1
|
Moiseeva A, Caraus A, Calenici O, Cociu M, Caraus M. Long-term antihypertensive effect of renal denervation in resistant hypertension: three years follow-up. Eur Heart J 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.2210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Recent studies have shown proven efficacy of renal denervation in arterial hypertension, but there is a continuing need to assess the duration of antihypertensive effect.
Purpose
Evaluation of the long-term antihypertensive effect of renal denervation in patients with resistant hypertension.
Methods
125 apparently resistant patients without comorbidities after a 3-week standardized treatment with Losartan 100 mg, Amlodipin 10 mg and Indapamid 1.5 mg and confirmation of their resistance were randomly assigned into three groups depending on treatment supplemented to previously administered: group I - selective I1-imidazoline agonist Moxonidine, group II - cardioselective beta-blocker Bisoprolol and group III – renal artery denervation. The compliance to treatment was confirmed using 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale. Renal denervation was performed in the main renal arteries and their branches. Patients were assessed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring at baseline, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months follow-up.
Results
The mean 24 hour systolic blood pressure (SBP) at baseline were 179.0±2.02 mmHg in group I versus 177.96±2.44 mmHg in group II and 176.92±1.97 mmHg in group III, p>0.05. A statistically significant reduction in SBP m/24 h was noted in all three groups starting at 3 months, the group of patients undergoing renal denervation showing superiority over both groups of pharmacological treatment: −6.48±0.81 mmHg in group I versus −6.2±0.88 mmHg in group II and −23.28±1.9 mmHg in group III, p<0.001. The progressive improvement continued until the end of the study, so at 3 years of evaluation in observational group supplemented with Moxonidine SBP m/24 h were 146.36±1.36 mmHg with a total reduction of −32.64±1.56 mmHg from baseline, in Bisoprolol group −152.88±1.56 mmHg with a reduction of −25.08±1.65 mmHg and 133.16±0.73 mmHg in renal denervation group with a total reduction of −282±1.30 mmHg in group III, p<0.001.
The mean 24 hour diastolic blood pressure (DBP) increased at baseline in all three observational groups (105.52±1.28 mmHg in group I versus 108.6±1.6 mmHg in group II and 107.24±0.92 mmHg in group III, p>0.05) similar with SBP m/24 h noted an authentic reduction at 3 months follow-up. The maximum reduction in DBP m/24 h were registered at 3 years of evaluation, a comparative analyses of dynamics between groups showing a presence of statistical difference due to superiority of renal denervation in amelioration of this parameter: −18.36±1.88 mmHg in group I versus −16.84±1.76 mmHg in group II and −28.2±1.30 mmHg in group III, p<0.001.
Conclusions
All three regimens have been shown to be effective in reducing SBP and DBP m/24 h in patients with resistant hypertension, with a superior but comparable effect of Moxonidine to Bisoprolol and the absolute superiority of renal denervation treatment, the beneficial effect being maintained for a period of 3 years.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): National Agency for Research and Development
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Moiseeva
- Institute of Cardiology , Chisinau , Moldova (Republic of)
| | - A Caraus
- Institute of Cardiology , Chisinau , Moldova (Republic of)
| | - O Calenici
- Hospital Center of Caux Vallée de Seine , Lillebonne , France
| | - M Cociu
- Institute of Cardiology , Chisinau , Moldova (Republic of)
| | - M Caraus
- St Spiridon University Hospital , Iasi , Romania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moiseeva A, Caraus A, Ciobanu A, Moscalu V, Abras M, Surev A. The impact of renal denervation treatment on left ventricular remodeling in patients with resistant hypertension. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwab061.159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Funding Acknowledgements
Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): National Agency for Research an Development
OnBehalf
HIPERDIAB
Background
Increased blood pressure is considered the major determinant for structural alterations of the left ventricle resulting in increased myocardial mass and pathological remodeling. Renal denervation is a novel treatment for hypertensive patients with promising results on blood pressure levels.
