Use of real-time ultrasound for locating tip position in neonates undergoing peripherally inserted central catheter insertion: A pilot study

A Comparison of In Vitro Measurement and Ultrasound for Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Placement in Premature Infants: A Before-and-After Self-Controlled Prospective Study

Background This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of ultrasonography (US) and in vitro measurement (IVM) methods in localizing peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in premature infants and analyze the relevant factors affecting the accuracy of IVM. Methodology The study employs a prospective before-and-after self-controlled clinical trial design. A total of 210 premature infants who underwent PICC catheterization were compared. We assessed the rate of catheter tip placement, consistency, and stability and analyzed the relevant factors. Results The study enrolled a total of 202 premature infants after eight infants dropped out. The one-time positioning rates of the PICC catheter tip using US and IVM were 100% and 73.8%, respectively. Concerning IVM, 53 (26.2%) patients did not reach the optimal position, with 24 (11.8%) patients having a shallow position and 29 (14.3%) having a deep position. The consistency of the two methods was 0.782 (p < 0.05). The degree of dispersion of US was 0.2 (0.0-0.4) cm, which was significantly smaller than IVM at 1.5 (0.0-1.8) cm. Gestational age less than 32 weeks (odds ratio (OR) = 6.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.43-30.81), weight less than 1,500 g (OR = 5.85, 95% CI = 2.11-16.20), body length less than 40 cm (OR = 15.36, 95% CI = 4.47-52.72), mechanical ventilation (OR = 5.13, 95% CI = 1.77-14.83), abdominal distension (OR = 78.18, 95% CI = 10.62-575.22), and bloating (OR = 8.81, 95% CI = 1.42-47.00) were risk factors that affected the accuracy of IVM. Conclusions Gestational age, weight, length, mechanical ventilation, abdominal distension, and swelling can lead to deviations with IVM. US can directly view the tip of the catheter, which is more accurate. Additionally, it is recommended to reduce the length of the catheter by 1.3 cm when using IVM to achieve the best-estimated placement length.

The utility of point-of-care ultrasound protocol to confirm central venous catheter placement in the preterm infant

Central vascular access is frequently required for preterm infants. Confirmation of positioning of central line is typically on chest and abdominal radiographs; POCUS is a relatively novel diagnostic method. Misdiagnosis is the main concern limiting use of this modality. The aim of this study is to validate our standard protocol accuracy in locating the central catheter position by correlating catheter position as determined by POCUS with radiographs. Premature babies < or equal to 30 weeks gestation who had peripheral central lines or surgical lines were enrolled. Confirmation of line position by radiographs was compared to images obtained through a specific US protocol technique. The operator of US exam was blinded to the radiograph findings. All images were reviewed by two radiologists who were blinded to the radiograph findings. 35 central line placements were assessed. 22 lines were inserted in the UL, and 13 were inserted in the LL with a total of 91 ultrasound scans and radiographs. The position of the line was interpreted as normal in 79/91 scans with interpreter reliability of [Formula: see text]=0.778 (p < 0.001), sensitivity of 0.83 and specificity of 0.96, and positive predictive value of 0.77 and negative predictive value of 0.97. There was no significant difference between the ultrasound interpretation and the radiograph interpretation of UL and LL.  Conclusion: The protocol of POCUS that we propose is a reliable tool for assessing the central line positions in preterm infants. What is Known: • POCUS is a reliable tool assessing the central line positions in preterm infants. What is New: • The protocol of POCUS that we propose is a reliable tool for assessing the central line positions in preterm infants.

Bedside ultrasonic localization of the nasogastric tube in a patient with severe COVID-19: A case report

BACKGROUND

The indwelling nasogastric tube is commonly used for supplying enteral nutrition to patients who are unable to feed themselves, and accurate positioning is essential in the indwelling nasogastric tube in the body of the aforementioned patients. In clinical practice, abdominal radiography, auscultation, and clinical determination of the pH of the gastric juice are routinely used by medical personnel to determine the position of the tube; however, those treatments have proved limitations in specific cases. There are few case reports on the precise positioning of the nasogastric tube in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), for whom a supply of necessary nutrition support is significant throughout the process of treatment.

