Nonspecific positivity on the Luminex crossmatch assay for anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies due to antibodies directed against the antibody coated beads

Donor-Specific Antibody Detection by Single-Antigen Bead Assay for Renal Transplantation: A 2-Year Experience from South India

Introduction

Recipient sensitization against donor human leukocyte antigens (HLA) plays a key role in transplant rejection, and this risk is best minimized by efficient pre transplant antibody detection. Determination of antibody specificity with the highest sensitivity and degree of resolution to the allelic antigen level is achieved by using single-antigen bead (SAB) assay.

Methods

This study evaluated the correlation of Luminex cross match (LXM) with SAB assay for detection of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). A total of 2075 renal transplant patients were screened for the presence of DSA by LXM, complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) cross match, and 125 patients for SAB from January 2018 to December 2019.

Results

There was a male preponderance among recipients (P < 0.0001), and the most affected age group was 21-40 years. HLA typing was done in 550/2075 by DNA PCR-reverse sequence-specific oligonucleotide probes (SSOP) method. HLA DSA by LXM was detected in 16.3% of recipients (338/2075). Majority 180/338 (53.2%) of the patients were class II DSA positive, (P < 0.0001). Among the class II DSA positive patients, 20/180 (11.1%) samples gave false-positive results by LXM. SAB for class I and class II HLA IgG antibodies was done in 125/338 renal transplant recipients, which included 20 recipients with false-positive class II Luminex DSA, to check whether the DSA detected were really donor specific or not. The results showed that although 20/125 patients had some antibodies detected in their serum, they were not against the donor HLA antigens, as per the HLA typing reports of the donors. When compared to SAB assay, LXM showed more discrepant results, particularly to class II DSA.

Conclusion

In conclusion, LXM, if used in combination with SAB assay and HLA typing of donors if necessary for virtual cross match, will help in avoiding unnecessary exclusion of donors for renal transplant recipients and also for post transplant monitoring of recipients, especially in cadaveric donor transplants.

Detection of donor-specific HLA antibodies: A retrospective observation in 350 renal transplant cases

BACKGROUND

The main objective of this study was to determine the results of the cell-based assay (CDC-XM and FC-XM), and correlate with the results of solid phase assay (L-SAB).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 350 prospective renal transplant recipients were tested for the presence of HLA antibodies by CDC-XM, FC-XM and L-SAB screening with their corresponding donor.

RESULTS

T-cell-FC-XM showed a sensitivity of 71.43% and a specificity of 91.50% for detecting class I L-SAB (+), while B-cell-FCXM showed a sensitivity of 94.94% and a specificity of 61.99% for detecting class II L-SAB (+). On the other hand, T-CDC-XM showed a sensitivity of 32.14% and a specificity of 98.64% for detecting class I L-SAB (+), while B-CDC-XM showed a sensitivity of 44.30% and a specificity of 94.83% for detecting class II L-SAB (+). In this study, the results indicated that DSA class I MFI value of 2845 and above significantly (p ≤0.001) correlated with T-cell-FC-XM positivity, while MFI value of 4585 and above (p ≤0.001) showed strong predictive accuracy of a positive T-cell-CDC-XM. However, DSA class II MFI cut-off of 1988 and above significantly (p ≤0.001) correlated with B-cell-FC-XM positivity, while MFI value of 5986 and above (p ≤0.001) showed strong predictive accuracy of a positive B-cell-CDC-XM.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that CDC-XM has poor sensitivity, while FC-XM has poor specificity to detect DSA. L-SAB has good correlation with T-cell-FC-XM (p < 0.0001) but not with B-cell-FC-XM (P = 0.31). DSA strength >2845 and > 1988 significantly correlated with T-cell-FC-XM positivity and B-cell-FC-XM positivity, respectively. While, a MFI value of >4585 and > 5986 significantly correlated with T-cell-CDC-XM positivity and B-cell-CDC-XM positivity, respectively. These MFI cut-off values could serve as a surrogate marker for CDC-XM and FC-XM tests and may help in resolving the limitations of cell-based techniques. In conclusion, we found that L-SAB is more sensitive and specific than CDC-XM and FC-XM and therefore may be used as a test of choice.

Evaluation of three different laboratory methods to detect preformed human leukocyte antigen antibodies in a South African kidney transplant population

Background

Anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (anti-HLA) play a crucial role in graft. Detection of anti-HLA, both pre- and post-transplant is a crucial investigation in clinical organ transplantation.

