Characteristics and treatment patterns in older patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer (KCSG HN13-01)

A Multicenter Evaluation of Different Chemotherapy Regimens in Older Adults With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Definitive Chemoradiation

PURPOSE

The number of older adults with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is increasing, and treatment of these patients is challenging. Although cisplatin-based chemotherapy concomitantly with radiation therapy is considered the standard regimen for patients with locoregionally advanced HNSCC, there is substantial real-world heterogeneity regarding concomitant chemotherapy in older patients with HNSCC.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The SENIOR study is an international multicenter cohort study including older patients (≥65 years) with HNSCC treated with definitive radiation therapy at 13 academic centers in the United States and Europe. Patients with concomitant chemoradiation were analyzed regarding overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) via Kaplan-Meier analyses. Fine-Gray competing risk regressions were performed regarding the incidence of locoregional failures and distant metastases.

RESULTS

Six hundred ninety-seven patients with a median age of 71 years were included in this analysis. Single-agent cisplatin was the most common chemotherapy regimen (n = 310; 44%), followed by cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (n = 137; 20%), carboplatin (n = 73; 10%), and mitomycin C plus 5-fluorouracil (n = 64; 9%). Carboplatin-based regimens were associated with diminished PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39 [1.03-1.89]; P < .05) and a higher incidence of locoregional failures (subdistribution HR, 1.54 [1.00-2.38]; P = .05) compared with single-agent cisplatin, whereas OS (HR, 1.15 [0.80-1.65]; P = .46) was comparable. There were no oncological differences between single-agent and multiagent cisplatin regimens (all P > .05). The median cumulative dose of cisplatin was 180 mg/m2 (IQR, 120-200 mg/m2). Cumulative cisplatin doses ≥200 mg/m2 were associated with increased OS (HR, 0.71 [0.53-0.95]; P = .02), increased PFS (HR, 0.66 [0.51-0.87]; P = .003), and lower incidence of locoregional failures (subdistribution HR, 0.50 [0.31-0.80]; P = .004). Higher cumulative cisplatin doses remained an independent prognostic variable in the multivariate regression analysis for OS (HR, 0.996 [0.993-0.999]; P = .009).

CONCLUSIONS

Single-agent cisplatin can be considered in the standard chemotherapy regimen for older patients with HNSCC who can tolerate cisplatin. Cumulative cisplatin doses are prognostically relevant in older patients with HNSCC.

Competing risk models versus traditional Cox models for prognostic factors' prediction and care recommendation in patients with advanced laryngeal squamous carcinoma: a population-based study

PURPOSE

To explore the prognostic factors and the optimal treatment modalities for patients with stage IVA laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC), so as to improve the survival rate of patients.

METHODS

Patients with stage IVA LSCC between 2004 and 2019 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We used competing risk models to build nomograms for predicting cancer-specific survival (CSS). The effectiveness of the model was assessed using the calibration curves and the concordance index (C-index). The above results were compared with the nomogram established by Cox regression analysis. The patients were grouped into low-risk and high-risk groups by competing risk nomogram formula. And the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method and log-rank test were used to make sure that these groups had a survival difference.

RESULTS

Overall, 3612 patients were included. Older age, black race, a higher N stage, a higher pathological grade, and a larger tumor size were independent risk factors for CSS; married marital status, total/radical laryngectomy, and radiotherapy were protective factors. The C-index was 0.663, 0.633, and 0.628 in the train set and 0.674, 0.639, and 0.629 in the test set of the competing risk model, and 0.672, 0.640, and 0.634 in the traditional Cox nomogram for 1, 3, and 5 years. In overall survival and CSS, the prognosis of the high-risk group was poorer than that of the low-risk group.

CONCLUSION

For patients with stage IVA LSCC, a competing risk nomogram was created to help screen risk population and guide clinical decision-making.