Best Achievements in Clinical Medicine in Diabetes and Dyslipidemia in 2020

Efficacy and safety of enavogliflozin versus dapagliflozin added to metformin plus gemigliptin treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes: A double-blind, randomized, comparator-active study: ENHANCE-D study

AIMS

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of enavogliflozin, a novel sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, versus dapagliflozin in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) inadequately controlled with metformin and gemigliptin.

METHODS

In this multicenter, double-blind, randomized study, patients with inadequate response to metformin (≥ 1000 mg/day) plus gemigliptin (50 mg/day) were randomized to receive enavogliflozin 0.3 mg/day (n = 134) or dapagliflozin 10 mg/day (n = 136) in addition to the metformin plus gemigliptin therapy. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24.

RESULTS

Both treatments significantly reduced HbA1c at week 24 (-0.92% in enavogliflozin group, -0.86% in dapagliflozin group). The enavogliflozin and dapagliflozin groups did not differ in terms of changes in HbA1c (between-group difference: -0.06%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.19, 0.06) and fasting plasma glucose (between-group difference: -3.49 mg/dl [-8.08;1.10]). An increase in urine glucose-creatinine ratio was significantly greater in the enavogliflozin group than in the dapagliflozin group (60.2 g/g versus 43.5 g/g, P < 0.0001). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between the groups (21.64% versus 23.53%).

CONCLUSIONS

Enavogliflozin, added to metformin plus gemigliptin, was well tolerated and as effective as dapagliflozin in the treatment of patients with T2DM.

Combined Effects of Obesity and Dyslipidaemia on the Prevalence of Diabetes Amongst Adults Aged ≥45 Years: Evidence from a Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Study

Objectives: This study aimed to explore the combined effects of different types of obesity and dyslipidaemia on the prevalence of diabetes in middle-aged and elderly residents. Methods: Data were obtained from the 2015 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Studydatabase, and 5023 valid participants were included after excluding those with missing data. A Chi-square test was used to test the difference in the prevalence of diabetes between the groups. Binary logistic regression was used to analyse the relationship between different types of obesity combined with dyslipidaemia and the prevalence of diabetes. Results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that, compared with those with a body mass index <24/ortholiposis, the subgroup with systemic obesity/dyslipidaemia had 4.37 times the risk of diabetes (OR = 4.37, 95% CI = 2.36−8.10, p < 0.001). In addition, compared with those with a normal waist circumference (WC)/ortholiposis, the subgroup with abdominal obesity/dyslipidaemia had 3.58 times the risk of diabetes (OR = 3.58, 95% CI = 2.49−5.13, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The coexistence of obesity and dyslipidaemia can significantly increase the risk of diabetes, suggesting that the strict control of weight, WC and lipid level is beneficial to the prevention of diabetes.

Effects of exercise initiation and smoking cessation after new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus on risk of mortality and cardiovascular outcomes

Lifestyle changes after a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) can affect vascular health outcomes. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of changes in smoking and exercise on the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality in patients with newly diagnosed DM. Data were analyzed for 181,591 people with newly diagnosed type 2 DM who underwent 2 serial health examinations within 2 years before and after DM diagnosis. The study population was followed from the baseline to the date of death or cardiovascular events, or until December 31, 2018 and median follow-up was 6.07 years. Based on the change in status from before to after the diagnosis, participants were grouped into smoking groups (continuous smokers, quitters, new smokers, and nonsmokers) and exercise groups (constant exercisers, new exercisers, exercise dropouts, and nonexercisers). Compared with the nonexercisers, those who initiated exercise after their DM diagnosis had a lower risk of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and all-cause mortality: the hazard ratio (HR; 95% confidence interval [CI]) was 0.85 (0.76–0.94) for MI, 0.86 (0.78–0.94) for stroke, and 0.84 (0.89–0.90) for all-cause mortality. Quitters had a higher risk of MI, stroke, and all-cause mortality than nonsmokers, but their risk level was much lower than that in continuous smokers. When the group of continuous smokers and nonexercisers was considered as the reference group, participants who quit smoking and remained nonexercisers had a 21% lower risk of CVD (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.70–0.90). Those who quit smoking and started exercising had a 46% reduced risk of CVD (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.41–0.71) and a 22% reduced risk in all-cause mortality (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.63–0.96). Smoking cessation and exercise initiation after a diagnosis of new-onset type 2 DM was associated with a reduced risk of CVD and all-cause mortality.

Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level, Statin Use and Myocardial Infarction Risk in Young Adults

Objective

The consequences of blood lipid abnormalities for cardiovascular disease risk in young adults is unclear. Optimal lipid levels may also vary depending on whether a statin drug is taken. It aimed to determine whether the optimal lipid levels in young adults differ depending on statin use.

Methods

Using a nationally representative database from the Korean National Health Insurance System, 6,350,400 participants aged 20–39 years who underwent a health examination between 2009–2012 were followed through to 2018. The primary outcome was incident myocardial infarction (MI). We assessed the associations between prespecified lipid levels and MI risk according to statin use.

Results

Among participants not taking statins, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels ≥120 mg/dL were significantly associated with MI risk (hazard ratio [HR], 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27–1.40) compared with statin nonusers with LDL-C <80 mg/dL. Statin users with LDL-C categories <80, 80–100, 100–120, and ≥120 mg/dL all had significantly higher MI risk compared with statin nonusers with LDL-C <80 mg/dL; these HRs (95% CIs) were 1.66 (1.39–1.99), 1.68 (1.36–2.09), 1.63 (1.31–2.02), and 2.32 (2.07–2.60), respectively.

Conclusion

Young adults taking statins have an increased MI risk compared with statin nonusers, even when they have similar LDL-C levels. Specific lipid targets may need to differ depending on statin use.