[Influence of anterior fracture line on anterior cortical reduction loss after cephalomedullary nail fixation in intertrochanteric fractures]

Objective

To investigate the position of the anterior fracture line in AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) type A2 unstable intertrochanteric fractures and its impact on the incidence of anterior cortical reduction loss after cephalomedullary nail fixation.

Methods

A clinical data of 95 patients with intertrochanteric fractures who met the selection criteria between April 2020 and February 2023 was retrospectively analyzed. All patients were treated with cephalomedullary nail fixation, and the intra- and post-operative imaging data were complete. Among them, there were 37 males and 58 females. The age ranged from 61 to 97 years, with an average of 79.6 years. The time from injury to operation ranged from 7 hours to 11 days, with an average of 2.8 days. According to the 2018-AO/OTA classification standard, there were 39 cases of type 31-A2.2 and 56 cases of type 31-A2.3. Intraoperative fluoroscopy was used to record the number of patients with satisfactory fracture alignment. The preoperative CT data were imported into Mimics17.0 software to simulate the fracture reduction and measure the distance between the anterior fracture line and the intertrochanteric line bony ridge. The fractures were classified as transcapsular fractures, extra-capsular fractures, and intra-capsular fractures according to the distance. CT three-dimensional reconstruction was performed within 2 weeks after operation to observe the number of patients with anterior cortical reduction loss. The postoperative anterior cortical reduction loss incidence in patients with satisfactory fracture alignment, and the relationship between postoperative anterior cortical reduction loss and the position of the anterior fracture line were observed.

Results

There were 52 cases (54.7%) of transcapsular fractures, 24 cases (25.3%) of extra-capsular fractures, and 19 cases (20.0%) of intra-capsular fractures. Among them, 41 of the 52 transcapsular fractures had satisfactory fracture alignment, and 4 (9.8%) of them experienced anterior cortical reduction loss after operation; 19 of the 24 extra-capsular fractures had satisfactory fracture alignment, and no anterior cortical reduction loss occurred; 16 of the 19 intra-capsular fractures had satisfactory fracture alignment, and 7 (43.8%) of them experienced anterior cortical reduction loss after operation. There was a significant difference in the incidence of anterior cortical reduction loss between groups ( χ 2=8.538， P=0.003). All patients were followed up 3-26 months (mean, 9 months). Among them, 91 cases had fracture healing, and 4 cases had nonunion.

Conclusion

In AO/OTA type A2 unstable intertrochanteric fractures, where the anterior fracture line is located within the joint capsule, there is a high risk of anterior cortical reduction loss after operation.

[Off target of distal interlocking screw in short cephalomedullary nail fixation for intertrochanteric femur fractures]

Objective

To analyze the causes and treatment of off target of the distal interlocking screws when short cephalomeduallry nails were installed through jig-guided targeting device, and to put forward the technical points to prevent off target.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of 9 patients with intertrochanteric fractures treated between July 2014 and June 2023 was conducted, in which off target occurred during the insertion of the distal interlocking screw by jig-guided targeting device in short cephalomedullary nailling (<24 cm). There were 1 male and 8 females, with an average age of 82.7 years (range, 73-94 years). There were 3 cases of type A1, 5 cases of type A2, and 1 case of type A3 according to 2018-AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) fracture classification. As for the misaligned distal interlocking screw, six parameters were collected and analyzed, including the time of finding, the position, the type of passing through the cortical bone, the special circumstances during operation (such as the need to remove the intramedullary nail for reaming the diaphysis, hammering, etc.), the treatment, and the patient follow-up results.

