Pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and cigarette smoking as prognostic factors in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with osimertinib

The study of primary and acquired resistance to first-line osimertinib to improve the outcome of EGFR-mutated advanced Non-small cell lung cancer patients: the challenge is open for new therapeutic strategies

The development of targeted therapy in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients has radically changed their clinical perspectives. Current first-line standard treatment for advanced disease is commonly considered third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), osimertinib. The study of primary and acquired resistance to front-line osimertinib is one of the main burning issues to further improve patients' outcome. Great heterogeneity has been depicted in terms of duration of clinical benefit and pattern of progression and this might be related to molecular factors including subtypes of EGFR mutations and concomitant genetic alterations. Acquired resistance can be categorized into two main classes: EGFR-dependent and EGFR-independent mechanisms and specific pattern of progression to first-line osimertinib have been demonstrated. The purpose of the manuscript is to provide a comprehensive overview of literature about molecular resistance mechanisms to first-line osimertinib, from a clinical perspective and therefore in relationship to emerging therapeutic approaches.

Prognostic Significance of Pretreatment Plasma D-dimer Levels in EGFR-Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Osimertinib: A Multicentre Retrospective Study

Purpose

This study examined the association between plasma D-dimer levels and overall survival (OS) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with osimertinib.

Methods

In this multicenter study, 88 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) carrying epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and receiving osimertinib were enrolled. The target independent and dependent variables were the D-dimer levels before osimertinib treatment and OS time, respectively. The t-test or chi-square test was utilized to analyze the variances among various groups. The predictive significance of D-dimer for overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the Cox proportional hazard regression model.

Results

The selected patients had an average age of 58.01±10.72 years, with females comprising 54.55%. Based on their D-dimer levels, the patients were categorized into three groups: low-level (< 0.6 mg/L), middle-level (0.6 ~ 2 mg/L), and high-level (≥ 2 mg/L). After accounting for possible confounding variables, the Cox proportional hazard model showed that increased D-dimer levels were linked to a greater likelihood of death (HR 2.28, 95% CI = 1.09 ~ 4.76, p = 0.029). Importantly, there was a significant trend indicating that as D-dimer levels rose, the risk of mortality also increased (p for trend, HR 1.15, 95% CI = 1.03 ~ 1.28, p = 0.012). Consistently comparable outcomes were noted in the majority of subcategories. Patients with low-middle and high D dimer levels had a median OS of 28.6 and 17 months, respectively (p =0.014).

Conclusion

In conclusion, elevated levels of D-dimer in the bloodstream were found to have a significant negative correlation with the overall survival (OS) of patients with EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent treatment with osimertinib.

The Role of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Advanced EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Patients Treated with First-Line Osimertinib

Purpose

Although serum neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is correlated with the outcome of various cancer types, its role in treatment-naïve, advanced, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with osimertinib remains uncertain. We have the intention to use this biomarker to evaluate the outcomes in NSCLC.

Patients and Methods

Advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients receiving osimertinib as the first-line treatment were included. We evaluated the prognostic role of baseline NLR and explored its association with patients' characteristics. A high NLR was defined as pretreatment serum NLR ≥ 5.

Results

A total of 112 eligible patients were included. The objective response rate was 83.7%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 20.5 months (95% CI 14.5-26.5) and 47.3 months (95% CI 36.7-58.2), respectively. A high NLR predicted an inferior PFS (HR 1.90 [95% CI 1.02-3.51], P = 0.042) and OS (HR 3.85 [95% CI 1.39-10.66], P = 0.009). Patients with stage IVB disease were more likely to have a high baseline NLR than those with stage IIIB-IVA (33.9% vs 15.1%, P = 0.029). Other patients' characteristics did not correlate with the baseline NLR significantly. Patients with a high NLR had significantly more metastatic organs than those with a low NLR (2.5 ± 1.3 vs 1.8 ± 0.9, P = 0.012), particularly brain, liver, and bone metastasis. There was no significant association between NLR and intrathoracic metastasis.

Conclusion

Baseline serum NLR could act as an important prognostic marker for EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients receiving first-line osimertinib. A high NLR was associated with higher metastatic burden, more extrathoracic metastases, and therefore, a worse outcome.

New Targeted Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer ranks first in cancer mortality in Korea and cancer incidence in Korean men. More than half of Korean lung cancer patients undergo chemotherapy, including adjuvant therapy. Cytotoxic agents, targeted therapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors are used in chemotherapy according to the biopsy and genetic test results. Among chemotherapy, the one that has developed rapidly is targeted therapy. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines have been updated recently for targeted therapy of multiple gene mutations, and targeted therapy is used not only for chemotherapy but also for adjuvant therapy. While previously targeted therapies have been developed for common genetic mutations, recently targeted therapies have been developed to overcome uncommon mutations or drug resistance that have occurred since previous targeted therapy. Therefore, this study describes recent, rapidly developing targeted therapies.

MDACT: A New Principle of Adjunctive Cancer Treatment Using Combinations of Multiple Repurposed Drugs, with an Example Regimen

In part one of this two-part paper, we present eight principles that we believe must be considered for more effective treatment of the currently incurable cancers. These are addressed by multidrug adjunctive cancer treatment (MDACT), which uses multiple repurposed non-oncology drugs, not primarily to kill malignant cells, but rather to reduce the malignant cells' growth drives. Previous multidrug regimens have used MDACT principles, e.g., the CUSP9v3 glioblastoma treatment. MDACT is an amalgam of (1) the principle that to be effective in stopping a chain of events leading to an undesired outcome, one must break more than one link; (2) the principle of Palmer et al. of achieving fractional cancer cell killing via multiple drugs with independent mechanisms of action; (3) the principle of shaping versus decisive operations, both being required for successful cancer treatment; (4) an idea adapted from Chow et al., of using multiple cytotoxic medicines at low doses; (5) the idea behind CUSP9v3, using many non-oncology CNS-penetrant drugs from general medical practice, repurposed to block tumor survival paths; (6) the concept from chess that every move creates weaknesses and strengths; (7) the principle of mass-by adding force to a given effort, the chances of achieving the goal increase; and (8) the principle of blocking parallel signaling pathways. Part two gives an example MDACT regimen, gMDACT, which uses six repurposed drugs-celecoxib, dapsone, disulfiram, itraconazole, pyrimethamine, and telmisartan-to interfere with growth-driving elements common to cholangiocarcinoma, colon adenocarcinoma, glioblastoma, and non-small-cell lung cancer. gMDACT is another example of-not a replacement for-previous multidrug regimens already in clinical use, such as CUSP9v3. MDACT regimens are designed as adjuvants to be used with cytotoxic drugs.