A Comparison of the Reliability of the Patellar Tendon-Trochlear Groove (PTTG) Distance and the Tibial Tuberosity-Trochlear Groove (TTTG) Distance Measured on MRI

Assessment of the reliability and validity of imaging measurements for patellofemoral instability: an updated systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To provide an update on the reliability and validity of all radiological measures used to assess patients presenting with patellofemoral instability.

METHODS

A search of the CINHAL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and SCOPUS databases and the Cochrane library was conducted. All studies assessing the validity, reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of radiological measures of the patellofemoral joints of patients with patellofemoral instability from 2010 onwards were considered for inclusion. Discrimination validity, inter- and intra-observer reliability, and the sensitivity and specificity of specific imaging measures were evaluated.

RESULTS

Seventy-three studies met the selection criteria and were included for analysis. We identified eight radiological measures in four categories with good reliability and validity: the tibial tubercle to trochlear groove distance, specific measures of patellar height (Blackburne-Peel index, Caton-Deschamps index and Insall-Salvati ratios), three measures of trochlear dysplasia (sulcus angle, trochlear depth, and lateral trochlear inclination), and the tibial tubercle to posterior cruciate ligament distance. No included studies examined the reliability and validity of patellofemoral instability ultrasound measures.

CONCLUSION

Our updated review demonstrated good inter- and intra-observer reliability and discrimination validity for the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance, specific patellar height, and trochlear dysplasia measures on MRI. The tibial tubercle to posterior cruciate ligament distance, an indirect measure of rotational asymmetry, was a valid and reliable measure on MRI. Due to a lack of assessments across more than one study, there are a variety of proposed measures with insufficient evidence to determine their validity, reliability, sensitivity, and specificity.

Sonographic evaluation of patellar tendon displacement and its correlation with patellofemoral pain syndrome

Background

Patellofemoral pain syndrome is the most common knee condition and is associated with patellar maltracking. Ultrasound is used in studying patellar maltracking. The objective is to determine if the technique which analyzes the displacement of the patellar tendon in the trochlear sulcus is associated with patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Methods

In total, 68 knees of 34 football players (males = 20, females = 14) were included. Patellar tendon displacement was assessed in supine and standing positions. Patellar tendon displacement difference in the two positions was determined.

Results

There was a significant difference in the lateral patellar tendon displacement during standing which was larger in patellofemoral pain syndrome than without patellofemoral pain syndrome (Mean Rank = 39.20 vs. 30.32, p = 0.02). There was no significant difference between the two groups for lateral patellar tendon displacement in supine and the difference in patellar tendon displacement from supine to standing.

Conclusion

The technique could be a potential method in assessing patellar maltracking. It could be used to have a comprehensive understanding of the pathomechanics and treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Assessment of validity and reliability of femoral shaft-patellar tendon angle measured on MRI

INTRODUCTION

Clinically measured Quadriceps angle (Q-angle) has low reliability. Measurement of angle between femoral shaft and patellar tendon (FSPT angle) on routine knee MRI was described in this study to represent the lateral vector forces of quadriceps mechanism. The cross-sectional study was designed to compare this angle between subjects with objective patellofemoral instability (PFI) versus those without PFI, to assess its reliability, and to assess its validity in terms of its ability to differentiate between PFI and non-PFI subjects using the "Receiver Operating Characteristic" (ROC) curve.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MRI scans of 20 subjects with PFI and 20 without PFI were obtained. FSPT angle was measured in each MRI by three different raters. In addition, the clinical Q-angle was also measured in the control group.

RESULTS

The FSPT angle was significantly higher in PFI group as compared with the non-PFI group (p < 0.001). It had substantial inter-rater reliability of 0.82 (95% CI = 0.67-0.92) in the non-PFI group and 0.89 (95% CI = 0.78-0.95) in the PFI group. Test-retest reliability was more than 0.90. The AUC for the ROC curve was 0.86 (95% CI = 0.74-0.97). The clinical Q-angle measured in non-PFI subjects had inter-rater reliability of only 0.48 (95% CI = 0.21-0.72), and showed a fair correlation of 0.58 with the MRI angle.

CONCLUSION

Measurement of FSPT angle was described on MRI with substantial intra-rater and inter-rater reliability. The angle was significantly higher in PFI versus non-PFI subjects and also showed a good ability to differentiate between these two groups in the ROC curve.