First-line tuberculosis treatment with double-dose rifampicin is well tolerated

The quest to deliver high-dose rifampicin: can the inhaled approach help?

INTRODUCTION

Tuberculosis (TB) is a global health problem that poses a challenge to global treatment programs. Rifampicin is a potent and highly effective drug for TB treatment; however, higher oral doses than the standard dose (10 mg/kg/day) rifampicin may offer better efficacy in TB treatment.

AREAS COVERED

High oral dose rifampicin is not implemented in anti-TB regimens yet and requires about a 3-fold increase in dose for increased efficacy. We discuss inhaled delivery of rifampicin as an alternative or adjunct to oral high-dose rifampicin. Clinical results of safety, tolerability, and patient compliance with antibiotic dry powder inhalers are reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

Clinical trials suggest that an approximately 3-fold increase in the standard oral dose of rifampicin may be required for better clinical outcomes. On the other hand, animal studies suggest that inhaled rifampicin can deliver a high concentration of the drug to the lungs and achieve approximately double the plasma concentration than that from oral rifampicin. Clinical trials on inhaled antibiotics suggest that dry powder inhalation is a patient-friendly and well-tolerated approach in treating respiratory infections compared to conventional treatments. Rifampicin, a well-known anti-TB drug given orally, is a good candidate for clinical development as a dry powder inhaler.

Glutathione Modulates Efficacious Changes in the Immune Response against Tuberculosis

Glutathione (GSH) is an antioxidant in human cells that is utilized to prevent damage occurred by reactive oxygen species, free radicals, peroxides, lipid peroxides, and heavy metals. Due to its immunological role in tuberculosis (TB), GSH is hypothesized to play an important part in the immune response against M. tb infection. In fact, one of the hallmark structures of TB is granuloma formation, which involves many types of immune cells. T cells, specifically, are a major component and are involved in the release of cytokines and activation of macrophages. GSH also serves an important function in macrophages, natural killer cells, and T cells in modulating their activation, their metabolism, proper cytokine release, proper redox activity, and free radical levels. For patients with increased susceptibility, such as those with HIV and type 2 diabetes, the demand for higher GSH levels is increased. GSH acts as an important immunomodulatory antioxidant by stabilizing redox activity, shifting of cytokine profile toward Th1 type response, and enhancing T lymphocytes. This review compiles reports showing the benefits of GSH in improving the immune responses against M. tb infection and the use of GSH as an adjunctive therapy for TB.

A Review of the Development of Multitarget Molecules against HIV-TB Coinfection Pathogens

The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) produces the pathologic basis of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). An increase in the viral load in the body leads to a decline in the number of T lymphocytes, compromising the patient's immune system. Some opportunistic diseases may result, such as tuberculosis (TB), which is the most common in seropositive patients. Long-term treatment is required for HIV-TB coinfection, and cocktails of drugs for both diseases are used concomitantly. The most challenging aspects of treatment are the occurrence of drug interactions, overlapping toxicity, no adherence to treatment and cases of resistance. Recent approaches have involved using molecules that can act synergistically on two or more distinct targets. The development of multitarget molecules could overcome the disadvantages of the therapies used to treat HIV-TB coinfection. This report is the first review on using molecules with activities against HIV and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) for molecular hybridization and multitarget strategies. Here, we discuss the importance and development of multiple targets as a means of improving adherence to therapy in cases of the coexistence of these pathologies. In this context, several studies on the development of structural entities to treat HIV-TB simultaneously are discussed.

Safety of Antimicrobials for Postexposure Prophylaxis and Treatment of Anthrax: A Review

BACKGROUND

Bacillus anthracis, the causative agent for anthrax, poses a potential bioterrorism threat and is capable of causing mass morbidity and mortality. Antimicrobials are the mainstay of postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) and treatment of anthrax. We conducted this safety review of 24 select antimicrobials to identify any new or emerging serious or severe adverse events (AEs) to help inform their risk-benefit evaluation for anthrax.

