Secretory paraspinal paraganglioma of thoracolumar spine: Case report and review of literature

Retroperitoneal paraganglioma in a young patient presenting with hypertensive crisis and transient loss of sight; a rare case report and literature review

INTRODUCTION

Catecholamine secreting tumors are a rare type of neuroendocrine tumors whose embryological origin is neural crest cells. 80 % to 90 % arise from the chromaffin cells of adrenal medulla while 10 % to 20 % arise from sympathetic and parasympathetic ganglia. Paragangliomas can be symptomatic due to excess catecholamine secretion or can be asymptomatic. Definitive treatment of paragangliomas is surgical resection.

CASE

A 16 yr old male who presented with right iliac fossa pain and hypertension associated with headache and transient loss of sight. Contrasted CT scan of the abdomen revealed a para-aortic retroperitoneal mass, 24 h urine Normetanephrines were significantly elevated. Pre-operative patient preparation included administration of alpha blockers then later beta blockers with adequate hydration. Intra operative blood pressure elevation during tumor manipulation managed with intravenous beta blockers. Post operatively patient required no inotropic support or anti hypertensives. Histopathology revealed features suggestive of a paraganglioma and immunohistochemistry s100 (+) Chromogranin A (+).

DISCUSSION

Functional paragangliomas are manifested by symptoms that result from catecholamine hypersecretion. Biochemical confirmation and functional localization of the tumors is recommended. Definitive management is surgical resection with a pre requisite of adequate patient preparation which includes blood pressure control and volume replacement.

CONCLUSION

Tumor localisation and adequate patient preparation with alpha blockers and adequate hydration is an important prerequisite to surgical resection.

Primary Paraganglioma of the Spine: A Systematic Review of Clinical Features and Surgical Management in Cauda Equina vs Non-Cauda Equina Lesions

BACKGROUND

Primary spine paragangliomas are rare tumors. Surgical resection plays a role, but aggressive lesions are challenging. We reviewed the literature on primary spine paragangliomas.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched upon the PRISMA guidelines to include studies on primary spine paragangliomas. Clinical-radiological features, treatments, and outcomes were analyzed and compared between cauda-equina vs non-cauda-equina tumors.

RESULTS

We included 143 studies comprising 334 patients. Median age was 46 years (range, 6-85). The most frequent symptoms were lower-back (64.1%) and radicular (53.9%) pain, and sympathetic in 18 patients (5.4%). Cauda-equina paragangliomas (84.1%) had frequently lumbar (49.1%) or lumbosacral (29%) locations. Non-cauda-equina tumors were mostly in the thoracic (11.4%), thoracolumbar (5.1%), and cervical (3.6%) spine. Median tumor diameter was 2.5cm (range, 0.5-13.0). Surgical resection (98.5%) was preferred over biopsy (1.5%). Decompressive laminectomy (53%) and spine fusion (6.9%) were also performed. Adjuvant radiotherapy was delivered in 39 patients (11.7%) with aggressive tumors. Post-treatment symptomatic improvement was described in 86.2% cases. Median follow-up was 19.5 months (range, 0.1-468.0), and 23 patients (3.9%) had tumor recurrences. No significant differences were found between cauda-equina vs non-cauda-equina tumors.

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection is effective and safe in treating primary spine paragangliomas; however, adjuvant treatments may be needed for aggressive lesions.

A Novel Endoscopic Technique for Biopsy and Tissue Diagnosis for a Paraspinal Thoracic Tumor in a Pediatric Patient: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

Conventional approaches to the thoracic spine can require extensive tissue dissection, bony disruption, and instability that may warrant the need for instrumentation and fusion. Furthermore, anterior approaches may require the involvement of various surgeons from multiple disciplines to ensure a successful operation and mitigate complications. Currently, available minimally invasive approaches still require bony removal and usually rely heavily on computed tomography (CT)-guided imaging without direct gross visualization. Endoscopic spinal procedures have provided an ultra-minimally invasive alternative to access many areas in and around the spinal column.

METHODS

We present a 12-year-old boy with a right-sided 2.0 × 3.2-cm paravertebral lesion at the level of T5. The patient successfully underwent an endoscopic approach to the lesion with minimal tissue and bony disruption for tissue diagnosis and tumor resection.

RESULTS

At initial and 6-month follow-up, the patient remained asymptomatic and without issues.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate here the feasibility and suggest the safety of a posterior ultra-minimally invasive endoscopic spinal approach to obtain a tissue biopsy of an incidentally found ventrolateral paraspinal tumor in the thoracic region in a pediatric patient. This minimal approach can prove to achieve similar results as other approaches that may otherwise necessitate more extensive or transthoracic procedures.

Paragangliomas of the spine: a retrospective case series in a national reference French center

INTRODUCTION

Primary paragangliomas (PG) of the spine are extremely rare entities. The present study reviews our experience over a period of 30 years.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single center, observational study. Patients surgically treated for a spinal PG with confirmed anatomopathological diagnosis were included. The McCormick classification was used as a reference for clinical evaluation. Follow-up MRI and clinical assessment took place at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery and on yearly basis after.

RESULTS

Six cases have been operated in our institution. The mean age was 37.8 (median 35.5, 30-53). The mean follow-up period was 9.6 years (median 9.5, 1-23). Preoperative duration of symptoms varied between a few hours to 4 years. Low back pain was most common sign. One presented with hemorrhage and acute onset of paraplegia. All patients underwent single surgery, with the exception of one case, which had two surgeries on the same anatomical site and a third surgery on another location of the same tumor type. Preoperatively, McCormick scale was I in four cases, and II and IV in one case, respectively. Postoperatively, all patients in McCormick I retained the same class; one patient in McCormick II passed to McCormick III; the case in McCormick IV recovered to McCormick II. Five of eight surgeries achieved total resection, while two surgeries accomplished a partial microsurgical excision and one a gross total resection. Three patients had spinal leptomeningeal dissemination. Two of them benefited from extended spine radiotherapy, while the other of a "wait-and-scan" policy. Spinal leptomeningeal dissemination was stable in all patients at last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

We consider surgery as primary treatment in all PG. In our experience, preoperative diagnosis is difficult and caution must be taken to perioperative course in these cases. We do not routinely perform postoperative radiation if there is a residual tumor. We regularly perform clinical and radiological follow-up, so as to be able to document recurrent cases, which have been reported even up to 30 years after primary surgical excision.