1
|
Patel L, Stenzel A, Van Hove C, Sidebottom A, Kethireddy R, Ha N, Beddow D, Manunga J, Qadri G, Kirven J, Skeik N. Outcomes in patients discharged with extended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after hospitalization with COVID-19. Vasc Med 2023; 28:331-339. [PMID: 37259526 PMCID: PMC10235916 DOI: 10.1177/1358863x231159945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a known complication of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in patients requiring hospitalization and intensive care. We examined the association between extended pharmacological VTE prophylaxis and outcomes among patients hospitalized with COVID-19. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with an index positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test at the time of, or during hospitalization. Patients who were prescribed extended pharmacological VTE prophylaxis were compared against patients who were not. Multivariable logistic regression was used to produce odds ratio (OR) estimates and Cox proportional hazard models for hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CI to examine the association between pharmacological VTE prophylaxis and outcomes of interest. Primary outcomes were 30- and 90-day VTE events. Secondary outcomes included 30- and 90-day mortality, 30-day superficial venous thrombosis (SVT), acute myocardial infarction (MI), acute ischemic stroke, critical limb ischemia, clinically significant bleeding, and inpatient readmissions. RESULTS A total of 1936 patients were included in the study. Among them, 731 (38%) were discharged on extended pharmacological VTE prophylaxis. No significant difference was found in 30- and 90-day VTE events among groups. Patients discharged on extended VTE prophylaxis showed improved survival at 30 (HR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.21-0.59) and 90 days (HR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.23-0.55) and reduced inpatient readmission at 30 days (OR: 0.12; 95% CI: 0.04-0.33) when compared to those without. CONCLUSION Patients discharged on extended VTE prophylaxis after hospitalization due to COVID-19 had similar thrombotic events on follow-up. However, use of extended VTE prophylaxis was associated with improved 30- and 90-day survival and reduced risk of 30-day inpatient readmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Love Patel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Abbott
Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Ashley Stenzel
- Care Delivery Research, Allina Health,
Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Rajesh Kethireddy
- Department of Internal Medicine, Abbott
Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Ngoc Ha
- Care Delivery Research, Allina Health,
Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - David Beddow
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mercy
Hospital, Coon Rapids, MN, USA
| | - Jesse Manunga
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Allina
Health Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Ghaziuddin Qadri
- Department of Internal Medicine, Abbott
Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Justin Kirven
- Department of Internal Medicine, Abbott
Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Nedaa Skeik
- Department of Vascular Medicine, Allina
Health Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yin X, Xi X, Min X, Feng Z, Li B, Cai W, Fan C, Wang L, Xia L. Long-term chest CT follow-up in COVID-19 Survivors: 102-361 days after onset. Ann Transl Med 2021; 9:1231. [PMID: 34532368 PMCID: PMC8421980 DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-1438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term longitudinal changes in chest computed tomography (CT) findings in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) survivors and their correlations with dyspnea after discharge. Methods A total of 337 COVID-19 survivors who underwent CT scan during hospitalization and between 102 and 361 days after onset were retrospectively included. Subjective CT findings, lesion volume, therapeutic measures and laboratory parameters were collected. The severity of the survivors' dyspnea was determined by follow-up questionnaire. The evolution of the CT findings from the peak period to discharge and throughout follow-up and the abilities of CT findings and clinical parameters to predict survival with and without dyspnea were analyzed. Results Ninety-one COVID-19 survivors still had dyspnea at follow-up. The age, comorbidity score, duration of hospital stays, receipt of hormone administration, receipt of immunoglobulin injections, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, receipt of mechanical ventilation, laboratory parameters, clinical classifications and parameters associated with lesion volume of the survivors with dyspnea were significantly different from those of survivors without dyspnea. Among the clinical parameters and CT parameters used to identify dyspnea, parameters associated with lesion volume showed the largest area under the curve (AUC) values, with lesion volume at discharge showing the largest AUC (0.820). Lesion volume decreased gradually from the peak period to discharge and through follow-up, with a notable decrease observed after discharge. Absorption of lesions continued 6 months after discharge. Conclusions Among the clinical parameters and subjective CT findings, CT findings associated with lesion volume were the best predictors of post-discharge dyspnea in COVID-19 survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi Yin
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.,Department of CT & MRI, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
| | - Xiaoqing Xi
- Department of Geriatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
| | - Xiangde Min
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhaoyan Feng
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Basen Li
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Wei Cai
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Chanyuan Fan
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Liang Wang
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Liming Xia
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Baba PUF, Shah R, Bhat H, Gul A, Wani A. Burns and COVID-19: Is the synergy sinister? Indian J Burns 2021. [DOI: 10.4103/ijb.ijb_24_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|