Unusual case of B cell lymphoma after immunosuppressive treatment for psoriasis

Clinical management for other iatrogenic immunodeficiency-associated lymphoproliferative disorders

Other iatrogenic immunodeficiency-associated lymphoproliferative disorders (OIIA-LPD), a category of immunodeficiency-associated LPD according to the World Health Organization classification, is associated with immunosuppressive drugs (ISDs). Several factors, including autoimmune disease (AID) activity, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, ISD usage, and aging, influence the development of OIIA-LPD, resulting in complicated clinical courses and outcomes. Most OIIA-LPD develops in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using methotrexate (MTX-LPD). The management of MTX-LPD is based on the clinical course, i.e., with/without regression, with/without relapse/regrowth event (RRE), LPD subtype, and ISDs for AIDs after LPD development. There are three clinical courses after ISD withdrawal: regressive LPD without relapse/regrowth (R-G), regressive LPD with RRE (R/R-G), and persistent LPD (P-G). The majority of EBV+ diffuse large B-cell lymphomas are classified in R-G, whereas classic Hodgkin lymphoma is generally classified in R/R-G. Polymorphic LPD (P-LPD) in MTX-LPD develops with heterogeneous pathological features similar to monomorphic LPD. Chemotherapy for MTX-LPD is selected according to that for de novo LPD, although the strategy for aggressive P-LPD and non-specific LPD is not well established. The absolute lymphocyte count in the peripheral blood has been suggested as a candidate marker for MTX-LPD development and RRE. Several clinical issues, including correct diagnosis among overlapping clinicopathological features in MTX-LPD and clinical management of LPD by ISDs other than MTX, require further investigation.

Safety and tolerability of adalimumab for the treatment of psoriasis: a review summarizing 15 years of real-life experience

Biologic therapies like adalimumab are the gold standard for psoriasis treatment with efficacy and safety profiles allowing for long-term treatment. However, adalimumab cannot be used in all patients and may cause adverse drug reactions. This study reviews conditions that might limit the use of adalimumab under real-life conditions. Local injection site reactions affect 12-37% of patients but rarely require specific therapy. Dermatological adverse events (AEs) include the paradoxical psoriasis and tend to respond to adequate therapy without adalimumab discontinuation. Adalimumab increases the risk for infections; latent chronic infections like tuberculosis or hepatitis B/C impose the highest risk for serious AEs. However, administration of adalimumab may still be possible under appropriate monitoring or prophylactic therapy. Some studies indicate an increased risk of malignancies in patients with psoriasis exposed to adalimumab. Here, the causal relationship is unclear since both psoriasis and some first-line therapies increase the risk of malignancies. Depression frequently coincides with psoriasis and may respond to adalimumab as well. Cardiovascular diseases are contraindications for adalimumab, but evidence suggests that adalimumab may still be a treatment option. Overall AE rates range from 245 to 399 per 100 patient years (serious AEs: 6-23; death: 1-2). Thus, adalimumab is slightly less safe than ustekinumab and infliximab but exhibits superior effectiveness and drug survival. Adalimumab is safe for pregnant women during the first trimester, for children up to 4 years and for the elderly. Thus, in spite of several conditions that require specific attention, the favourable safety and tolerability of adalimumab for the treatment of psoriasis is confirmed.

Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Secukinumab for the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis

BACKGROUND

In January 2015, US FDA approved secukinumab, a human interleukin-17A (IL-17A) antagonist, for the treatment of plaque psoriasis.

OBJECTIVE

To provide unbiased drug information about the efficacy and safety of secukinumab for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis by performing meta-analysis.

METHODS

PubMed and EMBASE database searches were conducted. Among the literatures retrieved, relevant Phase III clinical trials were analyzed. Statistical analysis of the data was performed by RevMan.

RESULTS

Four pivotal and three non-pivotal Phase III clinical trials were retrieved. All the trials evaluated the efficacy and safety of secukinumab for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis with two co-primary endpoints: proportions of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) responders and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) responders. The overall odd ratios for proportions of PASI responders and IGA responders in secukinumab-containing arm were 65.6 and 62.5 compared to the placebo arm, respectively. Secukinumab was superior to etanercept resulting in both of the odd ratios being 3.7 compared to the etanercept. Secukinumab was generally well tolerated during the one year trial. However, as with other monoclonal antibody medications, vulnerability of respiratory infection (especially nasopharyngitis) was reported as most common adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS

Meta-analysis of the seven Phase III clinical trials resulted in superiority of secukinumab over etanercept in terms of the efficacy and safety. However, long-term safety data is lacking at this time so post-marketing surveillance should be performed for any adverse events associated with the use of this new biological medication.