Differentiating Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children from Kawasaki Disease During the Pandemic

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to delineate the distinctive characteristics that aid in distinguishing between Kawasaki disease (KD) and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) with KD-like manifestations during the pandemic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated KD patients and MIS-C patients with KD-like symptoms admitted during the pandemic (between January 2021 and December 2022).

RESULTS

Thirty-three MIS-C patients and 15 KD patients were included. Kawasaki disease patients were younger than MIS-C patients (3.4 vs. 7.6 years). Rash (P = .044, 100% vs. 75.7%), oral mucosal changes (P = .044, 100% vs. 75.7%), and cervical lymphadenopathy (P = .001, 93.3% vs. 42.4%) were more common in KD. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children: patients had more hypotension (P = .002, 45.4% vs. 0), gastrointestinal (P .001, 72.7% vs. 13.3%), and respiratory symptoms (P = .044, 24.2% vs. 0). Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children patients also had low lymphocyte and thrombocyte counts and elevated levels of d-dimer, ferritin, and cardiac parameters, unlike KD patients. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children patients exhibited a notable reduction in left ventricular systolic function in echocardiography. Another significant difference with regard to management was the anakinra treatment, which was prescribed for MIS-C patients.

CONCLUSION

Although MIS-C patients might display a clinical resemblance to KD, several features could help differentiate between MIS-C and classical KD. Specific clinical (hypotension, gastrointestinal, and respiratory symptoms) and laboratory (low lymphocyte and thrombocyte counts with higher C-reactive protein, ferritin, d-dimer, and cardiac parameters) features are characteristic of MIS-C. In addition, divergence in management strategies is evident between the 2 diseases, as biologic drugs were more prevalently employed in MIS-C patients than in classical KD patients.

Patients Without a Rheumatic Disease Diagnosis in a Pediatric Rheumatology Unit: Retrospective Analysis and Comparison Between Pre-pandemic and Pandemic Periods

OBJECTIVE

Children with suspicious complaints of rheumatic diseases are generally referred to a pediatric rheumatologist. We aimed to evaluate the profile of patients referred to the pediatric rheumatology unit and were not diagnosed with a rheumatic disease and to assess the impact of the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic on referral complaints.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All new outpatients who applied to the pediatric rheumatology department between March 2019 and February 2021 and were not diagnosed with rheumatic disease were included. We also compared the frequency of admission symptoms during the pre-pandemic (March 2019-February 2020) and pandemic periods (March 2020-February 2021).

RESULTS

A total of 1089 patients without a rheumatic disease diagnosis (568 female, 52.2%; median age 10.0 years) were included in this study. The most common complaint for referral was prolonged or recurrent fevers (13.4%) followed by anti-nuclear antibody positivity (13.1%), arthralgia (13.0%), skin findings (7.5%), and the presence of heterozygous mutations in the Mediterranean fever gene (6.9%). During the pandemic year, the number of patients referred for back pain increased significantly (P = .028). A total of 682 of 1089 patients were consulted from other departments in our center (62.6%). Of these, the most frequent consultation request was from general pediatrics (43.6%). The rheumatic disease was excluded in 11.3% of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Prolonged or recurrent fever and anti-nuclear antibody positivity were the most frequent complaints of referrals to a pediatric rheumatology unit in patients who did not have a rheumatic disease. The rate of back pain was more common in children during the pandemic period.

The challenges in diagnosing pediatric primary antiphospholipid syndrome

Pediatric primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a very rare disease with significant distinctions from the APS in adults. Herein, we present our experience in the diagnosis and treatment of six pediatric primary APS patients, who met the updated Sapporo criteria for the APS diagnosis. One of them was also diagnosed as having probable catastrophic APS (CAPS) due to the involvement of three different organ systems simultaneously. Besides vascular involvement, four patients had thrombocytopenia, one had psychiatric disorder, and one had chorea and valvular heart disease. All patients received immunosuppressive treatment along with long-term anticoagulation therapy. Specific neurologic and hematologic manifestations that are not part of the classification criteria can be seen in children with primary APS. Therefore, using the adult criteria for diagnosing pediatric APS may result in missed or delayed diagnoses in children.