Purpose
Evaluation of impact of renal denervation treatment on indices of left ventricular remodeling in patients with resistant hypertension.
Methods
75 patients with resistant hypertension after a 3-week standardized treatment with Losartan 100 mg, Amlodipine 10 mg and Indapamid 1,5 mg were randomly assigned into three equal groups, depending on medication supplemented to previously administered: IM group - Moxonidine, IIB group - Bisoprolol and IIID group – renal artery denervation (RDN). Patients were assessed by echocardiographic exam at baseline and 6 months follow-up. Renal denervation was performed with a Symplicity Spyral catheter.
Results
Increased at the baseline in all three groups (170,96 ± 11,69 g/m2 in IM versus 156,5 ± 11,08 g/m2 in IIB and 164,94 ± 9,61 g/m2 in IIID groups) left ventricular mass index at 6 months of evaluation noted a statistically authentic reduction in all three groups, the group of patients treated with Moxonidine and RDN having a comparable and superior effect to the group treated with Bisoprolol (159,02 ± 10,34 g/m2 versus 150,5 ± 10,51 g/m2 and 149,15 ± 9,31 g/m2 in IM, IIB and IIID groups, p > 0,05).
Simultaniously with the regression of left ventricular myocardial hypertrophy all three treatment regimens induced the improvement of its geometry, renal denervation group demonstrated a superior effect in ameliorating of this parameter (Tab.).
Conclusion
The data obtained confirmed the benefit of RDN treatment in patients with resistant hypertension in inducing reverse-remodeling of the LV, the beneficial effect being superior to both pharmacotherapeutic regimens.
Geometric pattern of the left ventricle Group IM Group IIB Group IIID χ2 p baseline Concentric remodeling 5 (20%) 5 (20%) 4 (16%) 0,71 > 0,05 Concentric hypertrophy 13 (52%) 15 (60%) 14 (56%) Excentric hypertrophy 7 (28%) 5 (20%) 7 (28%) Normal geometry - - - 6 months Concentric remodeling 3 (12%) 7 (28%) 7 (28%) 4,61 < 0,05 Concentric hypertrophy 13 (52%) 13 (52%) 10 (40%) Excentric hypertrophy 8 (32%) 5 (20%) 5 (20%) Normal geometry 1 (4%) - 3 (12%)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Moiseeva
- Institute of Cardiology, Chisinau, Moldova (Republic of)
| | - A Caraus
- Institute of Cardiology, Chisinau, Moldova (Republic of)
| | - A Ciobanu
- Institute of Cardiology, Chisinau, Moldova (Republic of)
| | - V Moscalu
- Institute of Cardiology, Chisinau, Moldova (Republic of)
| | - M Abras
- Institute of Cardiology, Chisinau, Moldova (Republic of)
| | - A Surev
- Institute of Cardiology, Chisinau, Moldova (Republic of)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Falkovskaya A, Mordovin V, Pekarskiy S, Manukyan M, Zyubanova I, Lichikaki V, Ryabova T, Baev A, Shelemehov A, Vtorushina A, Moiseeva A, Caraus A. HIGH RENAL RESISTANCE INDICES AND HIGH PULSE PRESSURE MAY LIMIT NEPHROPROTECTIVE EFFICACY OF RENAL DENERVATION IN PATIENTS WITH RESISTANT HYPERTENSION AND TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS. J Hypertens 2021. [DOI: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000748724.36391.7c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
4
|
Moiseeva A, Caraus A, Moscalu V, Ciobanu N, Abras M, Calenici O, Surev A, Caraus M, Popescu L, Bitca A, Sapojnic N, Durnea A, Vascenco A. Sympathetic renal denervation treatment in resistant hypertension: one-year follow-up. Eur Heart J 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.2785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Aims
A comparison influence of renal denervation versus pharmacological treatment with sympathetic nervous system blockers on blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension.