Results

In the 9 patients, the off target of the distal interlocking screw was found in 7 cases during operation and in 2 cases after operation; the locking screw was located behind the nail in 7 cases and in front of the nail in 2 cases; the off target locking screw was passing tangentially in transcortical patern in 6 cases and in bicortical pattern through the medullary cavity in 3 cases. Three cases were attributed to the mismatch between the nail and the femur, two of which were attributed to the narrow femoral medullary cavity, one of which was attributed to the large anterolateral femoral bowing, and the other 6 cases were attributed to technical errors such as the loosening of the jig-guided targeting device, the tension of the fascia lata, and the blunt of the drill. In the 7 cases found during operation, the misaligned interlocking screw was removed first and the screw hole was left vacant, then in 2 cases, the interlocking screw was not used further; in 1 case, the distal dynamic hole was successfully inserted with a dynamic guide frame, and in 4 cases, the interlocking screw was successfully put after 2-3 attempts, leaving a large hole in the lateral cortex. No special treatment was performed in 2 cases found after operation. One patient was out of bed early after operation, 7 patients were in bed for 1 month, and 1 patient deteriorated to A3 type after operation and was in bed for 3 months. All the 9 patients were followed up 6-12 months, with an average of 8 months. Fracture healing was achieved in 8 patients. One patient with vacant interlocking screw had a secondary spiral fracture of the femoral shaft 3 months later, and was refixed with a long cephalomedullary nail and circlage wiring.

Conclusion

Distal interlocking screw off target is rare, but when it occurs, it leaves a large cortical hole in the osteoporotic femoral shaft, reducing bone strength; the use of precision instruments and attention to technical details can reduce this adverse phenomenon.

[Research progress on distal interlocking screws of cephalomedullary nails in intertrochanteric fractures]

Objective

To summarize the new research progress in distal interlocking screws of cephalomedullary nails for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures.

Methods

Relevant domestic and foreign literature was extensively reviewed to summarize the static/dynamic types of distal interlocking screw holes, biomechanical studies, clinical studies and application principles, effects on toggling in the cavity, and related complications of distal interlocking screws.

Results

The mode of the distal interlocking screw holes can be divided into static and dynamic. Distal interlocking screws play the role of anti-rotation, maintaining femur length, resisting compression stress, increasing torque stiffness, resisting varus stress, etc. The number of the screws directly affects the toggling of the main nail in the cavity. At present, regardless of whether long or short nails are used, distal interlocking screws are routinely inserted in clinical practice. However, using distal interlocking screws can significantly increase the duration of anesthesia and operation, increase fluoroscopy exposure time, surgical blood loss, and incision length. There is a trend of trying not to use distal interlocking screws in recent years. No significant difference is found in some studies between the effectiveness of dynamic and static interlocking for AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) 31-A1/2 fractures. At present, the selection of the number and mode of distal interlocking screws is still controversial. When inserting distal interlocking screws, orthopedists should endeavor to minimize the occurrence of complications concerning miss shot, vascular injuries, local stress stimulation, and peri-implant fractures.

Conclusion

Distal interlocking screws are mainly used to prevent rotation. For stable fractures with intact lateral walls, long cephalomedullary nails can be used without distal interlocking screws. For any type of intertrochanteric fractures, distal interlocking screws are required when using short cephalomedullary nails for fixation. Different interlocking modes, the number of interlocking screws, and the application prospects of absorbable interlocking screws may be future research directions.

[Research progress on valgus impacted proximal humeral fractures]

Objective

To review the advancement made in the understanding of valgus impacted proximal humeral fracture (PHF).

Methods

The domestic and foreign literature about the valgus impacted PHF was extensively reviewed and the definition, classification, pathological features, and treatment of valgus impacted PHFs were summarized.

