Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology International Workshop 2018

Prognostic Significance of HER3 Expression in Patients with Cervical Cancer

HER3 has been recognized to have an oncogenic role in various types of cancer. However, its prognostic significance has not been elucidated in cervical cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of HER3 expression in cervical cancer using immunohistochemistry (IHC). HER3 immunohistochemical staining was performed on the tumor tissue samples of 336 cervical cancer patients. The association between the clinicopathological characteristics and patient survival analysis was assessed according to HER3 expression. HER3 IHC staining was positive in 31.0% (104/336) of the cervical cancer patients. A higher proportion of adeno-/adenosquamous carcinoma was observed in the HER3-positive group (34.6%) than in the HER3-negative group (18.8%). In survival analysis, HER3 expression was significantly associated with poorer disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). Multivariate analysis also indicated that HER3 expression was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.42−4.67, p = 0.002) and OS (HR = 3.21, 95% CI, 1.26−8.14, p = 0.014). HER3 protein expression was a poor prognostic factor of survival in patients with cervical cancer. This finding could help to provide individualized management for these patients.

Postoperative adjuvant radiation for cervix cancer: reflections on the evidence and a peep into the future

Early stage cervical cancer, stages IB1–2 and IIA1, can be treated with (chemo)radiation and brachytherapy or radical hysterectomy with or without further adjuvant (chemo)radiation. In a carefully selected cohort for surgery, traditionally a small proportion of patients would need adjuvant (chemo)radiation so that the therapeutic ratio is maximized. However, advances in radiation technology, specifically intensity modulated radiotherapy, have led to a reduction in treatment related adverse events. Also, recent developments in risk stratification suggest using a lower threshold to offer adjuvant treatment to minimize pelvic relapse. These developments together present opportunities of not only re-examining the therapeutic ratio but also of further evolving postoperative risk stratification. This review article summarizes the current evidence on adjuvant treatment strategies and summarizes the key areas where research should be focused.

A Prospective Analysis of Laparoscopic Management of Endometrial Cancer in a Tertiary Care Centre

Background

Laparoscopic management of endometrial cancer is beneficial in view of decreased operative morbidity and post-operative recovery. In the case of early gynaecological malignancies, it is a safe and feasible mode of surgery.

Methods

A prospective study was conducted in our tertiary centre in the period January 2017-December 2019. The study included 51 patients diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma. Demographic details and operative findings have been recorded.

Results

The mean age was 55.47 years; 64.7% were post-menopausal. 86.2% had stage IA disease. All patients underwent laparoscopic staging. The mean operative time was 115 min, estimated blood loss was 82.5 ml, pelvic nodal yield was 13.53, and para-aortic nodes were 20.78. There were no conversions to laparotomy or any intra-operative complications, and none of the patients had recurrence. During post-operative follow-up, 2 patients had lymphocyst, 1 had chylous ascites and 1 had port site hernia. Average hospital stay was 3 days.

Conclusion

In our study, we found that laparoscopic management of endometrial cancer is less morbid and has better post-operative recovery.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is an independent predictor for survival outcomes in cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This updated meta-analysis sought to explore whether pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) could serve as an independent predictor for survival outcomes in patients with cervical cancer. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of science and Scopus for studies on the association of pretreatment serum NLR with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) among patients with cervical cancer. Included studies with a hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) or a p-value were weighted by generic inverse-variance and pooled in a random effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to regions, NLR cut-off values and treatments. Publication bias was analyzed by Egger’s and Begg’s tests. A total of 14 studies comprising 6041 patients were included. The median cut-off value for NLR was 2.46 (range from 1.60 to 3.80). The higher NLR was associated to worse OS (HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.44–2.40) and PFS (HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.25–2.23), compared with lower NLR. This association still exited when analyzed according to regions, NLR cut-off values. Moreover, Significant association between NLR and OS was observed in studies which included patients with early stage disease and receiving radical surgeries. High NLR is independently associated with decreased OS and PFS in patients with cervical cancer. Pretreatment NLR is of independent value to predict the survival outcomes in patients with cervical cancer, regardless of regions and primary treatments.

Fertility-sparing treatment in early endometrial cancer: current state and future strategies

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the fifth most common cancer in women worldwide. Global estimates show rising incidence rates in both developed and developing countries. Most women are diagnosed postmenopausal, but 14–25% of patients are premenopausal and 5% are under 40 years of age. Established risk factors include age and hyperestrogenic status associated with nulliparity, obesity, and metabolic syndrome. Standard treatment for EC, which involves total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, has excellent survival outcomes, particularly for low-grade endometrioid tumors. However, it leads to permanent loss of fertility among women who wish to preserve their reproductive potential. With current trends of reproductive-age women delaying childbearing, rising EC incidence rates, and a growing epidemic of obesity, particularly in developed countries, research on conservative non-surgical treatment approaches remains a top priority. Fertility-sparing treatment predominantly involves the use of oral progestins and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices, which have been shown to be feasible and safe in women with early stage EC and minimal or no myometrial invasion. However, data on the efficacy and safety of conservative management strategies are primarily based on retrospective studies. Randomized clinical trials in younger women and high-risk obese patients are currently underway. Here, we have presented a comprehensive review of the current literature on conservative, fertility-sparing approaches, defining the optimal candidates and evaluating tumor characteristics, reproductive and oncologic outcomes, and ongoing clinical trials. We have also summarized current guidelines and recommendations based on the published literature.

Phase I/II clinical trial of modulated electro-hyperthermia treatment in patients with relapsed, refractory or progressive heavily treated ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

To determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of modulated electro-hyperthermia (mEHT) treatment and to reveal whether mEHT treatment is feasible and effective as second-line therapy in recurrent and progressive ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Patients were treated with mEHT with dose escalation during the first cycle (two sessions each week for three weeks) to determine the MTD. Additional cycles were carried out with the determined dose. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined grade ≥ 2: skin burns and inability to endure the hyperthermic state of the study. The Fact-O quality of life scale was used to assess health-related well-being.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients with recurrent and progressive ovarian cancer were enrolled. In the first cycle of mEHT treatment, no patient developed DLT with applied power up to 110 W, 130 W, and 150 W/day; the 150 W was the maximal applied power. Stable disease was observed in only one patient (12.5%). With median progression of 4.0 months (range, 2-17 months), 18 patients (95%) demonstrated disease progression. With median overall survival of 8.0 months (range, 2-32 months), 18 patients (95%) had died. Physical well-being scores were significantly decreased over the study period, although social, emotional, and functional well-being scores did not significantly change.

CONCLUSIONS

The mEHT treatment was feasible in patients with recurrent or progressive ovarian cancer without any complication and optimal dose of mEHT treatment was up to 150 W for 1 hour/day.