Methods
125 patients with resistant hypertension without comorbidities after a 3-week standardized treatment with Losartan 100 mg, Amlodipine 10 mg and Indapamid 1,5 mg and confirmation of their resistance were randomly assigned into three groups, depending on medication supplemented to previously administered: IM group – selective I1-imidazoline agonist Moxonidine, IIB group – cardioselective beta-blocker Bisoprolol and IIID group – renal artery denervation. Patients were assessed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 month follow-up. The compliance to drug treatment was confirmed by 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale. Renal denervation was performed with a Symplicity Spyral catheter.
Results
The mean 24 hour systolic blood pressure (SBP m/24 h) at baseline were 179.0±2.02 mmHg in IM group versus 177.96±2.44 mmHg in IIB group and 176.92±1.97 mmHg in IIID group, p>0.05. Statistically significant dynamics was recorded starting with 3 months of evaluation in all three groups, the group of patients undergoing denervation of the renal arteries demonstrating a net superior effect compared with pharmacological treatment: −6.48±0.81 mmHg in I M group versus −6.2±0.88 mmHg in II B group and −23.28±1.9 mmHg in III D group, p<0.001. The beneficial effect was maintained until the end of the study, when in observational group supplemented with Moxonidine SBP m/24 h were 159.6±1.72 mmHg with a total reduction of −19.9±0.7 mmHg from baseline, in Bisoprolol group −164.08±1.93 mmHg with a reduction of −13.88±1.13 mmHg and 141.76±0.77 mmHg in renal denervation group with a total reduction of −35.16±2.23 mmHg, p<0.001.
The mean 24 hour diastolic blood pressure (DBP m/24 h) increased at baseline in all three groups (105.52±1.28 mmHg in IM versus 108.6±1.6 mmHg in IIB and 107.24±0.92 mmHg in IIID, p>0.05) similar to SBP m/24 h noted a significantly reduction at 3 month follow-up: −4.8±0.96 mmHg in IM group versus −3.64±0.47 mmHg in IIB group and −12.08±0.63 mmHg in IIID group, p<0.001. The maximum reduction in DBP m/24 h were registered at 12 month follow-up, a comparative analyses of dynamics between groups showing a presence of statistical difference due to superiority of renal denervation treatment in amelioration of this parameter: −13.68±0.83 mmHg in IM group versus −10.72±0.64 mmHg in IIB group and −20.2±1.28 mmHg in IIID group, p<0.001.
Conclusions
The application of all three treatment regimens has been shown to be effective in reducing SBP and DBP values m/24 hours in patients with resistant hypertension, with a superior but comparable effect of Moxonidine to Bisoprolol and the absolute superiority of renal denervation treatment versus both pharmacological treatment regimens.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding source: None
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Moiseeva
- Institute of Cardiology, Chisinau, Moldova (Republic of)
| | - A Caraus
- Institute of Cardiology, Chisinau, Moldova (Republic of)
| | - V Moscalu
- Institute of Cardiology, Chisinau, Moldova (Republic of)
| | - N Ciobanu
- Institute of Cardiology, Chisinau, Moldova (Republic of)
| | - M Abras
- Institute of Cardiology, Chisinau, Moldova (Republic of)
| | - O Calenici
- Hospital Center of Caux Vallée de Seine, Lillebonne, France
| | - A Surev
- Institute of Cardiology, Chisinau, Moldova (Republic of)
| | - M Caraus
- St Spiridon University Hospital, Iasi, Romania
| | - L Popescu
- Institute of Cardiology, Chisinau, Moldova (Republic of)
| | - A Bitca
- Institute of Cardiology, Chisinau, Moldova (Republic of)
| | - N Sapojnic
- Institute of Cardiology, Chisinau, Moldova (Republic of)
| | - A Durnea
- Institute of Cardiology, Chisinau, Moldova (Republic of)
| | - A Vascenco
- Institute of Cardiology, Chisinau, Moldova (Republic of)
| |
Collapse
|