Interpretation and Working through Contemptuous Facial Micro-Expressions Benefits the Patient-Therapist Relationship

Trainee psychotherapists' emotion recognition accuracy improves after training: emotion recognition training as a tool for psychotherapy education

Introduction

Psychotherapists' emotional and empathic competencies have a positive influence on psychotherapy outcome and alliance. However, it is doubtful whether psychotherapy education in itself leads to improvements in trainee psychotherapists' emotion recognition accuracy (ERA), which is an essential part of these competencies.

Methods

In a randomized, controlled, double-blind study (N = 68), we trained trainee psychotherapists (57% psychodynamic therapy and 43% cognitive behavioral therapy) to detect non-verbal emotional expressions in others using standardized computerized trainings - one for multimodal emotion recognition accuracy and one for micro expression recognition accuracy - and compared their results to an active control group one week after the training (n = 60) and at the one-year follow up (n = 55). The participants trained once weekly during a three-week period. As outcome measures, we used a multimodal emotion recognition accuracy task, a micro expression recognition accuracy task and an emotion recognition accuracy task for verbal and non-verbal (combined) emotional expressions in medical settings.

Results

The results of mixed multilevel analyses suggest that the multimodal emotion recognition accuracy training led to significantly steeper increases than the other two conditions from pretest to the posttest one week after the last training session. When comparing the pretest to follow-up differences in slopes, the superiority of the multimodal training group was still detectable in the unimodal audio modality and the unimodal video modality (in comparison to the control training group), but not when considering the multimodal audio-video modality or the total score of the multimodal emotion recognition accuracy measure. The micro expression training group showed a significantly steeper change trajectory from pretest to posttest compared to the control training group, but not compared to the multimodal training group. However, the effect vanished again until the one-year follow-up. There were no differences in change trajectories for the outcome measure about emotion recognition accuracy in medical settings.

Discussion

We conclude that trainee psychotherapists' emotion recognition accuracy can be effectively trained, especially multimodal emotion recognition accuracy, and suggest that the changes in unimodal emotion recognition accuracy (audio-only and video-only) are long-lasting. Implications of these findings for the psychotherapy education are discussed.

Impact of facemasks on psychotherapy: Clinician's confidence and emotion recognition

OBJECTIVES

Facial emotion recognition is a key component of human interactions, and in clinical relationships contributes to building and maintaining the therapeutic alliance with patients. The introduction of facemasks has reduced the availability of facial information in private and professional relationships. This study aimed to assess the impact of facemasks on clinicians' perception of clinical interactions as well as their ability to read facial expressions.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, a purposive sample of 342 clinical psychologists or psychotherapists completed an online survey including the assessment of burnout, alexithymia, emotion dysregulation, and self-perceived ability to build effective relationships and communication with patients with/without facemasks. Participants were randomly assigned to the standardized facial emotion recognition task Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy FACES 2-Adult Faces including 24 faces representing anger, fear, sadness, and happiness.

RESULTS

Facemasks impaired the self-perceived ability of clinicians to build effective relationships and communicate with patients and reduced satisfaction in clinical encounters. The ability of clinicians to recognize facial emotions is significantly reduced for masked happy and angry faces, but not for sad and afraid ones. The perceived difficulty in building good relationships and communication with patients had a positive correlation with alexithymia and emotion dysregulation; higher levels of discomfort when wearing facemasks had a positive correlation with burnout and emotion dysregulation.

CONCLUSION

Facemasks reduced clinicians' self-confidence in clinical encounters with patients wearing facemasks, but their facial emotion recognition performance was only partially impaired.

COVID-19 survivors: Multi-disciplinary efforts in psychiatry and medical humanities for long-term realignment

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic represents an enduring transformation in health care and education with the advancement of smart universities, telehealth, adaptive research protocols, personalized medicine, and self-controlled or artificial intelligence-controlled learning. These changes, of course, also cover mental health and long-term realignment of coronavirus disease 2019 survivors. Fatigue or anxiety, as the most prominent psychiatric “long coronavirus disease 2019” symptoms, need a theory-based and empirically-sound procedure that would help us grasp the complexity of the condition in research and treatment. Considering the systemic character of the condition, such strategies have to take the whole individual and their sociocultural context into consideration. Still, at the moment, attempts to build an integrative framework for providing meaning and understanding for the patients of how to cope with anxiety when they are confronted with empirically reduced parameters (e.g., severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2) or biomarkers (e.g., the FK506 binding protein 5) are rare. In this context, multidisciplinary efforts are necessary. We therefore join in a plea for an establishment of ‘translational medical humanities’ that would allow a more straightforward intervention of humanities (e.g., the importance of the therapist variable, continuity, the social environment, etc) into the disciplinary, medial, political, and popular cultural debates around health, health-care provision, research (e.g., computer scientists for simulation studies), and wellbeing.