Results

PHF with a neck shaft angle ≥160° is recognized as a valgus impacted PHF characterized by the preservation of the medial epiphyseal region of the humeral head, which contributes to maintenance of the medial periosteum's integrity after fracture and reduces the occurrence of avascular necrosis. Therefore, the valgus impacted PHF has a better prognosis when compared to other complex PHFs. The Neer classification designates it as a three- or four-part fracture, while the AO/Association for the Study of Internal Fixation (AO/ASIF) categorizes it as type C (C1.1). In the management of the valgus impacted PHF, the selection between conservative and surgical approaches is contingent upon the patient's age and the extent of fracture displacement. While conservative treatment offers the advantage of being non-invasive, it is accompanied by limitations such as the inability to achieve anatomical reduction and the potential for multiple complications. Surgical treatment includes open reduction combined with steel wire or locking plate and/or non-absorbable suture, transosseous suture technology, and shoulder replacement. Surgeons must adopt personalized treatment strategies for each patient with a valgus impacted PHF. Minimally invasive surgery helps to preserve blood supply to the humeral head, mitigate the likelihood of avascular necrosis, and reduce postoperative complications of bone and soft tissue. For elderly patients with severe comminuted and displaced fractures, osteoporosis, and unsuitable internal fixation, shoulder joint replacement is the best treatment option.

Conclusion

Currently, there has been some advancement in the classification, vascular supply, and management of valgus impacted PHF. Nevertheless, further research is imperative to assess the clinical safety, biomechanical stability, and indication of minimally invasive technology.

[Finite element study of three novel internal fixation modes for bicondylar four-quadrant fractures of tibial plateau]

Objective

To compare the biomechanical differences among the three novel internal fixation modes in treatment of bicondylar four-quadrant fractures of the tibial plateau through finite-element technique, and find an internal fixation modes which was the most consistent with mechanical principles.

Methods

Based on the CT image data of the tibial plateau of a healthy male volunteer, a bicondylar four-quadrant fracture model of the tibial plateau and three experimental internal fixation modes were established by using finite element analysis software. The anterolateral tibial plateaus of groups A, B, and C were fixed with inverted L-shaped anatomic locking plates. In group A, the anteromedial and posteromedial plateaus were longitudinally fixed with reconstruction plates, and the posterolateral plateau was obliquely fixed with reconstruction plate. In groups B and C, the medial proximal tibia was fixed with T-shaped plate, and the posteromedial plateau was longitudinally fixed with the reconstruction plate or posterolateral plateau was obliquely fixed with the reconstruction plate, respectively. An axial load of 1 200 N was applied to the tibial plateau (a simulation of a 60 kg adult walking with physiological gait), and the maximum displacement of fracture and maximum Von-Mises stress of the tibia, implants, and fracture line were calculated in 3 groups.

Results

Finite element analysis showed that the stress concentration area of tibia in each group was distributed at the intersection between the fracture line and screw thread, and the stress concentration area of the implant was distributed at the joint of screws and the fracture fragments. When axial load of 1 200 N was applied, the maximum displacement of fracture fragments in the 3 groups was similar, and group A had the largest displacement (0.74 mm) and group B had the smallest displacement (0.65 mm). The maximum Von-Mises stress of implant in group C was the smallest (95.49 MPa), while that in group B was the largest (177.96 MPa). The maximum Von-Mises stress of tibia in group C was the smallest (43.35 MPa), and that in group B was the largest (120.50 MPa). The maximum Von-Mises stress of fracture line in group A was the smallest (42.60 MPa), and that in group B was the largest (120.50 MPa).

Conclusion

For the bicondylar four-quadrant fracture of the tibial plateau, a T-shaped plate fixed in medial tibial plateau has a stronger supporting effect than the use of two reconstruction plates fixed in the anteromedial and posteromedial plateaus, which should be served as the main plate. The reconstruction plate, which plays an auxiliary role, is easier to achieve anti-glide effect when it is longitudinally fixed in posteromedial plateau than obliquely fixed in posterolateral plateau, which contributes to the establishment of a more stable biomechanical structure.

