New insights into the clinical pharmacokinetics of trofosfamide

DNA Adducts in Cancer Chemotherapy

DNA adducting drugs, including alkylating agents and platinum-containing drugs, are prominent in cancer chemotherapy. Their mechanisms of action involve direct interaction with DNA, resulting in the formation of DNA addition products known as DNA adducts. While these adducts are well-accepted to induce cancer cell death, understanding of their specific chemotypes and their role in drug therapy response remain limited. This perspective aims to address this gap by investigating the metabolic activation and chemical characterization of DNA adducts formed by the U.S. FDA-approved drugs. Moreover, clinical studies on DNA adducts as potential biomarkers for predicting patient responses to drug efficacy are examined. The overarching goal is to engage the interest of medicinal chemists and stimulate further research into the use of DNA adducts as biomarkers for guiding personalized cancer treatment.

The Nitrogen Mustards

The nitrogen mustards are powerful cytotoxic and lymphoablative agents and have been used for more than 60 years. They are employed in the treatment of cancers, sarcomas, and hematologic malignancies. Cyclophosphamide, the most versatile of the nitrogen mustards, also has a place in stem cell transplantation and the therapy of autoimmune diseases. Adverse effects caused by the nitrogen mustards on the central nervous system, kidney, heart, bladder, and gonads remain important issues. Advances in analytical techniques have facilitated the investigation of the pharmacokinetics of the nitrogen mustards, especially the oxazaphosphorines, which are prodrugs requiring metabolic activation. Enzymes involved in the metabolism of cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide are very polymorphic, but a greater understanding of the pharmacogenomic influences on their activity has not yet translated into a personalized medicine approach. In addition to damaging DNA, the nitrogen mustards can act through other mechanisms, such as antiangiogenesis and immunomodulation. The immunomodulatory properties of cyclophosphamide are an area of current exploration. In particular, cyclophosphamide decreases the number and activity of regulatory T cells, and the interaction between cyclophosphamide and the intestinal microbiome is now recognized as an important factor. New derivatives of the nitrogen mustards continue to be assessed. Oxazaphosphorine analogs have been synthesized in attempts to both improve efficacy and reduce toxicity, with varying degrees of success. Combinations of the nitrogen mustards with monoclonal antibodies and small-molecule targeted agents are being evaluated. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The nitrogen mustards are important, well-established therapeutic agents that are used to treat a variety of diseases. Their role is continuing to evolve.

Nitrogen Mustards as Anticancer Chemotherapies: Historic Perspective, Current Developments and Future Trends

Nitrogen mustards, a family of DNA alkylating agents, marked the start of cancer pharmacotherapy. While traditionally characterized by their dose-limiting toxic effects, nitrogen mustards have been the subject of intense research efforts, which have led to safer and more effective agents. Even though the alkylating prodrug mustards were first developed decades ago, active research on ways to improve their selectivity and cytotoxic efficacy is a currently active topic of research. This review addresses the historical development of the nitrogen mustards, outlining their mechanism of action, and discussing the improvements on their therapeutic profile made through rational structure modifications. A special emphasis is made on discussing the nitrogen mustard prodrug category, with Cyclophosphamide (CPA) serving as the main highlight. Selected insights on the latest developments on nitrogen mustards are then provided, limiting such information to agents that preserve the original nitrogen mustard mechanism as their primary mode of action. Additionally, future trends that might follow in the quest to optimize these invaluable chemotherapeutic medications are succinctly suggested.

Low-dose trofosfamide plus rituximab is an effective and safe treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the elderly: a single center experience

Background

Rituximab plus combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) is broadly accepted as standard for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Nevertheless, there is sparsely data concerning the management of elderly patients.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of treatment with rituximab and low-dose trofosfamide in elderly patients (≥ 75 years) with DLBCL who were not suitable for R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimens or who did not consent to aggressive treatment. The choice regarding the qualification for R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimen was left to the estimation of the treating physicians.

Results

Eleven patients with a median age of 83 years (range, 75–90 years) were included. The age-adjusted international prognostic index was low risk in one patient, low-intermediate in four patients, high-intermediate in three patients, and high risk in 3 patients. All patients were evaluable for response. Five patients (45%) achieved a complete response, three (27%) a partial response, one (9%) stable disease, and two (18%) progressive disease. The estimated 1-yr overall survival was 54.5%, and the estimated 1-yr progression-free survival 45.5%, however, three patients (27%) were alive without evidence of disease at 16–20 months from start of treatment. Main toxicity was leukopenia (36% grade III or IV), whereas grade III/IV non-hematological adverse events did not occur.

