Comparison of three different induction regimens for nasopharyngeal cancer

The efficacy and safety of docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (TPF)-based induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Clin Transl Oncol. 2020;22:429-439. [PMID: 31165410 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-019-02142-7]

OBJECTIVES

In recent years, docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (TPF)-based induction chemotherapy (IC) has been widely applied in the treatment of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC). However, it remains unclear whether TPF is the ideal IC regimen. Thus, we carried out a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of TPF-based IC plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) versus CCRT alone or double-drug-based IC plus CCRT for LA-NPC.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library from inception until December 2018. After rigorous screening of all relevant studies that reported the use of TPF-based IC followed by CCRT for patients with LA-NPC, eight studies met the inclusion criteria and were assessed for design and quality. Among them, three articles were classified as having a high risk of bias and were excluded from the meta-analysis. The outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS) and incidence of adverse events, were pooled with the use of hazard ratio (HR) or odds ratio (OR). Heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses were also carried out.

RESULTS

Five trials involving 4223 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to CCRT alone, TPF-based IC plus CCRT significantly improved OS (HR 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-0.84, P = 0.006), PFS (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.46-0.88, P = 0.006), LRFFS (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.34-0.94, P = 0.03), and DMFS (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.88, P = 0.01). Moreover, compared to double-drug-based IC plus CCRT, OS (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.87, P = 0.0004), PFS (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.66-0.88, P = 0.0001) and LRFFS (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61-0.92, P = 0.006) were also significantly improved by TPF-based IC plus CCRT. Notably, TPF-based IC plus CCRT mainly led to an increased risk of hematologic toxicities, such as leucopenia (OR = 3.20, 95% CI 2.13-4.81, P < 0.0001) and neutropenia (OR = 3.84, 95% CI 0.66-22.36, P = 0.13). However, these were uncomplicated and manageable with growth factor support.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to CCRT alone or double-drug-based IC plus CCRT, TPF-based IC plus CCRT results in better survival outcomes with manageable toxicities. Thus, it is reasonable to recommend the addition of TPF-based IC to CCRT as an excellent choice for patients with LA-NPC.

Selective Radiotherapy after Distant Metastasis of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated with Dose-Dense Cisplatin plus Fluorouracil

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of selective radiotherapy after distant metastasis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with dose-dense cisplatin plus fluorouracil.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were randomly assigned to a study group treated with dose-dense cisplatin plus fluorouracil following selective radiotherapy and a control group receiving traditional cisplatin plus fluorouracil following selective radiotherapy according to a 1:1 distribution using a digital random table method. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, relapse or progression rate in the radiation field and treatment toxicity.

RESULTS

Of 52 patients in the study group, 20 cases underwent radiotherapy., while in the control group of 51 patients, 16 underwent radiotherapy. The median PFS, median OS, survival rates in 1, 2 and 3 years in study and control group were 20.9 vs 12.7months, 28.3 vs 18.8months, 85.2%vs 65.9%, 62.2% vs 18.3%, and 36.6%vs 5.2% (p values of 0.00, 0.00, 0.04, 0.00 and 0.00, respectively). Subgroup analysis showed that the median OS and survival rates of 1, 2, 3 years for patients undergoing radiotherapy in the study group better than that in control group( 43.2vs24.1 months, 94.1% vs 86.7%, 82.4% vs 43.3%, 64.7% vs 17.3%, (p=0.00, 0.57, 0.04 and 0.01, respectively). The complete response rate, objective response rate after chemotherapy and three months after radiotherapy, relapse or progression rate in radiation field in study group and in control group were 19.2% vs 3.9%, 86.5% vs 56.9%, 85% vs 50%, 95% vs 81.3% and 41.3% vs 66.7% (p =0.03, 0.00, 0.03,0.30, 0.01 respectively). The grade 3-4 acute adverse reactions in the study group were significantly higher than in the control group (53.8% vs 9.8%, p=0.00).

CONCLUSIONS

The survival of patients benefits from selective radiotherapy after distant metastasis of NPC treated with dose-dense cisplatin plus fluorouracil.