Objectives

Three methodologies for the detection of lymphocytotoxic antibodies were compared to establish which of these is best suited to optimise pre-transplant donor-recipient matching.

Methods

Serum samples from 15 renal transplant patients were tested for the presence of anti-HLA by i) cytotoxic-dependent cross-match (CDCXM), ii) flow cytometric cross-match (FCXM) and iii) Luminex-based donor specific antibody cross-match (DSAXM) method, Confirmatory tests for the presence of preformed HLA antibodies were tested using Luminex methodology.

Results

Two (13%) of the 15 patients had positive HLA Class I antibodies (Ab) using all 3 methods. An additional 2 HLA Class I Ab were identified with FCXM/CDCXM. DSAXM identified 1 HLA Class I positive, not indicated by CDCXM/FCXM.

High HLA Class II positivity (40%), identified by CDCXM, while DSAXM and FCXM identified two and one patients, respectively. CDCXM produced 4 false-positive results confirmed by lymphocyte single antigen (LSA) assay.

Conclusions

The DSAXM method appears to add value in pre-transplantation screening to identify pre-sensitised patients that may not reject the donor graft due to the absence of donor-specific antibodies.

Abrogating biologics interference in flow cytometric crossmatching

The flow cytometric crossmatch is currently the gold standard for evaluating donor and recipient histocompatibility. The assay however does have limitations and is sensitive to false positive reactions resulting from the presence of non-HLA antibodies or therapy related immune biologics. Such false positive reactions can lead to the inappropriate decline of an acceptable donor organ or unnecessary therapeutic intervention. Here we describe the successful validation of anti-idiotype blocking antibodies in prevention of false positive flow crossmatch results caused by biologic therapy. Blocking antibodies specific for the Fab portion of Rituximab and/or Alemtuzumab were incubated with biologic containing patient serum prior to use in flow cytometric crossmatching. Biologic blocking successfully negated false positive crossmatch results with Rituximab (B cell ave. % change = -97%) or Alemtuzumab (T cell ave. % change = -99%, B cell ave. % change = -95%) infused sera respectively. Simultaneous blocking of these biologics was also successful. A complex case is presented to demonstrate the application of this procedure.

Significance of Luminex-based single antigen class II bead assay and its mean fluorescence intensity in renal transplant cases; a retrospective observation in 97 cases

The objective of this study was to determine the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values of class II Luminex single antigen bead (L-SAB) assay and compare these MFI values with cell-based complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch with anti-human globulin (CDC-AHG-XM) and IgG-B-cell flow cytometry crossmatch (FC-XM) results and explore the near-accurate MFI-cutoff values of positive cell-based crossmatch results. This retrospective study was an analysis in 97 renal transplant recipients, who were tested for the presence of DSA by CDC-AHG-XM and IgG-B-cell-FC-XM methods with their corresponding donor as well as for anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody detection using a sensitive L-SAB assay. In the group having DSA MFI values <1000, none of the patients showed positivity for FC-XM and CDC-AHG-XM; in the group having MFI values between 1000 and 3000, 35.48% showed positivity for FC-XM but none by the CDC-AHG-XM method. However, in the group having MFI values >3000, 83.33% of cases were positive for FC-XM. Further, in those groups with MFI values between 3000 and 6000, 38.09% were positive for CDC-AHG-XM, while 86.66% showed positivity in the group with MFI >6000. Our results indicated that Luminex-DSA MFI value >1995 (P < .0001) significantly correlated with IgG-B-cell-FC-XM positivity while Luminex-DSA MFI value of >4247 (P < .0006) was significantly correlated with positive CDC-AHG-XM. MFI cutoff of 1995 exhibited a diagnostic sensitivity of 97.56% and specificity of 89.29% for predicting positive IgG B-cell FC-XM and MFI cutoff of 4247 exhibited a diagnostic sensitivity of 90.48% and specificity of 97.37% for predicting positive CDC-AHG-XM. However, a cutoff MFI of >5000 and >7000 for SAB assay had a sensitivity and specificity of 100% in detecting a positive IgG B-cell FC-XM and CDC-AHG-XM, respectively.

