Mobile Crisis Outreach and Emergency Department Utilization: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis

Mobile Crisis Services: A Clinician Survey of Current Suicide Prevention Practices and Barriers to Care Delivery

Mobile crisis teams (MCTs) deploy clinicians to assist individuals in acute crisis in the community. Little is known about the extent to which these teams provide evidence-based practices (EBPs) for suicide prevention nor the barriers they face. We surveyed 120 MCT clinicians across the United States about their: (1) use of suicide risk screening and assessment tools; (2) strategies used to address suicide risk (both EBPs and non-EBPs); and (3) perceived barriers to high-quality MCT services. Nearly all clinicians reported use of validated suicide screening tools and generic "safety planning." However, a sizeable minority also reported use of non-EBPs. Open-ended responses suggested many client/family-, clinician-, and systems-level barriers to MCT use of EBPs for suicide prevention. We identified several targets for future implementation efforts, including the need for de-implementation strategies to reduce use of ineffective and potentially harmful practices, and unique aspects of MCTs that require tailored implementation supports.

Characteristics for Low, High and Very High Emergency Department Use for Mental Health Diagnoses from Health Records and Structured Interviews

Introduction

Patients with mental health diagnoses (MHD) are among the most frequent emergency department (ED) users, suggesting the importance of identifying additional factors associated with their ED use frequency. In this study we assessed various patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and service use associated with low ED users (1-3 visits/year), compared to high (4-7) and very high (8+) ED users with MHD.

Methods

Our study was conducted in four large Quebec (Canada) ED networks. A total of 299 patients with MHD were randomly recruited from these ED in 2021-2022. Structured interviews complemented data from network health records, providing extensive data on participant profiles and their quality of care. We used multivariable multinomial logistic regression to compare low ED use to high and very high ED use.

Results

Over a 12-month period, 39% of patients were low ED users, 37% high, and 24% very high ED users. Compared with low ED users, those at greater probability for high or very high ED use exhibited more violent/disturbed behaviors or social problems, chronic physical illnesses, and barriers to unmet needs. Patients previously hospitalized 1-2 times had lower risk of high or very high ED use than those not previously hospitalized. Compared with low ED users, high and very high ED users showed higher prevalence of personality disorders and suicidal behaviors, respectively. Women had greater probability of high ED use than men. Patients living in rental housing had greater probability of being very high ED users than those living in private housing. Using at least 5+ primary care services and being recurrent ED users two years prior to the last year of ED use had increased probability of very high ED use.

Conclusion

Frequency of ED use was associated with complex issues and higher perceived barriers to unmet needs among patients. Very high ED users had more severe recurrent conditions, such as isolation and suicidal behaviors, despite using more primary care services. Results suggested substantial reduction of barriers to care and improvement on both access and continuity of care for these vulnerable patients, integrating crisis resolution and supported housing services. Limited hospitalizations may sometimes be indicated, protecting against ED use.

Psychiatric Boarding Patterns Among Publicly Insured Youths Evaluated by Mobile Crisis Teams Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Importance

Psychiatric boarding occurs when patients needing intensive psychiatric services who are already under clinical supervision experience delays in their admission to psychiatric facilities. Initial reports have suggested that the US had a psychiatric boarding crisis during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, little is known about the consequences of this crisis for publicly insured youths.

Objective

To estimate pandemic-associated changes in psychiatric boarding rates and discharge modalities for people aged 4 to 20 years who accessed psychiatric emergency services (PES) through a mobile crisis team (MCT) evaluation and were covered by Medicaid or health safety net programs.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cross-sectional study used data from the MCT encounters of a multichannel PES program in Massachusetts. A total of 7625 MCT-initiated PES encounters with publicly insured youths who lived in Massachusetts between January 1, 2018, and August 31, 2021, were assessed.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Encounter-level outcomes (psychiatric boarding status, repeat visits, and discharge disposition) during a prepandemic period (January 1, 2018, to March 9, 2020) were compared with outcomes during a pandemic period (March 10, 2020, to August 31, 2021). Descriptive statistics and multivariate regression analysis were used.

Results

Among 7625 MCT-initiated PES encounters, the mean (SD) age of publicly insured youths was 13.6 (3.7) years; most youths identified as male (3656 [47.9%]), were of Black race (2725 [35.7%]) or Hispanic ethnicity (2708 [35.5%]), and spoke English (6941 [91.0%]). During the pandemic period, the mean monthly boarding encounter rate was 25.3 percentage points higher than the prepandemic period. After adjustment for covariates, the odds of an encounter resulting in boarding doubled during the pandemic (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.03; 95% CI, 1.82-2.26; P < .001), and boarding youths were 64% less likely to be discharged to inpatient psychiatric care (AOR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.31-0.43; P < .001). Publicly insured youths who boarded during the pandemic had significantly higher rates of 30-day readmissions (incidence rate ratio, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.88-2.50; P < .001). Boarding encounters during the pandemic were significantly less likely to end in discharge to inpatient psychiatric units (AOR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.31-0.43; P < .001) or community-based acute treatment facilities (AOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55-0.90; P = .005).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cross-sectional study, publicly insured youths were more likely to experience psychiatric boarding during the COVID-19 pandemic and, if boarding, were less likely to transfer to a 24-hour level of care. These findings suggest that psychiatric service programs for youths were not prepared to support the levels of acuity and demand that emerged from the pandemic.

More than Suicide: Mortality after Emergency Psychiatric Care and Implications for Practice

BACKGROUND

Emergency departments (EDs) provide vital mental health services. ED patients with behavioral health presentations, particularly suicidal ideation, are at increased risk of death by suicide, medical illness, trauma, or overdose. Causes of death for patients who receive specialty emergency psychiatric services remain undescribed.

OBJECTIVE

We describe the incidence and cause of death after care in a psychiatric emergency service (PES).

METHODS

Mortality data were obtained for all adult patients treated in a safety net ED from April 2016 to June 2020. Causes of death were categorized as medical, external (accidents, overdoses, and homicide), or suicide and compared between PES patients and ED patients who were not treated in the PES. Correlates of mortality were described for PES patients.

RESULTS

We analyzed 164,422 encounters including 6,063 PES visits. Mortality in the 30 days after discharge was 0.3% among PES patients and 0.6% among medical ED patients. At both 30 and 365 days, PES patients were more likely to die by suicide than were medical ED patients, and ED patients were more likely to die by medical causes. Among PES patients who died within 365 days, 46% died by medical causes, 32% by external causes, and 23% by suicide. In multivariable analyses, age was associated with all-cause, medical, and external mortality after a PES visit; opioid and stimulant use disorders were associated with all-cause and external mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients who die after receiving emergency psychiatric care die by medical and external causes such as accidents, overdose, and homicide. Patients who are older and have opioid or stimulant use disorders are at higher risk of non-suicide mortality. We propose interventions to re-imagine emergency psychiatric care and address non-suicide mortality among psychiatric patients treated in emergency and crisis settings.