Estimation of a Canadian preference-based scoring algorithm for the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey: a population survey using a discrete-choice experiment

Quality of life of the Canadian population using the VR-12: population norms for health utility values, summary component scores and domain scores

OBJECTIVES

To estimate Canadian population norms (health utility values, summary component scores and domain scores) for the VR-12.

METHODS

English and French speaking Canadians aged 18 and older completed an online survey that included sociodemographic questions and standardized health status instruments, including the VR-12. Responses to the VR-12 were summarized as: (i) a health utility value; (ii) mental and physical component summary scores (MCS and PCS, respectively), and (iii) eight domain scores. Norms were calculated for the full sample and by gender, age group, and province/territory (univariate), and for several multivariate stratifications (e.g., age group and gender). Results were summarized using descriptive statistics, including number of respondents, mean and standard deviation (SD), median and percentiles (25th and 75th), and minimum and maximum.

RESULTS

A total of 6761 people who clicked on the survey link completed the survey (83.4% completion rate), of whom 6741 (99.7%) were included in the analysis. The mean health utility score was 0.698 (SD = 0.216). Mean health utility scores tended to be higher in older age groups, ranging from 0.661 (SD = 0.214) in those aged 18-29 to 0.728 (SD = 0.310) in those aged 80+. Average MCS scores were higher in older age groups, while PCS scores were lower. Females consistently reported lower mean health utility values, summary component scores and domain scores compared with males.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to present Canadian norms for the VR-12. Health utility norms can serve as a valuable input for Canadian economic models, while summary component and domain norms can help interpret routinely-collected data.

The Use of Generic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Emergency Department Surveys: Discriminant Validity Evidence for the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey and the EQ-5D

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare discriminant validity evidence of 2 generic patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) and level 5 of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L), for use in emergency departments (EDs).

METHODS

Data were obtained via a cross-sectional survey of 5876 patients in British Columbia (Canada) who completed a questionnaire after visiting an ED in 2018. We compared the extent to which the VR-12 and the EQ-5D-5L distinguished among groups of ED patients with different levels of comorbidity burden and self-reported physical and mental or emotional health status. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the ability of the 2 PROMs to identify patients presenting with a mental health (MH) condition.

RESULTS

All the measures produced small effect sizes (ESs) for discriminating comorbidity levels (R² range: 0.00 [VR-12 mental component summary {MCS}] to 0.10 [VR-12 physical component summary score]). The EQ-5D visual analog scale offered the largest ES for discriminating self-reported physical health (R² = 0.48), whereas the MCS, the VR-12 MH domain, and the EQ-5D-5L anxiety/depression dimension had the largest ESs for discriminating self-reported mental or emotional health (R² = 0.42, 0.40, and 0.38, respectively). The MCS produced a medium ES (R² = 0.42) along with the VR-12 utility score (R² = 0.27) compared with the EQ-5D-5L index (R² = 0.19). Having a MH condition was predominantly identified by the MCS (Pratt index = 0.56).

CONCLUSIONS

The VR-12 PROM provides a more comprehensive measurement of MH than the EQ-5D-5L, which is important to inform healthcare service needs for patients who present in EDs with MH challenges.