Role of α2-Adrenoceptor Subtypes in Suppression of L-Type Ca2+ Current in Mouse Cardiac Myocytes

The Intrinsic Cardiac Nervous System: From Pathophysiology to Therapeutic Implications

The cardiac autonomic nervous system (CANS) plays a pivotal role in cardiac homeostasis as well as in cardiac pathology. The first level of cardiac autonomic control, the intrinsic cardiac nervous system (ICNS), is located within the epicardial fat pads and is physically organized in ganglionated plexi (GPs). The ICNS system does not only contain parasympathetic cardiac efferent neurons, as long believed, but also afferent neurons and local circuit neurons. Thanks to its high degree of connectivity, combined with neuronal plasticity and memory capacity, the ICNS allows for a beat-to-beat control of all cardiac functions and responses as well as integration with extracardiac and higher centers for longer-term cardiovascular reflexes. The present review provides a detailed overview of the current knowledge of the bidirectional connection between the ICNS and the most studied cardiac pathologies/conditions (myocardial infarction, heart failure, arrhythmias and heart transplant) and the potential therapeutic implications. Indeed, GP modulation with efferent activity inhibition, differently achieved, has been studied for atrial fibrillation and functional bradyarrhythmias, while GP modulation with efferent activity stimulation has been evaluated for myocardial infarction, heart failure and ventricular arrhythmias. Electrical therapy has the unique potential to allow for both kinds of ICNS modulation while preserving the anatomical integrity of the system.

Unraveling the relationships between alpha- and beta-adrenergic modulation and the risk of heart failure

Background

The effects of α and ß adrenergic receptor modulation on the risk of developing heart failure (HF) remains uncertain due to a lack of randomized controlled trials. This study aimed to estimate the effects of α and ß adrenergic receptors modulation on the risk of HF and to provide proof of principle for genetic target validation studies in HF.

Methods

Genetic variants within the cis regions encoding the adrenergic receptors α1A, α2B, ß1, and ß2 associated with blood pressure in a 757,601-participant genome-wide association study (GWAS) were selected as instruments to perform a drug target Mendelian randomization study. Effects of these variants on HF risk were derived from the HERMES GWAS (542,362 controls; 40,805 HF cases).

Results

Lower α1A or ß1 activity was associated with reduced HF risk: odds ratio (OR) 0.83 (95% CI 0.74-0.93, P = 0.001) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.93-0.97, P = 8 × 10-6). Conversely, lower α2B activity was associated with increased HF risk: OR 1.09 (95% CI 1.05-1.12, P = 3 × 10-7). No evidence of an effect of lower ß2 activity on HF risk was found: OR 0.99 (95% CI 0.92-1.07, P = 0.95). Complementary analyses showed that these effects were consistent with those on left ventricular dimensions and acted independently of any potential effect on coronary artery disease.

Conclusions

This study provides genetic evidence that α1A or ß1 receptor inhibition will likely decrease HF risk, while lower α2B activity may increase this risk. Genetic variant analysis can assist with drug development for HF prevention.

α2C-Adrenergic Receptor Blockade Inhibits Langendorff-Isolated Rat Heart Work

We studied the effect of selective α2C-adrenergic receptor antagonist JP-1302 in concentrations of 10-9-10-6 M on inotropy, chronotropy, and coronary flow in the Langendorff-isolated rat heart. JP-1302 in all studied concentrations decreased the left-ventricular myocardium force contraction, HR, and coronary flow. The maximum inotropic, chronotropic, and vascular effects were observed when the antagonist was applied to the perfused solution in a concentration of 10-7 M. The least pronounced decrease in the studied parameters was observed at JP-1302 concentrations of 10-8 and 10-9 M. The obtained data indicate the participation of this subtype of α2-adrenergic receptors in the regulation of activity of isolated adult rats heart.

Effects of dexmedetomidine on cardiac electrophysiology in patients undergoing general anesthesia during perioperative period: a randomized controlled trial

Background

Dexmedetomidine has controversial influence on cardiac electrophysiology. The aim of this study was to explore the effects of dexmedetomidine on perioperative cardiac electrophysiology in patients undergoing general anesthesia.

Methods

Eighty-one patients were randomly divided into four groups: groups D₁, D₂, D₃ receiving dexmedetomidine 1, 1, 0.5 μg/kg over 10 min and 1, 0.5, 0.5 μg/kg/h continuous infusion respectively, and control group (group C) receiving normal saline. Twelve-lead electrocardiograms were recorded at the time before dexmedetomidine/normal saline infusion (T₁), loading dose finish (T₂), surgery ending (T₆), 1 h (T₇) after entering PACU, 24 h (T₈), 48 h (T₉), 72 h (T₁₀) and 1 month (T₁₁) postoperatively. Cardiac circulation efficiency (CCE) were also recorded.

Results

Compared with group C, QTc were significantly increased at T₂ in groups D₁ and D₂ while decreased at T₇ and T₈ in group D₃ (P < 0.05), iCEB were decreased at T₈ (P < 0.05). Compared with group D₁, QTc at T₂, T₆, T₇, T₉ and T₁₀ and iCEB at T₈ were decreased, and CCE at T₂-T₄ were increased in group D₃ significantly (P < 0.05). Compared with group D₂, QTc at T₂ and iCEB at T₈ were decreased and CCE at T₂ and T₃ were increased in group D₃ significantly (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Dexmedetomidine at a loading dose of 0.5 μg/kg and a maintenance dose of 0.5 μg/kg/h can maintain stability of cardiac electrophysiology during perioperative period and has no significant adverse effects on CCE.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04577430 (Date of registration: 06/10/2020).