Cilostazol improves symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis - Evaluation of cerebral blood flow with single photon emission computed tomography

Phosphodiesterase inhibition and modulation of corticostriatal and hippocampal circuits: Clinical overview and translational considerations

The corticostriatal and hippocampal circuits contribute to the neurobiological underpinnings of several neuropsychiatric disorders, including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and schizophrenia. Based on biological function, these circuits can be clustered into motor circuits, associative/cognitive circuits and limbic circuits. Together, dysfunctions in these circuits produce the wide range of symptoms observed in related neuropsychiatric disorders. Intracellular signaling in these circuits is largely mediated through the cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)/protein kinase A (PKA) pathway with an additional role for the cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP)/ protein kinase G (PKG) pathway, both of which can be regulated by phosphodiesterase inhibitors (PDE inhibitors). Through their effects on cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) and Dopamine- and cAMP-Regulated PhosphoProtein MR 32 kDa (DARPP-32), cyclic nucleotide pathways are involved in synaptic transmission, neuron excitability, neuroplasticity and neuroprotection. In this clinical review, we provide an overview of the current clinical status, discuss the general mechanism of action of PDE inhibitors in relation to the corticostriatal and hippocampal circuits and consider several translational challenges.

From Age-Related Cognitive Decline to Alzheimer's Disease: A Translational Overview of the Potential Role for Phosphodiesterases

Phosphodiesterase inhibitors (PDE-Is) are pharmacological compounds enhancing cAMP and/or cGMP signaling. Both these substrates affect neural communication by influencing presynaptic neurotransmitter release and postsynaptic intracellular pathways after neurotransmitter binding to its receptor. Both cAMP and cGMP play an important role in a variety of cellular functions including neuroplasticity and neuroprotection. This chapter provides a translational overview of the effects of different classes of PDE-Is on cognition enhancement in age-related cognitive decline and Alzheimer's disease (AD). The most effective PDE-Is in preclinical models of aging and AD appear to be PDE2-Is, PDE4-Is and PDE5-Is. Clinical studies are relatively sparse and so far PDE1-Is and PDE4-Is showed some promising results. In the future, the demonstration of clinical proof of concept and the generation of isoform selective PDE-Is are the hurdles to overcome in developing safe and efficacious novel PDE-Is for the treatment of age-related cognitive decline and cognitive dysfunction in AD.

Delayed Stenosis in the Intracranial Vessels following Endovascular Treatment for Acute Stroke

PURPOSE

To evaluate delayed stenosis of the vessels after endovascular thrombectomy using magnetic resonance (MR) angiography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of 82 consecutive patients who underwent successful endovascular treatment for acute intracranial large vessel occlusion between October 2010 and October 2014 at a single institution, 57 patients for whom 3-month radiologic follow-up examinations using MR angiography were available were included in the analysis. MR angiography images were assessed to detect delayed stenosis, which was defined as a decrease in the diameter of treated vessels > 50% compared with MR angiography images obtained 24 hours after endovascular treatment.

RESULTS

MR angiography images obtained 3 months after endovascular treatment revealed delayed stenosis of treated vessels in five (8.8%) of 57 patients. All cases of delayed stenosis were asymptomatic and occurred in the middle cerebral artery (MCA). Further serial radiologic follow-up showed gradual improvement of all delayed stenosis over 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular treatment poses a risk of delayed stenosis of treated vessels, especially in the MCA. MR angiography is a useful modality in long-term follow-up to evaluate delayed stenosis after endovascular treatment.

Effects of cilostazol on the progression and regression of symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis: it reduces the risk of ischemic stroke

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the efficacy and safety of cilostazol on the progression and regression of symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis.

DATA RETRIVAL:

We searched the main databases for eligible trials including Medline (from 1966 to June 2014), Embase (from 1980 to June 2014), Cochrane Library (Issue 6, 2014), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (from 1995 to June 2014), Current Controlled Trials (http://controlled-trials.com), Clinical Trials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov), and Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.chictr.org). All studies regarding prevention and treatment of symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis by cilostazol were collected. The Mesh or text keywords were the English words: “cilostazol, phosphodiesterase 3 inhibitor, atherosclerosis, and ischemic stroke.” No restrictions were put on publications or publication language.

SELECTION CRITERIA:

Grade A or B randomized controlled trials were selected according to the quality of evaluation criteria from the Cochrane Collaboration, in which cilostazol and aspirin were used to evaluate the effects of cilostazol in the treatment of patients with symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis. The quality of study methodology was evaluated based on criteria described in Cochrane Reviewer's Handbook 5.0.1. RevMan 5.2 software was used for data analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:

Clinical efficacy and safety of cilostazol in stopping progression and promoting regression of symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis were measured by magnetic resonance angiography and transcranial Doppler.

