Citalopram and clozapine: potential drug interaction

Fatal poisonings involving clozapine: A 16-year review of Australian coronial investigations

OBJECTIVE

Concerns about intentional and unintentional poisoning present a barrier to wider use of clozapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The objective of this study was to investigate decedent demographics and trends in fatal poisonings in Australia involving clozapine.

METHODS

This was a retrospective case series of all fatal drug toxicity reported to an Australian coroner between 1 May 2000 and 31 December 2016 where toxicological analysis detected clozapine. Cases were identified using the National Coronial Information System. Demographics extracted included age and gender of the decedent, year and location of death, cause and manner of death and drugs detected in post-mortem samples.

RESULTS

There were 278 poisoning deaths where clozapine was detected in toxicological analyses. Three-quarters of all cases (n = 207) involved men and the median age at death was 38.5 years (interquartile range: 16 years). Three-quarters of the deaths occurred in the home. Overall, 15.8% of deaths were deemed intentional, 57.5% unintentional and 24.5% of unknown intent. While the annual number of intentional self-poisonings remained constant with <5 per year, the overall number of fatalities increased due to an increase in unintentional poisonings. Multiple drug toxicity was reported in 55.0% of cases and clozapine alone in 45.0% of cases. The most common co-reported medications were antidepressants, benzodiazepines and opioids detected in 47.1%, 44.4% and 41.2% of multiple drug toxicities, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This was the first Australia-wide review of all fatal drug poisonings reported to a coroner involving clozapine. Fatalities were most common in men and occurred at home. Multiple drug toxicity generally involved psychotropic, sedative or opioid analgesic medications. Despite increasing clozapine use, rates of intentional poisoning have remained constant and low. Developing a better knowledge of unintentional fatalities presents an opportunity to minimise harm.

Lack of clinically significant interactions between concomitantly administered rasagiline and escitalopram

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the potential of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions of a concomitantly administered monoamine oxidase (MAO) type B inhibitor rasagiline and a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) escitalopram.

METHODS

Twelve healthy male volunteers received a 10-day regimen of rasagiline 1mg daily, followed by concomitant rasagiline 1mg and escitalopram 10mg daily for 7 days.

RESULTS

We found that the drug combination was generally well tolerated, and there were no signs of central nervous system hyperexcitation or changes in the subjects' vital signs. The reported adverse effects were mainly mild or moderate, and typical for SSRIs. The MAO-A-dependent catecholamine metabolite DHPG levels did not change significantly during the study suggesting that rasagiline's MAO-B selectivity was preserved. The plasma monoamine concentrations indicated no subclinical signs of interaction. As expected, the whole blood serotonin was significantly reduced by escitalopram but unaffected by rasagiline. Rasagiline AUC was increased by 42% (p<0.0001) and the weight-adjusted apparent oral clearance was reduced by 35% (p=0.0009) after 7 days' concomitant escitalopram treatment. Escitalopram reduced the ratio of the AUC values of the main metabolite 1-aminoindan and rasagiline by about 23% (p=0.0079). There were no significant changes in the elimination half-life, t(max) and C(max) of rasagiline.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest good tolerability of concomitant administration of rasagiline and escitalopram. However, other medications, diseases and aging may change the individual drug response and tolerability of concomitant rasagiline and escitalopram, e.g. in Parkinsonian patients, and thus careful monitoring is recommended when combining rasagiline and escitalopram.

Metabolic drug interactions with newer antipsychotics: a comparative review

Newer antipsychotics introduced in clinical practice in recent years include clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, sertindole, ziprasidone, aripiprazole and amisulpride. These agents are subject to drug-drug interactions with other psychotropic agents or with medications used in the treatment of concomitant physical illnesses. Most pharmacokinetic interactions with newer antipsychotics occur at the metabolic level and usually involve changes in the activity of the major drug-metabolizing enzymes involved in their biotransformation, i.e. the cytochrome P450 (CYP) monooxygenases and/or uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferases (UGT). Clozapine is metabolized primarily by CYP1A2, with additional contribution by other CYP isoforms. Risperidone is metabolized primarily by CYP2D6 and, to a lesser extent, CYP3A4. Olanzapine undergoes both direct conjugation and CYP1A2-mediated oxidation. Quetiapine is metabolized by CYP3A4, while sertindole and aripiprazole are metabolized by CYP2D6 and CYP3A4. Ziprasidone pathways include aldehyde oxidase-mediated reduction and CYP3A4-mediated oxidation. Amisulpride is primarily excreted in the urine and undergoes relatively little metabolism. While novel antipsychotics are unlikely to interfere with the elimination of other drugs, co-administration of inhibitors or inducers of the major enzymes responsible for their metabolism may modify their plasma concentrations, leading to potentially significant effects. Most documented metabolic interactions involve antidepressant and anti-epileptic drugs. Of a particular clinical significance is the interaction between fluvoxamine, a potent CYP1A2 inhibitor, and clozapine. Differences in the interaction potential among the novel antipsychotics currently available may be predicted based on their metabolic pathways. The clinical relevance of these interactions should be interpreted in relation to the relative width of their therapeutic index. Avoidance of unnecessary polypharmacy, knowledge of the interaction profiles of individual agents, and careful individualization of dosage based on close evaluation of clinical response and, possibly, plasma drug concentrations are essential to prevent and minimize potentially adverse drug interactions in patients receiving newer antipsychotics.

A case of clozapine-induced tonic-clonic seizures managed with valproate: implications for clinical care

We describe a case of clozapine-induced seizures in a patient with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. She had previously been treated unsuccessfully with a number of atypical antipsychotic medications, before she was eventually started on clozapine. She experienced two separate episodes of observed fits whilst on an initial daily dose of 125 mg and, subsequently, on a daily dose of 237.5 mg. Following discontinuation of clozapine, she was rechallenged and again was observed to have seizures. Appropriate investigations ruled out any organic cause of the fits and clozapine was successfully restarted, together with sodium valproate. By the time of treatment stabilization, the patient had not experienced any further fits. These findings suggest that clozapine-induced seizures can be successfully treated, that gradual dose titration can reduce the likelihood of further episodes of seizures and that concomitant use of a suitable mood stabilizer/anti-epileptic medication can improve the outcome of treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Furthermore, the concomitant use of fluoxetine and clozapine is discouraged, with citalopram suggested as a suitable antidepressant in those depressed patients receiving clozapine.

Review of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction studies with citalopram

Citalopram is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor that is N-demethylated to N-desmethylcitalopram partially by CYP2C19 and partially by CYP3A4 and N-desmethylcitalopram is further N-demethylated by CYP2D6 to the likewise inactive metabolite di-desmethylcitalopram. The two metabolites are not active. The fact that citalopram is metabolised by more than one CYP means that inhibition of its biotransformation by other drugs is less likely. Besides citalopram has a wide margin of safety, so even if there was a considerable change in serum concentration then this would most likely not be of clinical importance. In vitro citalopram does not inhibit CYP or does so only very moderately. A number of studies in healthy subjects and patients have confirmed, that this also holds true in vivo. Thus no change in pharmacokinetics or only very small changes were observed when citalopram was given with CYP1A2 substrates (clozapine and therophylline), CYP2C9 (warfarin), CYP2C19 (imipramine and mephenytoin), CYP2D6 (sparteine, imipramine and amitriptyline) and CYP3A4 (carbamazepine and triazolam). At the pharmacodynamic level there have been a few documented cases of serotonin syndrome with citalopram and moclobemide and buspirone. It is concluded that citalopram is neither the source nor the cause of clinically important drug-drug interactions.