CASE SUMMARY

A 79-year-old patient, diagnosed with COVID-19 at the stage of combined syndromes with severe bacterial lung infection, respiratory failure, multiple co-morbidities, and a poor nutritional status, was presented to us and required an indwelling nasogastric tube for enteral nutrition support. After pre-treatment assessments including observation of the patient’s nasal feeding status and examination of the nasal septal deviation, inflammation, obstruction, nasal leakage of cerebrospinal fluid, and other disorders that might render intubation inappropriate, we measured and marked the length of the nasogastric tube to be placed and delivered the tube to the intended length in the standard manner. Then further scrutiny was conducted to ensure that the tube was not coiled in the mouth, and gentle movements were made to avoid damage to the esophageal mucosa. However, back draw of the gastric juice using an empty needle failed, and the stethoscope could not be used for auscultation due to the specific condition presented by the internal organs of the patient, and the end of the tube was placed in saline with no bubbles spilling out. Therefore, it was not possible to determine whether the nasogastric tube was placed exactly in the stomach and no nutrient infusion was performed for the time being. Subsequently, the ultrasound probe was utilized to view the condition of the patient’s stomach, where the nasogastric tube was found to be translucent and running parallel to the esophagus shaped as “=”. The pre-conditions were achieved and 100 mL nutritional fluid was fed to the patient, who did not experience any discomfort throughout the procedure. His vital signs were stable with no adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

We achieved successfully used ultrasound to position the nasogastric tube in a 79-year-old patient with COVID-19. The repeatable ultrasound application does not involve radiation and causes less disturbance in the neck, making it advantageous for rapid positioning of the nasogastric tube and worthy of clinical promotion and application.

Point-of-care ultrasound for neonatal central catheter positioning: impact on X-rays and line tip position accuracy

Objective of the study was to compare number of X-rays performed for neonatal central line tip positioning when real-time US is used compared to X-ray only, and to assess consequences on position accuracy, irradiation and cost. Retrospective monocentric cohort study conducted at Evelina London Children's Hospital Neonatal Unit over 6 months. Study was conducted during implementation of US for line tip localisation with formulation of US protocol. Tip position on X-ray was reviewed by one neonatologist and one radiologist and inter-rater agreement calculated. Criteria for good, satisfactory or inadequate position of the tip were defined. Estimated effective radiation dose and cost for each X-ray was determined. Two hundred seventy-four lines were inserted (nPICC, UVC, UAC). Eighty-three lines were scanned with US (US group); 191 lines were not (no-US group). Number of X-rays performed was significantly lower in the US group: 1.19 vs. 1.5 (p 0.001), related to a significantly lower percentage of lines requiring multiple X-rays (38.7% no-US group vs. 19.9% US group; p 0.004). Accuracy was higher in US group with more lines at cavoatrial junction (p 0.05) and was significantly increased with US use for lines inserted from lower limbs (22.9% and 76.2%, p 0.001). Inter-rater agreement was strong (k > 0.8). US group received lower mean radiation dose (p < 0.001) and cost related to X-ray was significantly reduced (p 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Real-time US use for line tip positioning in the NICU significantly decreased the number of X-rays performed and was associated with better-positioned lines, decreased irradiation and cost.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• The use of point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) by critical care providers in neonatology has increased in recent years. International guidelines advocate for the use of PoCUS as valid guidance to practical procedures in neonatology. • Central catheters (umbilical catheters and neonatal peripherally inserted central catheters) are among the most commonly used devices to support NICU patients. Proper positioning is crucial to avoid complications and PoCUS has high sensitivity and specificity in accurately determining line tip position. The current standard practice for line tip position confirmation in neonatology is still conventional radiography despite multiple evidence suggest significant inaccuracy of X-ray compared to ultrasound.

WHAT IS NEW

• PoCUS implementation for line tip positioning leads to a significant decrease in the number of X-rays performed, in radiation effective dose and costs. PoCUS evaluation of central catheters significantly increases the accuracy of the final line tip position with more lines at the cavoatrial junction. • Training is fundamental for univocal interpretation of ultrasound images and an effective learning strategy is being proposed.

Comparison of bedside ultrasonography and bedside chest radiography in neonatal peripherally inserted central catheters: A before and after self-control study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the applications of bedside ultrasonography (US) and bedside chest radiography (CR) in positioning peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) at Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs).

METHODS

The study is a prospective before and after self-control clinical trial. A consecutive series of 181 neonate patients were finally enrolled for PICC placement. CR, followed by US, was used to evaluate and readjust the sites of catheter tips. The imaging capability for PICC key structures, fluctuation of the measured data, measurement of tip-to-atrium distance, operation time, infants' body temperature changes, and direct expenses of the two imaging modalities were obtained and compared.

RESULTS

(1) Comparison in viewing PICC key structures: the display rate of catheter tip, SVC-and-right-atrium junction, IVC-and-right-atrium junction and tip-to-atrium distance is 99.47%, 100%, 100% and 99.47% for US and 100%, 98.42%, 97.37% and 95.79% for CR, respectively. (2) Fluctuation of the measured data by US and CR: the tip-to-atrium distance measured by US is 0.631 (0.435-0.820) cm, and that measured by CR is 0.593 (0.210-0.825) cm. US showed a narrower range of datum variance. (3) Consistency between US and CR: for consistency analysis, the Kappa coefficient (κ) was 0.843 (P < 0.05), showing their favorable consistency. (4) Comparison of operation time and infants' body temperature drop: for a CR exam, the time period taken was significantly longer than that of US (59.7 ± 26.33 vs. 79.6 ± 28.06, P < 0.001); and CR operations caused a significant babies' body temperature drop compared to US (0.14 ± 0.11 vs. 0.34 ± 0.19, P < 0.001). (5) Comparison of the direct expenses: the total cost for CR positioning was significantly higher than that for US (¥153.99 vs. ¥143, P = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

US exhibited superior traits to CR in the positioning of PICC tip. It could be promising for routine use in NICU.

