Single daily dose of cyclosporine in patients with primary glomerulonephritis and nephrotic syndrome

A case of membranous nephropathy with primary biliary cirrhosis and cyclosporine-induced remission

We report a case of membranous nephropathy with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). A 76-year-old Japanese man had been treated for PBC and was referred to our department because of acute severe proteinuria (10 g/day). Renal biopsy was performed and was compatible with a diagnosis of membranous nephropathy. The patient was treated with cyclosporine A (CsA; Neoral®), which was followed by normalization of liver function and partial remission of proteinuria (0.68 g/day) within six months without any significant side effects. This case suggests that CsA monotherapy is effective for the treatment of both liver dysfunction and membranous nephropathy associated with PBC.

Triple therapy with single daily dose of cyclosporine in Japanese patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy

OBJECTIVE

The optimal therapeutic approach to patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) remains controversial. In this study, we assessed the efficacy of single daily dose cyclosporine (CsA) combined with low-dose prednisolone (PSL) and an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) in patients with IMN.

METHODS

We studied 13 nephrotic patients (8 men, 5 women) with IMN diagnosed on biopsy. An initial single daily dose of 2 mg/kg, but not exceeding 150 mg, CsA was given for 12 months, tapered by a 25 mg reduction every 2 months. An initial twice-daily dose of 0.5 mg/kg PSL was given for 2 months and was also tapered. An ARB was given to all patients and the same dosage was used throughout the study. Patients were followed up for 6 to 66 months.

RESULTS

Nine patients achieved complete remission at 6.7±2.9 months, and incomplete remission was obtained in the remaining patients. After a follow-up period of 32.7±20.0 months, their serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate values were similar to baseline levels. The 9 patients who completed the treatment course have not relapsed. Moreover, there were no adverse effects requiring discontinuation of this triple therapy.

CONCLUSION

A single daily dose of CsA combined with a low dose of PSL and an ARB in new-onset nephrotic patients with IMN induced a high remission rate of nephrotic syndrome, with a low incidence of relapse and a low risk of adverse effects. The triple therapy and prospective follow-up shows potential as a treatment approach for patients with IMN.

Benefits of once-daily administration of cyclosporine a for children with steroid-dependent, relapsing nephrotic syndrome

Cyclosporine A (CsA) is an effective steroid-sparing agent for patients with steroid-dependent, relapsing nephrotic syndrome (SDRNS). The efficacy and safety of single-daily dose administration (SDD protocol) of CsA in selected patients with SDRNS has been reported. However, the efficacy of initial CsA treatment for children with SDRNS using the SDD protocol remains to be elucidated. The SDD protocol might be associated with lower clinical toxicity, compared to the conventional twice-daily dose administration (TDD protocol). Here we evaluated the efficacy and safety of the SDD protocol versus the TDD protocol in patients with SDRNS. The data from 19 patients (9.9 +/- 4.2 years old) were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Ten patients treated according to the SDD protocol for a mean of 27 months (SDD group), while 9 patients treated with the TDD protocol for a mean of 35 months (TDD group) as an initial CsA treatment. Although the mean daily CsA dose was significantly lower in the SDD group (1.5 +/- 0.4 mg/kg/day vs. 3.7 +/- 0.7 mg/kg/day, P < 0.01), there were no differences between the two groups in the mean minimum dose of prednisolone required for maintenance of clinical remission nor in the calculated relapse rate. One patient in the TDD group developed biopsy-proven mild CsA nephrotoxicity, whereas no patient in the SDD group showed nephrotoxicity. Despite a small number of patients, this study may support that the SDD protocol is at least as effective as the conventional TDD protocol, and is more cost-effective for selected children with SDRNS.