Diagnostic Utility of a Custom 34-Gene Anchored Multiplex PCR-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Fusion Panel for the Diagnosis of Bone and Soft Tissue Neoplasms With Identification of Novel USP6 Fusion Partners in Aneurysmal Bone Cysts

Current updates in sarcoma biomarker discovery: emphasis on next-generation sequencing-based methods

Soft tissue sarcomas comprise a heterogeneous group of neoplasms. Although soft tissue malignancies make up only 2% of adult cancers, classification based on histomorphology presents a diagnostic challenge. Characterisation of soft tissue sarcomas by molecular analysis is rapidly evolving to improve diagnostic accuracy and develop targeted therapies. This review highlights the advances in molecular techniques, including current next-generation sequencing-based assays (fusion detection by RNA sequencing, targeted/whole exome sequencing, microRNA profiling), as well as emerging methods (liquid biopsies, DNA methylation profiling, single-cell molecular profiling and next-generation immunohistochemistry) for future clinical applications.

Novel EWSR1::GFI1B gene fusion in angiofibroma of soft tissue

AIMS

Angiofibroma of soft tissue is a benign soft tissue tumour characterised by bland spindle cells and a distinct branching vascular network. The majority of soft tissue angiofibromas harbour AHRR::NCOA2 gene fusions. Here we present three cases of EWSR1::GFI1B-fused soft tissue tumours that are morphologically most reminiscent of soft tissue angiofibroma.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All three cases presented in male patients with an age range of 35-78 years (median = 54 years). Two cases presented as subcutaneous nodules on the trunk (posterior neck and chest wall); one was an intramuscular foot mass. The tumours were unencapsulated nodules with infiltrative margins ranging from 2.2 to 3.4 cm in greatest dimension. Histologically, the tumours contained uniformly bland fibroblastic spindle cells with ovoid to fusiform nuclei and delicate cytoplasmic processes embedded in a myxoid to myxocollagenous stroma. All three cases were characterised by a thin-walled, branching vascular network evenly distributed throughout the tumour. Overt cytological atypia or conspicuous mitotic activity was absent. The spindle cells had an essentially null immunophenotype. By targeted RNA sequencing, an in-frame gene fusion between EWSR1 exons 1-7 and GFI1B exons 6-11 or 7-11 was detected in all three cases. The tumours were marginally excised. For all three cases, there were no documented local recurrence or distant metastases during a limited follow-up period of 6-10 months.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose that EWSR1::GFI1B may represent a novel fusion variant of soft tissue angiofibroma.

Neonatal osteoblastic tumor with a novel PTBP1::FOSB fusion

Congenital/neonatal bone neoplasms are extremely rare. We present the case of a patient with a neonatal bone tumor of the fibula that had osteoblastic differentiation and a novel PTBP1::FOSB fusion. FOSB fusions are described in several different tumor types, including osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma; however, these tumors typically present in the second or third decade of life, with case reports as young as 4 months of age. Our case expands the spectrum of congenital/neonatal bone lesions. The initial radiologic, histologic, and molecular findings supported the decision for close clinical follow-up rather than more aggressive intervention. Since the time of diagnosis, this tumor has undergone radiologic regression without treatment.

Unravelling the USP6 gene: an update

Ubiquitin-specific protease 6 (USP6) rearrangements have been identified in aneurysmal bone cyst, nodular fasciitis, myositis ossificans, fibro-osseous pseudotumour of digits and cellular fibroma of tendon sheath. These entities show clinical as well as histological overlap, suggesting they are all clonal neoplastic belonging to the same biological spectrum and referred to as 'USP6-associated neoplasms'. They all show a characteristic gene fusion formed by juxtaposition of the USP6 coding sequences to the promoter regions of several partner genes, leading to USP6 transcriptional upregulation.

The treatment of aneurysmal bone cysts

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Aneurysmal bone cysts are rare, locally aggressive bone tumors. Optimal treatment of ABCs is still matter of debate as therapies including sclerotherapy, selective arterial embolization and systemic treatment with denosumab are increasingly utilized, in addition to or instead of traditional curettage. The purpose of this review is to discuss current concepts and difficulties in diagnosing and treating primary ABCs, based on latest available literature.

RECENT FINDINGS

In diagnostics, multiple new fusion partners of USP-6 have been described on next-generation sequencing specifically for primary ABCs. In a recent systematic review, failure rates of percutaneous injections and surgery were comparable. In a literature review, the use of denosumab seemed effective but resulted in multiple cases of severe hypercalcemia in children.

SUMMARY

Accurately diagnosing primary ABC is crucial for treatment decisions. Curettage remains a valid treatment option, especially with adjuvant burring, autogenous bone grafting and phenolization. Percutaneous sclerotherapy represents a solid alternative to surgery, with polidocanol showing good results in larger studies. Systematic therapy with denosumab exhibits favorable results but should be reserved in the pediatric population for unresectable lesions, as it may result in severe hypercalcemia in children. When selecting a treatment option, localization, stability and safety should be considered.

USP6-associated soft tissue tumors with bone metaplasia: Clinicopathologic and genetic analysis and the identification of novel USP6 fusion partners

Introduction

Among those tumors with consistent USP6 rearrangement, some arise from soft tissue and show bone metaplasia, including myositis ossificans (MO), fibro-osseous pseudotumor of digits (FOPD), soft tissue aneurysmal bone cyst (ST-ABC) and fasciitis ossificans (FO). These lesions are easily confused with malignancies because they show a rapid growth rate and brisk mitoses. Here, we aim to clarify the clinicopathologic and genetic characteristics of this entity and analyze the correlations among the different subtypes in one of the largest cohorts.

