Robustly optimized hybrid intensity-modulated proton therapy for craniospinal irradiation

Treatment planning of scanned proton beams in RayStation

The use of scanned proton beams in external beam radiation therapy has seen a rapid development over the past decade. This technique places new demands on treatment planning, as compared to conventional photon-based radiation therapy. In this article, several proton specific functions as implemented in the treatment planning system RayStation are presented. We will cover algorithms for energy layer and spot selection, basic optimization including the handling of spot weight limits, optimization of the linear energy transfer (LET) distribution, robust optimization including the special case of 4D optimization, proton arc planning, and automatic planning using deep learning. We will further present the Monte Carlo (MC) proton dose engine in RayStation to some detail, from the material interpretation of the CT data, through the beam model parameterization, to the actual MC transport mechanism. Useful tools for plan evaluation, including robustness evaluation, and the versatile scripting interface are also described. The overall aim of the paper is to give an overview of some of the key proton planning functions in RayStation, with example usages, and at the same time provide the details about the underlying algorithms that previously have not been fully publicly available.

Critical Appraisal of Paediatric Embryonal Cancers Treated with Image-guided Intensity-modulated Proton Therapy

AIM

To carry out a comprehensive critical appraisal of image-guided intensity-modulated proton therapy practice for craniospinal irradiation (CSI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An image-guided intensity-modulated proton therapy database of 45 consecutive paediatric patients with central nervous system embryonal malignancies treated between January 2019 and April 2022 were critically appraised for demography, diagnosis, treatment planning strategy and treatment delivery accuracy.

RESULTS

Most patients (median age: 7.5 years; male:female ratio: 34:11) had medulloblastoma (56%), followed by recurrent ependymoma (19%), pinealoblastoma (5%), germ cell (5%) and others (15%). The dose to the planning target volume-craniospinal (PTV-CS; length 39.06-79.59 cm) varied from 21 to 35 GyRBE, whereas the combined median dose to craniospinal and boost was 54 GyRBE. In all patients, the 95% isodose line covered the cribriform plate completely and optic nerves mostly, with a median V95% of 100% and 82.96%, keeping Dmax to the lens <3.9 GyRBE. In skeletally immature patients (88.38%), the anterior vertebral body was completely covered in 18.18% and underdosed in 70.15% of the cases, resulting in a median Dmean of 10.11 GyRBE to the oesophagus. Lateral spine coverage was maintained on the edges of the vertebral body in 52.2%, whereas it extended beyond in 48.8%. The median V98% for clinical target volumes and V95% for PTVs of the brain, spine and craniospinal were >97%, with excellent conformity (0.89) and homogeneity (0.07) indices for PTV-CS. All neurological organs at risk received a median Dmax ranging from 36 to 44 GyRBE from the combined CSI and boost regimens. Analysis of patient-specific quality assurance results revealed that 545 (97.67%) planar dosage verification had gamma (3% at 3 mm) values >95%. The online patient set-up verification showed translational and rotational deviation within 2 mm and 0.5° in 88-94% and 97% of the cases. Systematic and random error were within 0.90 mm and 1.71 mm in translation and 0.1° and 0.2° in rotation.

CONCLUSION

A change in practice pattern was observed. The findings from our comprehensive critical appraisal add to the growing library of CSI practice and may serve as a reference for inter-institutional comparison.

Encouraging early outcomes with image guided pencil beam proton therapy for cranio-spinal irradiation: first report from India

Background

To report our experience with image guided pencil beam proton beam therapy (PBT) for craniospinal irradiation (CSI).

Materials and Methods

Between January 2019 and December 2021, we carried out a detailed audit of the first forty patients treated with PBT. We had recorded acute toxicities, reporting early outcomes and discuss limitations of current contouring guidelines during CSI PBT planning.

Results

Median age of the patient cohort was 8 years, and histologies include 20 medulloblastoma, 7 recurrent ependymoma, 3 pineoblastoma, 3 were germ cell tumors and remaining 7 constituted other diagnoses. Forty percent patients received concurrent chemotherapy. Median CSI dose was 23.4 Gy (Gray; range 21.6–35 Gy). Thirty-five patients (87.5%) completed their CSI without interruption, 5 required hospital admission. No patient had grade 2/ > weight loss during the treatment. Forty-five percent (18) developed grade 1 haematological toxicities and 20% (8) developed grade 2 or 3 toxicities; none had grade 4 toxicities. At median follow up of 12 months, 90% patients are alive of whom 88.9% are having local control. Special consideration with modification in standard contouring used at our institute helped in limiting acute toxicities in paediatric CSI patients.

Conclusion

Our preliminary experience with modern contemporary PBT using pencil beam technology and daily image guidance in a range of tumours suitable for CSI is encouraging. Patients tolerated the treatment well with acceptable acute toxicity and expected short-term survival outcome. In paediatric CSI patients, modification in standard contouring guidelines required to achieve better results with PBT.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-02085-4.