METHODS

Twenty-four antimicrobials were included in this review. Tertiary data sources (e.g. Lactmed, Micromedex, REPROTOX) were reviewed for safety information and summarized to evaluate the known risks of these antimicrobials. PubMed was also searched for published safety information on serious or severe AEs with these antimicrobials; AEs that met inclusion criteria were abstracted and reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 1316 articles were reviewed. No consistent observations or patterns were observed among the abstracted AEs for a given antimicrobial; therefore, the literature review did not reveal evidence of new or emerging AEs that would add to the risk-benefit profiles already known from tertiary data sources.

CONCLUSIONS

The reviewed antimicrobials have known and/or potential serious or severe risks that may influence selection when recommending an antimicrobial for PEP or treatment of anthrax. Given the high fatality rate of anthrax, the risk-benefit evaluation favors use of these antimicrobials for anthrax. The potential risks of antimicrobials should not preclude these reviewed antimicrobials from clinical consideration for anthrax but rather guide appropriate antimicrobial selection and prioritization across different patient populations with risk mitigation measures as warranted.

L-GSH Supplementation in Conjunction With Rifampicin Augments the Treatment Response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a Diabetic Mouse Model

Both active tuberculosis (TB) and asymptomatic latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tb) infection (LTBI) cause significant health burdens to humans worldwide. Individuals with immunocompromising health conditions, such as Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), have a weakened ability to control M. tb infection and are more susceptible to reactivation of LTBI to active diseases. T2DM cases are known to have glutathione (GSH) deficiency and impaired immune cell function, including the granulomatous response to M. tb infection. We have previously reported that liposomal glutathione (L-GSH) supplementation can restore the immune cell effector responses of T2DM cases. However, the effects of L-GSH supplementation on the bactericidal activities of first-line anti-TB drug rifampicin (RIF) against M. tb infection have yet to be explored. The aim of this study is to elucidate the effects of L-GSH supplementation in conjunction with RIF treatment during an active M. tb infection in a diabetic mouse model. In this study, we evaluated total and reduced levels of GSH, cytokine profiles, malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, M. tb burden, and granulomatous response in the lungs. We show that L-GSH supplementation caused a significant reduction in M. tb burden in the lungs, decreased oxidative stress, and increased the production of IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-17, IL-10, and TGF-β1compared to the untreated mice. In addition, L-GSH supplementation in conjunction with RIF treatment achieved better control of M. tb infection in the lungs and significantly reduced the levels of oxidative stress compared to treatment with RIF alone. Moreover, L-GSH in conjunction with RIF significantly increased TGF-β1 levels compared to treatment with RIF alone. These findings suggest potential therapeutic benefits of L-GSH supplementation in conjunction with first-line antibiotic therapy against M. tb infection in individuals with T2DM.

Intensified Antituberculosis Therapy Regimen Containing Higher Dose Rifampin for Tuberculous Meningitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Tuberculous meningitis is difficult to diagnose and is associated with high mortality. Recently, several studies evaluated the intensified regimen containing higher dose rifampin to treat tuberculous meningitis. However, this topic remains to be concluded. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate pharmacokinetics parameters, safety, and survival benefits of high-dose rifampin for tuberculous meningitis.

Method

Data were searched from PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for studies describing an antituberculosis regimen including a higher dose of rifampin for patients with tuberculous meningitis. The quality of eligible studies was evaluated via The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The meta-analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.3 software, the synthesis of the data was shown in mean difference (MD) or relative risk (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

There were six randomized control trails included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that the concentration in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were significantly higher in the intervention group than the standard group [MD = 22.08, 95%CI (16.24, 27.92), p < 0.00001; MD = 0.74, 95%CI (0.42, 1.05), p < 0.00001], as well as the area under the time concentration curve between 0 and 24 h (AUC₀₋₂₄) of rifampin [MD 203.56, 95%CI (153.07, 254.05), p < 0.00001] in plasma, but the overall survival did not improve [RR = 0.92, 95%CI (0.67, 1.26), p = 0.61]. For adverse events, the results showed a statistically significant lower incidence of hypersensitivity compared with the intervention group [RR = 1.72, 95%CI (1.13, 2.62), p = 0.01]. Fortunately, other common adverse drug reactions such as liver injury, neurological events, myelosuppression, and cardiotoxicity had no significant increase [RR = 0.98, 95%CI (0.77, 1.26), p = 0.90; RR = 1.10, 95%CI (0.94, 1.30), p = 0.23; RR = 0.82, 95%CI (0.59, 1.13), p = 0.22; RR = 1.11, 95%CI (0.66, 1.86), p = 0.70].

