[Evaluation of the use of a simulation software in the learning of cardiopulmonary auscultation in undergraduate medical students]

INTRODUCTION

Medsounds™ software allows to create an auscultation learning platform, by providing real pre-recorded cardiopulmonary sounds on virtual chests. The study aimed at comparing the skills in cardiopulmonary auscultation between students who benefited from this platform and students who did not have access to it.

METHODS

A controlled trial was conducted with 2nd year medical students randomised into three groups. Groups A, B and C received 10 h of cardiopulmonary clinical training. In addition, group B benefited from an online access to the educative platform, and group C had a demonstration of the platform during their clinical training, then an online access. The main outcome was a 3-point multiple-choice questionnaire based on 2 original case vignettes about the description of cardiopulmonary sounds. The secondary outcome was the faculty exam on high-fidelity cardiopulmonary simulator.

RESULTS

Groups A and B included 127 students, and group C 117. Students in group C had a significantly higher score than those in group A (1.72/3 versus 1.48/3; p = 0.02), without difference between the groups B and C. Students who actually had a demonstration of the platform and used it at home had a higher score than those who did not use it (1.87 versus 1.51; p = 0.01). Students who had a demonstration of the platform before using it performed a better pulmonary examination on high-fidelity simulators.

CONCLUSION

The supervised use of an online auscultation simulation software in addition to the traditional clinical training seems to improve the auscultation performances of undergraduated medical students.

[The GLORI-COPD score: detection of COPD patients at risk of complications]

DEVELOPMENT OF THE GLORI-COPD SCORE

GLObal RIsk of severe outcomes in COPD patients.

INTRODUCTION

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a commonly under-diagnosed disease. This study aimed to develop a screening tool for COPD patients with a high risk of complications, taking into account COPD severity and associated co-morbidity.

METHODS

Two Delphi rounds were conducted to select the items for a preliminary score. Subsequently, this score was submitted to patients with a possible diagnosis of COPD attending for pulmonary function tests in hospital and primary care. Items associated with a diagnosis of COPD and its severity were examined with multivariate logistic regressions. Associated items in our analyses and in the literature were integrated into the score. The score was developed with a factorial analysis and optimized according to ROC curves.

RESULTS

Fifteen items were selected with the Delphi method, of which six were retained after logistic regression. They were submitted to 64 patients (mean age: 59+/-13.6 years). Factors associated with COPD were smoking ≥10 pack-years and a history of acute exacerbations. Low levels of activity and coughing up sputum were associated with COPD severity. Age ≥40 years and co-morbidities were added to the score. According to the factorial analysis, a two-stage score was developed assessing first the diagnosis of COPD and then the risk of severe outcomes. It showed a sensitivity of 71 %, a specificity of 77 %. The positive and negative predictive value were respectively 28 % and 96 %.

CONCLUSION

The score was an acceptable screening tool to identify COPD patients with high risk of complications. Nevertheless, validation needs be performed in a larger population to allow its use in primary care.

[Spotting the GLObalRIsk of severe outcomes in undiagnosed COPD patients (GLORI-COPD)]

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a severe chronic disease and its prevalence is increasing. Nevertheless, mortality linked to moderate and mild COPD without comorbidities is low. The aim of the study is to create and validate a questionnaire in primary care to spot patients with undiagnosed COPD who are at high risk of severe complications considering the severity of their COPD and their comorbidities.

METHODS

The development of the questionnaire has three steps. The first is the selection of the items which can be included in the questionnaire with a two-round Delphi method. The second step is a cross-sectional study to assess the link between spirometry and the selected items in the first step. The last step is the validation of the questionnaire in a prospective study in primary care.

EXPECTED RESULTS

Identifying undiagnosed COPD patients with a high global risk of complications in primary care will help to establish which patients have to be diagnosed as a priority. This is particularly useful in general practice as the patient is considered globally and not just on the basis of respiratory criteria. It should allow better selection of patients who need specialised follow up.

Tracking unnecessary negative urinalyses to reduce healthcare costs: a transversal study

About 7 million urinalyses are reimbursed yearly by the French public healthcare system, but the results of most of these tests are normal. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of negative urinalyses in ambulatory care, identify the associated factors and assess the relevance of prescriptions by general practitioners (GPs) according to French guidelines. A cross-sectional study was conducted in patients over 18 coming for urinalyses in two French ambulatory laboratories. Patients received a questionnaire on their symptoms, the reason for performing urinalysis and the use of urinary dipsticks. GP who prescribed urinalyses received a questionnaire assessing their practice. A total of 510 patients were included, and 71% of urinalyses were negative. Urinalyses were prescribed to 283 patients by GPs. Compared to those of specialists, GP prescriptions were associated with fewer negative urinalyses (59 vs 86%; p < 0.01). Among the negative urinalyses prescribed by GPs, the reasons of prescription were as follows: suspected urinary tract infection (UTI) (42.7%), control of bacteriological cure after UTI (24%), fever or abdominal pain (13%) and routine test (7%). About 35% of urinalyses were not indicated according to guidelines. Only 12% of patients used dipsticks before performing urinalysis although 87% of GPs were favourable to their use if they were provided by healthcare services. The annual cost of non-indicated urinalyses is estimated at 13 million euro. A systematic use of dipsticks provided by healthcare services could help to reduce health costs and the unnecessary use of antibiotics.