Benefits in quality of life following an obstructive sleep apnea screening and treatment program in patients with acute ischemic stroke

INTRODUCTION

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has been proposed as a factor that worsens stroke prognosis. Our aim was to determine if an OSA intervention could improve quality of life (QOL, first objective) and modified Rankin score (mRS, second objective).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The intervention group of this quasi-experimental study included patients with acute ischemic stroke <72 hours who underwent polygraphy and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and hygienic-dietary measures if required. The control group followed routine clinical practice. The Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) and mRS were applied at the sixth month after stroke in both groups.

RESULTS

Fifty-five vs. sixty-two patients were included in the intervention and control group respectively. In the intervention group, 64.71% of patients accepted the proposed CPAP (16 cases with a good adherence). An improvement in SF-36 items was detected in the intervention group: physical functioning (p = 0.008), role physical (p = 0.002), bodily pain (p = 0.008), general health (p <0.001), vitality (p = 0.001) and role emotional (p = 0.015). In a per-protocol analysis, all these improvements were verified in the group of patients treated with good CPAP adherence (p < 0.05 in all the same SF-36 items). The percentage of patients with physical component summatory = 50 was higher in the intervention group (p = 0.003). There were no differences in the median of mRS (p = 0.262).

CONCLUSIONS

Although more evidence is needed, a significant improvement in QOL was suggested after our OSA intervention, particularly in patients with good CPAP adherence.

[Delayed administration of thrombolytic therapy in minor stroke]

INTRODUCTION

Minor strokes are considered to be those that present with few symptoms, although up to 40% of them entail long-term disability. The rate of thrombolysis in these patients is also lower than in other strokes. The aim of this study is to explore whether there are any differences in intravenous thrombolysis care times in minor strokes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of strokes treated with intravenous thrombolysis at our centre and a comparative analysis of the care times in minor strokes and in the other types.

RESULTS

Longer times were found in minor strokes in terms of door-to-CT scan and door-to-needle time. This was not the case, however, for the time from the onset of symptoms to arrival at the hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of few symptoms in minor strokes can make them difficult to recognise and could be a reason for delaying treatment. Training among staff caring for these patients is essential to improve this aspect.