Conclusion

This meta-analysis suggested that the intensified treatment regimen including a higher dose of rifampin significantly increased the rifampin concentration both in the plasma and CSF, and it was safe in patients with tuberculous meningitis, but resulted in no improvement in survival rates.

High-dose rifamycins in the treatment of TB: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is growing interest in using high-dose rifamycin (HDR) regimens in TB treatment, but the safety and efficacy of HDR regimens remain uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing HDR to standard-dose rifamycin (SDR) regimens.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and clinicaltrials.gov for prospective studies comparing daily therapy with HDRs to SDRs. Rifamycins included rifampicin, rifapentine and rifabutin. Our primary outcome was the rate of severe adverse events (SAEs), with secondary outcomes of death, all adverse events, SAE by organ and efficacy outcomes of 2-month culture conversion and relapse. This study was prospectively registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020142519).

RESULTS

We identified 9057 articles and included 13 studies with 6168 participants contributing 7930 person-years (PY) of follow-up (HDR: 3535 participants, 4387 PY; SDR: 2633 participants, 3543 PY). We found no significant difference in the pooled incidence rate ratio (IRR) of SAE between HDR and SDR (IRR 1.00, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.23, I ²=41%). There was no significant difference when analysis was limited to SAE possibly, probably or likely medication-related (IRR 1.07, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.41, I ²=0%); studies with low risk of bias (IRR 0.98, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.20, I ²=44%); or studies using rifampicin (IRR 1.00, 95% CI 0. 0.75-1.32, I ²=38%). No significant differences were noted in pooled outcomes of death, 2-month culture conversion and relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

HDRs were not associated with a significant difference in SAEs, 2-month culture conversion or death. Further studies are required to identify specific groups who may benefit from HDR.

Standard versus high dose of rifampicin in the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

A growing amount of evidence suggests that the rifampicin dosing currently recommended for tuberculosis treatment could be associated with inadequate exposure and unfavourable outcomes. We aimed to compare clinical and microbiological efficacy and safety outcomes of standard and higher rifampicin dosing.

METHODS

Data sources were MEDLINE, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Library. This was a systematic review and meta-analysis that included experimental or observational studies comparing 8-week sputum culture conversion, treatment failure, or safety outcomes in naïve patients with pulmonary tuberculosis treated with standard (10 mg/kg) or higher doses of rifampicin.

RESULTS

Of a total of 9683 citations screened, eight randomized controlled trials were included, accounting for 1897 subjects; the risk of bias was low in three studies, high in two and intermediate in three. At week 8 a higher proportion of patients in the high-dose group obtained a sputum culture conversion than those in the standard dose group (83.7% versus 80.6%, RR 1.06; 95%CI 1.01-1.12, p 0.028); this result was confirmed in the sub-analysis including patients treated with a rifampicin dose of ≥20 mg/kg, but not in those treated with 11-19 mg/kg. Events of treatment failure at end of treatment showed no significant difference between the two groups (RR 0.84; 95%CI 0.59-1.21, p 0.362). In the analysis evaluating safety outcome, the difference in the occurrence of a grade 3 or 4 liver toxicity or adverse drug reactions leading to discontinuation was not significant at the statistical analysis among the groups (7.2% versus 5.4%, RR 1.19; 95%CI 0.81-1.73, p 0.370, and 1.5% versus 0.6%, RR 2.31; 95%CI 0.65-8.21, p 0.195, respectively). No statistical heterogeneity among studies was observed for each outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

High doses of rifampicin were associated with an increased rate of sputum culture conversion at 8 weeks of treatment, particularly in patients receiving ≥20 mg/kg.