The difference of the inflammatory milieu in MIS-C and severe COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) may have a severe course in children. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is the post-COVID complication characterized by an exaggerated inflammation, observed in children. However, data on the underlying pathophysiology are sparse. We therefore aimed to assess the cytokine and chemokine profiles of children with MIS-C and compare these to life-threatening severe SARS-CoV-2 and healthy controls (HCs) to shed light on disease pathophysiology.

METHODS

Samples of 31 children with MIS-C, 10 with severe/critical COVID-19 and 11 HCs were included. Cytokine and chemokine profiles were studied and compared in between groups.

RESULTS

Most cytokines and chemokines related to IL-1 family and IFN-γ pathway (including IL-18 and MIG/CXCL9) and IL-17A were significantly higher in the MIS-C group when compared to the severe/critical COVID-19 group and HCs. IP-10/CXCL10 and IL-10 were higher in both MIS-C patients and severe/critical COVID-19 compared to HCs.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that IL-1 and IFN-γ pathways play an important role in the pathophysiology of MIS-C.

IMPACT

This study defines a pattern of distinctive immune responses in children with MIS-C and in patients with severe/critical COVID-19. As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, biomarkers to identify MIS-C risk are needed to guide our management that study results may shed light on it.

Hematological involvement in pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus: A multi-center study

Introduction: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may present with features of several systems, including hematological manifestations. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the characteristics of hematological involvement and assess possible associations and correlations in pediatric SLE patients. Method: This is a retrospective multi-center study. The medical records of pediatric SLE patients followed between January 2000 and June 2020 were analyzed. All children fulfilled the criteria of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics. Results: The study included 215 children with SLE, 118 of whom had hematological manifestations. Concomitant renal involvement and low C3 levels were significantly more frequent in patients with hematological involvement (p = 0.04, p = 0.008, respectively). Also, anti-cardiolipin, anti-beta-2-glycoprotein I (anti-β2 GP1), and anti-Sm antibody positivity, and the presence of lupus anticoagulant were more common in the group with hematological findings (p = 0.001 for anti-cardiolipin antibody positivity and p < 0.001 for the positivity of anti-β2 GP1 antibody, anti-Sm antibody, and lupus anticoagulant). The most common hematologic abnormality was anemia (n = 88, 74.5%), with autoimmune hemolytic anemia constituting the majority (n = 40). Corticosteroids followed by IVIG were the mainstay of treatment. In patients resistant to corticosteroid and IVIG treatments, the most preferred drug was rituximab. Low levels of C3, high SLEDAI score, high incidence of renal involvement, and positive antiphospholipid antibodies were associated with hematological involvement in the univariate analysis. The presence of antiphospholipid antibodies and high SLEDAI score were independently associated with hematological involvement in multivariate analysis (OR: 4.021; 95% CI: 2.041-7.921; p < 0.001 and OR: 1.136; 95% CI: 1.065-1.212; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Hematological abnormalities are frequently encountered in pediatric SLE. Positive antiphospholipid antibodies and high SLEDAI scores were associated with hematological involvement.

IgG4-related disease in pediatric patients: a single-center experience

OBJECTIVE

Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a systemic, immune-mediated, and fibroinflammatory disease that can affect almost any organ system. We aimed to present our single-center experience of pediatric patients with IgG4-RD, a rare disease in children.

METHODS

Pediatric patients diagnosed with IgG4-RD at the Hacettepe University between June 2014 and September 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with definite, probable, or possible diagnosis of IgG4-RD were included.

RESULTS

A total of eight patients with a median age of 13.4 (IQR 9.5-15.0) years were included in the study. Clinical presentations were IgG4-related ophthalmic disease in six patients, IgG4-related lymphadenopathy in one patient, and IgG4-related sialadenitis and lymphadenopathy of several lymph nodes accompanied by pancreatitis, ulcerative colitis, and pulmonary manifestations in one patient. Elevated serum IgG4 was detected in three of eight patients (37.5%). The main histopathological feature was fibrosis and lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates. Corticosteroids were used as first-line treatment in almost all patients with or without steroid-sparing agents. Azathioprine, methotrexate and rituximab were used as steroid-sparing agents. Relapse occurred in two of seven patients. Radiotherapy was used as the last resort in one patient with severe orbital disease.

CONCLUSION

IgG4 RD mainly presents with orbital manifestations in pediatric population but has wide phenotypic clinical variability. Although rare, early recognition and treatment are essential for a better outcome in these patients.