Endovascular Treatment of Large Unruptured Fusiform Fenestrated Vertebrobasilar Junction Aneurysm

Endovascular Coiling of Fenestrated Vertebrobasilar Cerebral Aneurysms

Fenestrated vertebrobasilar junction aneurysms are uncommon vascular lesions. Surgical intervention remains extremely challenging due to the deep location and complex anatomy with adjacent cranial nerves and perforator vessels. Endovascular approach is safer and generally accepted as the primary treatment method. Optimal angiographic projections with three-dimensional reconstructions to guide microcatheter selection remain vital to successfully treating aneurysms with challenging fenestration anatomy. This report details the endovascular methods in two cases of fenestrated vertebrobasilar junction aneurysms with different coiling techniques.

Multiple Ruptured Aneurysms Over Basilar Artery Fenestration: Endovascular Management

Basilar artery fenestrations (BAF) are rare vascular anomalies. Surgical intervention for aneurysms in this vascular segment is exceptionally arduous because of the complexity of the neurovascular structures in the vicinity of the brainstem. Endovascular therapy (ET) is the treatment of choice because of its safety and efficacy. Here, we report a 62-year-old female presenting with a two-day history of sudden onset severe headache, vomiting, and altered sensorium. A computed tomography (CT) and subsequent CT angiogram (CTA) revealed subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and BAF with an aneurysm on each arm of the fenestration. Digital subtraction angiogram (DSA) with a three-dimensional rotational angiogram (3DRA) was employed before initiating ET. We used coiling and flow diversion to exclude the aneurysms from circulation. A six-month follow-up angiography reconfirmed the complete obliteration of the aneurysms. There was no focal neurological deficit.

Endovascular treatment modalities for basilar artery fenestration aneurysms: experience of two centers and literature review

Background/aim

The aim of this study is to present our experience on various endovascular treatment modalities of basilar fenestration aneurysms and reviewing our findings together with literature data.

Materials and methods

A total of 26 basilar artery fenestration (BAF) aneurysms in 24 patients were endovascularly treated in two different neurointerventional radiology clinics. All patients had been evaluated with computed tomography (CT), CT angiography, and digital subtraction angiography before the procedure.

Results

Aneurysms of all patients were successfully occluded (technical success rate 100%). Procedure-related complications were seen in two patients. Our comprehensive literature research revealed that studies related with the topic are composed mostly of case reports. In the literature, a total of 113 BAF aneurysms of 101 patients had been treated endovascularly in 46 studies between 1993 and 2019. Success rate of the treatment was reported as 97%, clinical success rate as 91%, and complication rate as 8.8%, while these rates are 100%, 92%, and 7.6% in our study, respectively.

Conclusion

Although the number of cases is low in our study, to our knowledge, it is the widest series in the literature until today. Our results demonstrate that BAF aneurysms can be treated successfully and safely with different endovascular techniques, with more stent use in recent years.

[Surgical treatment of vertebral artery confluence aneurysms]

BACKGROUND

Aneurysms of vertebral artery confluence and proximal parts of basilar artery are extremely rare. They are usually combined with proximal fenestration of basilar artery. No timely surgical treatment of these aneurysms is associated with high risk of adverse outcomes, and their treatment is a challenge for neurosurgeons.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed postoperative outcomes in 17 patients with 21 aneurysms of vertebral artery confluence and proximal parts of basilar artery.

RESULTS

Six patients with 10 aneurysms underwent microsurgical resection, 11 patients with 11 aneurysms - endovascular procedure. Persistent postoperative deterioration was observed in 5 (29.4%) patients: severe neurological symptoms (GOS grade 3) in 1 case (5.9%), minor bulbar disorders in 4 cases (23.53%). There were no lethal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

According to our own and literature data, aneurysms of vertebral artery confluence are extremely rare. The risk of rupture of these aneurysms is extremely high. Endovascular approach is preferred in these patients. Microsurgical procedure is an acceptable alternative if endovascular surgery is impossible.

Endovascular Treatment of Fenestration-related Aneurysms : Morphological Features, Operative Techniques and Therapeutic Outcomes

PURPOSE

Endovascular treatment of fenestration-related aneurysms (FAs) is prone to technical challenges, given the inherent complexities. Herein, we have analyzed FAs in terms of angioarchitectural characteristics and outcomes achieved through endovascular intervention.

METHODS

Data accrued prospectively between January 2002 and July 2020 were productive of 105 FAs in 103 patients, each classifiable by the nature of incorporated vasculature as proximal portion, fenestrated limb, or distal end. Our investigation focused on clinical and morphological outcomes, with emphasis on technical aspects of treatment.

RESULTS

The FAs selected for study originated primarily in anterior communicating artery (AcomA: 88/105, 83.8%), followed by basilar (7/105, 6.7%), anterior cerebral (4/105, 3.8%), and internal carotid (3/105, 2.8%) arteries. In nearly all locations, proximally situated aneurysms (43/105, 41%) were more frequent than aneurysms arising at distal ends (3/105, 2.8%), but the majority of AcomA lesions involved fenestrated segments (58/88, 65.9%); and most fenestrated channels (90/105, 85.7%) were asymmetric in size. Orifices of smaller fenestrated limbs were intentionally compromised during coil embolization in 23 aneurysms (21.9%), achieving complete (n = 19) or incomplete (n = 4) compromise, without resultant symptomatic ischemia. Saccular occlusion proved satisfactory in 77 lesions (73.3%). In follow-up monitoring of 100 patients for a mean period of 35.3 ± 26.5 months, 17 instances of recanalization (17.0%) occurred (minor, 9; major, 8). There was no recanalization of aneurysms with compromised limbs.

CONCLUSION

Coil embolization of FAs is safe and effective, enabling tailored procedures that accommodate aberrant angioanatomic configurations. Compromise of a single limb during coiling also appears safe, conferring long-term protection from recanalization.