A Survey of the Practice Status Quo of Ultrasound-Guided ECC Tip Location for Neonatal Patients in 31 Provinces of China

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the status quo of implementing ultrasound (US)-guided epicutaneo-caval catheters (ECC) tip location for neonatal patients in 31 provinces.

METHODS

The convenience sampling method was used to investigate the nursing managers and ECC (or intravenous therapy) nurses of 91 hospitals in 31 provinces from October 29 to November 10, 2021.

RESULTS

The survey involved a total of 182 medical staff, including 91 managers and 91 nurses, and 91 institutions, including 22 children's hospitals, 49 general hospitals and 21 maternal and child health care hospitals. Sixteen hospitals (17.6%) carried out US-guided ECC for neonatal patients; 176 subjects (96.7%) of the 91 hospitals had known about or heard of the technology of US-guided ECC. The low awareness of operators of the tip location of ECC catheters in children under ultrasound guidance (OR = 2.690, 95% CI = 1.163-6.221), limited conditions in existing wards (OR = 2.953, 95% CI = 1.285-6.790), and insufficient funds (OR = 2.836, 95% CI = 1.149-7.004) were the independent risk factors responsible for the failure to carry out ultrasonic-guided location of ECC tips in newborns.

CONCLUSION

The popularity of neonatal US-guided ECC location was seriously hindered by factors such as a low awareness rate of the project, the low qualification certification rate of the nursing staff, a flawed performance allocation system, and the lack of a professional team, among other factors.

Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for localising peripherally inserted central catheter tips in infants in the neonatal intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chest radiography after peripherally inserted central catheter insertion in infants is the reference standard method for verifying catheter tip position. The utilisation of ultrasound (US) for catheter placement confirmation in the neonatal and paediatric population has been the focus of many recent studies.

OBJECTIVE

In this systematic review we investigated the diagnostic accuracy of US for peripherally inserted central catheter tip confirmation in infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search of multiple databases. The study selection yielded eight articles, all of which had acceptable quality and homogeneity for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Sensitivity and specificity values were reported together with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

After synthesising the eligible studies, we found that US had a sensitivity of 95.2% (95% CI 91.9-97.4%) and specificity of 71.4% (95% CI 59.4-81.6%) for confirming catheter tip position.

CONCLUSION

Analyses indicated that US is an excellent imaging test for localising catheter tip position in the NICU when compared to radiography. Ultrasonography is a sensitive, specific and timely imaging modality for confirming PICC tip position. In cases where US is unable to locate malpositioned PICC tips, a chest or combined chest-abdominal radiograph should be performed.

Agitated saline contrast to delineate central venous catheter position in neonates

OBJECTIVE

Central venous catheter (CVC) insertion is required for the management of sick neonates. Ultrasonography/targeted neonatal echocardiography (TNE) with/without normal saline (NS) flush is used to identify CVC position. The present study compared the visibility and safety of agitated saline (AS) with normal saline (NS) flush.

STUDY DESIGN

This prospective interventional study included 110 CVC insertions, both umbilical venous catheterization (UVC) and peripherally inserted central catheterization (PICC). Catheter position was monitored by real-time TNE.

RESULTS

Overall visibility of catheter tip (combined UVC and PICC) was significantly better in AS (n = 55) compared with NS group (n = 55) [48/55 (87.2%) vs. 28/55 (50.9%); p < 0.0001]. Time to detect catheter tip by AS push was significantly less than that of NS push. There was no difference in the amount of saline flush required with either method. No major adverse effect was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

AS push can be used as a safe method to delineate CVC position in neonates.

[Operation and management guidelines for peripherally inserted central catheter in neonates (2021)]

Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) has been widely used in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in recent years, but there are potential risks for complications related to PICC. Based on the current evidence in China and overseas, the operation and management guidelines for PICC in neonates were developed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) in order to help the NICU staff to regulate the operation and management of PICC.

[Operation and management guidelines for peripherally inserted central catheter in neonates (2021)]

Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) has been widely used in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in recent years, but there are potential risks for complications related to PICC. Based on the current evidence in China and overseas, the operation and management guidelines for PICC in neonates were developed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) in order to help the NICU staff to regulate the operation and management of PICC.

