1
|
Rousseau F, Ranchon F, Bardin C, Bakrin N, Lavoué V, Bengrine-Lefevre L, Falandry C. Ovarian cancer in the older patient: where are we now? What to do next? Ther Adv Med Oncol 2023; 15:17588359231192397. [PMID: 37724138 PMCID: PMC10505350 DOI: 10.1177/17588359231192397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023] Open
Abstract
In recent years, major advances have been made toward the individualization of epithelial ovarian cancer care, leading to an overall improvement of patient outcomes. However, real-life data indicate that the oldest populations do not benefit from this, due to aspects related to cancer (more aggressive histopathological features), treatment (i.e. frequently suboptimal), and the host (increased toxicities in patients with lower physiological reserve). A specific risk-benefit perspective should therefore be taken when considering surgery, chemotherapy, and maintenance treatments: the decision for cytoreductive surgery should include geriatric vulnerability and surgical complexity, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy being an option when primary surgery appears at high risk; carboplatin paclitaxel association remains the standard even in vulnerable older patients; and bevacizumab and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors maintenance are interesting options provided they are prescribed according to their indications with a close monitoring of their toxicities. Future studies should aim to individualize care without limiting access of older patients to innovation. A specific focus is needed on age-specific translational analyses (focusing on tumor mutational burden and impaired biological pathways), a better patient stratification according to geriatric parameters, an adaptation of both oncological treatment and geriatric interventions, and treatment adaptations not a priori but according to formal pharmacokinetic data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frédérique Rousseau
- Institut Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
- Société Francophone d'OncoGériatrie (SOFOG)
- Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux pour l’Étude des Cancers de l’Ovaire et du sein (GINECO)
| | - Florence Ranchon
- Groupement Hospitalier Sud, Unité de Pharmacie Clinique Oncologique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France
- CICLY Centre pour l’Innovation en Cancérologie de Lyon, Oullins, France
- Société Française de Pharmacie Oncologique (SFPO)
| | - Christophe Bardin
- Service de Pharmacie Clinique, Hôpital Cochin AP-HP Centre Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Société Française de Pharmacie Oncologique (SFPO)
| | - Naoual Bakrin
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service de Chirurgie Digestive, CHU Hôpital Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite Cedex, France
- Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux pour l’Étude des Cancers de l’Ovaire et du sein (GINECO)
| | - Vincent Lavoué
- Service de Gynécologie, CHU de Rennes, Hôpital Sud, Rennes, France
- UMR S1085, IRSET-INSERM, Université de Rennes, Rennes, France
- Groupe Français de chirurgie Oncologique et Gynécologique (FRANCOGYN)
| | - Leila Bengrine-Lefevre
- Département d’Oncologie Médicale, Centre Georges-Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France
- Société Francophone d'OncoGériatrie (SOFOG)
- Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux pour l’Étude des Cancers de l’Ovaire et du sein (GINECO)
| | - Claire Falandry
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Unité de Gériatrie, Centre Hospitalier de la Croix Rousse, 103, Grande Rue de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon 69004, France
- Université de Lyon, CarMeN Laboratory, INSERM U.1060/Université Lyon 1/INRA U1397/INSA Lyon/Hospices Civils Lyon Bâtiment CENS-ELI 2D; Hôpital Lyon Sud Secteur 2; Pierre-Bénite 69310, France
- Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Pierre-Bénite 69310, France Société Francophone d'OncoGériatrie (SOFOG)
- Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux pour l’Étude des Cancers de l’Ovaire et du sein (GINECO)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vithayathil M, D'Alessio A, Fulgenzi CAM, Nishida N, Schönlein M, von Felden J, Schulze K, Wege H, Saeed A, Wietharn B, Hildebrand H, Wu L, Ang C, Marron TU, Weinmann A, Galle PR, Bettinger D, Bengsch B, Vogel A, Balcar L, Scheiner B, Lee P, Huang Y, Amara S, Muzaffar M, Naqash AR, Cammarota A, Personeni N, Pressiani T, Pinter M, Cortellini A, Kudo M, Rimassa L, Pinato DJ, Sharma R. Impact of older age in patients receiving atezolizumab and bevacizumab for hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int 2022; 42:2538-2547. [PMID: 35986902 PMCID: PMC9825835 DOI: 10.1111/liv.15405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Combination atezolizumab/bevacizumab is the gold standard for first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Our study investigated the efficacy and safety of combination therapy in older patients with HCC. METHODS 191 consecutive patients from eight centres receiving atezolizumab and bevacizumab were included. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) defined by RECIST v1.1 were measured in older (age ≥ 65 years) and younger (age < 65 years) age patients. Treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) were evaluated. RESULTS The elderly (n = 116) had higher rates of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (19.8% vs. 2.7%; p < .001), presenting with smaller tumours (6.2 cm vs 7.9 cm, p = .02) with less portal vein thrombosis (31.9 vs. 54.7%, p = .002), with fewer patients presenting with BCLC-C stage disease (50.9 vs. 74.3%, p = .002). There was no significant difference in OS (median 14.9 vs. 15.1 months; HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.65-2.02 p = .63) and PFS (median 7.1 vs. 5.5 months; HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.54-1.92; p = .72) between older age and younger age. Older patients had similar ORR (27.6% vs. 20.0%; p = .27) and DCR (77.5% vs. 66.1%; p = .11) compared to younger patients. Atezolizumab-related (40.5% vs. 48.0%; p = .31) and bevacizumab-related (44.8% vs. 41.3%; p = .63) trAEs were comparable between groups. Rates of grade ≥3 trAEs and toxicity-related treatment discontinuation were similar between older and younger age patients. Patients 75 years and older had similar survival and safety outcomes compared to younger patients. CONCLUSIONS Atezolizumab and bevacizumab therapy is associated with comparable efficacy and tolerability in older age patients with unresectable HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathew Vithayathil
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College LondonHammersmith HospitalLondonUK
| | - Antonio D'Alessio
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College LondonHammersmith HospitalLondonUK,Department of Biomedical SciencesHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleItaly
| | - Claudia A. M. Fulgenzi
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College LondonHammersmith HospitalLondonUK,Division of Medical OncologyPoliclinico Universitario Campus Bio‐MedicoRomeItaly
| | - Naoshi Nishida
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyKindai University Faculty of MedicineOsakaJapan
| | - Martin Schönlein
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section of PneumologyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany
| | - Johann von Felden
- Department of MedicineUniversity Medical Center Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany
| | - Kornelius Schulze
- Department of MedicineUniversity Medical Center Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany
| | - Henning Wege
- Department of MedicineUniversity Medical Center Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany
| | - Anwaar Saeed
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of MedicineKansas University Cancer CenterKansas CityKansasUSA
| | - Brooke Wietharn
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of MedicineKansas University Cancer CenterKansas CityKansasUSA
| | - Hannah Hildebrand
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of MedicineKansas University Cancer CenterKansas CityKansasUSA
| | - Linda Wu
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of MedicineTisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai HospitalNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Celina Ang
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of MedicineTisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai HospitalNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Thomas U. Marron
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of MedicineTisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai HospitalNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Arndt Weinmann
- I. Medical DepartmentUniversity Medical Center MainzMainzGermany
| | - Peter R. Galle
- I. Medical DepartmentUniversity Medical Center MainzMainzGermany
| | - Dominik Bettinger
- Department of Medicine II (Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology and Infectious Diseases), Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg University Medical CenterUniversity of FreiburgFreiburgGermany
| | - Bertram Bengsch
- Department of Medicine II (Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology and Infectious Diseases), Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg University Medical CenterUniversity of FreiburgFreiburgGermany,University of FreiburgSignalling Research Centers BIOSS and CIBSSFreiburgGermany,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner SiteFreiburgGermany
| | | | - Lorenz Balcar
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine IIIMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Bernhard Scheiner
