Diagnostic Accuracy of Different Computed Tomography Signs for Differentiating Between Malignant and Cirrhotic Ascites Keeping Ascitic Fluid Cytology as Gold Standard

Possible use of 2D shear wave liver elastography in new-onset ascites evaluation

BACKGROUND

No data on the use of 2D shear wave elastography exists regarding the evaluation of the new-onset ascites causality.

AIMS

To determine whether 2D shear wave elastography can help in the non-invasive assessment of the new-onset ascites cause. To assess the applicability of liver stiffness measured by 2D shear wave elastography using Esaote MyLab Nine apparatus in patients with ascites.

METHODS

In 52 consecutive patients with new-onset ascites (January 2020 to October 2021), liver stiffness using 2D shear wave elastography was prospectively measured. The reliable measurements were used for further analysis. Relevant clinical and laboratory data was collected.

RESULTS

The calculated liver stiffness measurement cut-off value of 14.4 kPa held 94% accuracy, 100% sensitivity, and 83% specificity when determining ascites with serum ascites albumin gradient ≥11 g/L. Reliable 2D shear wave elastography success rate was 84%.

CONCLUSIONS

2D shear wave elastography may potentially be used to differentiate transudative from exudative ascites, especially in patients with portal hypertension and peritoneal carcinomatosis.

The Evaluation Value of CT in the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer Patients

Aim

To discuss the evaluation value of CT in the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with ovarian cancer.

Methods

The clinical, pathological, and CT imaging information of 72 patients with ovarian cancer treated in our hospital from January 2018 to January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. CT examination and pathological examination were compared to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Results

Using the CRS grading system, 26 cases (36.11%) scored 1, 42 cases (58.33%) scored 2, and 4 cases (5.56%) scored 3. CRS grading system scores of 1, 2, 3, and 4–7 patients were compared, P > 0.05. The CT manifestations of lymphadenectasis, degree of peritoneal thickening, ascites, and maximum length diameter of the mass were compared between the patients before and after chemotherapy, P < 0.05. According to RECIST 1.1, there were 1 (1.39%) CR, 38 (52.78%) PR, 29 (40.28%) SD, and 4 (5.56%) PD. The comparison was done between RECIST 1.1 and CRS grading system, P > 0.05.

Conclusion

CT could be used to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.