RECIL and PERCIST as Prognostic Factors in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the criteria of the Lugano, RECIL, and PERCIST for prognosis in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 335 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. All patients underwent baseline 18 F-FDG PET/CT. Among them, 252 and 213 patients underwent interim PET/CT (I-PET/CT) and end-of-treatment PET/CT (EoT-PET/CT), respectively. Scans were interpreted by 2 nuclear medicine physicians using Lugano, RECIL, and PERCIST. RECIL and PERCIST were compared with Lugano for predicting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

All 3 response criteria could be used to predict PFS and OS. In I-PET/CT, the concordance index of Lugano in predicting PFS and OS was higher than that of RECIL (both P = 0.043) or PERCIST ( P = 0.008 and P = 0.034, respectively). In EoT-PET/CT, the concordance index of Lugano for predicting PFS and OS was similar to RECIL and not significantly different from PERCIST ( P = 0.597 and P = 0.231, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

For I-PET/CT, using the Lugano criteria is more accurate than RECIL or PERCIST in predicting PFS and OS. However, for EoT-PET/CT, the PERCIST criteria are minimally better.

Progression-free survival, disease-free survival and other composite end points in oncology: improved reporting is needed

Composite outcome measures such as progression-free survival and disease-free survival are increasingly used as surrogate end points in oncology research, frequently serving as the primary end point of pivotal trials that form the basis for FDA and EMA approvals. Such outcome measures combine two or more distinct events (for example, tumour (re)growth, new lesions and/or death) into a single, time-to-event end point. The use of a composite end point can increase the statistical power of a clinical trial and decrease the follow-up period required to demonstrate efficacy, thus lowering costs; however, these end points have a number of limitations. Composite outcomes are often vaguely defined, with definitions that vary greatly between studies, complicating comparisons of results across trials. Altering the makeup of events included in a composite outcome can alter study conclusions, including whether treatment effects are statistically significant. Moreover, the events included in a composite outcome often vary in clinical significance, reflect distinct biological pathways and/or are affected differently by treatment. Therefore, knowing the precise breakdown of the component events is essential to accurately interpret trial results and gauge the true benefit of an intervention. In oncology clinical trials, however, such information is rarely provided. In this Perspective, we emphasize this deficiency through a review of 50 studies with progression-free survival as an outcome published in five top oncology journals, discuss the advantages and challenges of using composite end points, and highlight the need for transparent reporting of the component events.

A comparison of the prognostic performance of the Lugano 2014 and RECIL 2017 response criteria in patients with NHL from the phase III GOYA and GALLIUM trials

The Lugano 2014 criteria are the standard for response assessment in lymphoma. We compared the prognostic performance of Lugano 2014 and the more recently developed response evaluation criteria in lymphoma (RECIL 2017), which relies primarily on computed tomography and uses unidimensional measurements, in patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL) from the phase III GOYA and GALLIUM trials, respectively. Concordance between responses according to the Lugano 2014 and RECIL 2017 criteria was analyzed. Landmark analyses of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by end of treatment (EOT) and end of induction (EOI) response status according to RECIL 2017 and Lugano 2014 criteria, and prognostic value of response at EOT/EOI were also compared. Overall, 1333 patients were included from GOYA and 502 from GALLIUM. Complete response (CR) status according to RECIL 2017 criteria showed high concordance with complete metabolic response (CMR) status by Lugano 2014 criteria in both GOYA (92.5%) and GALLIUM (92.4%). EOT and EOI CR/CMR status by both criteria was highly prognostic for PFS in GOYA (RECIL 2017 [CR]: hazard ratio [HR], 0.35 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-0.46]; Lugano 2014 [CMR]: HR, 0.35 [95% CI 0.26-0.48]; both p < .0001) and GALLIUM (RECIL 2017 [CR]: HR, 0.35 [95% CI 0.23-0.53]; Lugano 2014 [CMR]: HR, 0.21 [95% CI 0.14-0.31]; both p < .0001). In conclusion, response categorization by RECIL 2017 is similar to that by Lugano 2014 criteria, with high concordance observed. Both were prognostic for PFS and OS.

Staging of lymphoma under chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: reasons for discordance among imaging response criteria

BACKGROUND

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART) prolongs survival for patients with refractory or relapsed lymphoma. Discrepancies among different response criteria for lymphoma under CART were recently shown. Our objective was to evaluate reasons for discordance among different response criteria and their relation to overall survival.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with baseline and follow-up imaging at 30 (FU1) and 90 days (FU2) after CART were included. Overall response was determined based on Lugano, Cheson, response evaluation criteria in lymphoma (RECIL) and lymphoma response to immunomodulatory therapy criteria (LYRIC). Overall response rate (ORR) and rates of progressive disease (PD) were determined. For each criterion reasons for PD were analyzed in detail.

RESULTS

41 patients were included. ORR was 68%, 68%, 63%, and 68% at FU2 by Lugano, Cheson, RECIL, and LYRIC, respectively. PD rates differed among criteria with 32% by Lugano, 27% by Cheson, 17% by RECIL, and 17% by LYRIC. Dominant reasons for PD according to Lugano were target lesion (TL) progression (84.6%), new appearing lesions (NL; 53.8%), non-TL progression (27.3%), and progressive metabolic disease (PMD; 15.4%). Deviations among the criteria for defining PD were largely explained by PMD of preexisting lesions that are defined as PD only by Lugano and non-TL progression, which is not defined as PD by RECIL and in some cases classified as indeterminate response by LYRIC.

CONCLUSIONS

Following CART, lymphoma response criteria show differences in imaging endpoints, especially in defining PD. The response criteria must be considered when interpreting imaging endpoints and outcomes from clinical trials.

It's About Quality, Not Quantity: Qualitative FDG PET/CT Criteria for Therapy Response Assessment in Clinical Practice

OBJECTIVE. FDG PET/CT has emerged as an effective tool for the timely accurate assessment of how tumors respond to therapy. To standardize interpretation and reporting, numerous response criteria have been developed. This article will review the evolution of these criteria along with their strengths and weaknesses. CONCLUSION. Several qualitative assessments applicable to common malignancies have been developed in recent years that solve many of the challenges faced by their quantitative predecessors. These are reviewed, and information is provided regarding individual treatment efficacy and prognosis.

[Hybrid imaging in lymphoma]

Hybrid imaging using the tracer [18F]FDG (2‑deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose) is regarded as the backbone of the diagnostic workup of lymphomas. All international guidelines, and especially the Lugano and RECIL (Response Evaluation Criteria in Lymphoma) guidelines, currently recommend [18F]FDG-PET/CT (positron emission tomography/computed tomography) for staging and treatment response assessment. With the exception of pediatric lymphomas, neither PET/MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) nor whole-body MRI are currently endorsed by international guidelines, despite the fact that both techniques have clear advantages over [18F]FDG-PET/CT in the assessment of lymphomas with variable FDG avidity. Of the new, more specific PET tracers that are being evaluated for the use in lymphomas, the CXCR4 (CXC motif chemokine receptor 4) tracer [68Ga]Pentixafor is of particular interest, as initial studies have shown that it may be used to visualize frequently non-FDG-avid lymphomas such as small-cell lymphocytic lymphoma, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma and lymphomplasmacytic lymphoma.