A positive complement dependent cytotoxicity immunoglobulin G crossmatch due to auto-antibodies with a negative luminex bead assays in a renal transplant recipient: A Diagnostic dilemma

Transplant recipients are always at a risk of developing anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies due to prior sensitizing events such as blood transfusions, multiple pregnancies, or transplantation. Unexpected positive outcomes can be seen in complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) based assays due to underlying autoimmune disorders or pharmacological treatment (rituximab/intravenous immunoglobulin/anti-thymocyte globulin administration), therefore, limiting its value. CDC based assay results strongly depend on the vitality of the donor lymphocytes, highlighting another major limitation of this assay. Thus, as an alternative approach, solid phase based crossmatch assays were introduced which function independently of the cell quality and have higher sensitivity and specificity in detecting anti-HLA antibodies. We describe a case where the patient awaiting renal transplantation from living related donor was evaluated by pretransplant histocompatibility testing for the detection of anti-HLA antibodies. The histocompatibility testing revealed positive CDC anti-human globulin and flow crossmatch along with negative Luminex based assays (HLA antibody screen, luminex crossmatch, and luminex single bead assay). Detailed histocompatibility workup revealed immunoglobulin G autoantibodies which were complement activating and lympocytoxic in nature.

The good, the bad, and the ugly of luminex donor-specific crossmatch

The presence of donor-specific antibodies directed against human leukocyte antigen significantly influences renal transplant because of antibody-mediated rejection. We performed the screening of pre-renal transplant patients for preformed anti-HLA antibodies using anti-human globulin augmented-complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity crossmatch (AHG-CDCXm), luminex donor-specific crossmatch (LumXm) and HLA antibody screening. Seven hundred and fifty-four patients were assessed for LumXm. HLA antibody screening was possible in 325 out of 754 cases. All the three investigations viz. CDCXm, HLA antibody screening and LumXm was performed in 325 patients. All CDCXm positive patients (10/325, 3.08%) were also positive with LumXm and HLA antibody screen whereas 14 cases (4.31%) with CDCXm negative were positive with luminex-based assays. LumXm and HLA antibody screening were both positive in 24 (7.38%) cases, LumXm and HLA antibody screening were both negative in 275 (84.63%) cases and LumXm negative and HLA antibody screening was positive in 22 (6.76%) cases. However, there were four cases (1.23%) which were positive in LumXm in spite of being negative in HLA antibody testing. Single Antigen Bead (SAB) assay was performed in all patients positive for HLA antibody test. We suggest that LumXm is a useful and sensitive technique for the detection of anti-HLA antibodies in pre-transplant renal patients. However, other measures such as luminex antibody screen, SAB assay, history of the donor, and the class of antibodies involved should be taken into consideration for pre-transplant work up of renal patients.

Photocleavage-based affinity purification of biomarkers from serum: Application to multiplex allergy testing

Multiplex serological immunoassays, such as implemented on microarray or microsphere-based platforms, provide greater information content and higher throughput, while lowering the cost and blood volume required. These features are particularly attractive in pediatric food allergy testing to facilitate high throughput multi-allergen analysis from finger- or heel-stick collected blood. However, the miniaturization and microfluidics necessary for creating multiplex assays make them highly susceptible to the “matrix effect” caused by interference from non-target agents in serum and other biofluids. Such interference can result in lower sensitivity, specificity, reproducibility and quantitative accuracy. These problems have in large part prevented wide-spread implementation of multiplex immunoassays in clinical laboratories. We report the development of a novel method to eliminate the matrix effect by utilizing photocleavable capture antibodies to purify and concentrate blood-based biomarkers (a process termed PC-PURE) prior to detection in a multiplex immunoassay. To evaluate this approach, it was applied to blood-based allergy testing. Patient total IgE was purified and enriched using PC-PURE followed by multiplex microsphere-based detection of allergen-specific IgEs (termed the AllerBead assay). AllerBead was formatted to detect the eight most common pediatric food allergens: milk, soy, wheat, egg, peanuts, tree nuts, fin fish and shellfish, which account for >90% of all pediatric food allergies. 205 serum samples obtained from Boston Children’s Hospital were evaluated. When PC-PURE was employed with AllerBead, excellent agreement was obtained with the standard, non-multiplex, ImmunoCAP^® assay (average sensitivity above published negative predictive cutoffs = 96% and average Pearson r = 0.90; average specificity = 97%). In contrast, poor ImmunoCAP^®-correlation was observed when PC-PURE was not utilized (average sensitivity above published negative predictive cutoffs = 59% and average Pearson r = 0.61; average specificity = 97%). This approach should be adaptable to improve a wide range of multiplex immunoassays such as in cancer, infectious disease and autoimmune disease.