Accuracy of shoulder joint injections with ultrasound guidance: Confirmed by magnetic resonance arthrography

High Accuracy of Intra-articular Needle Position during Anterior Landmark Guided Glenohumeral Injections

OBJECTIVES

Image-guided ultrasound or fluoroscopic glenohumeral injections have high accuracy rates, but require training, equipment, cost, and radiation exposure (fluoroscopy). In contrast, landmark-guided glenohumeral injections do not require additional subspecialist referral or equipment. An optimal technique would be safe, accurate, and have few barriers to implementation. The purpose of this study was to define the accuracy of glenohumeral needle placement via an anterior landmark-guided approach as assessed by direct arthroscopic visualization.

METHODS

A consecutive series of adult patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy in the beach chair position were included in this study. Demographic and procedural data were collected. Time required to perform the injection, precise location of the needle-tip, and factors that affected accuracy of injection were also assessed.

RESULTS

A standardized anterior landmark-guided glenohumeral joint injection was performed in the operating room prior to surgery and location of the needle tip was documented by arthroscopic visualization with a low complication profile and few barriers to implementation. A total of 81 patients were enrolled. Successful intra-articular glenohumeral needle placement by Sports Medicine and Shoulder/elbow fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons was confirmed in 93.8% (76/81) of patients. Average time to complete the procedure was 24.8 seconds. There were no patient-related variables associated with non-intra-articular injection in the cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated a technique of anterior landmark-guided glenohumeral injection has an accuracy of 93.8% and requires less than 30 seconds to perform. This method is safe, yields similar accuracy to image-guided procedures with improved cost-and time-efficiency, and less radiation exposure. No patient-related factors were associated with inaccurate needle placement. Anterior landmark-guided glenohumeral injections may be utilized with confidence by providers in the clinical setting.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 5.

Frequency of technical success of ultrasound-guided arthrogram injections in children

BACKGROUND

MR arthrography is an essential diagnostic tool to assess and guide management of labral, ligamentous, fibrocartilaginous, and capsular abnormalities in children. While fluoroscopy is traditionally used for intra-articular contrast administration, ultrasound offers advantages of portability and lack of ionizing radiation exposure for both the patient and proceduralist.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this retrospective study is to quantify technical success and frequency of complications of ultrasound-guided arthrogram injections at our institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective analysis investigates the results of 217 ultrasound-guided arthrograms of the shoulder, elbow, and hip in patients aged 5-18 years. Successful injection of contrast into the target joint, clinical indication for MR arthrography, and complications were reviewed.

RESULTS

Accurate ultrasound-guided intra-articular administration of contrast into the target joint was successful for 100% of shoulder cases (90/90), 97% of elbow cases (77/79), and 98% of hip cases (47/48). Leak of contrast outside the target joint occurred in 1.4% (3/217) of cases. No major side effects including excessive bleeding, paresthesia, allergic reactions, or infection occurred during or after the procedure. Additionally, no major vessel, nerve, or tendon complications were observed on MR images.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound guidance is a reliable, effective, and safe approach to arthrography in children.

Learning Effect for Large Joint Diagnostic Aspirations With Fluoroscopy and Ultrasound

OBJECTIVE

The first objective was to identify whether increased experience, gauged by number of procedures performed posttraining, is correlated with greater likelihood of obtaining joint fluid in diagnostic aspirations. The second objective was to identify whether trainee involvement at the time of procedure affected the success rate of the procedure (which in this case was obtaining fluid on aspiration).

DESIGN

This was a retrospective analysis of fluoroscopic- and ultrasound-guided large joint aspirations. Logarithmic fit was performed to identify the presence of a learning curve to the successful attainment of fluid with experience. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify whether trainee presence for a procedure affected fluid attainment.

RESULTS

Ultrasound did not demonstrate a significant fit to the logarithmic curve ( P = 0.447), whereas fluoroscopy did ( P < 0.001), indicative of a learning curve for fluoroscopy. After adjusting for covariates, joint fluid was successfully attained at a similar rate whether trainees were present or not. Significant independent factors related to successful joint fluid attainment were image guidance technique ( P = 0.001), body mass index ( P = 0.032), and joint aspirated (overall P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

There was a statistically significant learning curve for fluoroscopic-guided joint aspirations, but not with ultrasound guidance. Trainee involvement did not affect the success rate of joint aspirations.

A proposed framework for point of care musculoskeletal ultrasound and ultrasound image-guided interventions by physiotherapists: scope of practice, education and governance

BACKGROUND

The use of point of care ultrasound (PoCUS) in the management of musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders is a diverse area of PoCUS practice. Its use by clinicians, such as physiotherapists, can occur across a wide range of roles and care pathway configurations; however, professional, educational and regulatory uncertainties can leave clinicians, managers and patients at risk.

MAIN BODY

A PoCUS framework approach (previously applied to support PoCUS consolidation and expansion) is used to frame these proposals. Central to this is the defining of (clinical and sonographic) scope of practice (ScoP). A number of indicative ScoPs are described to both (i) illustrate application of the principles and (ii) provide templates for ScoP derivations for individual services or clinicians. Image-guided MSK interventions are increasingly an aspect of MSK physiotherapy PoCUS. Given the utility of physiotherapists drawing upon their imaging to fully inform the selection (and performance) of such techniques, we present a rationale for competency in undertaking sonographic differentials as a pre-cursor to performing ultrasound image-guided MSK interventions. Alignment of ScoP with the relevant education and formal competency assessments are a cornerstone of the PoCUS framework approach; as such, key aspects of MSK PoCUS education and competency assessment are outlined. Strategies for addressing such requirements in healthcare settings where formal provision is not accessible, are also presented. Governance considerations are aligned with the regulatory environment, including those pertaining to professional guidance and insurance considerations. In addition, generic quality assurance elements are emphasised, as core aspects of high-quality service provision. Whilst the paper clarifies the situation for MSK physiotherapists using PoCUS in the UK, prompts are provided to support other professional groups working in MSK services in the United Kingdom (UK) and MSK physiotherapists/physical therapists in other countries-to facilitate their application of the principles.

CONCLUSION

Acknowledging the breadth of MSK physiotherapy PoCUS practice, this paper draws upon a framework approach to provide integrated ScoP, education/competency and governance solutions, along with mechanisms for other professions working with MSK PoCUS-and physiotherapists/physical therapists outside of the UK-to consolidate and expand their practice.