Efficacy of pethidine, ketorolac, and lidocaine gel as analgesics for pain control in shockwave lithotripsy: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial

Effect of acupressure on pain intensity and physiological indices in patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a randomized double-blind sham-controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Despite the widespread use of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) as a treatment for kidney stones, it is essential to apply methods to control pain and improve patient comfort during this procedure. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of acupressure at the Qiu point on pain intensity and physiological indices in patients undergoing ESWL.

METHODS

This randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial was conducted at the Shahid Beheshti Educational-medical Center in Hamadan City (western Iran) from May to August 2023. Seventy-four eligible patients were split into intervention (n = 37) and sham (n = 37) groups. Ten minutes before lithotripsy, the intervention group received acupressure at the Qiu point, while the sham group received touch at a neutral point. The primary outcomes were pain intensity measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and physiological indices such as blood pressure and heart rate at baseline, 1, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 min after the intervention. The secondary outcomes included lithotripsy success and satisfaction with acupressure application.

RESULTS

The analysis of 70 patients showed no significant differences in the demographic and clinical information of the patients across the two groups before the study (P > 0.05). Generalized estimating equations revealed that the interaction effects of time and group in pain and heart rate were significant at 30 and 40 min (P < 0.05). The results of this analysis for systolic blood pressure revealed a significant interaction at 30 min (P = 0.035). However, no significant interaction effects were found for diastolic blood pressure changes (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Acupressure at the Qiu point positively impacts pain in patients undergoing ESWL treatment and increases their satisfaction. However, these results for physiological indices require further studies. Thus, acupressure can be considered a simple, easy, and effective option for pain management in patients during this procedure.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

[ https://en.irct.ir/trial/69117 ], identifier [IRCT20190524043687N4].

The effect of piezoelectric shockwave lithotripsy with 2- and 8-mm focus sizes on stone disintegration and renal injury

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) using a narrow focus or wide focus for renal stones.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A double-blind randomised trial included adult patients with a solitary radio-opaque renal pelvic stone of 1-2 cm. Patients were randomised into two groups: narrow-focus (2 mm) SWL and wide-focus (8 mm) SWL. The stone-free rate (SFR) and presence of complications such as haematuria, fever, pain, and peri-renal haematoma were evaluated. Pre- and postoperative urinary markers (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin [NGAL] and kidney injury molecule 1 [KIM-1]) concentrations were compared to assess renal injury.

RESULTS

A total of 135 patients were recruited for this study. The SFR after the first SWL session was 79.2% and 69.1% in narrow- and wide-focus groups, respectively. There was a comparable rise in the median 2-h NGAL concentration in both groups (P = 0.62). However, the rise in the median (interquartile range [IQR]) 2-h KIM-1 concentration was significantly higher in the narrow-focus group at 4.9 (4.6, 5.8) ng/mL compared with the wide-focus group at 4.4 (3.2, 5.7) ng/mL (P = 0.02). Nevertheless, the 3-day NGAL and KIM-1 urinary marker concentrations were significantly improved (P = 0.263 and P = 0.963, respectively). The overall SFR after three sessions was 86.6% and 86.8% in the narrow- and wide-focus groups, respectively (P = 0.77). Both groups were comparable for complications, apart from the median pain score and the percentage of high-grade haematuria, which were significantly higher in the narrow-focus group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.03, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Narrow- and wide-focus SWL were associated with comparable outcomes and re-treatment rates. However, narrow-focus SWL was associated with significantly higher morbidity in terms of pain and haematuria.

Opioid usage differs significantly following ureteroscopy and shockwave lithotripsy, while development of long-term usage is positively correlated with total days' supply and total MME supplied

PURPOSE

This study evaluated possible predictors of long-term opioid usage among patients with ureteric stones who received ureteroscopy (URS) or shockwave lithotripsy (SWL). We also assessed opioid usage characteristics of URS and SWL recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study used IQVIA PharMetrics^® Plus for Academics administrative claims database from years 2006-2020 to identify patients with a diagnosis of kidney or ureteral stones who were treated with either SWL or URS. We performed unadjusted bivariate analyses to compare opioid use characteristics of URS and SWL recipients, and performed logistic regression to determine demographic and clinical factors associated with becoming a long-term opioid user.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of opioid naive individuals having a diagnosis of a kidney stone who underwent URS (N = 9407) or SWL (N = 4894). About 6.7% (N = 964) of study subjects were long-term opioid users. Unadjusted bivariate associations showed that compared to non-long-term opioid users, long-term opioid users had significantly greater total days' supply, total morphine milliequivalents (MME) supplied, and claims per month. A similar trend was observed for URS (vs. SWL) recipients. However, compared to SWL recipients, URS recipients had 14.3% (1.2-25.6%; p = 0.034) lower odds of becoming long-term users. Total days' supply (OR: 1.041 (95% CI 1.030-1.052; p < 0.001) and total MME supplied (OR 1.001 (95% CI 1.000-1.001; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with long-term usage.

CONCLUSION

Higher total days' supply and total MME supplied as well as SWL were identified as risk factors for becoming long-term opioid users.

Does intraoperative penile tourniquet application during hypospadias repair affect the patients and surgeons reported outcomes? A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Hemostasis aimed to maintain the bloodless surgical field for better exposure for the surgeon. There are no trials regarding the impact of hemostasis techniques for hypospadias surgery on surgeon satisfaction and patients' reported outcomes. Application of penile tourniquet is a common practice in hypospadias surgery that aims at reducing blood loss and improving visualization. Yet, scarce data exist on the effect of penile tourniquet on hypospadias repair outcomes.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of restraining penile perfusion using a tourniquet in hypospadias repair on the surgical outcome, also surgeons and patients reported outcomes. To evaluate the effect of penile tourniquet application on hypospadias repair outcome and surgeon's satisfaction with intraoperative hemostasis.

STUDY DESIGN

In this single-blinded randomized controlled trial, a total of 110 children with distal hypospadias amenable for TIP repair were assigned to hypospadias repair with or without intraoperative application of a penile tourniquet. Surgeries were performed by a junior (2-5 years of experience in TIP repair) or a senior pediatric urologist (with >5 years of experience). Intraoperative blood loss, the number of times bipolar diathermy was used, hemoglobin deficit, and operative time were compared. Surgeon's satisfaction with intraoperative hemostasis was evaluated using a 4-tiered questionnaire. Patients were followed up for a minimum of one year. Complications and readmission rates were compared. The patient-reported outcome of hypospadias repair was assessed using the hypospadias objective scoring evaluation (HOSE).

RESULTS

Baseline patient demographics and hypospadias characteristics were comparable between the study groups. Bipolar diathermy was more often used in the non-tourniquet group (mean ± SD = 5.7 ± 1.8 times vs. 6.7 ± 1.9 for the tourniquet group; p = 0.007). Also, the operative time was longer in non-tourniquet group [mean = 54.7 ± 14.9 vs. 60.8 ± 12.5 min (p = 0.028)]. Junior surgeons were more likely to be satisfied with hemostasis when a tourniquet was used (97.4% vs. 79.5%, p = 0.02). Postoperative complications, readmission rates, and patient-reported outcomes were similar between both groups.

CONCLUSION

The application of penile tourniquet during hypospadias repair can reduce operative time and the need for diathermy use; and also improves junior surgeon's satisfaction with intraoperative hemostasis without adversely affecting success rates or patient-reported outcomes.