Materials and Methods

The clinicopathologic features of 73 cases of MO, FOPD, ST-ABC and FO diagnosed at West China Hospital, Sichuan University from January 2010 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Forty-three undecalcified samples were analyzed by systematic genetic studies, including fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), Sanger sequencing and next-generation-based sequencing were performed.

Results

This series included 40 males and 33 females aged 2 to 80 years old (median: 31 years). FOPD occurred in extremal soft tissue, while lower extremities (38/58, 65.5%) were the most commonly involved lesions in the other three subgroups. Histologically, proliferative myofibroblasts/fibroblasts with varying degrees of osteoid tissue were present. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results indicated that 22 cases (22/27, 81.5%) were positive for USP6 rearrangement, and 5 cases were negative. Among those cases with positive FISH results, 18 underwent reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) detection that successfully detected common USP6 fusion types. Thirteen cases showed COL1A1::USP6 fusion, one showed MYH9::USP6 fusion, and 4 were negative for common fusion types. Next-generation-based sequencing technology was performed on two lesions with negative RT-PCR results and novel fusion partners SNHG3 and UBE2G1 were discovered.

Conclusions

Our findings revealed that COL1A1 is the most common fusion partner in this entity, unlike primary aneurysmal bone cysts and nodular fasciitis. Notably, we believed that FO may demonstrate more similar clinicopathologic and genetic manifestations with MO/FOPD and ST-ABC instead of nodular fasciitis for involving lower limbs most frequently and showing recurrent COL1A1::USP6 fusion. Additionally, this study also found two novel USP6 fusion partners, which further expanded our knowledge of this neoplastic spectrum.

Solid-variant aneurysmal bone cysts in the craniofacial skeleton: the role of genomic analysis

BACKGROUND

Solid variant aneurysmal bone cysts (SVABCs) are a rare but well-described subtype of ABCs. While classic ABCs are readily identified radiographically, SVABCs lack these characteristic radiographic features and thus have a wide differential diagnosis on presentation (including Ewing sarcoma, Langerhans cell histiocytosis, osteosarcoma, metastasis, and giant cell tumor). Genomic/molecular analyses are often necessary for the diagnosis of SVABCs, with USP6 rearrangements being a characteristic finding. We present two cases in which genomic analysis was critical in the diagnosis of SVABCs and revealed unique gene fusions that may provide insight into SVABC pathogenesis.

CASE DESCRIPTIONS

Two 13-year old male children presented to our institution with new mass lesions involving the craniofacial skeleton. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in both cases revealed predominantly solid, avidly enhancing masses, one of the squamous portion of the temporal bone, and the other arising from the sphenopalatine foramen with extension into the ipsilateral maxillary and ethmoid sinuses. Histopathology displayed predominantly solid morphology, and next generation sequencing (NGS) revealed a FAT1-USP6 gene fusion in the temporal lesion, and a MIR22HG-USP6 gene fusion in the maxillofacial lesion, the latter of which was not identified on fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). These findings were most consistent with a diagnosis of SVABC in each case.

CONCLUSIONS

These two cases highlight novel gene fusions in atypically located SVABCs and emphasize the ability of NGS to more accurately and consistently identify USP6 gene fusions, particularly in SVABCs that may otherwise be indistinguishable from alternative pathologies.

Clinical Utility of Anchored Multiplex Solid Fusion Assay for Diagnosis of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors

Sarcoma diagnosis has become increasingly complex, requiring a combination of morphology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular studies to derive specific diagnoses. We evaluated the role of anchored multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based gene fusion assay in sarcoma diagnostics. Between 2015 and 2018, bone and soft tissue sarcomas with fusion assay results were compared with the histologic diagnosis. Of 143 sarcomas tested for fusions, 43 (30%) had a detectable fusion. In review, they could be classified into 2 main categories: (1) 31 tumors with concordant morphologic and fusion data; and (2) 12 tumors where the fusion panel identified an unexpected rearrangement that played a significant role in classification. The overall concordance of the fusion assay results with morphology/immunohistochemistry or alternate confirmatory molecular studies was 83%. Collectively, anchored multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based solid fusion assay represents a robust means of detecting targeted fusions with known and novel partners. The predictive value of the panel is highest in tumors that show a monomorphic cell population, round cell tumors, as well as tumors rich in inflammatory cells. However, with an increased ability to discover fusions of uncertain significance, it remains essential to emphasize that the diagnosis of bone and soft tissue neoplasms requires the integration of morphology and immunohistochemical profile with these molecular methods, for accurate diagnosis and optimal clinical management of sarcomas.

Ubiquitin-specific Peptidase 6 (USP6)-associated Fibroblastic/Myofibroblastic Tumors: Evolving Concepts

Ubiquitin-specific peptidase 6 (USP6) is a hominoid-specific gene residing on chromosome 17p13 and serves as a deubiquitinating enzyme with a diverse set of functions including intracellular trafficking, inflammatory signaling, cell transformation and protein turnover. USP6 rearrangements were first identified in aneurysmal bone cysts, resulting in promoter swapping and over-expression of wild type USP6. Several morphologically overlapping fibroblastic/myofibroblastic tumors are known to harbor USP6 rearrangements, including nodular fasciitis, cellular fibroma of tendon sheath, myositis ossificans and fibro-osseous pseudotumor of digits. Over the past few years, fusions involving the USP6 gene and various partner genes have been described in these neoplasms. The current World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of Soft Tissue suggests that USP6-rearranged lesions are typically benign and usually self-limited in their growth. This review provides an updated overview of the clinical, histological and molecular genetic features of USP6-associated fibroblastic/myofibroblastic tumors and discusses how these lesions should be best classified.