[Interventionist endoscopic ultrasonography. A retrospective analysis of 60 procedures]

Quiste de duplicación gástrico en paciente adulto: Reporte de caso y revisión de la literatura

Introducción. Los quistes gástricos de duplicación son malformaciones congénitas muy infrecuentes del tracto gastrointestinal. Se definen como una lesión quística tapizada por epitelio gastrointestinal que comparte una capa de músculo liso con la pared gástrica. Se han propuesto diferentes teorías sobre su patogénesis, sin embargo, los eventos embriológicos que conducen a la malformación no han logrado ser dilucidados. Debido a su localización y presentación clínica, el diagnóstico se realiza con mayor frecuencia durante los primeros años de vida y existen pocos casos reportados en adultos, en quienes el hallazgo suele ser incidental. Caso clínico. Se presenta el caso de una mujer de 65 años quien consultó por dolor abdominal crónico y síntomas digestivos inespecíficos. Por medio de Tomografía Axial Computarizada se evidenció una lesión quística en contacto con el páncreas y la pared gástrica. Se realizó exploración quirúrgica que, junto con los hallazgos histopatológicos, confirmó el diagnosticó de quiste de duplicación gástrico. Discusión. Los quistes de duplicación gástrica son anomalías excepcionales que se localizan más frecuentemente en la curvatura mayor. Su tratamiento es quirúrgico y la confirmación del diagnóstico se realiza mediante la histología.

Canalization technique to obtain deep tissue biopsy of gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors as an alternative to conventional known techniques

Background and Objectives

The most accurate technology to detect and diagnose subepithelial tumors (SETs) is the endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) combined with puncture techniques, such as the endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) or the endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle biopsy. Going further in the improvement of the results of tumor samples obtained endoscopically to diagnose the SETs, the canalization technique guided by miniprobes (MPs) to obtain biopsies of SET could be an alternative to EUS-FNA. The objective of this study is to analyze the results of samples obtained by this procedure.

Materials and Methods

A multicenter, retrospective study of a review of a database of 32 consecutive patients with a SET in the digestive tract, from 2000 to 2015 was conducted. All patients underwent EUS-performed by MP, to define the size, internal echostructure, and layer of origin of tumor. Once the echostructure was defined, it proceeded to the canalization technique to arrive to the tumor tissue.

Results

The average diameter of SETs in this series (32 patients) was about 21.6±11 mm (range: 5-41 mm). The diagnostic accuracy was 28/32, 87.50% (Confidence interval 95%: 76.04%-98.99%), and there were no major complications. All procedures were performed on outpatients, none of which required additional hospitalization. The 50% of patients were operated or endoscopically resected and in all cases, the previous pathological diagnosis was confirmed.

Conclusions

This is a feasible, safe, and effective procedure that allows to access to inside of SET to obtain deep biopsies. Tumor samples obtained by deep biopsy, with prior performing of the canalization technique guided by MP, were sufficient for histopathological and immunohistochemical diagnosis and similar to those obtained with other known methods (FNA Trucut, ProCore^®, etc.). However, more prospective comparative studies with a larger number of patients and different specialists carrying out the procedure to reach a higher statistical significance are necessary.

Diagnostic value of EUS elastography in detection of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors

AIM: To summarize the real-time EUS elastographic patterns of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors (SMTs) and investigate the potential use of EUS elatography for the differentiation between benign and malignant conditions.

METHODS: Thirty-four patients who underwent EUS at our department for SMT between January 2009 and October 2011 were enrolled, and real-time elastography was carried out during conventional EUS examination. Elastographic images were scored 1 to 5 based on the elastographic pattern. The final diagnosis was made based on the histopathology of specimens resected by surgery or endoscopy.

RESULTS: The 34 lesions were finally diagnosed as leiomyoma (n = 6), lipoma (n = 1), liposarcoma (n = 1), neurilemmoma (n = 1), or gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) (n = 25). Among the 25 GIST cases with pathological results, 12 were low-risk GISTs, 7 were moderate-risk GISTs, and 6 were high-risk GISTs. The elatographic patterns of benign SMTs tended to be type Ⅰ, Ⅱ or Ⅲ. All moderate-/high-risk GIST showed an elatographic pattern of type IV. There was a significant difference in elastographic pattern between benign and malignant lesions (P < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of real-time EUS elastography in the evaluation of malignant lesions were 92.86%, 95.00% and 94.12%, respectively. There was no significant difference in elastographic pattern between GISTs and leiomyoma.

CONCLUSION: There is an apparent difference in elastographic pattern between benign and malignant lesions of upper gastrointestinal SMTs. Real-time EUS elastography may be a promising method for the differentiation of benign and malignant lesions of upper gastrointestinal SMTs.