[Three-dimensional finite element analysis of exo-cortical placement of humeral calcar screw for reconstruction of medial column stability]

Objective

To explore the biomechanical stability of the medial column reconstructed with the exo-cortical placement of humeral calcar screw by three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Methods

A 70-year-old female volunteer was selected for CT scan of the proximal humerus, and a wedge osteotomy was performed 5 mm medially inferior to the humeral head to form a three-dimensional finite element model of a 5 mm defect in the medial cortex. Then, the proximal humeral locking plate (PHILOS) was placed. According to distribution of 2 calcar screws, the study were divided into 3 groups: group A, in which 2 calcar screws were inserted into the lower quadrant of the humeral head in the normal direction for supporting the humeral head; group B, in which 1 calcar screw was inserted outside the cortex below the humeral head, and the other was inserted into the humeral head in the normal direction; group C, in which 2 calcar screws were inserted outside the cortex below the humeral head. The models were loaded with axial, shear, and rotational loadings, and the biomechanical stability of the 3 groups was compared by evaluating the peak von mises stress (PVMS) of the proximal humerus and the internal fixator, proximal humeral displacement, neck-shaft angle changes, and the rotational stability of the proximal humerus. Seven cases of proximal humeral fractures with comminuted medial cortex were retrospectively analyzed between January 2017 and December 2020. Locking proximal humeral plate surgery was performed, and one (5 cases) or two (2 cases) calcar screws were inserted into the inferior cortex of the humeral head during the operation, and the effectiveness was observed.

Results

Under axial and shear force, the PVMS of the proximal humerus in group B and group C was greater than that in group A, the PVMS of the internal fixator in group B and group C was less than that in group A, while the PVMS of the proximal humerus and internal fixator between group B and group C were similar. The displacement of the proximal humerus and the neck-shaft angle change among the 3 groups were similar under axial and shear force, respectively. Under the rotational torque, compared with group A, the rotation angle of humerus in group B and group C increased slightly, and the rotation stability decreased slightly. All the 7 patients were followed up 6-12 months. All the fractures healed, and the healing time was 8-14 weeks, with an average of 10.9 weeks; the neck-shaft angle changes (the difference between the last follow-up and the immediate postoperative neck-shaft angle) was (1.30±0.42)°, and the Constant score of shoulder joint function was 87.4±4.2; there was no complication such as humeral head varus collapse and screw penetrating the articular surface.

Conclusion

For proximal humeral fractures with comminuted medial cortex, exo-cortical placement of 1 or 2 humeral calcar screw of the locking plate outside the inferior cortex of the humeral head can also effectively reconstruct medial column stability, providing an alternative approach for clinical practice.

[Patterns and research progress on the concomitant ipsilateral fractures of intracapsular femoral neck and extracapsular trochanter]

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the patterns and research progress of the concomitant ipsilateral fractures of intracapsular femoral neck and extracapsular trochanter, and to provide a common language among orthopedic surgeons for scientific exchange.

METHODS

According to related literature and authors own experiences concerning the anatomic border between femoral neck and trochanter region, the intertrochanteric line (or intertrochanteric belt) and its capsularligament attachment footprint, fracture patterns, and treatment strategies were reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS

With the rapid growing of geriatric hip fractures, an increased incidence was noted in recent years regarding the proximal femoral comminuted fractures that involving ipsilateral intracapsular neck and extracapsular trochanter regions simultaneously. But the concept of femoral neck combined with trochanter fractures was ambiguous. Based on the anatomic type of femoral neck fracture, the location of fracture center, and the ability to achieve direct inferior calcar or anteromedial cortex-to-cortex apposition and buttress, we classified these complex fractures into 3 sub-types: ① Segmental femoral neck fractures (two separate fracture centers at subcapital and trochanteric region respectively); ② Femoral neck fracture (trans-cervical) with extension to the supero-lateral trochanteric region (fracture center in femoral neck); ③ Trochanteric fracture with extension to the medio-inferior femoral neck region (fracture center in trochanter, comminuted basicervical fracture, or variant type of comminuted trochanter fracture). For treatment strategy, surgeons should consider the unique characteristics of femoral neck and trochanter, usually with combined fixation techniques, or arthroplasty supplemented with fixation.

CONCLUSION

Currently there is no consensus on diagnosis and terminology regarding the concomitant ipsilateral fractures of femoral neck and trochanter. Further studies are needed.