Conclusions

Due to its potency and low toxicity, trofosfamide/rituximab might represent an alternative therapy for DLBCL of elderly patients not suitable for R-CHOP. This observation, however, should be confirmed in a larger patient population within a prospective clinical trial.

Trofosfamide in the treatment of elderly or frail patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

PURPOSE

The introduction of immunochemotherapy has led to a significant improvement in treatment results and prognosis of diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkins lymphoma (DLBCL) both at initial diagnosis and in relapse. Trofosfamide, an oxazaphosphorine derivative, has been utilized as alternative treatment option for patients with lymphoproliferative diseases unsuitable for conventional chemotherapy agents and protocols because of age, comorbidity, or poor performance score. While data on the activity and safety of single-agent trofosfamide have been published, the potential value of this agent in immunochemotherapy in combination with anti-CD20 antibodies such as rituximab has not been investigated to our knowledge.

METHODS

Safety and therapeutic effectiveness of trofosfamide given orally at a dose of 50 mg twice daily alone, or in combination with standard-dose rituximab, was investigated in a cohort of elderly and/or highly comorbid patients with histologically confirmed primary or secondary DLBCL.

RESULTS

Treatment with trofosfamide in this combination setting was generally well tolerated with no treatment-related deaths and manageable side effects, most of which were WHO class I-II; the most clinically relevant toxicity was cytopenia. 19 of 21 examined patients responded to therapy with 11 of 21 (52.4%) achieving a complete remission (CR). Median overall and progression-free survival (OS and PFS) in the CR-group was 14 and 9 months, respectively. In the subgroup with trofosfamide-based first-line therapy, 7 of 10 (70%) achieved CR and median PFS was not reached.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunochemotherapy with rituximab and trofosfamide (RT) is safe and effective in elderly and poor-performance patients with DLBCL. Response rates are comparable to most commonly used primary and salvage treatment protocols. The potential value of TR regimen in both first-line and relapsed/refractory DLCBL merits further investigation and is probably underestimated.

Oxazaphosphorine bioactivation and detoxification The role of xenobiotic receptors

Oxazaphosphorines, with the most representative members including cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and trofosfamide, constitute a class of alkylating agents that have a broad spectrum of anticancer activity against many malignant ailments including both solid tumors such as breast cancer and hematological malignancies such as leukemia and lymphoma. Most oxazaphosphorines are prodrugs that require hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes to generate active alkylating moieties before manifesting their chemotherapeutic effects. Meanwhile, oxazaphosphorines can also be transformed into non-therapeutic byproducts by various drug-metabolizing enzymes. Clinically, oxazaphosphorines are often administered in combination with other chemotherapeutics in adjuvant treatments. As such, the therapeutic efficacy, off-target toxicity, and unintentional drug-drug interactions of oxazaphosphorines have been long-lasting clinical concerns and heightened focuses of scientific literatures. Recent evidence suggests that xenobiotic receptors may play important roles in regulating the metabolism and clearance of oxazaphosphorines. Drugs as modulators of xenobiotic receptors can affect the therapeutic efficacy, cytotoxicity, and pharmacokinetics of coadministered oxazaphosphorines, providing a new molecular mechanism of drug-drug interactions. Here, we review current advances regarding the influence of xenobiotic receptors, particularly, the constitutive androstane receptor, the pregnane X receptor and the aryl hydrocarbon receptor, on the bioactivation and detoxification of oxazaphosphorines, with a focus on cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide.

Penetration of ifosfamide and its active metabolite 4-OH-ifosfamide into cerebrospinal fluid of patients with CNS malignancies

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to examine the penetration of ifosfamide (IFO) and 4-hydroxy-ifosfamide (4-OH-IFO) into the CSF of human adults and to evaluate the influence of blood-CSF barrier (BCB) function.

METHODS

In 12 adult patients with a malignant CNS disease treated with IFO 1,300-2,000 mg/m(2)/d as a 3-hour intravenous infusion, 17 CSF samples were collected within 10 min after the end of IFO infusion. In 8 of these patients, the CSF was obtained in up to 5 sequential 2-ml portions to detect a potential caudocranial concentration gradient. Additionally, blood was collected before treatment and immediately following IFO infusion.