RESULTS:

Two randomized controlled trials with a total of 203 patients were included in this study. The results showed that while cilostazol was associated with a significantly reduced progression of intracranial artery stenosis (OR = 0.21, 95%CI: 0.09–0.47, P < 0.01), it had no beneficial effect on symptom regression (OR = 1.42, 95%CI: 0.80–2.51, P = 0.24). During the follow-up period, although some adverse effects developed, including headache, gastrointestinal disturbance, and dizziness, incidences of bleeding were lower than in aspirin-treated patients.

CONCLUSION:

Cilostazol may prevent the progression of symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis, which could reduce the incidence of ischemic stroke.

Systematic study of cilostazol on secondary stroke prevention: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To study the efficacy and safety of cilostazol on ischemic stroke prevention and treatment, systematic reviews of related clinical randomized controlled trials were analyzed.

METHODS

We searched the main databases for eligible trials including literature from January 1966 to November 2012 in MEDLINE, reports from 1980 to November 2012 in EMBASE, and all the studies published in EBSCO, Springer, Ovid, and Cochrane library citations. We also searched for keywords, including cilostazol and aspirin. RewMan 5.0 software was used to conduct the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Our search yielded five eligible trials. The effects of cilostazol and aspirin on ischemic stroke prevention and treatment were almost equal (combined odds ratio (OR) 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.59, 1.04)). Additionally, both magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and transcranial Doppler (TCD) examination showed that cilostazol could significantly decrease the incidence of intracranial artery stenosis exacerbation (MRA: combined OR 0.22, 95% CI (0.07, 0.68); TCD: combined OR 0.17, 95% CI (0.05, 0.51)). In terms of adverse reactions, there were slightly fewer incidences of major bleeding with cilostazol than with aspirin (combined OR 0.38, 95% CI (0.24, 0.60)), and there was no difference in the number of heart palpitations between cilostazol and aspirin. However, the incidence of gastrointestinal disorders, dizziness, and headaches caused by cilostazol was greater.

CONCLUSIONS

Cilostazol might be a more effective and safer alternative to aspirin for patients with ischemic stroke. Further studies are required to confirm whether cilostazol is a suitable therapeutic option for secondary stroke prevention in larger cohorts of patients with ischemic stroke.

Reproducibility of cerebral blood flow assessment using a quantitative SPECT reconstruction program and split-dose 123I-iodoamphetamine in institutions with different γ-cameras and collimators

Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is used widely in clinical studies. However, the technique requires image reconstruction and the methods for correcting scattered radiation and absorption are not standardized among SPECT procedures. Therefore, quantitation of cerebral blood flow (CBF) may not be constant across SPECT models. The quantitative SPECT (QSPECT) software package has been developed for standardization of CBF. Using the QSPECT/dual-table autoradiographic (DTARG) method, CBF and cerebral vascular reactivity (CVR) at rest and after acetazolamide challenge can be evaluated using (123)I-iodoamphetamine in a single SPECT session. In this study, we examined the reproducibility of quantitative regional CBF and CVR in QSPECT/DTARG using different SPECT models at two facilities. The subjects were nine patients with chronic cerebral ischemic disease who underwent QSPECT/DTARG at both facilities with use of different γ-cameras and collimators. There were significant correlations for CBF at rest and after acetazolamide challenge measured at the two facilities. The consistency of the CBFs of the patients measured at the two facilities were good in all cases. Our results show that CBF measured by QSPECT/DTARG in the same patients is reproducible in different SPECT models. This indicates that standardized evaluation of CBF can be performed in large multicenter studies.

Use of Cilostazol for Secondary Stroke Prevention: An Old Dog with New Tricks?

Objective:

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cilostazol for secondary prevention of non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke.

Data Sources:

PubMed and MEDLINE searches were performed (January 1970-September 2011) using the key words cilostazol, antiplatelet, aspirin, acetylsalicylic acid, secondary stroke prevention, ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, intracranial, cerebrovascular accident, and transient ischemic attack. Additionally, reference citations from publications identified were reviewed.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

Articles published in English and relevant primary literature evaluating the efficacy and safety of cilostazol in the secondary prevention of atherosclerotic ischemic stroke were included.

Data Synthesis:

Antiplatelet therapy plays a vital role in the multifaceted approach to secondary stroke prevention. Current American Heart Association/American Stroke Association clinical guidelines for secondary stroke prevention support the use of aspirin, Clopidogrel, and combination aspirin/extended-release dipyridamole. The antiplatelet, antithrombotic, and vasoditatory effects of cilostazol make it a potential alternative agent for atherosclerotic stroke prevention. Recent literature has demonstrated superior efficacy of cilostazol 100 mg twice daily for secondary stroke prevention compared to placebo and aspirin. Three clinical trials were reviewed (1 placebo-controlled, 2 aspirin-controlled), all of which were conducted in Japan or China. Cilostazol reduced the primary outcome of recurrence of stroke, with significantly fewer major bleeding events when compared to aspirin.

Conclusions:

Available literature suggests that cilostazol may be safer and more effective than aspirin in the secondary prevention of stroke in Asian patients. Further large-scale studies in more heterogeneous study populations are warranted to determine whether cilostazol is a viable therapeutic option for patients with a history of non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke.