Renal Cell Carcinoma Surgical Treatment Disparities in American Indian/Alaska Natives and Hispanic Americans in Arizona

Neighborhood social vulnerability and disparities in time to kidney cancer surgical treatment and survival in Arizona

BACKGROUND

Hispanics and American Indians (AI) have high kidney cancer incidence and mortality rates in Arizona. This study assessed: (1) whether racial and ethnic minority patients and patients from neighborhoods with high social vulnerability index (SVI) experience a longer time to surgery after clinical diagnosis, and (2) whether time to surgery, race and ethnicity, and SVI are associated with upstaging to pT3/pT4, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

Arizona Cancer Registry (2009-2018) kidney and renal pelvis cases (n = 4592) were analyzed using logistic regression models to assess longer time to surgery and upstaging. Cox-regression hazard models were used to test DFS and OS.

RESULTS

Hispanic and AI patients with T1 tumors had a longer time to surgery than non-Hispanic White patients (median time of 56, 55, and 45 days, respectively). Living in neighborhoods with high (≥75) overall SVI increased odds of a longer time to surgery for cT1a (OR 1.54, 95% CI: 1.02-2.31) and cT2 (OR 2.32, 95% CI: 1.13-4.73). Race and ethnicity were not associated with time to surgery. Among cT1a patients, a longer time to surgery increased odds of upstaging to pT3/pT4 (OR 1.95, 95% CI: 0.99-3.84). A longer time to surgery was associated with PFS (HR 1.52, 95% CI: 1.17-1.99) and OS (HR 1.63, 95% CI: 1.26-2.11). Among patients with cT2 tumor, living in high SVI neighborhoods was associated with worse OS (HR 1.66, 95% CI: 1.07-2.57).

CONCLUSIONS

High social vulnerability was associated with increased time to surgery and poor survival after surgery.

Real-World Outcomes of Latinx Versus Non-Latinx Patients Treated With First-Line Immunotherapy for Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

There are limited data regarding the impact of ethnicity among patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. We evaluated real-world outcomes between Latinx and non-Latinx patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with first-line nivolumab/ipilimumab within 2 different healthcare settings.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with mRCC who received nivolumab/ipilimumab within the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services (LAC-DHS), a safety-net healthcare system, and the City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center (COH), a tertiary oncology center, between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2021. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and covariates were adjusted using multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

Of 94 patients, 40 patients (43%) were Latinx while the remainder were non-Latinx (44 pts [46%] White, 7 pts [7%] Asian, and 3 pts [3%] Other). Fifty (53%) and 44 (47%) patients received their care at COH and LAC-DHS, respectively. Most Latinx patients (95%) were treated at LAC-DHS, and most non-Latinx patients (89%) were treated at COH. Pooled analysis by ethnicity demonstrated significantly shorter PFS in Latinx versus non-Latinx patients (10.1 vs. 25.2 months, hazard ratios [HR] 3.61, 95% CI 1.96-6.66, P ≤ .01). Multivariate analysis revealed a HR of 3.41 (95% CI 1.31-8.84; P = .01). At a median follow-up of 11.0 months, the median OS was not reached in either arm at the time of data cutoff.

CONCLUSION

Latinx patients with mRCC had a shorter PFS treated with frontline nivolumab/ipilimumab compared to their non-Latinx counterparts. No difference was observed in OS although these data were immature. Larger studies are needed to further interrogate the social and economic determinants of ethnicity on clinical outcomes in mRCC.

Racial and ethnic disparities in surgery for kidney cancer: a SEER analysis, 2007-2014

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Compared with White patients, Black and American Indian/Alaskan Native (AI/AN) patients experience higher rates of kidney cancer incidence, and Black, AI/AN, and Hispanic patients face later stages of disease at diagnosis, poorer survival rates, and greater risk of mortality. Despite the importance that appropriate treatment has in ensuring positive outcomes, little is known about the association between race and ethnicity and receipt of treatment for kidney cancer. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to explore differences in receipt of treatment and patterns of refusal of recommended treatment by race and ethnicity.

DESIGN

96,745 patients ages 45-84 with kidney cancer were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program between 2007 and 2014. Logistic regression models were used to examine the association of race and ethnicity with treatment and with patient refusal of recommended treatment. Outcomes of interest were (1) receiving any surgical procedure, and (2) refusing recommended surgery.

RESULTS

Relative to White patients, Black and AI/AN patients had lower odds of undergoing any surgical procedure (OR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.72-0.81; p < 0.001, and OR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.76-1.10; p = 0.36, respectively) after adjusting for gender, age, insurance status, stage at diagnosis, unemployment status, education status, and income as additive effects. Black and AI/AN patients also had higher odds of refusing recommended surgery (OR = 1.93; 95% CI: 1.56-2.39; p < 0.001, and OR = 1.99; 95% CI: 1.05-3.76; p = 0.035, respectively). Hispanic patients had slightly higher odds of undergoing any surgical procedure (OR = 1.10; 95% CI: 1.04-1.17; p = 0.001) and lower odds of refusal (OR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.50-0.90; p = 0.007, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with White patients, Black patients were less likely to receive potentially life-saving surgery, and both Black and AI/AN patients were more likely to refuse recommended surgery.

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma molecular variations in non-Hispanic White and Hispanic patients

BACKGROUND

The United States is becoming increasingly diverse, but few molecular studies have assessed the progression of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) in diverse patient populations. This study examined ccRCC molecular variations in non-Hispanic White (NHW) and Hispanic patients and their effect on the association of gene expression with high-grade (Grade 3 or 4) ccRCC and overall mortality.

METHODS

A total of 156 patients were included in VHL sequencing and/or TempO-Seq analysis. DESeq2 was used to identify the genes associated with high-grade ccRCC. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess whether race and ethnicity was associated with high/moderate impact VHL somatic mutations and the ccA/ccB subtype. Cox regression analysis was performed to assess association of molecular subtype and gene expression with overall mortality.

RESULTS

NHWs had moderate or high impact mutations in the VHL gene at a higher frequency than Hispanics (40.2% vs. 27.4%), while Hispanics had a higher frequency of the ccA subtype than NHWs (61.9% vs. 45.8%). ccA was more common in patients with BMI≥35 (65.2%) than in those with BMI < 25 (45.0%). There were 11 differentially expressed genes between high- and low-grade tumors. The Haptoglobin (HP) gene was most significantly overexpressed in high- compared to low-grade ccRCC in all samples (p-adj = 1.7 × 10^-12 ). When stratified by subtype, the 11 genes were significantly differentially expressed in the ccB subtype, but none of them were significant after adjusting for multiple testing in ccA. Finally, patients with the ccB subtype had a significantly increased risk of overall mortality (HR 4.87; p = 0.01) compared to patients with ccA, and patients with high HP expression and ccB, had a significantly increased risk of mortality compared to those with low HP expression and ccA (HR 6.45, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

This study reports ccRCC molecular variations in Hispanic patients who were previously underrepresented.