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine IIIMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Pei‐Chang Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of MedicineTaipei Veterans General HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Yi‐Hsiang Huang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of MedicineTaipei Veterans General HospitalTaipeiTaiwan,Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of MedicineNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Suneetha Amara
- Division of Hematology/OncologyEast Carolina UniversityGreenvilleNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Mahvish Muzaffar
- Division of Hematology/OncologyEast Carolina UniversityGreenvilleNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Abdul Rafeh Naqash
- Division of Hematology/OncologyEast Carolina UniversityGreenvilleNorth CarolinaUSA,Medical Oncology/TSET Phase 1 Program, Stephenson Cancer CenterUniversity of OklahomaNormanOklahomaUSA
| | - Antonella Cammarota
- Department of Biomedical SciencesHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleItaly,Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer CenterIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
| | - Nicola Personeni
- Department of Biomedical SciencesHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleItaly,Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer CenterIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
| | - Tiziana Pressiani
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer CenterIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
| | - Matthias Pinter
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine IIIMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Alessio Cortellini
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College LondonHammersmith HospitalLondonUK
| | - Masatoshi Kudo
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyKindai University Faculty of MedicineOsakaJapan
| | - Lorenza Rimassa
- Department of Biomedical SciencesHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleItaly,Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer CenterIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
| | - David J. Pinato
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College LondonHammersmith HospitalLondonUK,Division of Oncology, Department of Translational MedicineUniversity of Piemonte OrientaleNovaraItaly
| | - Rohini Sharma
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College LondonHammersmith HospitalLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhao Y, Zuo J, Li N, Zheng R, Yuan G, Shen G, Wu L. Differences in Treatment Modalities and Prognosis of Elderly Patients with Ovarian Cancer: A Two-Center Propensity Score-Matched Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153655. [PMID: 35954319 PMCID: PMC9367487 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The prognosis of older patients with ovarian cancer is poor. We evaluated the effect of chronological age and different treatment characteristics on the prognosis of older patients with ovarian cancer; Methods: The study retrospectively analyzed patients aged over 60 years who underwent cytoreduction followed by platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy between January 2011 and December 2019 in two national centers in China. Propensity score matching (PSM, 1:1) was performed to stratify the comorbidity- and treatment-related factors. The Kaplan−Meier method was employed to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) in the original cohort and the cohort after PSM; Results: A total of 324 patients were evaluated. The Age ≥ 70 group often received more neoadjuvant chemotherapy (62.3% vs. 31.2%, p < 0.001), more discontinuation of adjuvant chemotherapy (31.2% vs. 10.8%, p < 0.001), and had more severe chemotherapy-related toxicity (45.6% vs. 34.2%, p = 0.040) than the Age < 70 group. After matching, the PFS of the Age < 70 group was not significantly different from the Age ≥ 70 group (median PFS = 12.4 and 11.9 months, respectively, p = 0.850). Furthermore, the advanced FIGO stage, non-R0 cytoreduction, and discontinuation of adjuvant chemotherapy were all found to be poor prognostic factors. Serum albumin level <40 g/L (HR = 2.441, p = 0.018) and age ≥ 70 years (HR = 2.639, p = 0.008) led to more severe chemotherapy-related toxicity. Additionally, poor renal function (HR = 5.128, p = 0.002) was in association with discontinuation of adjuvant chemotherapy; Conclusions: The chronological age of older patients cannot be seen as a poor prognostic factor. Older patients may benefit most from R0 cytoreduction followed by the completion of chemotherapy. Postoperative poor renal function and serum albumin level <40 g/L may help predict the discontinuation of adjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuxi Zhao
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China; (Y.Z.); (J.Z.); (N.L.); (G.Y.)
| | - Jing Zuo
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China; (Y.Z.); (J.Z.); (N.L.); (G.Y.)
