1
|
Nappi F, Gambardella I, Singh SSA, Salsano A, Santini F, Spadaccio C, Biancari F, Dominguez J, Fiore A. Survival following acute type A aortic dissection: a multicenter study. J Thorac Dis 2023; 15:6604-6622. [PMID: 38249919 PMCID: PMC10797382 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-23-1137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
Background While surgery is almost always indicated for acute type A aortic dissections (ATAADs), the extent of surgery is often debated, with some surgeons preferring a conservative option and others preferring a more radical option This study aims to assess the outcome after surgery for ATAAD and the prognostic impact of surgical strategy (with vs. without aortic arch replacement). Methods Data was gathered between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2021 and retrospectively analyzed with multivariable logistic and Cox regression to ascertain risk factors and survival respectively. Results A total of 601 patients underwent type A aortic dissection repair across the recruiting centers with an operative mortality of 24.3% (146 patients) which was considerably linked with the clinical condition at presentation. In-hospital mortality was 23.1% for ascending and root replacement alone vs. 28.7% for arch involvement. Overall survival was 73.3% after the first year, 68.2% at 5 years, and 53.5% at 10 years. The median follow-up period was 2.5 years [interquartile range (IQR), 6.6 years]. Aortic arch replacements were more often carried out in younger patients and those without adverse clinical conditions, although outcomes for patients who underwent either surgical option were comparable throughout apart from a higher rate of cerebrovascular complications in the arch group (7.6% vs. 21.9%) (P=0.01). Conclusions Surgery for ATAAD still confers a relatively high mortality. In our study, there was a higher stroke rate associated with patients who underwent arch replacements at the time of dissection despite them being younger. The choice of repair with or without arch replacement should be individualized to the patient and the severity of clinical status presentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Nappi
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Centre Cardiologique du Nord, Saint-Denis, France
| | - Ivancarmine Gambardella
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine-New York, Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Antonio Salsano
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesco Santini
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Fausto Biancari
- Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Joaquin Dominguez
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Centre Cardiologique du Nord, Saint-Denis, France
| | - Antonio Fiore
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yadav I, Saifullah H, Mandal AK, I Kh Almadhoun MK, Elsheikh Elabadi HM, Eugene M, Suleman M, Bushra Himedan HO, Fariha F, Ahmed H, Muzammil MA, Varrassi G, Kumar S, Khatri M, Elder M, Mohamad T. Cannulation Strategies in Type A Aortic Dissection: Overlooked Details and Novel Approaches. Cureus 2023; 15:e46821. [PMID: 37954771 PMCID: PMC10636502 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.46821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Aortic dissection type A is a life-threatening condition that frequently necessitates surgical intervention. This review focuses on central aortic cannulation, arch branch vessel (ABV) cannulation, and proximal arch cannulation as key techniques during aortic surgery. It discusses innovative solutions for addressing these challenges. The review synthesizes findings from recent studies and emphasizes the significance of meticulous planning and execution of cannulation in aortic dissection repair. This review aims to contribute to the advancement of surgical practices and the enhancement of patient outcomes in the management of type A aortic dissection (AAD) by addressing these frequently overlooked details.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Indresh Yadav
- Internal Medicine, Samar Hospital and Research Center Pvt. Ltd., Janakpur, NPL
- Internal Medicine, Community Based Medical College, Bangladesh, Mymensingh, BGD
| | - Hanya Saifullah
- Medicine and Surgery, CMH Lahore Medical College and the Institute of Dentistry, Lahore, PAK
| | - Arun Kumar Mandal
- Internal Medicine, Manipal College of Medical Sciences/Oda Foundation, Pokhara, NPL
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Fnu Fariha
- Medicine and Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, PAK
| | - Hanzala Ahmed
- Medicine and Surgery, Islamic International Medical College, Riphah International University, Karachi, PAK
| | | | | | - Satesh Kumar
- Medicine and Surgery, Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical University, Karachi, PAK
| | - Mahima Khatri
- Medicine and Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, PAK
| | - Mahir Elder
- Interventional Cardiology, Heart and Vascular Institute, Detroit, USA
| | - Tamam Mohamad
- Cardiovascular, Wayne State University, Detroit, USA
| |
Collapse
|