A hospital-based registry of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: Can neuroimaging serve as a surrogate biomarker?

Role of Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Prion Diseases: A Narrative Review

Prion diseases are progressive and irreversible neurodegenerative disorders with a low incidence (1.5–2 cases per million per year). Genetic (10–15%), acquired (anecdotal) and sporadic (85%) forms of the disease have been described. The clinical spectrum of prion diseases is very varied, although the most common symptoms are rapidly progressive dementia, cerebellar ataxia and myoclonus. Mean life expectancy from the onset of symptoms is 6 months. There are currently diagnostic criteria based on clinical phenotype, as well as neuroimaging biomarkers (magnetic resonance imaging), neurophysiological tests (electroencephalogram and polysomnogram), and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers (14-3-3 protein and real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC)). The sensitivity and specificity of some of these tests (electroencephalogram and 14-3-3 protein) is under debate and the applicability of other tests, such as RT-QuIC, is not universal. However, the usefulness of these biomarkers beyond the most frequent prion disease, sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease, remains unclear. Therefore, research is being carried out on new, more efficient cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers (total tau, ratio total tau/phosphorylated tau and neurofilament light chain) and potential blood biomarkers (neurofilament light chain, among others) to try to universalize access to early diagnosis in the case of prion diseases.

Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted brain magnetic resonance imaging in patients with sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic yield and performance of DWI in patients with sporadic CJD (sCJD).

METHODS

A systematic literature search of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed, since their inception up to July 28, 2020. Pooled diagnostic yield of diffusion-weighted imaging was calculated using DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Pooled diagnostic performance of DWI (sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve) in diagnosing sCJD among patients with rapidly progressive dementia was calculated using a bivariate random-effects model. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed.

RESULTS

Fifteen original articles with a total of 1144 patients with sCJD were included. The pooled diagnostic yield was 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 86 to 94%); summary sensitivity, 91% (95% CI, 84 to 95%); and specificity, 97% (95% CI, 94 to 99%). The area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97-0.99). Simultaneous involvement of the neocortex and striatum was the most common finding, and the neocortex was the most common site to be involved on DWI followed by striatum, thalamus, and cerebellum. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression demonstrated significant heterogeneity among the studies associated with the reference standards used for diagnosis of sCJD.

CONCLUSIONS

DWI showed excellent diagnostic value in diagnosis of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease among patients with rapidly progressive dementia. Simultaneous involvement of the neocortex and striatum was the most common finding, and the neocortex was the most common site to be involved on diffusion-weighted imaging followed by striatum, thalamus, and cerebellum.

KEY POINTS

• The pooled diagnostic yield of diffusion-weighted imaging in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease was 91%. • The diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging for predicting sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease among patients with rapidly progressive dementia was excellent, with pooled sensitivity, 91%, and specificity, 97%. • Simultaneous involvement in the neocortex and striatum was most commonly seen on diffusion-weighted imaging (60%), followed by the neocortex without striatum (30%), thalamus (21%), cerebellum (8%), and striatum without neocortex (7%).