Effectiveness of intracavitary electrocardiogram-guided peripherally inserted central catheter tip placement in premature infants: a multicentre pre-post intervention study

This pre-post intervention study was conducted in Neonatal Intensive Care Units in two Chinese hospitals. The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intracavitary electrocardiogram (IC-ECG)-guided peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement and tip positioning in premature infants. A total of 161 premature infants who required a PICC were enrolled and divided into two groups: pre-intervention group (n = 83) from October 2017 to July 2018 and post-intervention IC-ECG group (n = 78) from August 2018 to March 2019. Nurses were trained from May 2018 to July 2018. The reposition rate in the IC-ECG group and pre-interventions group was 3.85% and 19.28%, respectively (OR 5.970; 95% CI 1.666-21.395; p = 0.002). More infants achieved optimal tip position at the first attempt in the IC-ECG group than the pre-intervention group (93.59% vs 73.49%; OR 0.190; 95%CI 0.068-0.531; p = 0.001). The overall catheter-related complications in the pre-intervention group were 14.46% compared to 3.84% in the IC-ECG group (OR 2.962; 95%CI 1.013-8.661; p = 0.040). However, no significant differences were observed between the individual complication leakage, phlebitis and catheter-related blood stream infection.Conclusions: IC-ECG-guided peripherally inserted central catheter placement and tip positioning technology might decrease reposition rates, achieve more accurate tip positioning at the first attempt and might reduce catheter-related complications in premature infants. Further robust RCTs are needed to confirm the effectiveness of IC-ECG-guided PICC placement and tip positioning in neonates.What is Known:• Chest radiography is the gold standard for tip position confirmation of peripherally inserted central catheter placement.• Studies in adult patients have shown that electrocardiogram guidance in the placement of central venous catheters can be beneficial, while evidence in neonates is limited.What is New:• Intracavitary electrocardiogram-guided peripherally inserted central catheter placement might be superior to chest radiography in preterm infants.• Decreasing the repositioning rates and correct tip position of peripherally inserted central catheters might reduce catheter-related complications.

Ionizing Radiation Exposure in NICU

The authors prospectively studied ionizing radiation exposure in consecutive 107 very low birth weight (VLBW) neonates, admitted to their Level III neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Number of X-rays, their indications and calculated dose of radiation were documented. Their mean birth weight (+SD) and gestational age (+SD) were 1077 (±219.8) g and 29.7 (+2.57) wk respectively. Extremely low birth weight (ELBW) neonates underwent significantly higher radiographs when compared with VLBW neonates; 7.5(5-13.25) vs. 2(1-6); p < 0.0001. ELBW neonates received 3 times higher dose of radiation, when compared with VLBW neonates; 139.4 μsv (81.6-256.15) vs. 46.6 μsv (14.4-115.7); p < 0.0001. Seven percent of ELBW neonates received >1msv radiation. Lifetime risk associated with high radiation exposure during neonatal period is unknown. Every effort should be taken to reduce number of radiographs. Imaging modalities without radiation exposure such as, point of care ultrasound should be used wherever possible.

Iatrogenic Pleural Effusion Due to Extravasation of Parenteral Nutrition via an Epicutaneo Cava Catheter in Neonates: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background: Although Epicutaneo cava catheters (ECCs) are being routinely used for intravenous access for long-term parenteral nutrition and prolonged medication administration in neonates, ECC use can be associated with rare but acute life-threatening events such as pleural effusion (PE). It is important to identify and maintain the ECC tip in a central location for preventing complications. Recently, intracavitary electrocardiogram (IC-ECG) has been developed for the real-time monitoring and verification of ECC tip position. Objective: To investigate the causes and preventive measures of ECC-related PE in neonates. Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted between January 2013 and December 2017. We observed and analyzed the clinical characteristics and causes of ECC-related PE. From January to December 2017, all ECCs were guided by IC-ECG. The incidence of ECC-related PE and first-attempt success rates were analyzed before and after the introduction of IC-ECG. Additionally, the sensitivity and specificity of IC-ECG were evaluated. Results: ECC-related PE was identified in 14 infants. Catheters were malpositioned in three cases; in the other 11 cases, catheters were located centrally on insertion but had migrated to non-central locations at the time of PE. After the introduction of IC-ECG, the incidence of PE was zero (P < 0.05). The incidence of ECC-related PE was lower when veins of the lower extremities were selected as the insertion site (P < 0.05). The first-attempt success rate was significantly higher in the group with IC-ECG-guided ECC placement than in the group without (P < 0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of IC-ECG were 97.9 and 84.6%, respectively. Conclusion: ECC-related PE can be associated with either primary malposition or migration of the catheter tip. IC-ECG can help detect malposition and migration of catheter tips and improve the first-attempt success rate. Choosing a lower extremity insertion site may help decrease the rate of ECC-related PE. In neonates, IC-ECG is a reliable positioning method for ECCs with superior sensitivity and specificity.