| | - Ning Li
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China; (Y.Z.); (J.Z.); (N.L.); (G.Y.)
| | - Rongshou Zheng
- Office of National Central Cancer Registry, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China;
| | - Guangwen Yuan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China; (Y.Z.); (J.Z.); (N.L.); (G.Y.)
| | - Guihua Shen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Center of Gerontology/Beijing Hospital, Beijing 100730, China
- Correspondence: (G.S.); (L.W.); Tel.: +86-13521969989 (G.S.); +86-13910865483 (L.W.)
| | - Lingying Wu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China; (Y.Z.); (J.Z.); (N.L.); (G.Y.)
- Correspondence: (G.S.); (L.W.); Tel.: +86-13521969989 (G.S.); +86-13910865483 (L.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bengrine L, Bakrin N, Rousseau F, Lavoué V, Falandry C. Multi-Disciplinary Care Planning of Ovarian Cancer in Older Patients: General Statement-A Position Paper from SOFOG-GINECO-FRANCOGYN-SFPO. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:1295. [PMID: 35267603 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Revised: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary This position paper aims to provide practitioners a proposal for multidisciplinary care planning for older patients with ovarian cancer from the time of suspected diagnosis. The first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer involves several interdependent sequences: cytoreductive surgery, (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and maintenance targeted treatments. In older patients, care planning must be adapted to their geriatric parameters and consider the geriatric impact of each treatment sequence to allow treatment completion. Care planning should be centered on patient motivation and imply multidisciplinarity. Each step of treatment plan should be reconsidered in light of a geriatric assessment and follow-up. Studies are needed to prospectively evaluate the impact of geriatric vulnerability parameters at each step of the treatment agenda and the impact of geriatric interventions on patient outcomes. Abstract In this position paper the Société Francophone d’OncoGériatrie (SOFOG; French-speaking oncogeriatric society), the Société Française de Pharmacie Oncologique (SFPO, French society for oncology pharmacy), the Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux pour l’Étude des Cancers de l’Ovaire et du sein (GINECO, National Investigators’ Group for Studies in Ovarian and Breast Cancer) and the Groupe Français de chirurgie Oncologique et Gynécologique (FRANCOGYN) propose a multi-disciplinary care planning of ovarian cancer in older patients. The treatment pathway is based on four successive decisional nodes (diagnosis, resectability assessment, operability assessment, adjuvant, and maintenance treatment decision) implying multidisciplinarity and adaptation of the treatment plan according to the patient’s geriatric covariates and her motivation towards treatment. Specific attention must be paid to geriatric intervention, supportive care and pharmaceutical conciliation. Studies are needed to prospectively evaluate the impact of geriatric vulnerability parameters at each step of the treatment agenda and the impact of geriatric interventions on patient outcomes.
Collapse
|
5
|
Di Capua B, Bellieni A, Fusco D, Gambacorta MA, Tagliaferri L, Villani ER, Bernabei R, Valentini V, Colloca GF. Perspectives and limits of cancer treatment in an oldest old population. Aging Clin Exp Res 2021; 33:2831-2837. [PMID: 33704699 PMCID: PMC8531055 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-021-01821-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Population of oldest old will grow dramatically in the next future and cancer, physiologically related to aging, will be very prevalent among them. Lack of evidence is a huge problem to manage cancer in oldest old and will be more and more in the next years. AIMS Our purpose was to investigate the characteristics of a population of oldest old patients with cancer treated in the Radiation Oncology Unit of Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study. The primary outcome was to evaluate which characteristics of the population could influence the choice of oncological treatment (with radical or non-radical intent). RESULTS We identified a total of 348 patients: 140 were on follow-up; 177 were under treatment; 31 were considered not eligible for treatments. Patients under treatment had a high comorbidity index (mean Charlson Comorbidity Index 5.4), and a high prevalence of polypharmacy (mean number of drugs 5.6). More than half (53.1%) was treated with radical intent. Patients treated with radical intent were 1 year younger (87.1 years old vs 88.1 years old), more performant (ECOG 0.7 vs 1.3), and had less prevalence of metastatic neoplasia (6.4% vs 34.9%); comorbidities and drugs did not show differences in the two groups. CONCLUSION Oldest old, usually not considered in international guidelines, are treated for oncological disease, often with radical intent. The treatment seems not to be tailored considering comorbidities but on performance status.
Collapse
|
6
|
Sehouli J, Mustea A, Oskay-Özcelik G, Keller M, Richter R, Tomé O, Woopen H, Sommer-Joos AK, Grabowski JP, Armbrust R, Wimberger P. Bevacizumab Combined with Platinum-Taxane Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Results of the NOGGO Non-Interventional Study (OTILIA) in 824 Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4739. [PMID: 34638225 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The OTILIA non-interventional study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of a standard treatment regimen for advanced ovarian cancer in Germany. All of the women participating in the study received chemotherapy combined with a targeted treatment called bevacizumab. Among the 824 women who received treatment in this study, the median duration of progression-free survival (time alive without their disease returning) was 19.4 months. This is similar to the results in previous randomized phase 3 trials in more restricted populations of women. The safety and effectiveness of treatment seemed to be similar in older (at least 70 years) and younger (less than 70 years) women. Quality of life improved over time. Abstract In the single-arm non-interventional OTILIA study, patients with newly diagnosed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIB–IV ovarian cancer received bevacizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks for up to 15 months) and standard carboplatin–paclitaxel. The primary aim was to assess safety and progression-free survival (PFS). Subgroup analyses according to age were prespecified. The analysis population included 824 patients (453 aged <70 years, 371 aged ≥70 years). At data cutoff, the median bevacizumab duration was 13.8 months. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and AEs leading to bevacizumab discontinuation were more common in older than younger patients, whereas treatment-related AEs were less common. Median PFS was 19.4 months, with no clear difference according to age (20.0 vs. 19.3 months in patients <70 vs. ≥70 years, respectively). One-year OS rates were 92% and 90%, respectively. Mean change from baseline in global health status/quality of life showed a clinically meaningful increase over time. In German routine oncology practice, PFS and safety were similar to reported randomized phase 3 bevacizumab trials in more selected populations. There was no notable reduction in effectiveness and tolerability in patients aged ≥70 years; age alone should not preclude use of bevacizumab-containing therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01697488.
Collapse
|
7
|
Dragomir R, Sas I, Săftescu S, Popovici D, Margan R, Dragomir AS, Stanca H, Mocanu V, Pac C, Negru Ș. Treatment Experience and Predictive Factors Associated with Response in Platinum-Resistant Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Single-Institution Study. J Clin Med 2021; 10:3596. [PMID: 34441892 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10163596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) represents the most common and lethal gynecologic malignancy, due to its increased incidence and mortality rate. It is usually diagnosed in advanced stages and, even though surgery and platinum-based treatments are initially efficient, recurrences emerge in over 70% of cases. Although there are multiple options of chemotherapy drugs from which to choose, little is known regarding the best strategy for prolonged survival. Thus, this study aimed to assess the effect that most frequently used chemotherapeutic regimens have upon time-to-treatment-failure (TTF) from the first line and beyond, considering clinical and biological factors which influence the treatment outcome of platinum-resistant recurrent OC. We retrospectively analyzed data from 78 patients diagnosed with platinum-resistant OC, who underwent chemotherapy-based treatment with or without anti-angiogenic therapy at OncoHelp Oncology Center, Romania (January 2016–February 2021). Our study identified positive predictive factors for TTF related to histology (serous carcinoma subtype), anthropometry (age over 60 for patients treated with topotecan with or without bevacizumab), renal function (creatinine levels between 0.65 and 1 mg/dL for patients treated with regimens containing bevacizumab and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin) and treatment choice (bevacizumab in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin or topotecan used from the first line and beyond).
Collapse
|
8
|
Turco LC, Ferrandina G, Vargiu V, Cappuccio S, Fagotti A, Sallustio G, Scambia G, Cosentino F. Extreme complications related to bevacizumab use in the treatment of ovarian cancer: a case series from a III level referral centre and review of the literature. Ann Transl Med 2020; 8:1687. [PMID: 33490199 PMCID: PMC7812204 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-4448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
In patients undergoing debulking surgery for ovarian cancer (OC), bevacizumab-combined chemotherapy has been reported to be associated with an increased incidence of adverse events (AEs). Reports in the literature have noted the overall morbidity of bevacizumab to be between 3.7% and 9%. The aim of this study is to report uncommon and unusual manifestations of morbidity in surgical cases performed at our third level referral centers for gynecologic oncology. Additionally, we review the rare and severe bevacizumab-related complications that have been described in the literature. We defined as "extreme", the particularly rare and/or severe complications up to determining a life-threatening condition or death, which are related to the use of bevacizumab. A case-series of extreme complications registered at our institutions were reported. In addition, a literature search of the PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE electronic databases was performed for this review. The studies collected included: 8 randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 5 prospective observational, 1 prospective phase-IV, 10 prospective phase-II, 2 prospective phase-I, and 20 retrospective studies, as well as 9 case reports. Bevacizumab was administered as primary treatment in adjuvant and neo-adjuvant setting in 16 and 5 studies respectively, as treatment for recurrence in 36 trials, and for secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) in 3 studies. The overall population administered with bevacizumab numbered 7,096 women. Extreme complications were observed in 591 patients, with a morbidity rate of the 8.3%. Overall, central nervous system (CNS), cardiovascular, gastrointestinal (GI) and primary infectious complications were seen in 22 patients (0.3%), 261 patients (3.7%), 159 patients (2.2%), and 8 patients (0.13%), respectively. Hemorrhagic and wound complications occurred in 18 women (0.25%), and 112 women (1.6%), respectively. Extreme complications related to the use of bevacizumab are rare, and often go unrecognized. The recognition and immediate management of such rare and life-threatening complications in patients treated at third level referral centers could significantly improve patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Carlo Turco
- Mater Olbia Hospital, Gynaecology and Breast Unit, Olbia.,Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Gemelli-Molise, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italia
| | - Gabriella Ferrandina
- Department of Woman's, Children's and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italia.,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia
| | - Virginia Vargiu
- Department of Woman's, Children's and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italia
| | - Serena Cappuccio
- Department of Woman's, Children's and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italia
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Department of Woman's, Children's and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italia.,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia
| | - Giuseppina Sallustio
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia.,Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Gemelli-Molise, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italia
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Department of Woman's, Children's and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italia.,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia
| | - Francesco Cosentino
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Gemelli-Molise, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Joueidi Y, Dion L, Bendifallah S, Mimoun C, Bricou A, Nyangoh Timoh K, Collinet P, Touboul C, Ouldamer L, Azaïs H, Dabi Y, Akladios C, Canlorbe G, Bolze PA, Costaz H, Mezzadri M, Gauthier T, Kridelka F, Chauvet P, Bourdel N, Koskas M, Carcopino X, Raimond E, Graesslin O, Lecointre L, Ballester M, Huchon C, Levêque J, Lavoué V. Management and Survival of Elderly and Very Elderly Patients with Ovarian Cancer: An Age-Stratified Study of 1123 Women from the FRANCOGYN Group. J Clin Med 2020; 9:E1451. [PMID: 32414065 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9051451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Elderly women with ovarian cancer are often undertreated due to a perception of frailty. We aimed to evaluate the management of young, elderly and very elderly patients and its impact on survival in a retrospective multicenter study of women with ovarian cancer between 2007 to 2015. We included 979 women: 615 women (62.8%) <65 years, 225 (22.6%) 65–74 years, and 139 (14.2%) ≥75 years. Women in the 65–74 years age group were more likely to have serous ovarian cancer (p = 0.048). Patients >65 years had more >IIa FIGO stage: 76% for <65 years, 84% for 65–74 years and 80% for ≥75 years (p = 0.033). Women ≥75 years had less standard procedures (40% (34/84) vs. 59% (104/177) for 65–74 years and 72% (384/530) for <65 years (p < 0.001). Only 9% (13/139) of women ≥75 years had an Aletti score >8 compared with 16% and 22% for the other groups (p < 0.001). More residual disease was found in the two older groups (30%, respectively) than the younger group (20%) (p < 0.05). Women ≥75 years had fewer neoadjuvant/adjuvant cycles than the young and elderly women: 23% ≥75 years received <6 cycles vs. 10% (p = 0.003). Univariate analysis for 3-year Overall Survival showed that age >65 years, FIGO III (HR = 3.702, 95%CI: 2.30–5.95) and IV (HR = 6.318, 95%CI: 3.70–10.77) (p < 0.001), residual disease (HR = 3.226, 95%CI: 2.51–4.15; p < 0.001) and lymph node metastasis (HR = 2.81, 95%CI: 1.91–4.12; p < 0.001) were associated with lower OS. Women >65 years are more likely to have incomplete surgery and more residual disease despite more advanced ovarian cancer. These elements are prognostic factors for women’s survival regardless of age. Specific trials in the elderly would produce evidence-based medicine and guidelines for ovarian cancer management in this population.
Collapse
|
10
|
Dion L, Mimoun C, Nyangoh Timoh K, Bendifallah S, Bricou A, Collinet P, Touboul C, Ouldamer L, Azaïs H, Dabi Y, Akladios C, Canlorbe G, Bolze PA, Costaz H, Mezzadri M, Gauthier T, Kridelka F, Chauvet P, Bourdel N, Koskas M, Carcopino X, Raimond E, Graesslin O, Lecointre L, Ballester M, Levêque J, Huchon C, Lavoué V. Ovarian Cancer in the Elderly: Time to Move towards a More Logical Approach to Improve Prognosis-A Study from the FRANCOGYN Group. J Clin Med 2020; 9:E1339. [PMID: 32375360 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9051339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Revised: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and objective: Elderly and/or frail women with ovarian cancer are often undertreated. The aim of the study is to compare the effects of age and frailty on surgical approaches, postoperative complications, and prognosis in elderly women with ovarian cancer. Methods: A retrospective multicenter study of women ≥70 years were treated for ovarian cancer at seven French university hospitals between 2007 and 2015. Results: Of the 1119 women treated for ovarian cancer during the study period, 147 were ≥70 years and had complete data. Of these women, 65 were aged 70–74 years, and 82 were aged ≥75 years. Overall, 77% of the younger women (49/65) received optimal treatment compared with 51% (40/82) of the older women (p = 0.018). Women ≥75 years underwent fewer bowel resections (32% vs. 67%, p < 0.001) and experienced fewer postoperative complications (22.6% vs. 38.9%, p < 0.001); 53.2% of the women in this age group were treated by primary surgery or surgery only. These women also received more chemotherapy with platinum only (15% [9/56] vs. 2% [1/57], p = 0.007) and less bevacizumab (9% [5/56] vs. 32% [18/57], p = 0.003). Patients with greater frailty (a modified Charlson Comorbidity Index [mCCI] score >3) had a five-year survival rate of 30% versus 62% for those with a score ≤3 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Surgeons modify their approach to treating ovarian cancer in women ≥75 years probably to reduce immediate postoperative complications. The prognosis is significantly worse in patients with greater frailty. Improvements to the sequence of treatments administered, with priority given to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with greater frailty, could help increase the number of women who receive optimal treatment and improve their prognosis.
Collapse
|