Personalized treatment - which interaction ingredients should be focused to capture the unconscious

A recent meta-analysis revealed that mental health and baseline psychological impairment affect the quality of life and outcomes in different chronic conditions. Implementing mental health care in physical care services is still insufficient. Thus, interdisciplinary communication across treatment providers is essential. The standardized language provided by the diagnostic statistical manual favors a clear conceptualization. However, this approach might not focus on the individual, as thinking in categories might impede recognizing the continuum from healthy to diseased. Psychoanalytic theory is concerned with an individual’s unconscious conflictual wishes and motivations, manifested through enactments like psychic symptoms or (maladaptive) behavior with long-term consequences if not considered. Such modifiable internal and external factors often are inadequately treated. However, together with the physical chronic condition constraints, these factors determine degrees of freedom for a self-determined existence. The effect of therapeutic interventions, and especially therapy adherence, relies on a solid therapeutic relationship. Outcome and process research still investigates the mechanism of change in psychotherapeutic treatments with psychanalysis’s focus on attachment problems. This article examines existing knowledge about the mechanism of change in psychoanalysis under the consideration of current trends emerging from psychotherapy research. A clinical example is discussed. Additionally, further directions for research are given. The theoretical frame in psychoanalytic therapies is the affect-cognitive interface. Subliminal affect-perception is enabled via awareness of subjective meanings in oneself and the other; shaping this awareness is the main intervention point. The interactional ingredients, the patient’s inherent bioenvironmental history meeting the clinician, are relevant variables. Several intrinsic, subliminal parameters relevant for changing behavior are observed. Therapeutic interventions aim at supporting the internalization of the superego’s functions and at making this ability available in moments of self-reflection. By supporting mentalization abilities, a better understanding of oneself and higher self-regulation (including emotional regulation) can lead to better judgments (application of formal logic and abstract thinking). Thus, this facilitates enduring behavior change with presumably positive effects on mental and physical health.

Veränderungen der Kontextfaktoren und deren Auswirkungen auf die Arzt-Patient-Beziehung

Therapeutisches Wirken wird durch begünstigende Kontextfaktoren erleichtert, wobei therapeutische Interventionen gleichzeitig Anregung sein können, Kontextfaktoren zu verändern. Kommunikation und Therapie werden durch eine gute therapeutische Beziehung erst ermöglicht, vor allem unter erschwerten inneren und äußeren Bedingungen.

Future of processing and facilitating change and learning

The field of the sciences of the mind is evolving fast. With the diversification of knowledge and accumulation of data, often lacking integration and reproducibility, questions arise. The role of critical thinking and research is evident. As the science of the unconscious, psychoanalysis provides a method and theory to understand human minds and mentalities, helping the patient know his mind and transform action into reflection. Mental activities, including social skills, develop in the social context, depending on the social environment’s demands and resources put onto the individual. Encoding emotional signals, markers of meaning for the individual, is ontogenetically necessary and has influences on memory encoding. Beyond theoretical understanding, implicit relational knowledge is actualized in the therapeutic setting. With a strong focus on experiencing emotional reconsolidation of memories, previous relationships’ repercussions are enriched with broadening viewpoints in the analytic environment. The long-term effects of psychotherapeutic treatments have been examined. A sufficient explanation of the specific factors contributing to success or an answer when an impact is lacking is still under investigation. When investigating subliminal and implicit mechanisms leading to memory reconsolidation and the formation of functional object relations and interaction patterns, the focus is set on affective interplay and processing prior/during and after social interactions. The present paper discusses which parameters might contribute to the reshaping of memories and the linkage of memory with the emotional load of experience. Providing insights into such dynamic mental phenomena could enhance process research by investigating moment by moment interactions in psychoanalysis, treatment, and learning processes. Due to the research subject’s complexity, different research methods and integration of associated research fields are required.

Zusammenhänge zwischen Empathie, therapeutischer Haltung und Wirkeffizienz

Empathisch sein heißt, fühlen und verstehen können, was andere fühlen. Vermuten zu können, was das Gegenüber fühlt, denkt und wünscht, beruht auf der Fähigkeit, eigene Gefühle und Gedanken als getrennt von jenen anderer wahrnehmen und regulieren zu können. Definierte Therapieerfolge mit adäquatem Aufwand erreichen zu können, verlangt ein Fokussieren auf Wesentliches und Wichtiges. Die Empathie ist im Bereich der Psychotherapie jener Faktor, für den für sich genommen die höchste Effektstärke nachgewiesen werden konnte. Empathietraining ermöglicht eine bessere soziale Performance. Im Falle von Defiziten in sozialer Kompetenz ist störungsunabhängig ein besonders hoher Leidensdruck nachweisbar.

Construct Validity of the Mentalization Scale (MentS) Within a Mixed Psychiatric Sample

Introduction: The concept of mentalizing is nowadays widely used in research as well as in clinical practice. Despite its popularity, the development of an economic assessment is still challenging. The Mentalization Scale appears to be a promising measurement with good psychometric properties but lacking convergent validity with the Reflective Functioning Scale. Objective: This study aims to test the construct validity of the Mentalization Scale through correlations with the gold standard, the Reflective Functioning Scale, within a clinical sample. Furthermore, it was of interest to replicate its internal consistency. Methods: Twenty-six inpatients of an acute psychiatric ward in Vienna were given the Mentalization Scale (MentS). They were interviewed with the Brief Reflective Function Interview, which was coded with the Reflective Functioning Scale. Correlations and internal consistency were calculated. Results: Concerning the primary aim of this study, the validity was satisfactory for the MentS whole-scale mentalizing as well as for the subscales self- and other-oriented mentalizing. Internal consistency was lower to the findings of the developer and close to the 0.70 threshold. Conclusion: Our findings could foster the psychometric properties of the MentS. Furthermore, the MentS seems to be a promising measurement tool for detecting different dimensions of reflective functioning. Limitations and further research are discussed.