RESULTS

IFO was detected in all 17 CSF samples at a median concentration of 79.24 μmol/l (39.27-176.73) and a median CSF/plasma ratio of 0.38 (0.18-0.72). 4-OH-IFO was detected in 11 CSF samples from 7 patients at a median concentration of 4.1 μmol/l (2.44-36.03) and a median CSF/plasma ratio of 3.07 (0.62-29.12). 4-OH-IFO was undetectable in 6 CSF samples from 5 patients and in one plasma sample. Both CSF drug concentrations and their CSF/plasma quotients neither correlated with steroid comedication nor with albumin quotients (QAlb).

CONCLUSIONS

Both IFO and 4-OH-IFO can penetrate into the CSF of human adults without a correlation to CSF turnover. In contrast to IFO, 4-OH-IFO CSF penetration is not reliable with levels ranging between undetectable and exceeding those in the corresponding plasma.

Metronomic trofosfamide inhibits progression of human lung cancer xenografts by exerting anti-angiogenic effects

BACKGROUND

Recent studies of conventional chemotherapeutic drugs administered in metronomic therapy schedules showed remarkable inhibitory effects on tumor angiogenesis. Subsequent and prolonged tumor regression was achieved moreover by circumventing acquired drug resistance. In this study, metronomic and conventional trofosfamide were compared on human NSCLC xenograft "LX-1."

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In vitro cytotoxicity of trofosfamide on tumor and human umbilical cord endothelial cells was determined under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Additionally fractions and duration of cell cycles were analyzed by flow cytometry. In vivo LX-1 xenotransplanted nude mice were treated with trofosfamide in conventional and metronomic schedules (i.p./p.o.). Tumor sections were evaluated for microvessel density (MVD), relative growth fraction and apoptosis.

RESULTS

In contrast to the rapid growth of conventionally treated lung cancer, long lasting tumor growth retardation over the total treatment period was achieved with metronomic treatment. While growth fraction and apoptotic rate of LX-1 cells remained unchanged, the MVD was significantly reduced (50%).

CONCLUSION

Our results show advantages of a metronomic trofosfamide schedule compared to a conventional bolus therapy mainly due to inhibition of angiogenesis. In vitro data show that this mechanism works under normoxic and hypoxic conditions and suggest that this is in part a direct cytotoxic effect on endothelial cells.

Metabolism and transport of oxazaphosphorines and the clinical implications

The oxazaphosphorines including cyclophosphamide (CPA), ifosfamide (IFO), and trofosfamide represent an important group of therapeutic agents due to their substantial antitumor and immuno-modulating activity. CPA is widely used as an anticancer drug, an immunosuppressant, and for the mobilization of hematopoetic progenitor cells from the bone marrow into peripheral blood prior to bone marrow transplantation for aplastic anemia, leukemia, and other malignancies. New oxazaphosphorines derivatives have been developed in an attempt to improve selectivity and response with reduced toxicity. These derivatives include mafosfamide (NSC 345842), glufosfamide (D19575, beta-D-glucosylisophosphoramide mustard), NSC 612567 (aldophosphamide perhydrothiazine), and NSC 613060 (aldophosphamide thiazolidine). This review highlights the metabolism and transport of these oxazaphosphorines (mainly CPA and IFO, as these two oxazaphosphorine drugs are the most widely used alkylating agents) and the clinical implications. Both CPA and IFO are prodrugs that require activation by hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP)-catalyzed 4-hydroxylation, yielding cytotoxic nitrogen mustards capable of reacting with DNA molecules to form crosslinks and lead to cell apoptosis and/or necrosis. Such prodrug activation can be enhanced within tumor cells by the CYP-based gene directed-enzyme prodrug therapy (GDEPT) approach. However, those newly synthesized oxazaphosphorine derivatives such as glufosfamide, NSC 612567 and NSC 613060, do not need hepatic activation. They are activated through other enzymatic and/or non-enzymatic pathways. For example, both NSC 612567 and NSC 613060 can be activated by plain phosphodiesterase (PDEs) in plasma and other tissues or by the high-affinity nuclear 3'-5' exonucleases associated with DNA polymerases, such as DNA polymerases and epsilon. The alternative CYP-catalyzed inactivation pathway by N-dechloroethylation generates the neurotoxic and nephrotoxic byproduct chloroacetaldehyde (CAA). Various aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDHs) and glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are involved in the detoxification of oxazaphosphorine metabolites. The metabolism of oxazaphosphorines is auto-inducible, with the activation of the orphan nuclear receptor pregnane X receptor (PXR) being the major mechanism. Oxazaphosphorine metabolism is affected by a number of factors associated with the drugs (e.g., dosage, route of administration, chirality, and drug combination) and patients (e.g., age, gender, renal and hepatic function). Several drug transporters, such as breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), multidrug resistance associated proteins (MRP1, MRP2, and MRP4) are involved in the active uptake and efflux of parental oxazaphosphorines, their cytotoxic mustards and conjugates in hepatocytes and tumor cells. Oxazaphosphorine metabolism and transport have a major impact on pharmacokinetic variability, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship, toxicity, resistance, and drug interactions since the drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters involved are key determinants of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oxazaphosphorines. A better understanding of the factors that affect the metabolism and transport of oxazaphosphorines is important for their optional use in cancer chemotherapy.

