[Efficacy and radiology evaluation of pulpotomy in mature permanent teeth]

OBJECTIVE

To observe the clinical efficacy of pulpotomy in patients of different ages and to explore the occurrence and characteristics of pulpal calcification.

METHODS

A total of 77 patients who underwent pulpotomy for mature permanent premolars and molars with caries-derived pulp exposure in the Department of General Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from October 2019 to August 2022 were selected. Pulpotomies were performed in a single visit using iRoot BP Plus bioceramic material as pulp capping agent. The patients were divided into three groups according to age: 25 cases in the adolescent group (11-20 years old) with a mean age of (15.88±2.19) years; 27 cases in the middle-aged group (21-50 years old) with a mean age of (34.59±8.67) years; and 25 cases in the elder-aged group (51-83 years old) with a mean age of (63.84±7.40) years. The patients were reviewed 1 year after the operation to evaluate the clinical efficacy and to record the formation of calcified bridge, thickness of calcified bridge, and pulp calcification index (PCI).

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference between the three groups in terms of gender, dentition, and tooth position (P > 0.05). The 1-year postoperative follow-up rate was 85.71% (66/77), including 88.00% (22/25) in the adolescent group, 85.19% (23/27) in the middle-aged group, and 84.00% (21/25) in the elder-aged group. The 1-year follow-up clinical success rates of the three groups were 95.45% (21/22), 91.30% (21/23), and 95.24% (20/21), respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). Among the clinical success cases, calcified bridges appeared in 12 cases (57.14%, 12/21) in the adolescent group, 8 cases (38.10%, 8/21) in the middle-aged group, and 3 cases (15.00%, 3/20) in the elder-aged group, with statistically significant differences (χ2= 7.810, P = 0.020 < 0.05). The difference was statistically significant (F = 4.434, P = 0.020 < 0.05) when comparing the thickness of calcified bridges among the three groups. Calcified bridge thickness was negatively correlated with age (r = -0.516, P < 0.05). The changes in pulpal calcification index ΔPCI were 0.67 ± 0.58, 0.43 ± 0.51, and 0.25 ± 0.52, respectively, with statistically significant differences among the three groups (F = 3.404, P = 0.040 < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Pulpotomy for caries-derived pulp exposure in elderly patients could also achieve a high success rate. The incidence of calcified bri-dges after pulpotomy and the acceleration of pulpal calcification were age-related. The adolescent group was more likely to form calcified bridges and also showed more pronounced accelerated root canal calcification.

[Evaluation of bioceramic putty repairmen iRoot and mineral trioxide aggregate in mature permanent teeth pulpotomy]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical characteristics and effectiveness of pulpotomy in mature permanent teeth with bioceramic putty repairmen iRoot and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA).

METHODS

Pulpotomy was performed on mature permanent premolars and molars with carious exposures at the Department of General Dentistry of Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, from November 2017 to September 2019. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups, Group iRoot (n=22) and Group MTA (n=21). In Group iRoot, bioceramic putty repairmen iRoot was used as pulp capping agent, while in Group MTA, mineral trioxide aggregate was used as pulp capping agent. All the patients had signed informed consent forms. The clinical efficacy was evaluated by clinical examinations (temperature and electrical activity test) and imaging examinations 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Blinding was used for the patients and evaluators, but due to the obvious differences in the properties of the two pulp capping agents, the blinding method was not used for the treatment provider (the attending physician).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in gender, average age, dentition and tooth position distribution between the two groups (P>0.05). In the study, 7 cases were lost to follow-up 12 months after operation (4 cases in Group iRoot, and 3 cases in Group MTA). One case in each of the two groups had transient sensitivity at the end of the 3-month follow-up, and the pulp vitality was normal at the end of the 6-month follow-up. One case in Group iRoot showed sensitivity at the end of the 12-month follow-up. The success rates of the two groups at the end of 12-month follow-up were 100%, and the cure rates were 94.4% (Group iRoot) and 100% (Group MTA), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). No cases in Group iRoot had obvious crown discoloration, while 3 cases in Group MTA had.

CONCLUSION

The clinical characteristics and effectiveness of pulpotomy in mature permanent teeth with bioceramic putty repairmen iRoot were similar with MTA. Bioceramic putty repairmen iRoot is an acceptable material when used in pulpotomy of mature permanent teeth. Because it is not easy to cause tooth discoloration after treatment and is convenient to operate, bioceramic putty repairmen iRoot has a better clinical application prospect.