The Emerging Role of Interdisciplinarity in Clinical Psychoanalysis

Given the tight interconnections proposed between brain and psyche, psychoanalysis was conceptualized as an interdisciplinary theory right from the beginning. The diversification of knowledge performed by different science and technology fields, concerned with the same matter (explaining mind and brain and connecting them), makes this interdisciplinarity even more visible and evident. This challenges the integrative potential lying in psychoanalytic meta-theory.

Die „Facilitative interpersonal skills“-Übung – Messen therapeutischer Kompetenz mit der deutschsprachigen Version

Hintergrund

Sowohl für die Erforschung von Therapeuteneffekten als auch für die Aus- und Weiterbildung ist es von hoher Bedeutung, interpersonelle Fähigkeiten von Psychotherapeuten zu messen. Eines der wenigen dafür zur Verfügung stehenden Instrumente ist die Facilitative-interpersonal-skills(FIS)-Übung.

Ziele der Arbeit

1. Vorstellung der FIS-Übung, 2. Prüfung der psychometrischen und deskriptiven Eigenschaften und 3. Untersuchung der Zusammenhänge des FIS-Gesamtwerts mit Alter, Geschlecht und Ausbildungsstand der Testteilnehmer.

Material und Methoden

In die Querschnittsuntersuchung wurden Psychologiestudierende und Psychologen in psychotherapeutischer Ausbildung eingeschlossen. Die Teilnehmer sollten in der FIS-Übung auf herausfordernde Therapiesituationen, die in 13 Videoclips nachgestellt sind, verbal reagieren. Die audioaufgezeichneten Reaktionen wurden von je 3 geschulten Ratern eingeschätzt.

Ergebnisse

Der durchschnittliche FIS-Gesamtwert der 115 Studienteilnehmer (Alter: M = 31,97 Jahre, SD ± 7,94 Jahre; weiblich: n = 90, 78,3 %; in psychotherapeutischer Ausbildung: n = 72, 66,1 %) betrug 3,24 (SD ± 0,42). Die Reliabilität erwies sich als gut (Intraklassen-Korrelationskoeffizient[ICC]2FIS-Gesamtwert = 0,69; Cronbachs α = 0,958). Unter den Videoclips befanden sich 3 signifikant leichtere und 4 schwierigere. Über die Clips hinweg wurden sowohl ein Lern- als auch ein Ermüdungseffekt ersichtlich. Ausbildungskandidaten erzielten signifikant höhere Werte als Psychologiestudierende.

Diskussion

Die FIS-Übung erwies sich in einer größeren Stichprobe als reliabel. Es sollten mindestens 3 und maximal 9 Clips eingesetzt werden, die je nach Ausbildungsstand der Durchführenden und Clip-Schwierigkeit ausgewählt werden können. Die FIS-Übung ist zur standardisierten, empirisch fundierten Messung interpersoneller therapeutischer Fähigkeiten in Forschung und in der Aus- und Weiterbildung von großem Nutzen.

Learning and competence development via clinical cases – what elements should be investigated to best train good medical doctors?

In European higher education, application of information technology, concentration on the learning-processes, consistent implementation, transfer learning, case-based learning, autonomous learning has been extensively studied in the last decade. Educational sciences based on neuroscientific findings use brain-based learning and teaching, including integrated thematic instructions and emotion-theory. Elements essential to this strategy, such as theory and methods for learning, competencies, attitudes, social reality, and a metadiscourse are described herein. Research on learning tends to focus on declarative knowledge, associative learning with conditional stimuli, and procedural knowledge with polythematic/crosslinking thinking. Research on competencies: In research on competencies (e.g., for clinical reasoning, decision-making), intuitive and analytical components are studied. As repeated presentation and exercising of clinical cases is crucial for an efficient learning process, the implementation of interactive scenarios including affectively involving didactics is considered. For competence-development observational methods, questionnaires/item sets or factors have to be targeted and empirically validated. Attitudes and social reality: Clinical decision-making, identification processes and attitudes (“Hidden curriculum”), as well as secondary socialization processes (integration of social norms, values, preparation of role-acquisition, occupational role) are studied via process research, conceptual research, and observational methods. With respect to social reality research, conscious and unconscious bargaining processes have to be taken into account. Methodology: Neuroscience – memory, neuronal, molecular biology, and computer science (Neurocircuits) are integrated into observational process research (e.g., affective-cognitive interface, identification processes) and conceptual research is added and studied on the meta-level, including discussion of research paradigms. This discussion provides ongoing feedback to projects in a hermeneutic circle.