Pharmacokinetics and efficacy of ifosfamide or trofosfamide in patients with intraocular lymphoma

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of intraocular lymphoma (IOL) is poor, and the optimal treatment has not yet been defined. The study assesses ifosfamide (IFO) and trofosfamide (TRO) for treating IOL.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We prospectively evaluated the efficacy and aqueous penetration of intravenous IFO, oral TRO and their active 4-hydroxy (4-OH) metabolites in 10 patients with IOL. Doses varied from 1500 to 2000 mg/m2/day on days 1-3 for IFO and from 150 to 400 mg/day (continuous or intermittent administration) for TRO. Four patients had newly diagnosed disease, and six had relapsed after pretreatment.

RESULTS

All patients responded to first treatment with IFO or TRO, and both of two patients responded to re-treatment with IFO on ocular relapse. Progression-free survival from the first treatment with IFO or TRO was > or = 6-18 months. In six of six patients, 4-OH metabolites were detected in the aqueous humor at a concentration of 0.32-1.56 microM immediately after IFO infusion with an aqueous/serum ratio of 0.19-0.54. 4-OH metabolites could be detected in one of three patients at a concentration of 7.2 microM 3-16 h after ingestion of TRO.

CONCLUSIONS

IFO and TRO are active in IOL. IOL patients evidence aqueous penetration of 4-OH metabolites after intravenous administration of IFO.

Dose escalation study for defining the maximum tolerated dose of continuous oral trofosfamide in pretreated patients with metastatic lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Trofosfamide is increasingly used in the treatment of patients with several types of malignancies. However, the optimal dose of trofosfamide for patients with advanced cancer has not been systematically investigated yet. The aim of this study was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of continuous oral trofosfamide.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

16 patients with advanced lung cancer (14 nonsmall cell lung cancer, 2 small cell lung cancer; 10 male, 6 female; median age 64 years (range 46-82); median Karnofsky status 70%; median number of organs involved 3 (range 1-6)) were enrolled. All patients were previously treated with chemotherapy (median 2x, range 1-6) and 8/16 (50%) with radiotherapy. Patients received trofosfamide p.o. administered in 3 doses per day for 3 weeks (1 cycle) using a 3-patient-cohort dose-escalation strategy. Toxicities were graded according to the WHO Criteria.

RESULTS

Patients received a median of 2 cycles of trofosfamide (range 1-4) at 3 dose levels (90, 125, and 175 mg/m2). Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia were observed in 20, 13.3, and 6.6%, respectively. Dose-limiting toxicities during the first cycle were grade 3 muscle weakness and anorexia observed in 1/6 patients in cohort 1 (trofosfamide 90 mg/m2), grade 3 neutropenia in 1/6, and encephalopathy in 1/6 patients in cohort 3 (trofosfamide 175 mg/m2). Therefore, the dose level of 125 mg/m2 was defined as the MTD.

CONCLUSION

Trofosfamide at 125 mg/m2 administered in 3 doses per day was well tolerated. This dose level is recommended for further clinical studies.

Trofosfamide in the Palliative Treatment of Cancer: A Review of the Literature

Trofosfamide is an alkylating agent that is derived from the oxazaphoshorines. It has found application in a broad spectrum of malignancies in the last three decades. The main indications for application were in the palliative situation and as maintenance therapy. Good results were reported from the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas and soft tissue sarcomas. A lot of small studies and casuistic contributions are available giving treatment results of several solid carcinomas (malignant gliomas, ovarian, lung and prostate cancer, and others). Due to its oral formulation and good tolerability trofosfamide is an attractive candidate for the palliative situation because treatment on an outpatient basis is possible. However, there is still a lack of randomized clinical studies with trofosfamide. Thus, evidence-based conclusions on the therapeutic value of the drug cannot be drawn. In the future, phase III trials should be undertaken.