Zhu P, Gu YF, Yang BL, Lin Q, Ding YJ. Effects of gamboge in an orthotopic mouse model of colon cancer.
Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2014;
22:476-482. [DOI:
10.11569/wcjd.v22.i4.476]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To study the antitumor and anti-metastatic effects of gamboge in an orthotopic mouse model developed with human colon cancer cell line HCT116.
METHODS: A colon cancer model was developed by surgical orthotopic implantation of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing HCT 116 tumor in nude mice. Forty mice were equally randomized into four groups. Group 1 served as a negative control and received intragastric infusion of normal saline once daily. Group 2 received intraperitoneal injection of 5-fluorouracil at a dose of 25 mg/kg three times per week. Groups 3 and 4 received intragastric infusion of gamboge extract at a dose of 10 and 20 mg/kg, respectively, once daily. Each animal was checked for mortality and signs of morbidity every day. Primary tumor volume and metastasis for each animal were observed under a fluorescence imaging system twice a week, and body weights were measured as well. At the end of the experiment, all mice were sacrificed and open fluorescent images of tumors and metastases expressing GFP were acquired, and the tumor was removed from each mouse and weighed.
RESULTS: After initiation of different treatment regimens, the average tumor volume (mm3) was significantly smaller in the gamboge (20 mg/kg) group than the control group at each observation point (d4: 104.5 ± 35.5 vs 164.1 ± 66.1; d7: 102.6 ± 53.8 vs 286.2 ± 132.0; d11: 137.6 ± 70.5 vs 324.4 ± 115.8; d14: 207.2 ± 101.7 vs 434.2 ± 169.3; d21: 229.8 ± 99.8 vs 480.4 ± 165.5; P < 0.05 for all). At the end of the study, the average tumor weight was significantly smaller in the gamboge group (20 mg/kg) than in the control group (0.58 ± 0.26 vs 0.92 ± 0.26, P < 0.05). There were no statistical differences between the gamboge (20 mg/kg) group and 5-fluorouracil group, as well as between the gamboge (10 mg/kg) group and control group, in term of average tumor volume and weight (P > 0.05 for all). At the end of the experiment, open GFP imaging demonstrated that all groups presented metastasis of lymph nodes or the pancreas, although there were no significant differences between the four groups with regard to the metastasis rate (P > 0.05 for all). No significant morbidity or weight loss was found in all tumor-bearing mice.
CONCLUSION: Gamboge at a dose of 20 mg/kg was able to suppress HCT 116 tumor growth in an orthotopic mouse model of colon cancer safely and effectively, and may possess clinical therapeutic potential for colorectal cancer.
Collapse